Editorial reaction to $700B bailout plan

advertisement

Here is what some newspapers had to say about the Bush administration's move to ask Congress for $700 billion to buy up troubled mortgage-related assets from U.S. financial institutions:

— The Philadelphia Inquirer:

"The unprecedented taxpayer bailout of Wall Street and the banking industry is as necessary as it is infuriating. Spawned by greed and reckless lending, the worst financial crisis in decades has left policymakers without any good options for fixing the mess."

— The Los Angeles Times:

"The main question for politicians isn't whether to act — the comments Friday by congressional leaders and top administration officials made it clear that Washington will undertake something extraordinary — but what to extract from the companies that are helped and how to prevent the problems from recurring."

— Fort Worth (Texas) Star-Telegram:

"It's crucial that trust and confidence be restored in the markets of the world's largest and most-powerful economy."

— The News Tribune of Tacoma, Wash.:

"Hard-core free marketeers are grumping, but federal officials have little choice but to pay the price for past failures to regulate."

— The Anniston (Ala.) Star:

"Simply put, something had to be done. The path chosen seems as sound as any available."

— Rochester (N.Y.) Democrat and Chronicle:

"The taxpayer once again is digging deep to rescue private companies that played fast and loose with America's financial security. It has to be done ... (b)ut from this must come reform — and consequences for those who pushed us to the brink."

  • 2 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.5
{"commentId":3035913,"authorDomain":"parsoje"}

The United States Government is capitalizing on a comprehensional failure of the human mind – the inability to fully grasp the magnitude of large numbers. Upon hearing numbers beyond a few thousand our brains interpret it as, "Wow, that's a big number!" with no tangible image to relay exactly how big. So, let's start with a One Dollar Bill. We can understand $1.00, right?

According to the United States treasury, a One Dollar Bill has a thickness of 0.0043 inches. One thousand One Dollar Bills would be one thousand times thicker -- 4.3 inches.

One million is one thousand thousands, so the thickness of $1,000,000 is 4300 inches. Converting to feet and this becomes 358.3 feet, an American football field.

One billion -- $1,000,000,000 is one thousand times thicker still or 358,333.3 feet. This is 67.866 miles, the driving distance from New York to Milford CT.

One Trillion is one thousand billions – one trillion One Dollar Bills stacked one on top of another is 67,866 miles. This would circumnavigate the globe 2.73 times.

The proposed 700 Billion Dollar bailout alone would be a stack of One Dollar Bills stretching 47,506.2 miles, or 1.90 times around the globe.

A stack of One Dollar Bills totaling the current national debt cap of 10.6 trillion dollars would go around the equator 28.93 times. The proposed cap of 11.3 trillion dollars would go around 30.85 times.

Is creating a debt that is the equivalent of a stack of One Dollar Bills rounding planet 31 times a responsible act?

{"commentId":3035913,"threadId":"364106","contentId":"1893923","authorDomain":"parsoje"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:04 PM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"364106","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"364106","contentId":"1893923"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking