OXFORD — In a faceoff that returned again and again to judgment, John McCain portrayed himself as a battle-tested elder running against a naive rookie, while Barack Obama suggested the Republican is a hothead who made the wrong choices on the Iraq war, corporate taxes and more.
Now they take the themes from an intense first debate back to the campaign trail, looking for some edge in a tight presidential race. With 38 days left, McCain is headed for Washington and the dispute over a Wall Street bailout, while Obama plans to visit Republican-leaning states where the Democrat thinks he can make inroads.
The debate presented a huge opportunity for the candidates to deliver their message to millions of Americans — or make an embarrassing blunder.
Interest in Friday's debate was amplified by suspense about whether it would even take place. McCain had said he wouldn't take part unless the financial crisis was resolved, then reversed course and decided at the last minute to participate without a deal.
McCain, 72, frequently referred to his age and experience.
Sometimes he joked — at one point he waggled his eyebrows and quipped that the moderator didn't think he could hear the question — and other times he went out of his way to mention the foreign countries he has visited and the years he has spent on Capitol Hill.
"I have a long record and the American people know me very well," he said.
But Obama, a 47-year-old serving his first term in the Senate, challenged McCain frequently and offered himself as someone who can be trusted to make sound choices.
Obama noted that he opposed invading Iraq, while McCain supported it. He said McCain has voted with the unpopular President Bush 90 percent of the time. He argued McCain backs corporate tax breaks and lax regulation that have contributed to the Wall Street economic crisis.
"We have to recognize that this is a final verdict on eight years of failed economic policies promoted by George Bush, supported by Senator McCain," Obama said.
Obama sought to connect with voters who might have doubts about a relative newcomer to national politics, a black man with an exotic name and background. He talked often about the struggles of ordinary Americans — "the nurse, the teacher, the police officer who, frankly, at the end of each month they've got a little financial crisis going on."
The Obama campaign tried to back up that point in its newest ad, a spot released Saturday that notes McCain never mentioned the middle class during the debate. "McCain doesn't get it," the announcer says. "Barack Obama does."
In a long exchange with McCain over the Iraq war, Obama tried to avoid being seen as soft or reluctant to use force when necessary.
An early opponent of invading Iraq, he stressed that his position was prompted partly by worries that it would distract from hunting down Osama bin Laden, and he said withdrawing from Iraq now would free up resources to re-energize that hunt.
Obama suggested McCain might overreact to national emergencies, noting that the Arizona senator has talked about "extinction" for North Korea and joked about bombing Iran.
McCain accused Obama of seeking to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory" in Iraq. He said the "surge" of U.S. troops has reduced violence there and withdrawing would destabilize the country and the entire region.
Asked what lessons he had learned from the long war, McCain said, "that you cannot have a failed strategy that will then cause you to nearly lose a conflict."
In its first post-debate TV ad, the McCain campaign accused Obama of "playing politics ... risking lives" when he voted against a war spending bill in May 2007, supporting the charge that Obama's "not ready to lead" with criticism from that time by Joe Biden, now Obama's running mate. When McCain cited that vote during the debate, Obama defended it as being aimed at the lack of a withdrawal timetable, not at funding for troops.
On Iraq and many other issues, McCain said Obama was naive, experienced, confused. He criticized Obama for saying he would meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad without precondition. "This is dangerous. It isn't just naive; it's dangerous," McCain said.
The two bickered at times, talking over one another and throwing accusations of twisted words and false statements. But Obama sometimes acknowledged agreements with McCain — concessions that might reinforce Obama's claim to be a politician who can find common ground and reduce confrontation in Washington.
The stakes were high as the two rivals walked on stage. The polls gave Obama a modest lead and indicated he was viewed more favorably than his rival when it came to dealing with the economy. But the same surveys show McCain favored by far on foreign policy.
The candidates stood behind identical wooden lecterns on stage at the performing arts center at the University of Mississippi for the first of three scheduled debates with less than six weeks remaining until Election Day. The two vice presidential candidates will meet next week for their only debate, and Obama and McCain each put in a plug for his own running mate.
But there was a difference: Biden made the round of post-debate television shows. NBC and CNN said they invited McCain's running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who has granted only three interviews since joining the ticket a month ago, but she declined.
Moderator Jim Lehrer's opening question concerned the economic crisis. While neither man committed to supporting bailout legislation taking shape in Congress, they readily agreed lawmakers must take action to prevent millions of Americans from losing their jobs and their homes.
Both also said they were pleased that lawmakers in both parties were negotiating on a compromise.
Neither could offer specifics about how the potential $700 billion price tag of a Wall Street bailout might affect their ability to implement all the campaign promises they've made.
McCain jabbed at Obama, who he said has requested millions of dollars in pork barrel spending, including some after he began running for president. As he does frequently, the Republican vowed to veto any lawmaker's pork barrel project that reaches his desk in the White House.
McCain said a freeze on most government spending was worth considering, except for veterans, defense and "some other vital issues."
Obama said the problem with that was that some programs needed more money. He mentioned early childhood education as an example.
"The problem with a spending freeze is you're using a hatchet where you need a scalpel," he said.
The presidential hopefuls are scheduled to debate twice more, at Belmont University in Nashville on Oct. 7 and at Hofstra University in Hempsted, N.Y., on Oct. 15.
___
Associated Press writer Beth Fouhy contributed to this report.
McCain knows that if he ducks the debate and Obama shows up for a 90 minute one-on-one his campaign is done. No amount of spin could save him. His suggestion to postpone this debate and replace the VP debate with the rescheduled Friday debate is laughable. He can't hide forever and neither can Palin.
He still might not have the guts to show up. We'll see.
[sarcasm]Obama is just being MEAN insisting that the debates go on! [/sarcasm]
Not a day goes by that we are not told that failing in Iraq is not a option. We are told constantly that we have to win, that failure is not a option, that the war on terror is the transcendental challenge of our generation. And really it sounds good and it sounds right, but is it right. When our President and his supporters like Senator McCain are confronted with the enormity of the problem of trying to change a Islamic Dictatorship into a Democracy they act as though the over 1 trillion dollars that have been invested in this farce is insignificant, and that our nation will not pay a long term price for this ill advised escapade.
When the Old Soviet Union began its escapade in Afghanistan some 30+ years ago they too were a super power but after 10 years of exhausting their wealth and resources in Afghanistan they found themselves facing not defeated people in Afghanistan but defeated people within their own country and the internal break up of their own empire, which was the direct result of neglecting the critical needs of their own people and their internal national infrastructure. The Soviet Army like the American Military in Iraq today found themselves fighting not for a well defined national goal that was supported by and understood by its citizens but essentially they fought purely to revenge their fallen comrades a sentiment often expressed today by our band of brothers in Iraq.
It has been said that we are fighting a guerrilla war now in Iraq, and guerrilla wars are not about power and hardware, but they are more a contest of will and endurance. The question that must be answered is whether our desire to build something , a form of goverment that the Arabs don't want is greater than their desire to destroy both it and us. In Afghanistan the Soviet Military was unable to overcome the will of the Mujaheddin and in Iraq the American Military may not be able to overcome the will of the multiple splinter groups that fight against the Iraqi puppet Goverment or against the American Military itself.
Finally it was the double whammy of the lingering effect of a stagnant economy caused by a 10 year war in Afghanistan , and the sharp drop of oil prices that broke the back of the Soviet Union. And unless something gives in a hurry its going to be the double whammy of the more than quadrupled cost of oil and the rising energy and food cost as well as the continuing cost of a ill advised war in Iraq that is threatening the long term stability of the United States as a world power.
War is and has always been a tremendous undertaking requiring massive investments of both manpower and material. But the real cost of war can only be measured by figuring what else we could have done to improve the lives of our citizens and to repair our infrastructure here at home with the extra 5 trillion dollars spent over the course of the last 6 years that has increased our national debt from 4.9 trillion to over 9 trillion dollars fighting what can only be called Bush's Folly in Iraq which only the most naive and partisan members of the Republican Party will not admit was started under false pretenses using hyped and distorted evidence to sell it to the American people
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |