Answer Desk: How far will gas prices fall?

advertisement

It's hard not to notice the recent drop in gasoline prices. Which has a lot of readers wondering: How much lower are they headed?

If refiners are still running at — or near — capacity, and supplies of gasoline are tight, prices won’t come down. Each market for a specific product — gasoline, heating oil, diesel, crude oil — moves to some degree to the supply-demand balance for that commodity.

So the cost of crude has a lot to do with the rise in gas prices — but it’s not the whole story. As ethanol has become more widely used as an additive to help reduce smog, for example, the price of ethanol has become another factor. But the biggest factor is demand at the pump.

Until recently, refining capacity was expanding barely fast enough to keep up with demand. (Even though no new refineries have been built in the 30 years, refiners have been steadily squeezing more production out of their existing plants to keep up.) And consumers were willing to keep paying for gas as prices rose: Americans are spending roughly three times as much on gas as they were six years ago — or about $1.5 billion a day, according to Tom Kloza at the Oil Price Information Service.

The good news is that it looks like those high pump prices have begun to ease demand — as people figure out how to use less gas — and so prices have fallen. Since July 10, wholesale gas prices have fallen by about 55 cents a gallon on the East Coast, 40 to 45 cents in the Midwest and by 40 cents on the West Coast, according to OPIS.

Kloza figures that as the savings from the lower cost of crude flow through the system, we can expect another 10 to 20 cents a gallon of what he calls “catch-up” price weakness at the pump. The price drop for diesel has been even bigger, according to OPIS; wholesale prices for those products are down by 80 to 90 cents in less than a month.

The bad news: If prices keep falling, and we all go back to using more gasoline again, that will put more pressure on supplies and send prices higher again.

So our hope — one shared by a growing number of readers — would be that we get serious about finding another way to power our cars. Our personal favorite is all-electric vehicles, plugged in and recharged at night when power demand is low. Several car makers say they’ll have all-electrics available by 2010.

The trick will be coming up with a battery pack that can keep going far enough for a long range trip. Some battery makers are working on making these take a 75 percent recharge in about the time it takes to top off a tank of gas.

Like any retirement plan, Social Security needs an update from time to time, and its overdue for one now. But if Congress and the White House can make some relatively minor fixes soon (just as Ronald Reagan did in the mid-80s) there’s no reason Social Security can’t go on supporting retirees for another 75 years.

Medicare is a different problem: It’s seriously broken and at a much greater risk of going broke. Part of the reason is that the U.S. health care system continues to pile on expenses without any effort made to reform the way it’s financed. In its current state, it’s just not sustainable for another generation. Everyone seems to agree on the basic problem, but the system is so complicated — much more so than Social Security — that it’s much harder to agree on solutions.

Trying to protect yourself now with insurance is problematic. The most popular form of “pre-retirement” insurance is a policy that covers long-term health care. In theory, you buy now at a relatively healthy age, and your premiums are held to manageable levels as you get older. The policy kicks in for long-term illnesses after a certain period (30, 60, 100 days — think of it like a deductible) and then pays the cost of long-term care in a hospital or other facility. In theory, this protects you and your family from financial ruin in the event of the need for extended care.

That’s when things get complicated. A serious acute illness — like a major operation — is usually not covered. While the policy may limit premium increases, there’s no guarantee that base rates (those that apply to everyone in a given state) won’t go up faster than you expect.

The result is that, if the income from your retirement savings don't keep up, you could find yourself unable to keep up with the premiums as you get older — just when they need the coverage. That would mean you'd have paid premiums for 20 years — and end up with no coverage. (Some policies include riders that pay you back some of the premiums if you cancel, but this only increases the cost.)

Once they reach 65, many retirees who are eligible for Medicare buy “supplemental” policies to fill in the gaps of what’s covered. As the system gets stretched further, it’s likely that these coverage gaps will widen. So the best strategy might be to set aside your own “health care premium” fund that you use to purchase coverage when the time comes.

An even better idea would be to press your Congressional representatives to get serious about fixing Medicare and health care insurance generally. Unless and until we do, the cost of reasonable insurance for retirees is just going to keep going up — whether it's paid for by Uncle Sam or our retirement savings.

  • 0 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.5
0.5
{"commentId":2562953,"authorDomain":"skrumland"}

Gas prices are not falling very fast here in Kalispell,mt. area. I saw where it was 3.89 a gallon-so more than that and some 3.83.It's still tourist season and that could be why.Hope it isn't price fixing!

{"commentId":2562953,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"skrumland"}
    Reply#1 - Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:01 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2681210,"authorDomain":"Deborah5157"}

    I think that great! for the new electric cars coming in 2012. I have a question wouldn't that raise the your electric bill up more by having to plug into your house to charge it? If that does use up more of your electric by plugging into your house that would mean more money you have to pay on your bill. I wonder if they will be making solar cars to with it for back up?

    {"commentId":2681210,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"Deborah5157"}
      Reply#2 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 2:04 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2681235,"authorDomain":"Deborah5157"}

      I am sorry. I meant 2010 on the year.

      {"commentId":2681235,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"Deborah5157"}
        Reply#3 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
        {"commentId":2702847,"authorDomain":"pauljorlandi"}

        As a bridge to the long distance electric vehicle, why could we not have 2 cars? The all electric for commuting / shopping / errands / etc., and the gasoline cars for those few freeway trips of 50 miles or more? This would allow us the luxury of long distance driving when needed and still achieve substantial reduction in gas usage & pollution. This would also promote the introduction of more electrics sooner as the distance / capacity issue could be addressed separately. If "NEVs" were priced closer to reality, more folks would be encouraged to buy & use them as their primary vehicle. I know I would.

        {"commentId":2702847,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"pauljorlandi"}
          Reply#4 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 5:27 PM EDT
          {"commentId":2747892,"authorDomain":"zachgaricathe3rd"}

          Still Blaming ethanol to intently mislead the public huh, which mega investor transferring the profits to his account do you work for? How much are they paying you to create misleading storys,,,,the real story is investors are cashing in now that others have jumped on the band wagon and brought oil futures that's the whole, complete and simple story. The real cost of oil hasn't increased, and ethanol didn't add to it, it replaced the expensive MBTE additive that is getting into ground table water. Now that's costly, to clean and to use on food crops, bad thing. So the whole ethanol cost is offsetting the MBTE cost and the only thing increasing corn costs are, futures speculations on corn and futures speculations on oil, oil that makes the fertilizer to grow the corn, which the after ethanol corn remains is still used to as cattle feed so there is little lost in corn...

          But back to the real story is the authors re-direct away from mega investors wealth transfer system from normal Americans pockets to their mega super size bank accounts using oil futures, corn futures, soy bean futures lets have alot more media coverage about the Wealth Transfer Systems making everyone poorer and Mega Size Investors Super wealthy.

          {"commentId":2747892,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"zachgaricathe3rd"}
            Reply#5 - Thu Sep 4, 2008 8:00 AM EDT
            {"commentId":2748026,"authorDomain":"zachgaricathe3rd"}

            Sorry about the paying remark

            {"commentId":2748026,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"zachgaricathe3rd"}
              Reply#6 - Thu Sep 4, 2008 8:11 AM EDT
              {"commentId":2748305,"authorDomain":"zachgaricathe3rd"}

              I sorta like the author and his views I was carried away with my narrow focus

              Sorry again I won't, well at least try not to let it happen again.

              {"commentId":2748305,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"zachgaricathe3rd"}
                Reply#7 - Thu Sep 4, 2008 8:31 AM EDT
                {"commentId":2748555,"authorDomain":"zachgaricathe3rd"}

                As far as oil barrel prices, $65 dollars per barrel is the target,

                and

                every business in America should be pressing congress to end non real users of Futures who don't take deliverly of said Futures item from buying Futures as every business in america has been hurt by it in the past 2 years.

                {"commentId":2748555,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"zachgaricathe3rd"}
                  Reply#8 - Thu Sep 4, 2008 8:49 AM EDT
                  {"commentId":3342286,"authorDomain":"pookacris"}

                  you know in 91 i worked for a home health agency and drove all over the rural country side in a ford festiva. 50mpg.  now i drive a ford taurus 91 and get 30 mpg. now they're saying we've got more fuel efficient cars? another example of government and oil stepping on the car makers so we can't have fuel efficient vehicles.  the tv is showing all the new cars at 24+ mpg--oh my how wonderful!!!! liar.  just like the new diesel festiva we can't have because americans don't like them?  who said.  i would drive one in a heart beat. 65 mpg? we need to jump on congress like crazy, demonstrate, something, because we are becoming slaves to a rich government who is controlling everything about us. walk softly and carry a big stick?

                  {"commentId":3342286,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"pookacris"}
                    Reply#9 - Mon Oct 6, 2008 4:28 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":3467178,"authorDomain":"starlighter2002"}

                    President Bush ordered gas prices lowered because McCain's ratings are so low. He wants to take credit for lowering the prices so you will vote republican. So inflation should ease right? WRONG. With 700 billion in new money in the "market" inflation will be running at about 10% or more by the end of the year.

                    {"commentId":3467178,"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654","authorDomain":"starlighter2002"}
                      Reply#10 - Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:13 PM EDT
                      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"338513","isPrivate":false}
                      Leave a Comment:
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                      {"threadId":"338513","contentId":"1739654"}
                      Start TrackingStart Tracking
                      Stop TrackingStop Tracking