The Bush administration insisted Sunday that Congress must move quickly to approve what one lawmaker called the "mother of all bailouts" — a $700 billion proposal to buy a mountain of bad mortgage debt in an effort to unfreeze the nation's credit markets.
Congressional leaders endorsed the plan's main thrust, saying passage might occur in a matter of days. But they said it must be expanded to include help for people on Main Street as well as the big Wall Street financial firms who have lost billions of dollars through their bad investment decisions.
The proposal "does not include the necessary safeguards," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. She called for "independent oversight, protections for homeowners and constraints on excessive executive compensation."
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson stressed that time was critical to get the proposal passed and that changes to the administration's measure, which was sent to lawmakers on Saturday, could delay that approval, further unsettling global financial markets, which have already seen a number of stomach-churning days as the result of the biggest upheaval on Wall Street since the Great Depression.
The administration, which has been scrambling to deal with all the tumult, announced late Sunday that it was modifying a program announced just two days ago to try to bolster the teetering $3 trillion money-market mutual fund industry.
On Friday, the government said it would use a $50 billion Treasury fund to provide government guarantees for money-market mutual fund accounts. However, in a significant revision announced late Sunday, the Treasury Department said it would only guarantee funds that were in the accounts as of last Friday, indicating that money deposited after that date would not be guaranteed.
The guarantees had been put in place to stem a wave of withdrawals from mutual fund accounts that had been sparked largely by panicked institutional investors.
But the banking industry had complained that the new guarantees ran the risk of sparking withdrawals by their savings depositors who might decide to transfer their bank deposits, which are government-insured, to money-market mutual funds, which often pay more in interest than bank savings accounts but up until Friday had not enjoyed any government guarantees.
The American Bankers Association praised Treasury's about-face. "By limiting this new guarantee to funds that existed on or before last Friday, they have eliminated the incentive for people to move money out of bank accounts to seek a higher government guarantee," ABA President Edward Yingling said in a statement.
In another change, Treasury said that funds deposited in tax-exempt money-market mutual funds as of last Friday would also be covered. Originally, the department had said those funds would not be covered because it might jeopardize their tax-exempt status.
In the past two weeks, the government has taken over the country's two biggest mortgage companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and its biggest insurance company, American International Group Inc., and stood by while the nation's fourth-largest investment bank, Lehman Brothers, was forced to declare bankruptcy and another investment giant, Merrill Lynch, was forced to sell itself to Bank of America.
Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke made the joint decision last week that the only way to stop the carnage was to deal with the root cause of all the troubles, billions of dollars of bad mortgage debt sitting on the books of major financial companies. This debt has triggered the worst credit crisis in decades, causing credit markets to essentially freeze up last week despite the fact that the Fed joined with major central banks around the world to pump billions of dollars of reserves into the financial system.
The plan the administration has developed with support from the Fed would have the government buy up to $700 billion of the bad loans, taking them off the books of financial firms with the hope that this will allow those companies to resume normal lending operations. Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, said the government's efforts would be the "mother of all bailouts" that could well cost $1 trillion when the cost of the government takeovers of Fannie, Freddie and AIG were included.
Paulson, appearing on four of the five Sunday morning talk shows to sell the plan, insisted that the administration had no choice.
The cost of doing nothing would have been far more severe because the clogged credit markets would make it harder for businesses to get the loans they need to keep operating, he said. Doing nothing also would make it harder for consumers to get the credit they need for car loans and other purchases, the Treasury secretary said. Consumer spending accounts for two-thirds of total economic activity.
"We need to look at what is going on in the credit markets and they are still very fragile right now and frozen," Paulson said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
In addition to what is happening in the United States, Paulson said he was confident that other major countries would take similar actions to support their financial systems, helping to avert a global meltdown.
"We have a global financial system and we are talking very aggressively with other countries around the world and encouraging them to do similar things and I believe a number of them will," Paulson said on ABC's "This Week." He refused to name the countries that he expected would act.
Congressional Democrats said they understood the need for urgency but insisted that the measure needed to provide help for homeowners threatened with losing their homes. And some GOP leaders told the White House on Sunday to prepare to accept more oversight and guarantees that the Treasury will recoup some of the bailout money.
Republicans, however, appeared less eager to support several other Democratic proposals. One would change bankruptcy laws to allow for mortgages to be modified, something financial companies have strongly opposed. Another would cap benefit packages for executives at the huge Wall Street firms that will be selling their bad debt to the government.
"It would be a grave mistake to say that we're going to buy up a bad debt that resulted from bad decisions of these people and then allow them to get millions of dollars on the way out," said House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass. "The American people don't want that to happen and it shouldn't happen."
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., told reporters at a Capitol Hill news conference on Sunday that while he hoped Congress could pass the legislation this week "if it takes a little longer, then so be it."
He said financial markets should be reassured that Congress was moving toward a significant response and a few more days to "get it right" should not trigger a renewed nosedive on Wall Street.
The whole congressional debate is occurring just weeks before voters go to the polls. Both Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and Republican John McCain have given grudging support to the bailout effort. Obama has also called on Congress to pass a second economic stimulus bill given the economy's weak state, with unemployment at a five-year high of 6.1 percent.
While Paulson gave no indication during the interview shows of what changes the administration would be willing to accept, the administration did modify an early draft obtained by The Associated Press in a significant way.
A later version expands the definition of the financial firms that would qualify to sell their bad debt to the government to include not just U.S. firms but also foreign firms doing business in the United States if the government decides debt purchases from those firms are needed to stabilize the financial system.
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said that he believed there would be changes to Paulson's plan and that agreement could still be reached quickly.
Schumer said that he was pushing to get a provision where the government would receive stock warrants in return for the bailout relief and for creation of a government oversight board to supervise the huge operation, which under Paulson's plan would be run out of the Treasury Department. He said Paulson seemed receptive to changes when he had discussed his ideas with him.
Republicans warned against too many amendments. "This would be the most serious financial crisis that the world has ever dealt with. It is not a time to be playing games," said House Republican Leader John Boehner.
Paulson said in his round of interviews that the nation's outdated regulatory system for financial markets must be overhauled but the first job is to get the rescue package through Congress and then deal with a comprehensive regulatory overhaul next year.
The administration's proposal seeks an increase in the limit on the national debt from $10.6 trillion to $11.3 trillion to make room for the massive rescue. But Paulson said that the government would recoup a part of the $700 billion when the housing market recovers and the mortgage assets rebound in value.
What a god-awful mess. Where was Greenspan when the seeds of all these problems were planted?
encouraging it.. lol he didn't even see a housing bubble
Vacationing with the Bush family ? It's amazing, these people, CEO's, Presidents, Vice Presidents, etc, all the deadwood at the top, get paid millions to lose billions.
Greenspan is a joke. He was right there with Slick Willy and his tax and spend policies that seeded the recession. But things are getting better and amidst all the doom and gloom news that reaches the headlines it is interesting to note that the dollar hit a 2 year high against the Indian rupee today. You wont find that on the front page of your web browser but its a lot bigger financial news than Lehman Bros mismanagment.
Good question, Tom, But Paulson and Co. must deal with it now. Sort of like asking about Clinton's role in 9/11;-/
Anyone care to hazard a guess what the markets will do Monday?
not really.. this is much more in the open.
minus 350-450
this actually makes very little sense
allowing BAC to get bigger is exactly the opposite of something that will fix this problem
we need to break up the large banking institutions precisely because they are way too large to be allowed to fail
it would be better if they were broken up into a few dozen regional banks that if problems arose from piss poor business decisions like now then they could be made to pay the piper and fail fair and square
but as long as we allow two different banks to have more than 20% of americas deposits EACH these banks are far too large to be allowed to fail
Exactly. Allowing Merrill and BofA to combine is just the wrong medicine. What we need now is downsizing of all banks to managable size, ie not too big to fail. Regionalizing banks would also help in that if one part of the country had trouble it wouldn't neccessarily hurt the entire country.
This problem was caused by a few who wanted more money.
And who is going to pay? Everyone but those with money.
What ever happened to honesty?
What ever happened to the truth?
We will all pay for the few playing with our money.
Sadly true, kiml... sadly true. That and the whole "spend money! The economy depends on it! Charge charge!" mantra. Now we'll all suffer for trying to keep the economy afloat;-/
This will be a massive rippling effect. Please say it isnt true Bank of America and United States.
The companies all of them Leh "brothers", MMM Lynch mob, and all others need to do the time.
They have taken advantage and ripped off small investors, honest American taxpayers, shareholders, and investors for years. It is bad American, Government and business policy to bail out a company that owes teh system hundreds of billions and trillions of dollars back to sharholders and investors.
Now that makes teh Bank of America a target too since you have not considered buying the problem.
Why do this now? Large Regional and National Banks should not even be thinking of this insane move it will put the entire integrity of the Bank of America, America itself at risk. Bank of America? ok
The Lynch mob? no way not going to touoch it or a combined company. Time to go to a new bank l;ike the intelligent ones JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Wachovia, U.S. Bank, etc. Didn't you learn not to get greedy or hang with bad boys Bank of America? Sink like the rest if not. Stay clear banks. Even Citigroup is smart enough not to get involved with the Leh "borthers" or MMM Lynch mob! BOA: shame
CORRECTION: Companies the likes of Lynch owe the system hundreds of billions and trillions.
CORRECTION: Bank of America considering buying into the problem and lawsuits for $50 billion?
CORRECTION: Lynch mob? not touching Lynchers or combined company with or with out Bank America
CORRECTION: Intelligent banks i.e. all Federal, Regional, Government Banks stay clear of bad apples
CORRECTION: Leh "brothers" rest in peace. MMM Lynch? It's your time next RIP. BOA/banks back off
CORRECTION: Bank of America shame on you to even consider the Lynch mob. Bad business will lose
just remember that 20 billion was too much for poor sick children
but 50 billion to bail out some super rich guys atht made some super stupid descions.. well that's a bargin
The article i must say written nicely and presented graphically.The financial melt down caused by the plummeting real estate prices,complicated by gradual erosion of confidence, evokes the sinking feeling.Employees and passers by snapping the behemoth institutions on their cameras and mobiles show the attachment of both for the institutions that were part of their lives.Really a confidence building measure at its best is needed to prevent a repeat of it with other institutions and a dynamic plan to pull them out of possible rut of economic recession is the urgent need of the day..Sutting far away from US ,i feel the impact.
I earnestly feel the real rehabilitation measures do take place insted of the skullduggery.
The result of loosely regulated capitalism.
Wall Street is scared to death of Martin Luther Obama. If McCain pulls ahead in the polls everything will normalize. What this country cannot afford is a return to the disasterous tax and spend policies of the 90s that paved the way for the this recession.
Admitedly, McCain's 11 hour conversion to conservatism is scary but not as scary as the alternative.
How do they do it ?
Daniel Mudd, the outgoing CEO of Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac's departing CEO Richard Syron would receive in case of removal from their positions, As neither man voluntarily retired or was removed for "cause" (material breach of contract), Mudd is entitled to receive cash severance of $1.98 million (two years of base salary) and a cash bonus of $2.23 million, according to Fannie Mae's 2008 proxy filing. Syron should get $1.10 million (one-year's salary) and a cash bonus of $2.64 million, according to Freddie Mac's 2008 proxy filing. In addition, Mudd holds pension benefits with a present value of $4.92 million and Syron has pension assets worth $1.46 million, as of December 2007.
How can this be justified ? They do a crappy job and get paid to do it. It makes no sense. I wonder how much all these others will pocket when asked to leave ?
take a lesson from the animal word snakes never bite their own. these guys are walking out the door with more knowledge of what was going on behind the scenes than you could ever imagine.
Thank the DEN OF THIEVES.........WALL STREET
AND the REPUBLICAN partyAND Mccain/Palin and company!!
They are sending you and each taxpayer a bill for $3300
Oh and while you're at it be sure and vote that den of thieves back into office AGAIN!
Mccain/Palin.........
GREAT IDEA
Let Palin, Mccain and company pay the taxes and surtax them
it's their fault that THEIR PARTY caused the great financial crisis !!
Tell that whiny shrill voiced idiot Palin to shut her mouth she doesnt know what the hell she's talking about, let her and the shadow governor of alaska ,mr mom, mr Palin go back where they came from!
Every CEO and every CFO whose company files for bankruptcy protection or a government bailout should be required by law to forfeit their entire compensation package while they led that company AND be liable for one-third of their personal property at the time of the default. There needs to be accountability from these people and they should not be allowed to just walk away.
G.W. Bush, [Calvin Coolidge the Second] is leading us all into the worst Depression ever.
If John McCain, [Herbert Hoover the Second] is elected, that will finish us all for sure.
Be prepared for a dollar being worth only 10 cents, if this happens.
Now you see the price of de-regulation set in place by President Roosevelt after the last calamity delivered to us by the Republicans, and changed by the Reagen Administration.
God help us all.
Whoever you blame, Reverend - and there's a lot to go around - I can only echo the last line: "God help us all"...
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |