Analysis: A racial milestone, but don't mention it

advertisement

Barack Obama achieved a historic breakthrough with his nomination for president, but you wouldn't know it by tracking the official events of the Democratic convention's first three days.

In becoming the first black American to claim a major party's nomination, Obama has reached a milestone that many felt was at least a generation away. But the convention, like Obama's overall campaign, thus far has dealt with race lightly, obliquely, or often not at all.

Prominent black lawmakers addressed the Denver crowd Wednesday without mentioning the campaign's racial dimensions, which they eagerly and emotionally discuss in private. Americans watching TV might assume otherwise because convention commentators often discuss race. But they are drawing from interviews and other sources, not from the speeches that are vetted by the Obama campaign and that serve as a record of the four-day event.

Obama is "running as a candidate who happens to be African-American, not as an African-American who happens to be running for president," said Chris Lehane, a spokesman for Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign.

The reason is simple, campaign strategists say. The more Obama is seen as a black candidate, the greater the risk that some white voters might reject him.

In Denver, the omissions are notable because several convention events have celebrated Hillary Rodham Clinton's unprecedented achievements as a female presidential candidate.

The tone will change Thursday, when Obama accepts the nomination on the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech, a coincidence that could hardly be ignored. But when Obama resumes campaigning Friday in Pennsylvania, party insiders expect him to revert to his practice of soft-pedaling race: acknowledging its role in American society, when asked, but rarely bringing it up on his own, and never using it as basis for seeking people's votes.

"No one is going to forget that Barack Obama is half black," Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell said Wednesday. But in seeking his state's crucial white, working-class voters, Rendell said: "I wouldn't emphasize it. I'd say, 'Look, right now I think the only color you're concerned about is green,'" a reference to families' economic worries.

Obama, the son of a black father from Kenya and a white mother from Kansas, often says that race's role in American society is undeniable, but he does not want people to vote for or against him mainly because of his race.

In his presidential campaign, he has addressed race in a lengthy, comprehensive way only once: on March 18, when incendiary remarks by his former pastor threatened his campaign. "Race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now," Obama said in Philadelphia.

He later broke all ties with the minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and has not addressed race again in anywhere near the depth he did that day.

In Denver, the party has passed up obvious opportunities to celebrate Obama's achievement in a nation whose legacies of slavery and segregation still feel fresh to many. On Wednesday, three of the House's most senior black members — Maxine Waters of California, Elijah Cummings of Maryland and Democratic Whip Jim Clyburn of South Carolina — addressed the convention without alluding to race.

In Denver's hotels and restaurants, of course, talk of racial politics is more commonplace. Some of the bluntest speakers are white labor union leaders, eager to help Obama win working-class votes in key states such as Michigan, Pennsylvania and Ohio.

"There are a lot of white workers, and frankly, some of them are union members," who refuse to vote for Obama "because they think he's the wrong race," AFL-CIO Treasurer Richard Trumka told Ohio delegates this week. "We cannot tap dance around the fact."

"Race is a tool that is used to divide working people," Trumka said. He called on Democratic activists to convince blue-collar workers that Republican John McCain's policies would harm their interests.

If black delegates say little about race on the convention stage, many are privately exulting over Obama's nomination. "This reflects what Dr. King was talking about" in the 1963 "dream" speech, said James W. Crowell, treasurer of the Mississippi chapter of the NAACP.

Martin Luther King III said that his father's dream is not totally fulfilled but that Obama is wise to keep from making race central to his candidacy. The campaign, he said, "shouldn't be about black issues or white issues. It should be about issues for every American."

Rendell, the Pennsylvania governor, said families struggling to pay their bills are more likely to vote on pocketbook issues than on matters such as race, which should help Obama.

People will choose their candidate, he said, based on "who's most likely to help them with their financial condition. If the answer is Barack Obama, nobody's going to care whether he's black, green, orange, purple, fuchsia or whatever."

___

EDITOR'S NOTE — Charles Babington covers politics for The Associated Press.

  • 6 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.8
1.5
0.5
{"commentId":2618846,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

FoxNews commentators "recognized" the historical nature of the first official major political party candidate of "African" ancestry {my label, not FoxNews'}.

It's a huge event in the history of this country. If Obama loses in Nov., that will be just as important-the first african American who ran on the ticket and lost due to his position in the political spectrum, rather than racism.

{"commentId":2618846,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
    Reply#1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:37 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2621072,"authorDomain":"cncfnbamilwaukee"}

    You know, I really, really think we are too timid when it comes to referencing or talking about Candidate Obama being African American. That is his background/profile.

    What is that about?

    Is it the fear that Caucasians are going to rise up and be what they say they are not - racists.
    Is it because there is a fear that Caucasians will have to look squarely in the face of African Americans and say, we have just been so wrong, so self-righteous, thinking superior to African Americans?
    Is it some ongoing myth to keep alive? Is it is a big hammer over everybody's head, Can't Touch This.

    Listen, African Americans for the most part know the "walk" and the "talk", it is time that Caucasians realize, for everybody's good, that they are not the only one that matter.

    Take the election, all through the campaign so far, conveniently news reporters and talking heads would interject, " oh the White middle class - Hilary Clinton said, the working white people. The code words the juvenile way we paint the picture of fear. I often wonder, when the reporters are talking about the all important Caucasians, the so-called white workers needing assurance. Assurance of what, that his blackness will not rub off. What do they want but to have the rights and pursuits this country is suppose to provide. That is all they are due. Unfortunately, African Americans have not been able to get that.

    Yet, it is what the white people think. Get the email, we do ourselves an injustice every time we create division such as this.

    When we fail to acknowledge every American as an American – NO MORE AND NO LESS.

    Take Rev. Wright's comments, Caucasians got all pushed out of shape because he said what they did not like and refused to acknowledge. Instead, they chose to victimize him. Hold him up-to-sn Victimizing the messenger does not kill the message. All the while, the YOU tube, was keeping the fear in the air.
    What do you think African Americans were thinking? That is those of you who gives a hoot about what African Americans think.

    Candidate Barack Obama is an African American man. PERIOD. Just like Senator Joe Biden is a Caucasian man. Period.

    It then should go to trust, quality of character and preparedness for the office.
    When you are facing a man of the statute of Candidate Obama, you are not looking at the every day man. Yet he is an everyday man.

    This gentleman, father, husband, brother, grandson, friend and senator has been sprinkled by a divine grace. Therefore, he creates the experience as he goes in the way of a trailblazer. And, guess what, it sets a new standard.

    Yes, he is a candidate for President of the United States that happens to be African American.
    He is also an African American man running for President. He is a Senator from Illinois running for President.
    He is a husband, father of two girls running for President.
    Did we say George Bush was a Caucasian man running for President.
    Embrace race, it is not going any place.

    Mary Glass - Milwaukeean

    {"commentId":2621072,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"cncfnbamilwaukee"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2628912,"authorDomain":"sanfelipebob"}

    Charles, it is time for you to put the sheet and hood away. This nomination is about not having to make this distinction ever again. You should be ashamed.

    {"commentId":2628912,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"sanfelipebob"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:46 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2629049,"authorDomain":"ellenbogdanowicz"}

    charles: you are horrible! get a new job. take keith oberlman's advice.

    {"commentId":2629049,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"ellenbogdanowicz"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2629189,"authorDomain":"claudia-robert"}

    Based on your AP report tonight going out to numerous AP outlets on Barack Obama's acceptance speech is biased and raciest. Barack's words spoke for every American with a dream for a better future.

    You should be fired! You should be fired!

    {"commentId":2629189,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"claudia-robert"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#5 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:56 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2629290,"authorDomain":"denn1214"}

    Mr. Babington, you exemplify everything that is lazy about "journalists" today. You are a tool and should probably seek employment on Fox News.

    {"commentId":2629290,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"denn1214"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#6 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:01 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2629327,"authorDomain":"peskyspole"}

    I wonder if John McCain will mention the milestone of being his age and running for president. I get the feeling that he has more of a chance of doing so than of Charles Babiington commenting about it.

    {"commentId":2629327,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"peskyspole"}
      Reply#7 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:02 AM EDT
      {"commentId":2629419,"authorDomain":"timlaud64"}

      Even Pat Buchanan said that this was the "greatest political speech ever." Obama spoke on every single "issue" and on all real issues that the GOP tries to discredit his great name with. Charles Babington is without a doubt one of the worst journalists I have ever read. The Associated Press has lost my confidence and respect.

      Thank you, Charles Babington, for proving that the media is in the back pockets of the Republican party. Both you and John McCain can follow Osama bin Laden to the gates of hell. All three of you can stay there.

      {"commentId":2629419,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"timlaud64"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#8 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:07 AM EDT
      {"commentId":2629486,"authorDomain":"dannyjordaniii"}

      Truly someone with eloquence. Truly someone who can represent a country. Race no longer matters. We need someone to help us – all of us.

      {"commentId":2629486,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"dannyjordaniii"}
        Reply#9 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:10 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2629514,"authorDomain":"dentist11729"}

        Unfortunately there are still people around who probably would have preferred things stayed as they were for women and non white Americans prior to the civil rights movement ...do yourself a favor Mr. Babington stay home on November 4th.

        {"commentId":2629514,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"dentist11729"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#10 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:11 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2629604,"authorDomain":"dkomornic"}

        Charles Babington is a fool. I just was watching MSNBC after the conclusion of the Democratic National Convention and Keith Olberman came across Mr. Babington's column for tomorrown (8/29/08). The article was about Barack Obama's speech tonight at Invesco field. It was a lame column by a GOP lover. That speech that Obama gave was one of the best political speeches ever and for this guy to rip it, well, it was like KO said: "Mr. Babington, maybe you need to find new work" or something to that affect. GO BARACK AND GO DEMOCRATS. This country needs change from George Bush, John McCain (who is nothing more than a Bush wannabe) and biased reporters like Charles Babington.

        {"commentId":2629604,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"dkomornic"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#11 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:15 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2629666,"authorDomain":"dannyjordaniii"}

        Hello Mr. Babington. I only know of you because on MSN they read your incompetent analysis on Democratic Nominee Obama's speech. As an american, I demand you retire.

        {"commentId":2629666,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"dannyjordaniii"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#12 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:18 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2630995,"authorDomain":"possib"}

        Mr. Babington,

        As a journalist for the past 38 years, I find it difficult to believe AP labels your so-called writing "Analysis." That has been, for too long, the euphemism for outright biased reporting placed on the news pages rather than on the OP-ED page where it belongs. Based on your assessment of Obama's speech, your 20 years in Washington have left you with absolutely no sense of objectivity or any other competent perspective and thus rendered you useless to the field of political commentary and to those of us who appreciate intellectually honest analysis. Fine if you didn't like the speech, but to say it lacked specifics is an outright lie and diminishes your journalistic integrity ... to the point of oblivion if everything I read about you is even half true.

        {"commentId":2630995,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"possib"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#13 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:46 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2631095,"authorDomain":"imac1"}

        Charles:

        Your analysis is breathtaking in how short it falls. Watch it again, Chuck. This time with the volume on.

        {"commentId":2631095,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"imac1"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#14 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:57 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2631994,"authorDomain":"maggilunde"}

        Yesterday was a historic day in the history of not only the USA but the world. But per your AP "analysis", it was clear that you were not listening carefully. If you were not in Denver, at least you could have been listening to C-span. Unfortunately you struck out.

        {"commentId":2631994,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"maggilunde"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#15 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:04 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2646528,"authorDomain":"BadMommy"}

        Mr. Babington, FOX NEWS is calling...and they want YOU!!! Do everyone with a brain a favor and depart to FOX!!! They have a time honored tradition of distortion which seems to be your forte. Good Riddance!!!

        {"commentId":2646528,"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159","authorDomain":"BadMommy"}
          Reply#16 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"342035","isPrivate":false}
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          {"threadId":"342035","contentId":"1795159"}
          Start TrackingStart Tracking
          Stop TrackingStop Tracking