Log In | Register
3 Comments
Printadvertisement
A highly popular Scrabble clone already pulled from Facebook in the United States and Canada continued its tumble over the weekend as the online hangout extended its block of the game throughout most of the world.
Facebook said Monday it was forced to disable Scrabulous after one of Scrabble's rights owners, Mattel Inc., made a formal removal request and the developers of Scrabulous took no action themselves.
The Scrabulous application remains available in India, where its developers live and where Mattel has filed a lawsuit claiming violations of intellectual property. Facebook isn't blocking Scrabulous there for now, considering the question of ownership still a matter for Indian courts to resolve.
In deciding to block Scrabulous on Friday, Facebook risked antagonizing a community of software developers it has been trying to nurture and promote. But had it done nothing, it could have faced liability for copyright and trademark infringement.
The company initially skirted that quandary after Rajat and Jayant Agarwalla, the brothers in Calcutta who created Scrabulous, agreed to withdraw the program in the United States and Canada following a legal threat from Scrabble's North American owner, Hasbro Inc.
Facebook had hoped for a similar resolution when Mattel, owner of Scrabble's rights elsewhere, sent a similar notice, but the Agarwalla brothers refused.
In a statement, Jayant Agarwalla said he found Facebook's action "astonishing" given the site's "claims to be a fair and neutral party."
The bulk of his criticism was directed at Mattel, however.
"It surprises us that Mattel chose to direct Facebook to take down Scrabulous without waiting for the (Indian court's) decision," Agarwalla said. "Mattel's action speaks volumes about their business practices and respect for the judiciary."
Mattel representatives did not respond to e-mail and phone messages Monday.
Both Hasbro and Mattel have been trying to promote an authorized version of Scrabble for Facebook — made by Electronic Arts Inc. in the United States and Canada and by RealNetworks Inc. elsewhere.
The Agarwallas, meanwhile, have released an alternative Scrabble-like word game called Wordscraper, which was not affected by Facebook's latest action. They are hoping that with new rules and circular tiles instead of square ones, Wordscraper can withstand legal challenges.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
1 Vote- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Published to:
- Anick Jesdanun's Column, All of Newsvine
- Groups: none
- Regions: United States , India , Canada
 | Facebook yanks international access to Scrabulous | Ars Technica | Tue Aug 26 | 0 |
- Public Discussion (3)
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user
has on the current conversation.
The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd
row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera).
Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group
is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the
left, in their corresponding group.
Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the
number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative
one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their
relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.7
{"commentId":2580496,"authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
uhh...
isn't it called word scrape now and haven't they made enough changes to it that you can not say they have infringed a copyright? I mean, Scrabble can't claim to have a lock on word games.
{"commentId":2580496,"threadId":"339736","contentId":"1784257","authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
#1 - Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:18 PM EDT{"commentId":2588846,"authorDomain":"lunartick"}
Try reading to the end of the article. And it was primarily a trademark dispute, not a copyright dispute.
{"commentId":2588846,"threadId":"339736","contentId":"1784257","authorDomain":"lunartick"}
{"commentId":2591356,"authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
And Scrabulous has changed their name so where is the trade mark issue?
{"commentId":2591356,"threadId":"339736","contentId":"1784257","authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"339736","isPrivate":false}
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
Start Tracking
Stop TrackingCOMPANY STUFF:
LEGAL STUFF:
- © 2005-2009 Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine is a property of
