BARNET — Responding to a report of animal cruelty, authorities found dozens of living and dead animals in a home infested with fleas, maggots and rotting carcasses. The owners — a woman and her adult son — were charged with animal cruelty.
"It has to be the worst case of animal abuse in the history of Vermont," according to Animal Control Officer Josephine Guertin.
Five cats, two ferrets, a lizard, a gecko, a rabbit, a python, a gerbil, a tarantula, a chinchilla, a guinea pig, a tortoise, a mouse and a malnourished dog were rescued. Found dead were an iguana, a white rat, a hedgehog and at least 15 cats and kittens in various stages of decomposition.
Also found was a decomposing animal of unknown type in a pot on a stove. More than a dozen partially frozen dead animals were found in a refrigerator freezer.
The animals had been denied food and medical care, according to Sgt. Bill O'Hare, of the Caledonia County Sheriff's Department, who responded to the scene.
Pauline Harpin, 70, and son Paul Harpin, 41, were charged with animal cruelty and cited into Vermont District Court on Sept. 8.
"The stench was overwhelming, between the urine and feces," said O'Hare. "As soon as you step in, you're covered head to toe with fleas."
On Wednesday, O'Hare and three deputies served a search warrant on the house after receiving a report of severe animal cruelty and threats allegedly made by Paul Harpin to shoot anyone who tried to take the animals.
Inside, they found neglected animals including a 4-year-old Labrador mix who had apparently been living amid filth and water in a basement since it was three months old, Guertin said.
"She's as starved for affection as she is food. She still has diarrhea," Guertin said.
One cat had an upper respiratory infection, and a tortoise was found with a deformed shell, according to Guertin.
Pauline Harpin, who was covered in flea bites, had to be decontaminated by a hazardous materials crew before being taken by ambulance to Northeastern Vermont Regional Hospital in St. Johnsbury, where she was treated and released.
Guertin and a veterinarian who responded to the scene also had to be decontaminated, according to O'Hare.
The Harpins signed voluntary surrender forms allowing the live animals to be removed and adopted once they are rehabilitated. For now, the animals are in town custody.
The Harpins, meanwhile, are staying at a motel after being advised to stay out of the house until it is cleaned, according to O'Hare.
"They said they didn't know why their animals were dying. They were very angry we were taking the animals away from them, and they didn't offer any information. They simply said `We're taking care of them, but they're dying, there's nothing we can do.' The response they gave was very strange," O'Hare said.
Animal cruelty is punishable by up to $2,000 in fines and a year in jail.
___
Information from: The Caledonian-Record, http://www.caledonian-record.com
I can't figure out how to quote other people's words! Do you hit the reply button?
Anyway...Katrix...I have often seen people hold the opinion that animals have no rights. When asked for justification for this position, they always say something along the lines that humans are the "superior" species...superior in intellect and strength and, therefore, dominant over lesser species who, by virtue of their inferiority, are stripped of any "rights." Accordingly, the severely mentally/physically disabled would fall into that same category, correct?
Certainly I would not choose the life of an animal over that of a (worthy) human being. But not because I believe human life is of more "value" than animal life. God has given man free will - not so with animals. Man can CHOOSE to live a valueless life - animals are incapable of making that decision. So the issue of "value" of a life is ambiguous. I would choose a human life over an animal life only because the impact of the loss of human life would be greater than that of an animal life. The loss of a beloved family member would certainly cause more grief to more people than the loss of a cat.
And suggesting that animal abuse should be treated in the same fashion as child abuse is in no way an insult to parents who have lost a child. Treating them the same elevates the status of animals...it does not diminish the importance of children.
To quote someone else's words, hit the "Reply" button and then copy and paste the words you want to quote into your reply. Then highlight them and click the "Quote" button at the top of your reply.
I can understand where you're coming from. But animals simply are not human beings - not that we're so great in many cases. People who abuse animals should certainly be criminally punished, but I don't see them having rights at the level of humans.
There are a lot of feral cats in my area, since I live in the boondocks. One young cat brought me her three kittens last year and raised them in my flower bed - I found the kittens good homes, got the mother cat fixed, and she decided to adopt me. She sleeps with me unless she decides she'd rather spend the night outside, which she often does unless it's wintertime (couldn't let a child do that). However, I don't feel I have an obligation to try to round up all the other feral cats that live in the semi-wilderness around me (not that I could find them all), make sure they get fixed and get shots, keep them fed, etc. If these were abandoned children, even if they were eating well out of somebody's garbage can, I would feel that I DO have an obligation to do something about it.
I would die to protect my friends' kids before I would die to save their cat or dog; but that's just me.
I like my father's point of view on this. He said that animals don't have rights, but that humans have a responsibility to treat them well and not abuse them.
Katrix: Your dad is a very wise man. I probably treat my dogs "too well"--they get to sleep in bed, they curl under the covers when they're cold, they use my pillow, turn me into a pretzel overnight, and then I wonder how come I wake up with back aches... But I wouldn't trade them for anything, because I don't have kids...
You also wrote: "I would die to protect my friends' kids before I would die to save their cat or dog; but that's just me."
Ditto on that. But if I have a minute to run back for the family dog/cat/guinea pig, I'll save it, too.
I always get upset when there is a house fire or accident or something and the family pet doesn't make it out, and I feel terrible about all those animals left as strays after Katrina. But I still don't get upset on the level I do when it's a person.
But if I have a minute to run back for the family dog/cat/guinea pig, I'll save it, too.
Oh, same here.
Actually, animals do have rights. That's why there are laws against animal abuse and neglect. So it is a bit off.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |