‘Thunder’ mocks Hollywood racial profiling

advertisement

One of the more outrageous conceits of the new comedy “Tropic Thunder” involves Robert Downey, Jr.’s performance as Australian actor Kirk Lazarus, who undergoes a controversial skin pigmentation surgery to play an African-American soldier in the Vietnam epic movie-within-the-movie. (Shades of, say, Christian Bale losing lots of weight for “The Machinist” or Robert De Niro putting on the pounds for “Raging Bull.”)

But like all the jokes in the film, it comes from a very real place. (The film’s controversial use of the word “retard”? It’s about mocking hammy, Oscar-starved actors, not about making fun of the mentally challenged.)

Hollywood has a fairly despicable history of casting Caucasians as ethnic minorities. “Tropic Thunder,” at least, is making fun of the practice, but in these movies, it was no joke at all:

“The Jazz Singer” (1927): In this legendary first talkie, Al Jolson plays a singer torn between hot-cha Jazz Age nightclubs and his legacy as the son of a Jewish cantor. In one famous sequence, he dons burnt-cork blackface to sing “Mammy.” (There’s a hilarious moment in 2007’s “The Savages” where the siblings screen the film at their father’s nursing home, only to squirm as the mostly African-American staff stone-facedly watches this scene.) Giving the old movie a little credit, vaudeville performers of the era were still doing this kind of performing, but it’s hard to watch through contemporary eyes. And modern standards certainly didn’t stop Neil Diamond from also putting on blackface for the opening number of the 1980 “Jazz Singer” remake.

“Holiday Inn” (1942): Wondering why this musical starring Bing Crosby and Fred Astaire, about a hotel that’s only open during holidays, doesn’t get as much TV play as its quasi-remake, “White Christmas”? Probably because of the Lincoln’s Birthday number, “Abraham,” which involves an all-white chorus of singers and dancers wearing blackface to portray liberated slaves.

Charlie Chan: Hollywood’s most infamous — although far from its only — example of “yellowface” comes from this series of films about the legendarily wily Chinese-American detective created by author Earl Derr Biggers. Apart from a few early silent forays, these films featured Chan being played by the likes of Warner Oland (born in Sweden), Sidney Toler and Roland Withers. And lest you think Neil Diamond was the only actor embarrassing himself racially during the Reagan years, check out 1981’s “Charlie Chan and the Curse of the Dragon Queen,” starring the oh-so-British Peter Ustinov as the famous private eye. To this day, about the only time Chan has been played by an actual Chinese actor was in the goofy 1970s Hanna-Barbera cartoon “The Amazing Chan and the Chan Clan,” where he was voiced by Keye Luke, who played “Number One Son” in several Chan films.

“Taza, Son of Cochise” (1954): Rock Hudson. In the title role of a Native American. In 3-D.

“The Conqueror” (1956): While this legendary flop is most famous for its tragic aftermath — much of the shooting occurred near a nuclear test site in Utah, resulting in much of the cast and crew eventually dying of cancer — “The Conqueror” also provides a cavalcade of ridiculous racial impersonations. Anglo actors John Wayne (as Genghis Khan!) and Agnes Moorehead, alongside Mexican performers like Pedro Armendáriz, play Mongols while red-headed Susan Hayward tries to convince us that she’s a Tartar princess.

“Soul Man” (1986): This comedy’s heart was mostly in the right place, but given the amount of controversy it stirred up when it was released, it’s worth mentioning here. C. Thomas Howell plays a college student who can’t afford to attend Harvard Law unless he can snag a minority scholarship, so he overdoses on tanning pills and makes himself “black.” The idea might sound offensive on its face, but “Soul Man” actually teaches Howell’s character one lesson after another about the realities of stereotyping — his preppy fellow students assume he’s good as basketball, he gets arrested for “driving while black” — and two of the film’s best performances come from Rae Dawn Chong and James Earl Jones. It’s by no means a perfect movie, but it’s one that’s smarter about race that many were willing to assume.

“South Pacific” (1958) and “Flower Drum Song” (1961): The big-screen versions of these Rodgers and Hammerstein musicals prove that yellowface isn’t just for white performers. Juanita Hall played Pacific Islander “Bloody Mary” in the former and Chinese-American “Auntie Liang” in the latter, but Hall herself was African-American.

“Dragon Seed” (1944): Katharine Hepburn and Walter Huston. As Chinese villagers.

“Breakfast at Tiffany’s” (1961): It’s a testament to how great everything else — from the screenplay to the score to the performances — is in this movie that “Tiffany’s” managed to become a classic despite the presence of Mickey Rooney as Japanese landlord Mr. Yunioshi. Whatever the Asian equivalent to shucking and jiving is, Rooney does it here, complete with big glasses, buck teeth and the mangling of his l’s and r’s. (“Miss Gorightry! I must plotest!”) There’s a great scene in “Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story” where Lee and his date walk out of the movie during one of Rooney’s scenes, and no doubt many “Tiffany’s” lovers fast-forward through his embarrassing and racist mugging.

“Teahouse of the August Moon” (1956): Ah, but the lure of yellowface was apparently hard to resist, even among our most distinguished performers. Marlon Brando lobbied hard to play the Japanese character Sakini in the adaptation of the Broadway play, and he even received top billing. Brando’s work is certainly a step above Rooney’s, but it’s not a performance that has aged well, for obvious reasons.

“Lost Horizon” (1973): John Gielgud. As a Tibetan.

“Bamboozled” (2000): More scattershot than “Tropic Thunder” but far more scathing, Spike Lee’s satirical comedy provides an interesting history lesson about blackface performance in this country while simultaneously commenting on contemporary African-American images in pop culture. It’s not one of Lee’s most focused movies, but it’s one of his most blistering.

  • 0 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

  • All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":2471771,"authorDomain":"shutyourmouth"}

and it mocks it how? i understand what has happened through the years but in all honesty is there ever going to be a point when you can really joke about everything and anything without anyone getting offended? of course not, but think about it. those people who honestly care are @!$%#in nuts, they have to take everything so seriously and complain about it.I mean how many movies have you seen? In every movie there is always going to be something controversial. There is always going to be something that upsets someone and there is always going to be that person who doesnt understand. in all honesty its not a big deal. At this point in time, especially, we should be able to talk about anything and everything with out getting offended and laugh and make fun of everything. we are at a point in time where every single group of people has had their moment. we are also at a point where you should be strong enough to take an insult, especially when its meant as a joke, and let it pass. I mean why take everything so seriously? especially in movies, its just meant to entertain people. im more than sure i have not written this correctly, but i am more than sure i have made my poin clear. so dont bother commentin about how "retardedly" this paragraph was written. i already admit it.

{"commentId":2471771,"threadId":"333049","contentId":"1748001","authorDomain":"shutyourmouth"}
    Reply#1 - Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:44 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2539374,"authorDomain":"JeffGerber"}

    Film is the record of a generation. Either they are important (as media and money are). Or they are not (in which, give people of color more jobs.)

    It has been going on for over 100 years in this country. When white people stop defaming black people, that is when it will stop.

    Still needs to go away (healthfully.... no threats here).

    .......but really......away......

    {"commentId":2539374,"threadId":"333049","contentId":"1748001","authorDomain":"JeffGerber"}
      Reply#2 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:36 AM EDT
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"333049","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"333049","contentId":"1748001"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking