MONTGOMERY — Alabama, pushed to second in national obesity rankings by deep-fried Southern favorites, is cracking down on state workers who are too fat.
The state has given its 37,527 employees a year to start getting fit — or they'll pay $25 a month for insurance that otherwise is free.
Alabama will be the first state to charge overweight state workers who don't work on slimming down, while a handful of other states reward employees who adopt healthy behaviors.
Alabama already charges workers who smoke — and has seen some success in getting them to quit — but now has turned its attention to a problem that plagues many in the Deep South: obesity.
The State Employees' Insurance Board this week approved a plan to charge state workers starting in January 2010 if they don't have free health screenings.
If the screenings turn up serious problems with blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose or obesity, employees will have a year to see a doctor at no cost, enroll in a wellness program, or take steps on their own to improve their health. If they show progress in a follow-up screening, they won't be charged. But if they don't, they must pay starting in January 2011.
"We are trying to get individuals to become more aware of their health," said state worker Robert Wagstaff, who serves on the insurance board.
Not all state employees see it that way.
"It's terrible," said health department employee Chequla Motley. "Some people come into this world big."
Computer technician Tim Colley already pays $24 a month for being a smoker and doesn't like the idea of another charge.
"It's too Big Brotherish," he said.
The board will apply the obesity charge to anyone with a body mass index of 35 or higher who is not making progress. A person 5 feet 6 inches tall weighing 220 pounds, for example, would have a BMI of 35.5. A BMI of 30 is considered the threshold for obesity.
The board has not yet determined how much progress a person would have to show and is uncertain how many people might be affected because everyone could avoid the charge by working to lose weight.
But that's unlikely — government statistics show Alabamians have a big weight problem. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 30.3 percent are now obese, ranking the state behind only Mississippi.
E-K. Daufin of Montgomery, a college professor and founder of Love Your Body, Love Yourself, which holds body acceptance workshops, said the new policy will be stressful for people like her.
"I'm big and beautiful and doing my best to keep my stress levels down so I can stay healthy," Daufin said. "That's big, not lazy, not a glutton and certainly not deserving of the pompous, poisonous disrespect served up daily to those of us with more bounce to the ounce."
A recent study suggested that about half of overweight people and nearly a third of obese people have normal blood pressure and cholesterol levels, while about a quarter of people considered to be normal weight suffer from the ills associated with obesity.
Walter Lindstrom, founder of the Obesity Law and Advocacy Center in California, said he's concerned that all overweight Alabama employees will get is advice to walk more and broil their chicken.
"The state will feel good about itself for offering something and the person of size will end up paying $300 a year for the bad luck of having a chronic disease his/her state-sponsored insurance program failed to cover in an appropriate and meaningful fashion," he said.
William Ashmore, executive director of the State Employees' Insurance Board, said the state will spend an extra $1.6 million next year on screenings and wellness programs, but should see significant long-term savings.
Ashmore said research shows someone with a body mass index of 35 to 39 generates $1,748 more in annual medical expenses than someone with a BMI less than 25, considered normal.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, a few states offer one-time financial incentives for pursuing healthy lifestyles. Ohio workers, for instance, get $50 for having health assessments and another $50 for following through with the advice.
Arkansas and Missouri go a step further, offering monthly discounts on premiums for employees who take health risk assessments and participate in wellness programs to reduce obesity, stress and other health problems.
Alabama's new policy is drawing no objection from the lobbying group representing state workers.
Mac McArthur, executive director of Alabama State Employees Association, said the plan is not designed to punish employees.
"It's a positive," he said.
Well I am glad to see some one is stepping up to the plate to eliminate weight related health problems! I work for a county government, and would love to see it in my state. I am 42 and use the gym 7 days a week and have no health problems. I work with guys 10 years younger, with hypertension and type II diabetes. Well all I need to do is look at their waist line and diet to see the root of the problem. Since they cost more in health care costs they should pay a premium. Better yet drop their obese butts from the insurance coverage altogether!!!
You are an idiot.
People complaining about the fees for unhealthy behaviors are likely to be those participating in them. I work in the health care industry and people who are overweight have more health issues, see the doctor more often and raise the health care costs for everyone. There is no difference in the health care/health insurance industry charging more for an overweight person than the auto industry charging someone who has more tickets or accidents a larger amount. They are not forcing these people to lose weight they are letting them know that engaging in risky behavior such as being obese and not caring for your body will cost them more than someone that does not. The fact is that they are only going to charge those people that are clinicly obese(bmi of 35) not everyone that has a few extra pounds. Good lord read the article it said someone that is 5 foot 6 and 220 pounds.........that is very large and a person of that size is likely to be diabetic, have high blood pressure, high cholesterol and possibly have lung issues as well. I am tired of people saying it is their right....sure it is but it is also the right of the employer to even out the costs of the health insurance premiums. If Jane Doe is 35 years old and is 300 pounds and is on multiple medications to keep her sugar, blood pressure and cholesterol in check why should she pay the same as someone who is not? If it was an arguement about you paying the same auto insurance rate as a person who has multiple tickets for speeding I am sure you would say that is unfair and the person without accidents or tickets should not pay the same. People continue to behave in ways that are unhealthy and don't want any consiquences well I for one am tired of paying higher premiums because of people that are not healthy. If you want to be overweight, drink, or smoke fine it is a free country but I should not have to pay extra every month on my health insurance because you want that choice you should.
I can't say this enough. Not all obese people engage in unhealthy habits. I, for one, see my overweight friends care more about what they eat and watch every little calorie while I watch my thin friends eat all the McDonald's they want and never exercise. You cannot equate unhealthy with obese just as you cannot equate thin with healthy. If you are thin and think you're healthy, try having a physical. Thin people die from diabetes and heart attacks just as often.
Mishelle-437990
"Not all obese people engage in unhealthy habits" Are you a complete idiot? Being obese IS and unhealthy habit. How do you think they got obese. Facts are facts look it up less than 1% of obese people have their thyroid to blame the only thing they have to blame is over eating period. Go to a doctor read a book the American Medical Association will tell you flat out that being obese is UNHEALTHY end of story. Just because someone eats McDonald's does not mean they are unhealthy. However the likelihood that an obese person has diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and heart disease is extremely high..........a much higher rate than someone who is not obese......look that up too. I can take 10 obese people out of a crowd and 10 regular sized people and it would be overwhelmingly the obese people that have health problems. Look at the doctors office, how many people in there are overweight. Look at the local hospital(I work in one) the rate of people we see that are overweight with the issues listed above is astounding. We rarely see people of normal weight with the above issues. We see the obese people with these issues younger and younger. Obviously from your comment you are overweight and or obese and are trying to defend your behaviors. I honestly don't care if you want to be overweight or just don't want to do anything about it that is your issue. The issue here is the employers insurance rates are going through the roof and they are deferring the cost to the employees that engage in high risk behaviors such as smoking and being overweight they are not forcing anyone to change their lifestyle they are just putting the cost where it belongs. I am tired of having my rates go up or having to work double shifts because others are out sick( I am speaking from personal experience) there are a number of extremely overweight people where I work and they are perpetually out sick for issues with blood pressure, heart issues and circulation issues to the extremities(at a certain weight your legs especially suffer poor circulation). Also as I said in my prior post sure you watch your calories now however it takes very little intake to maintain your weight it does take extra calories to gain it. Check with a nutritionist they will tell you once the weight is on you can eat a normal persons calories each day and not lose anything it will take calorie cutting and exercise to take it off. Stop acting as if the facts are not the facts likely as not you are neither a nutritionist or a doctor and look up a fact or two. The AMA flat out says obesity is UNHEALTHY end of story and they also have documentation showing that overeating is the majority cause of it more than 99% of obese people are that way because they overeat.
And how many of those nutritionists/doctors/AMA people have ever been overweight? Read my other posts. You will see that the only thing "unhealthy" about me is my weight. 10 to 1 I live and eat healthier than you. It is attitudes like this that encourage eating disorders such as Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia. Whether you believe me or not, I could starve myself and gain weight so don't give me your "I'm thin and because I am, I know it all" attitude. Until you have lived in the shoes, you have no idea. You may rarely see people of normal weight with the above health issues, but you do not see all overweight people with those health issues either. I am not trying to say that all overweight people do not overeat and underexercise. My point is merely, not ALL overweight people are unhealthy and overeat/underexercise. To lump us all into one category is much the same as saying all blondes are stupid idiots and all men are arseholes. It is called a "stereotype" and is the biggest societal issue America has. I have absolutely NO problem paying more for healthcare if I use the system more than others. However, I don't. I don't even cost my insurance company half of what I pay in premiums. The only surgeries I have ever had have been a torn ACL from (of all things) exercising , c-sections to give birth and a UPPP and septoplasty to correct a birth defect.
As far as the AMA flat out saying that obesity is unhealthy, have you watched the news lately? They are coming out now that some overweight people ARE healthy. Their documentation is just like any other study. They study a small cross section of the population and apply the results to the entire population. Guess what... statistics, as well as scientists, have been wrong many times in recent history. I am not an uneducated person. I keep up with the news and I pay attention to what the AMA says. I have been overweight my entire life. And when *I* was a kid, we didn't have video games or cable television. If it was sunny, we had to go outside and play. I got plenty of exercise as a kid, even played soccer and did weight lifting and, guess what, I was still overweight.
How dare a state or any employer dictate as to what a person does on his or her time off the job.If that person is doing the job required of them then thats enough.It won't stop there with the weight and smoking issue.Unsafe sexual practrices should be monitored and of course your everday dangerous activities such as four wheeling,horsback riding,and oh yes hunting with"oh my God" weapons.I don't think that our men and women who died for our freedoms to choose,be it good or bad,would one day be dictated by our employers.It's such a nice fuzzy feeling to think they care that much.Workers of America it's time to stand up and end this big brother tyranny and stand up to these overzealous ***holes just as our fathers and mothers did and the ones before them.Its all about free choice people,when we lose that we lose America.
What do you mean how dare the employer tell them what to do in their off time? The employer is paying for their health insurance. They are footing the entire bill for it the employees of the State pay nothing for their insurance absolutely nothing. This employers costs have gone through the roof due to smoking and obesity and they have the huge premiums to prove it. They are deferring the increasing cost of that insurance to the people engaging in the behavior. They are not saying don't be fat they are not saying you can't smoke. They are saying that because these particular behaviors have been overwhelmingly proven by science to be bad for your health and increase the risks of many many ailments we are going to asses a fee for that choice period. The auto industry does the same thing and no one complains about them doing it. If you speed and get tickets your premium goes up not mine and that is how it should be. Why should the costs be spread out to everyone? Why should I pay more or even the same amount as a smoker or an obese person. I don't smoke, I am of a normal body weight, I exercise and I should not pay the same rates as a person who is overweight or a smoker. I do not choose do engage in those behaviors and I don't have a problem with those that do however as there is scientific proof that those behaviors are detrimental to your health you should pay more than me, end of story.
Perfectly stated.
This is a slippery slope. Next they'll want to do genetic testing on everyone and base their rates on that. Pretty soon the only people who can get reasonably priced insurance will be 20-to-25 year olds. That's not America. We're supposed to take care of our own.
Insane...period.Seems like big industries are standing on our necks via corrupt paid off government i.e. insurance,energy,pharmaceutical,health care ect. Just about anybody who can afford to buy a law and a little media slant.My son plays linebacker at the Div.1 college football level.He stands 5 ft.11inches tall and weighs 252 lbs. and there's not an ounce of fat on him.I wonder if he would be designated obese on the insurance industry...uh.. excuse me, government charts.What's next?
this is discrimination, pure and simple. watch any tv shows.... 9 out of 10 remarks about fat people are of a disparaging nature are usually cast in society ridiculed/hated roles. airlines.... charging more per weight of a human being/just another way to charge more.
for a state/government to open the gates in this issue..... now just think of the possibilities. dont apply if over so many pounds.... be in this weight range or be fired....
the casino industry has already found a way around this issue.... beverage servers are hired as models and if they change from their weight/appearance range (mostly at the discretion of a manager) they are fired-just a way from keeping a high turnover of people, keeping people over 35 from keeping a decent paying job and the like.
government is supposed to be the protector of people.... not the demeanor of people.
if the government was paying people to stay in good health or staying in treatment for issues (hypertension-diabetes-bipolor-etc.... that is different, and the right thing to do.
and.... for a union to accept this deal is horrible, short sighted and in the worst interest of its members.
Ever flown in an airplane next to a fata$$ who can't fit into their seat so their elbows stick out into your neck? How did you like it?
It is not discrimination to have a person pay for habits they have. Life insurance companies have had this in place for years. If you want a certain amount of insurance you do an exam and based on that they give you your rate. This is nothing different. If you engage in unhealthy behaviors the risk is higher therefore you pay more. The auto insurance industry does it too. If you have speeding tickets, parking tickets and accidents you pay more as you are a higher risk to them. This is nothing different. The costs should be deferred to those engaging in the behaviors whether it be smoking, being overweight just as it is with traffic violations. If my neighbor gets a speeding ticket his rate goes up not mine and that is how it should be he engaged in the behavior and he is reaping the ramifications of it not me.
At other places I've lived, adults also may ride bicycles (i hate them) or engage in other outside activities. Alabama really seemed to have limited choices in physical activities for adults. They do have an average compliment of tennis courts, golf courses, and ball diamonds.
I live in Montgomery, Alabama and think it is a great idea...Is is time for people to get active instead of complaining about health problems all the time...There are many benefits with being physically active and eating right...It is sad that the government has to step in, however the only time people will slightly listen is to hurt there bank account...Kudos for Alabama to take some initiative...
I can't believe how many posts I am reading that equate obesity with no exercise and bad eating habits. When you all get a clue and actually pull your heads out of whatever clouds they are in, you will realize that the percentage of obese people who don't exercise and eat bad is not as high as you would like.
Again you are showing your stupidity. I belong to a gym.......I see no fat people there, I go to the park with my dog.....no fat people there. I go down to to the baseball and soccer fields.....only fat people there are in the stands eating hot dogs and drinking soda or beer. Where do I see the fat people....parking as close as they can get to the local buffet restaurant too be herded in like cattle. I go to my local grocery store....where do I find the fat people, not in the fresh fruit and vegetable area I find them in the soda, chip and cookie isle then only to see them in the frozen foods but not getting frozen vegetables they are buying frozen pizza, ice cream and tacquitos. I am not someone who has no experience in this area a very good friend of mine is and has been overweight for quite a few years. She is the only fat person I have ever heard admit she ate too much. She says lots of fat people say this " I don't eat that much" her own words are this "you may not right now but you did to get this way". Check out the show the biggest loser they admit it why can't you? I guess being fat is like being in jail......you didn't eat the food and no one in prison is guilty either.....LOL what a joke. Take responsibilty for your actions like my friend she admits it. She is a Nurse and flat out says that obese people always try to blame their thyroid she says that is crap and science shows that excuse is crap.
To the post that talks about the airline seats....I completely agree. I paid the same amount as the fat guy next to me and he is half way into my seat......is he going to reimburse me for using half of it? If you take up more than one seat you should pay for it I should not have to pay for a full seat and only get half because someones fat ass is in it. I also contiually see obese people park as close as they can to the store or wherever, maybe if you walked a bit you would not be as fat, worse yet the fat a$ $ that gets the motorized cart in the store, how lazy. My personal favorite getting the disabled sticker for being fat. A lady at my job actually was allowed a sticker because she is too fat. My friend has cerebral palsy and is in braces and on crutches and this fatty takes the last space all the time leaving my friend to walk when do to circumstances beyond her control she has difficulty walking. Oh and don't say she may have other health issues..... because I am sure she does since she is 400 pounds. I have watched her eat and in the year I have been working here I figure she added another 50 or so. Her eating light is a double bacon cheeseburger, chili cheese fries and a vanilla shake and then she goes back for a snack later which is a large bag of chips and a soda. I think making excuses for being fat is lame, blaming the fast food industry is ridiculous as they do not force you to eat is. This country is the fattest on earth........wonder why? Look at the average american diet and the lack of exercise. Quit using obesity for excuses.....child murders and rapists on death row are using "I am too fat to execute" what is next. I should not have to work because I am too fat?
I'd hate to be the person with a thyroid problem. In that case the insurance would not even cover testing the thyroid, and the person cannot fix his or her obesity because of that. A thyroid problem is completely out of a person's control.
This does not sound like a good policy.
A better idea would be to require overweight employees to get a doctor-authorized weight-loss plan, pay employees' gym fees and one or two personal training visits a year (should be contingent on actually going to the gym), encourage people to join weight loss support groups, and train people about nutrition. Getting people to a point where they are ready to lose weight is a process. It can't be done by ridiculing or threatening them (only leads to depression, feeling worthless, etc. which in turn leads to more eating and less exercise). Helping people how to incorporate healthy foods and a healthy lifestyle will lead to better results.
This policy is rdiculous and discriminatory. If the state is going to punish people for being unhealthy, then develop standards to define what "unhealthy" is. Many people have high cholesterol, triglycerides or blood pressure and are not overweight - yet they are at risk of significant health problems. My husband is one of those. He has them all, has to take meds and is 160 lbs. I, on the other hand, am overweight, have spent the last 18 mos losing 50 pounds and have NEVER had problems with cholesterol, trigycerides or blood pressure. I am relatively healthy for my weight. But I must watch my blood sugar levels to be sure I dont become diabetic.
And what about smokers?? Smoking is the largest single cause of disease and death, next to obesity. Why arent these bureaucrats adopting similar policies for them and provide incentives to stop using tobacco?
All health issues are complex involving environmental, psychological, physiological, economic and genetic factors. We know so little about the many facets and intricacies of our physiology and weight related isues. Yet we are quick to blame everyone for being addicted or being obese. Yes, we need to take responsibility for the choices we make, undertand the consequences of those choices and strive to be healthy. Society has an equal responsiblity for looking at all the practices that, in fact, promote counterproductive attitudes and market products that promote unhealthy behaviors.
Policies such as these, are short sided and far too simplistic. We need mutlitple approaches including support and assistance to change behavior - and they need to be comprehensive and involve all systems of health and fitness.
The primary problem is that employees do not expect to be surcharged or credited within the framework of a group (health, life) employer policy.
Does the employee have a right to be exempt from underwriting? Will the same underwriting rules (pre-existing conditions, age, weight, height) be used in determining individual insurance rates within a corporate group policy.
This was a difficult lesson learned personally when additional employer life insurance was based on an age-based scale. The scale was weighted in such a way as to discourage 50+ employees to obtain life insurance through the company for ANY amount over the standard.
This is the best response I have seen and I think it focuses on the real story. Why are people seeing this issue as discrimination or a way to make everyone healthy? It is simply a revenue generator for the state.
Group insurance is our safety net. For those crying for each person to be charged for their health and lifestyle choice the main problem is that it will raise all of our insurance rates. Imagine if group insurance didn't exist the cost for individual policies is already ridiculous. Insurance companies and our public officials are trying to squeeze out the benefit we receive from group policies.
I absolutely believe that people should have consequences for their lifestyle choices. I am a radiation therapist who has seen tobacco use and obesity effect the chances of getting cancer. I certainly can't say that skinny people or those who don't use tobacco won't get cancer, but I have seen first-hand a definite trend to confirm that obesity causes some serious health problems, including a higher risk of cancer. Those of us who choose to temper our consumption of food or tobacco shouldn't have to pay (in insurance premiums) for those who don't care. I tend to agree with Gregor27, that they should use a body % to test fitness. Those who make progress should be rewarded. If they are doing this on a case-by-case basis, it should be easy to tell who is trying. On another note, I can't believe they're whining about paying $25.00 for insurance! I pay $150.00 for mine, and that's after my company pays for half of the premium. Most people in this country don't even have insurance! Maybe these people should be grateful they are some of the few who do and stop their whining!
So as a member of the medical field you know that the BMI is a poor indicator of obesity.
You also know that diabetes and thyroid conditions are hereditary and can directly affect a person ability to control weight.
So knowing this you know this practice is discriminatory because they are using bad science.
Along those lines ALL of your cancer patients should pay higher premiuims, since genteics don't need to be considered here.
And while we are at it I want all of you who go to the doctor for a cold/sinus infection/sore throat to pay some of my premuims, since you are basically being subsidized by me to be a complete wimp and not ride it out.
She can also probably tell you that just looking at someone will tell you whether they are fat. The State of Alabama said they were going to charge people with a BMI of 35 or more. A person that is 5 foot 6 inches would have to weigh 220 pounds unless you are a weight lifter that is FAT end of story. They did not say they were going to charge for a few pounds overweight they said they are going to charge people that are obese. Besides 25 dollars quit whinning. My husbands and my health insurance costs 400.00 per month and we are healthy. We don't have any health issues nothing, we take no pills we only go when absolutely necessary and that is rare. I will have you know cancer patients do end up being penalized. They run out of their maximum lifetime coverage and end up with no insurance at all.
I do agree with you on one point. The people that go to the doctor or take their child to the doctor for a splinter or a cold need to be charged as well. The last time I checked there is no cure for the common cold. The only thing you are doing by going to the doctor is taking up his time and costing everyone else and taking up a spot for someone with a real health problem. The same thing goes for the flu the last time I went to the drug store they have lots of flu remedies. The flu shot is almost pointless the run on that every year is flat out stupid. The shot covers only 3 of the hundreds and hundreds of flu strains on top of that they guess the year before on which strains they THINK might be the big ones. You have a better shot winning in Las Vegas than guessing which flus they should put in the shot. Getting that raises costs. The only reason you or a child should go to the doctor for the flu is if the fever is extremely high or will not come down with over the counter meds. This country is a bunch of wimps! People used to go to the doctor when absolutely necessary now they treat it like a trip to the local Starbucks the amount of people filling every doctors office, urgent care and emergency rooms for colds, sinus infections and bumps and bruises is ridiculous.
People do not need to be charged for their vices, it is a good idea to encourage employee's to loose weight and practice healthy habits, but to force a person to do so violates his or her basic rights! The state of Alabama, California, New York, etc have no right what so ever to say what someone should or should not eat, because ultimately you are responsible for your weight not the government!
No one is forcing you to change. No one is forcing you to eat healthier. They are just saying if you make that choice, there's a premium attached because people who spend a great deal of time and effort exercising our butts off and eating healthy shouldn't not be paying for your medical bills due to obesity.
A hundered years ago we didn't have everything in our food and water we have today. our food was produced naturally not with chemicals. our water wasn't full of chemicals. These cause a lot of health problems including weight gain. This is the goverments problem that we all are paying for and the insurance companys are making a profit on. You need to think of what your saying and pray that you don't have problems in the furture sometimes it takes 20 years or more for it to show up. I don't have a weight problem and think you have a problem with people that do.
Actually, I have been overweight in the past. Not obese, but overweight. I had to really dedicate myself to eating healthy and exercising. It took a while, but I am a healthy weight and have maintained it. And it's something I have to constantly monitor and it's DIFFICULT. I watch what I eat. I'm active. So why is it that I drink the same water as my neighbor and he is obese and I am not? You think it's the chemicals in the water? Not the fact that our meals have doubled in size in the last few decades? That we watch more tv and take less walks? Couldn't it be the fact that he comes home with fast food bags while I am leaving to go to the gym?
I don't have a problem with obese people. I have a problem subsidizing them while I work my tail off to maintain a healthy weight. And I have a problem with the fact that common sense has apparently been lost in this country.
Insane...period.Seems like big industries are standing on our necks via corrupt paid off government i.e. insurance,energy,pharmaceutical,health care ect. Just about anybody who can afford to buy a law and a little media slant.My son plays linebacker at the Div.1 college football level.He stands 5 ft.11inches tall and weighs 252 lbs. and there's not an ounce of fat on him.I wonder if he would be designated obese on the insurance industry...uh.. excuse me, government charts.What's next?
No good, this can morph itself into all kinds of things. I think that Google has a food police and sticks there nose into their employees lunch/snack choices and makes "recommendations" (I'm sure there is a record of those who have been "counseled"). A "perfect" height and weight is BS, people are different. I would suggest that if any states want to cut costs on healthcare they can start by kicking the deadbeats off of welfare and revamp the food stamp program. Also if they really enforced the drug policys we would lose half the state employees including teachers.
There is no reason why anyone should be a size 16, no excuse, I'm sorry. We are a bunch of fatties in this country because of our gluttonous ways, the fact that no one takes responsibility for their own actions, and that Americans are straight up lazy. I've never ever been overweight because I eat right and workout. I don't deprive myself and I like to eat food, but I don't binge and I avoid really fattening foods. I only eat the junk on rare occasion and treat it like a special treat. We need to start taking care of ourselves and I think Alabama is taking a step in the right direction by holding people accountable for their lack of self-control. It's not discrimination; these law makers are trying to save people from themselves!
While division by zero is right, the majority rule is obesity equals major health problems. If people can't manage their health on their own, it can cost companies millions. This affects all of us because then insurance costs rise. People need to be held accountable for themselves. If you choose to allow yourself to balloon up then you should be forced to cover your own costs. As for the comment in the article about 'some people come into this world big'...that's a copout. Yes, there are big babies but with active parents and lifestyles coupled with healthy choices they slim down over time. If you come into this world big, you shouldn't eat at KFC every meal.
Div by 0: True, but you could make the same argument about smoking and lung cancer. The actuarial sciences show that on average obesity correlates strongly with higher medical costs. Right now everyone is paying for this extra cost; by enacting this policy, FEWER people will have to pay more than their fair share. Still unfair, but on the whole, unfair for far fewer people.
As a very healthy, fit person, I'm happy to pay slightly more to cover those who are unhealthy - as long as they have no control over their conditions. If someone is obese - and therefore a more expensive patient - due to their own lifestyle choices, I see no reason why I should bear the financial burden to cover their additional costs to the system. Same reason my insurance rates shouldn't be the same as a heavy smoker's. (If a person's obese for medical reasons, this should have to be medically proven to be covered.)
This seems like a good idea to me. It's a free market disincentive to obestity which may end up making our society more healthy. A noble goal, without resorting to government-imposed taxes which so upset conservatives.
I agree with this measure , obese people don't even care about themselves , let alone their country or comunnity , if they don't care about us why should we care about them.
I can't believe I just read this post. That is unequivocably untrue. Do you realize that you are considered obese if you are 40 pounds overweight? And if you actually took the time to ask someone who is obese how they feel about it, you might find someone who has tried every possible diet out there and had them fail time and time again. Most people don't just wake up obese. A good majority of people are obese because they have tried so very hard to be thin and had every diet fail. And guess what, they don't need you to remind them of the fact that they are not their ideal weight. Instead, they need help and assistance from someone who actually understands that it is not always about "eat less/exercise more". And, contrary to the popular belief of doctors and people who have never had a weight issue, obese does not necessarily equal unhealthy.
"And, contrary to the popular belief of doctors and people who have never had a weight issue, obese does not necessarily equal unhealthy. "
So basically you are saying DOCTORS and all the research that has been done in the medical community is all wrong? Obesity is not unhealthy? I think you might need a reality check.
This would be good for a large number of people, but it isn't practical for the masses (no puns intended). What category would you put people who do work out who have a BMI over 35? Such as body builders or individuals who just enjoy lifting weights. I'm 5'9" and weigh 220 lbs, I have a 34" waist and 17" biceps. My BMI is over 35.....am I unhealthy? Is it fair for me to have to pay for my insurance? I don't think so. It is a good idea for people to be aware of their health and their physical condition, but how it is determined needs to be looked at.
I'm 5'9" and weigh 220 lbs, I have a 34" waist and 17" biceps. My BMI is over 35.....am I unhealthy? Is it fair for me to have to pay for my insurance
Yes you are, and yes it is.
"Disrespectful comments will be removed" then remove the whole story... It is disrespectful of our states and governmental agencies and INSURANCE providers to even consider such a thing... Whats next a tax because someone has false teeth???? or maybe a tax because we sit at computer monitors as part of our professional occupations all day, and lack the time and ability to get out of our offices for regular exercise? What the hell people....what they need to be doing is shutting down the greasy food joints that encourage the consumption of the foods causing the addictions and problems. Besides I wanna know... Is the butthead that introduced this bill Overweight as well,, and were is their share of this tax money...Its just another way for the insurance companies to rob everyday folks of hard earned money.. besides what are the insurance companies doing with these collected funds? Are they paying for the individuals to get help with there weight issues? NO>NO>NO>, so where is this money going? Who's getting their pocket lined each month...definately not the insured!!!!!
I'm guessing that this money is going to pay for the EXORBITANT expense of paying for the medical conditions associated with obesity- heart disease, diabetes, etc.
OK so now are you not only paying an "Obesity Tax", But you're also footing the bill for the EXORBITANT expense of paying for the medical conditions associated with obesity- heart disease, diabetes, etc. How Bogus!
Do they plan to Tax the Anorexic as well? Or maybe those who already may have a heart condition not associated with Obesity? This is retarded.... premiums are already to high for the average worker and family unit. Why do you think so many Americans now don't have insurance and therfore overburdening the insurance and medical industries. Now we have J.... reduce the overall premiums to cover the cost of treatment options and counseling for these conditions...Thats Incentive>>>>
and what do you do with those who are in great shape----bodybulders, weightlifters and even laborers who have a bmi over 35 and have less than 10% bodyfat? Looks to me like the heart is in the right spot but as usual the bureaucrats and politicians have messed it up.
This policy is actually a form of discrimination. If there is one thing obese people are painfully aware of, it's that they are obese. Every time we turn around, some doctor is blaming everything on our weight, regardless of our health. Every person who has never had a weight problem in their lives thinks that it is as easy as exercise more/eat less. In most instances, that may be true, but not all. As someone already said, I am a perfect example of an overweight person who is in perfect health. Perfect cholesterol levels, perfect blood pressure, no diabetes, no liver problems, no kidney problems, etc. I know many skinny people who eat crap all day long and are in way worse health than I am. While I agree obesity is an issue in the world, it will not be resolved by making people pay a fee for being fat. Next thing you know, employers will require employees to pay a fee for being stupid, which is what this policy is.
Mishelle, if your doctors are "blaming everything on our weight", then you probably aren't the picture of health that you seem to think you are.
And yes, weight loss is a simple calculation. If you consume more calories than you use, you gain weight. If you consume less calories than you use, you lose weight. This is not rocket science, and regardless of thyroid problems, big bones, genetics, whatever you want to bring up, this calculation holds true. You can't argue with math.
And I would agree that this policy is a form of discrimination. I'd advise you to look up the word discrimination in a dictionary. Discrimination is simply the act of finding differences, and anyone who can't discriminate between things doesn't have a functioning mind.
Hmmmm, let me see, oldcrankyman. I just had a physical which included a stress echo cardiogram. My cholesterol levels are 65 for the good (the doctors like to see it above 60) and 110 for the bad (100 is optimal). For the record, my current doctor does not blame it all on my weight. I don't have diabetes. I don't have high blood pressure. My heart is in perfect condition as are my kidneys and my liver and everything else. The only time I ever go to the doctor is for sinus issues related to allergies that I have had since I was born and for my annual exams. According to my personal trainer, I burn 1900 calories a day just sitting on my backside and yet I only lose weight with less than 1,000 calories. Try subsisting on 1,000 calories a day for a month and see if you don't become oldbastardman instead of oldcrankyman. I am 5'2" and I leg press 220. I can bench 90 pounds (which is not shabby for a GIRL). Lat pull is over 110. I cook meals at home using lean, skinless meat and all natural ingredients (not preprocessed). To lump me together with even a skinny person who eats a triple decker burger every day is a sad commentary on our ignorant society. What most people do not realize is that those of us who are obese started of as just overweight, but many years of trying to live up to "skinny is healthy" standards has totally screwed up our metabolisms. Tell me one illness that obese people have and skinny people are exempt from.
Since you are listing all of your statistics what do you weigh? My guess is you are FAT. Your doctor says you burn 1900 calories a day sitting on your butt. Check a BMI calculator, I put in 5 foot 2 and it said for a sedentary lifestyle(sitting on your butt as you put it) you would burn a maximum of 1700 calories. I don't know who your doctor is but my guess is he got his degree in a cracker jack box since a woman should eat a maximum of 1500-1800 calories a day that means you should be losing weight by the minute. My guess is you don't count the chips and ice cream and all of the snacks in between. Just because no one saw you eat it doesn't mean you didn't. If you were being truthful to the board and yourself about your calorie intake you would lose weight. I am guessing you eat that 1000 calories by the end of breakfast since you weren't even smart enough to look up what the average calories per day for a healthy woman would be nor the amount of calories sitting on your butt would burn. If you truly ate only 1000 calories per day you would lose weight so my guess is you not only lie to yourself but to your doctor and you are truly the only loser in that blame game.
Of course this is meant to punish the overweight people! Funny how they throw smokers in there, which is a JOKE! I know of MANY smokers who lie to their employers in order to avoid paying the extra premium, but smoke outside work and get away with with it! What I can't understand is why this is not being challenged in court? Shame, shame, shame.
My employer actually tests employees for nicotine........no lying there!!!!!
Challenged in court? Are obese people all of a sudden a "protected class"?
Yes court and yes.
Olivia, they're working on that, and have made some strides in that direction. Pretty much shows the stupidity of having "protected classes" at all, doesn't it?
Excellent paintcraze! As it should be. I have some acquaintances who brag about lying to their employer on the smoking issue.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |