Paddlings, swats, licks. A quarter of a million schoolchildren got them last year — and blacks, American Indians and kids with disabilities got a disproportionate share of the punishment, according to a study by a human rights group.
Even little kids can be paddled. Heather Porter, who lives in Crockett, Texas, was startled to hear her little boy, then 3, say he'd been spanked at school. Porter was never told, despite a policy at the public preschool that parents be notified.
"We were pretty ticked off, to say the least. The reason he got paddled was because he was untying his shoes and playing with the air conditioner thermostat," Porter said. "He was being a 3-year-old."
For the study released Wednesday, Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union used Education Department data to show that, while paddling has been declining, racial disparity persists. Researchers also interviewed students, parents and school personnel in Texas and Mississippi, states that account for 40 percent of the 223,190 kids who were paddled at least once in the 2006-2007 school year.
Porter could have filled out a form telling the school not to paddle her son, if only she had realized he might be paddled.
Yet many parents find that such forms are ignored, the study said.
Widespread paddling can make it unlikely that forms will be checked. A teacher interviewed by Human Rights Watch, Tiffany Bartlett, said that when she taught in the Mississippi Delta, the policy was to lock the classroom doors when the bell rang, leaving stragglers to be paddled by an administrator patrolling the hallways. Bartlett now is a school teacher in Austin, Texas.
And even if schools make a mistake, they are unlikely to face lawsuits. In places where corporal punishment is allowed, teachers and principals generally have legal immunity from assault laws, the study said.
"One of the things we've seen over and over again is that parents have difficulty getting redress, if a child is paddled and severely injured, or paddled in violation of parents' wishes," said Alice Farmer, the study's author.
A majority of states have outlawed it, but corporal punishment remains widespread across the South. Behind Texas and Mississippi were Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Florida and Missouri.
African American students are more than twice as likely to be paddled. The disparity persists even in places with large black populations, the study found. Similarly, Native Americans were more than twice as likely to be paddled, the study found.
The study also found:
_In states where paddling is most common, black girls were paddled more than twice as often as white girls.
_Boys are three times as likely to be paddled as girls.
_Special education kids were more likely to be paddled.
More than 100 countries worldwide have banned paddling in schools, including all of Europe, Farmer said. "International human rights law puts a pretty strong prohibition on corporal punishment," she said.
In rural Drew, Miss., Nickolaus Luckett still remembers the paddlings he got in fifth and seventh grades. One happened when he called a teacher by her first name, the other when a classmate said, wrongly, that he threw a spitball.
"I didn't get any bruises, but they still hurt, and from that point on, I told myself and my parents I wasn't going to take any more paddlings," said Luckett, who is about to be a sophomore at the University of Mississippi.
It's not an easy choice. In many schools, kids can avoid a paddling if they accept suspension or detention, or for younger kids, if they skip recess. But often, a child opts for the short-term sting of the paddle.
And sometimes teachers don't have the option of after-school detention, because there are no buses to take kids home later.
During the three years Evan Couzo taught in the Mississippi Delta, he refused to paddle kids, offering detention instead. But others — teachers, parents, even kids — were accustomed to paddling.
"Just about everyone at the beginning of the year said, `If he or she gives you any trouble, you can paddle them. You can send them home, and I'll paddle them. Or you can have me come out to the school, and we can both paddle them.'
"It's really just a part of the culture of the school environment there," Couzo said.
There is scant research on whether paddling is effective in the classroom. But many studies have shown it doesn't work at home, said Elizabeth Gershoff, a University of Michigan associate professor of social work.
"The use of corporal punishment is associated almost overwhelmingly with negative effects, and that it increases children's problem behavior over time," Gershoff said.
Children may learn to solve problems using aggression, and a sense of resentment might make them act out more, Gershoff said.
The practice is banned in 29 states, most recently in Delaware and Pennsylvania. While some education groups haven't taken a position on the issue, the national PTA believes paddling should be banned everywhere.
"We teach our children that violence is wrong, yet corporal punishment teaches children that violence is a way to solve problems," said Jan Harp Domene, the group's president. "It perpetuates a cycle of child abuse. It teaches children to hit someone smaller and weaker when angry."
___
On the Net:
Human Rights Watch: http://www.hrw.org.
(This version CORRECTS Gershoff's title to associate professor.)
(Maxwell Despard) - "...how does anything ever get done..." Things get done when leftist ideologues get out of the way and permit the free market to work and when they stop their politically correct nonsense that does nothing more than cause problems. If leftists cared for people as much as they claim, they wouldn't be lacking in generosity and, if they truly cared about members of the black community, they'd be fighting for the repeal of affirmative action laws, an end to the insane welfare programs that create dependency and they'd be singing the praises of the free market that has created a significant number of black millionaires.
Take a sociology class. It's a freshman college course. 3 credit hours a week. Maybe read some books.
And it's not about leftist. It's about things that make sense.
By the by, the Free Market has never existed. It's Utopian rhetoric to grant further power to the ruling class.
LOL! Yes, it is about leftists because leftist utopian ideas have destroyed the black community. I understand you have class envy and, as usual, you use the class warfare card. As for a sociology class, your comment is so typical of arrogant, white guilt ridden leftists. Leftists think they're smarter than everyone else but, in reality, they're not smarter than anybody. Simply examine the results where of their extreme leftism in places like the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, China and Cuba. You'll find economic ruin, environmental disaster and death.
Why don't you try reading some books other than those written by Michael Moore, Bill Mahar and Arianna Huffington? It's interesting that the left has intellectual midgets like the 3 aforementioned "authors" but the right gave us intellectual giants like William F. Buckley, Jr. and Russel Kirk. Earlier conservatives include Edmund Burke and John Adams (Russel Kirk called Adams the first American Conservative).
Nothing is more offensive than an arrogant leftist who will go to any lengths to justify the most despicable behavior yet, at the same time, claim he/she/it is intellectually superior. The vast majority of the problems facing this nation are the result of insane leftist policies. They've created a culture of death, a culture of minorities not accepting responsibility, a decadent culture filled with Hollywood filth, and a culture where intellectual midgets like Michael Moore "win" Academy Awards for films filled with nothing but lies and liberal editing.
Considering your arrogance and rudeness, I have no desire to communicate with you. LEARN SOME MANNERS!
I read your comments with respect and interest.
I do want to point out one thing. The "leftist" in then Russia, Cuba, China, and some communist European countries, ended up dead or in prison, sometimes for life. There was no"left" in the sense you are thinking. Look the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Solgenysisn (I have butchered his name), who wrote a book and languished in priosn for years and years. Remember the Soviet woman journalist who was shot to death in the elevator of her apartment about 18 months ago? She evidently wrote something unpopular with the ruling officials, even today. Now there is the occupation of Georgia by Soviet troops.
In China many went/and still go to prison for "reeducation" or a new way of thinking, China's repressive thinking. I am sure you know about the era in China when all books were banned. The arts of any kind were banned, and any comment even remotely view as suspect ad to death. Remember, the picture of the young Chinese man in front of the tank headed straight for him. That was a long over due of a demonstration of ofne of the most repressive eras in history.
China's, sometimes poor workmanship and potentially deadly products, are not the result of a leftist society, but from a broken and brutal system of dictators. Workers may slave under the most brutal conditions, 14-18 hour days, work sick, and in extremes of temperatures, unsafe working conditions by any atandards, enforced child labor (denied), For example, their equivalent of out and the poorest of lighting. The Chinese equivalent of the head of what we woulf call the FDA was executed. He took bribes, and I believe he was involved in the horrible dog food/melamine recall which reeked death and critical illness to dogs. Melamine was added as a protein filler to make more profits. Being s leftist had nothing to do with this. There is no left in the countries you mentioned. I know part of your education has been knowledge of the Hungarian Revolution which happened about 50 years ago. The communist system was not in favor of thinking let alone voicing dissent. THIS IS WHY HUMAN RIGHTS ARE SO CRITICAl AND WHY WE MUST PROTEST THE BUTCHERY OF OUR US CONSTITUTION, adhere to the Bill of Rights, and uphold articles of the Geneva Conference. AND WHY WE MUST NOT HAVE A THEOCRACY OR LOSS OF HUMAN RIGHTS here in the US. The last eight years have been a severe threat. They may have longed for freedom to express themselves, but they did not, if thay knew what was good for them.
This is still true. They were "dissidents," and any comment or suspected comment could end with a prolonged prison sentence in Siberia, years in a Russian Gulag, starvation, torture, loss of work or an apartment, being called mentally ill and held in a mental hospital and filled with all kinds of horrendous medications. I am sure you saw the program about the New York Philharmonic Orchestra and their invitation to play an official concert in North Korea. After 6-9 long months of preparation, it turned out to be a winner for all. HOWEVER, ONE OF THE FOREMOST PAINISTS OF NORTH KOREA WAS SHOWN TO HAVE GONE TO PRISON FOR PLAYING A SIMPLE SONG, PROBABLY CLASSICAL, NOT ON THE APPROVED NORTH KOREAN LIST>
The information I posted is from the Department of Justice. Take it up with them! The simple fact is that blacks commit a large number of crimes that are disproportionate to their percentage of the population. Instead of attacking me, perhaps you should take it up with the thugs in the black community who commit crimes at alarming rates.
Of course, you resort to the "racist" mantra used by all leftists when anything, including the truth, is posted about blacks. Leftists have cried racism so often the word doesn't mean anything anymore, and it's simply a tactic used by leftists to deflect attention away from the fact their policies are responsible for the destruction of the black family.
I will give you one thing -- you're extremely politically correct and, therefore, a complete waste of time. Political correctness is, in my opinion, modern day stupidity and a lack of commonsense.
The information I posted is from the Department of Justice. Take it up with them!
I'm taking it up with you until I get a link. I linked my data, from the DoJ, and it contradicted yours. So where's your link?
Okay, from what I've been reading, a LOT of the posters are missing the point of the article. It's not that paddling is still going on or if it's good or bad for the child, etc. The point of the article is that minority children are getting more than their fair share of the paddlings.
I could agree with paddling (not beating and not more than say three whacks), but only if it were done on an even basis. You racists out there that want to quote inaccurate statistics about how Black people commit more crimes than anybody else, get your head out of your butts.
I feel like this, racism is something that I can deal with, and I've been dealing with it most of my life. But, when you turn that on an innocent child, then I've got a problem. These are children, people, and they're being singled out because they were "born the wrong color". How is this discipline?
It's worse than that; what kind of precedent does it set? How would seeing black girls getting beaten by white adults affect the minds of children, white or otherwise?
Though, there's no need for paddling children. It's a barbaric, antiquated practice, often used as punishment for being inconvenient to the attending adults. Generally, these adults know a whole lot of nothing about developmental psychiatry, and wind up crushing the childrens' spirits.
I read a Harvard Study which I believe to be accurate for many reasons which concluded:
The children who were whipped the most in school and/or at home were followed for a length of time. Parents were open to talking about their choice of spanking/whipping.
Those children whipped the most, for any reason, then became the most aggressive with peers, their siblings, with situations in general, and were the most anger filled. They often disliked more people and were themselves the most disliked.
(In some severely disorganized homes, the parent or authority figure is so out of control that somebody gets hit, anybody. The child getting hit may have had nothing to do with the issue at hand.)
This study showed an outcome just the opposite of alleged justification for whippings. It was the seeding, for some at least, to the garden of anti-social behavior (not un-social) and the projected path, straight to juvenile and perhaps to prison.
Many of the children did not really understand why they were whipped and saw it as an attack rather than any kind of true discipline.
The real intent of any kind of discipline is to help that child learn to discipline him/her self. It is to help that child to learn a way of living by feeling loved, cared about, having limits and boundaries, with parents and school officials to be first in control of themselves. Power over really is an illusion, and cooperation with life events to lead to an outcome of a responsible and fully actualized adult is the goal.
I do not believe that any child swatted on the behind (not whipped or beaten) is destined for a life of crime.
I read an article a few years ago, complete with names, locations, pictures, and a horrendous consequences of totally out of control behaviors by a few teachers/principals. For example, one student was picked up and thrown across the long tables in a school cafeteria. Students were beaten in the head with objects causing head trauma.
I realize these teachers/ principals were and are in the minority The majority of persons in the education profession are super conscientious. They abuse no one.
Death. paralysis, surgery, head injuries, broken bones, and injuries requiring ER treatment were a few of the consequences. *** Yes, the attacks on teachers/principals pose a severe risk to their physical, emotional, psychological, and mental health. There are real risks to these professionals and students in the class room. God bless every single good teacher who upholds the highest of professional standards and holds in high esteem their calling to teach.***
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |