WaMu becomes biggest bank to fail in US history

advertisement

As the debate over a $700 billion bank bailout rages on in Washington, one of the nation's largest banks — Washington Mutual Inc. — has collapsed under the weight of its enormous bad bets on the mortgage market.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. seized WaMu on Thursday, and then sold the thrift's banking assets to JPMorgan Chase & Co. for $1.9 billion.

Seattle-based WaMu, which was founded in 1889, is the largest bank to fail by far in the country's history. Its $307 billion in assets eclipse those of Continental Illinois National Bank, which failed in 1984 with $40 billion in assets; adjusted for 2008 dollars, its assets totaled $67.7 billion. IndyMac, seized in July, had $32 billion in assets.

One positive is that the sale of WaMu's assets to JPMorgan Chase prevents the thrift's collapse from depleting the FDIC's insurance fund. But that detail is likely to give only marginal solace to Americans facing tighter lending and watching their stock portfolios plunge in the wake of the nation's most momentous financial crisis since the Great Depression.

Because of WaMu's souring mortgages and other risky debt, JPMorgan plans to write down WaMu's loan portfolio by about $31 billion — a figure that could change if the government goes through with its bailout plan and JPMorgan decides to take advantage of it.

"We're in favor of what the government is doing, but we're not relying on what the government is doing. We would've done it anyway," JPMorgan's Chief Executive Jamie Dimon said in a conference call Thursday night, referring to the acquisition. Dimon said he does not know if JPMorgan will take advantage of the bailout.

WaMu is JPMorgan Chase's second acquisition this year of a major financial institution hobbled by losing bets on mortgages. In March, JPMorgan bought the investment bank Bear Stearns Cos. for about $1.4 billion, plus another $900 million in stock ahead of the deal to secure it.

JPMorgan Chase is now the second-largest bank in the United States after Bank of America Corp., which recently bought Merrill Lynch in a flurry of events that included Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. going bankrupt and American International Group Inc., the world's largest insurer, getting taken over by the government.

JPMorgan also said Thursday it plans to sell $8 billion in common stock to raise capital. Its stock rose in midday trading Friday on the New York Stock Exchange, gaining $1.90, or 4.37 percent, to $45.36.

The downfall of WaMu has been widely anticipated for some time because of the company's heavy mortgage-related losses. As investors grew nervous about the bank's health, its stock price plummeted 95 percent from a 52-week high of $36.47 to its close of $1.69 Thursday. On Wednesday, it suffered a ratings downgrade by Standard & Poor's that put it in danger of collapse.

WaMu "was under severe liquidity pressure," FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair told reporters in a conference call.

"For all depositors and other customers of Washington Mutual Bank, this is simply a combination of two banks," Bair said in a statement. "For bank customers, it will be a seamless transition. There will be no interruption in services and bank customers should expect business as usual come Friday morning."

Besides JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo & Co., Citigroup Inc., HSBC, Spain's Banco Santander and Toronto-Dominion Bank of Canada were also reportedly possible suitors. WaMu was believed to be talking to private equity firms as well.

The seizure by the government means shareholders' equity in WaMu was wiped out. The deal leaves private equity investors including the firm TPG Capital, which led a $7 billion cash infusion in the bank this spring, on the sidelines empty handed.

WaMu ran into trouble after it got caught up in the once-booming subprime mortgage business. Troubles then spread to other parts of WaMu's home loan portfolio, namely its "option" adjustable-rate mortgage loans. Option ARM loans offer very low introductory payments and let borrowers defer some interest payments until later years. The bank stopped originating those loans in June.

Problems in WaMu's home loan business began to surface in 2006, when the bank reported that the division lost $48 million, compared with net income of about $1 billion in 2005.

At the start of 2007, following the release of the company's annual financial report, then-CEO Kerry Killinger said the bank had prepared for a slowdown in its housing business by sharply reducing its subprime mortgage lending and servicing of loans. Alan H. Fishman, the former president and chief operating officer of Sovereign Bank and president and CEO of Independence Community Bank, replaced Killinger earlier this month.

As more borrowers became delinquent on their mortgages, WaMu worked to help troubled customers refinance their loans as a way to avoid default and foreclosure, committing $2 billion to the effort last April. But that proved to be too little, too late.

At the same time, fears of growing credit problems kept investors from purchasing debt backed by those loans, drying up a source of cash flow for banks that made subprime loans.

In December, WaMu said it would shutter its subprime lending business and reduce expenses with layoffs and a dividend cut.

The bank in July reported a $3 billion second-quarter loss — the biggest in its history — as it boosted its reserves to more than $8 billion to cover losses on bad loans. Over the last three quarters, it added $10.9 billion to its loan-loss provisions.

JPMorgan Chase said it was not acquiring any senior unsecured debt, subordinated debt, and preferred stock of WaMu's banks, or any assets or liabilities of the holding company, Washington Mutual Inc. JPMorgan also said it will not take on the lawsuits facing the holding company.

JPMorgan Chase said the acquisition will give it 5,400 branches in 23 states, and that it plans to close less than 10 percent of the two companies' branches.

The WaMu acquisition would add 50 cents per share to JPMorgan's earnings in 2009, the bank said, adding that it expects to have pretax merger costs of approximately $1.5 billion while achieving pretax savings of approximately $1.5 billion by 2010.

"This is a definite win for JPMorgan," said Sebastian Hindman, an analyst at SNL Financial, who said JPMorgan should be able to shoulder the $31 billion writedown to WaMu's portfolio.

___

AP Business Writers Marcy Gordon in Washington and Sara Lepro in New York contributed to this report.

  • 7 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
4.8
1.5
1.1
{"commentId":3132570,"authorDomain":"netprophet"}

As a former victim of Providian/WaMu's f@#k the consumer business practices, I have to say that this one actually feels good. How does it feel to have your predatory a$$e$ hung out to dry, @!$%#es?

Amid all the gloom and doom, it's actually satisfying to know that some of these @!$%#es might be feeling a fraction of the pain that they have inflicted with callous disregard for anyone but themselves.

{"commentId":3132570,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"netprophet"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:13 PM EDT
{"commentId":3133012,"authorDomain":"perceptions1"}

Ok...Im an employee at "WAMU" now...here's the F*C*3D-UP part: Instead of getting an email from the "boss" Alan Fishman of wamu.....WE get an email from Jaime Dimon, CEO of JPMORGAN at 8:14cst, EXACTLY ONE MINUTE when it was nationally announced!!! What a SNAKE-FACED COWARD!!!!...some of us were totally left in the DARK about whether or not we would be bought out. I knew better. Thank god for mortage payment insurance.

{"commentId":3133012,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"perceptions1"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:32 PM EDT
{"commentId":3133351,"authorDomain":"netprophet"}

Looks like they screw their own just as hard...at least they're consistent.

{"commentId":3133351,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"netprophet"}
  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:47 PM EDT
{"commentId":3133508,"authorDomain":"perceptions1"}

Trust me...Im not a manager of the sort and if I was, I would not bullS*** people that work for me like that..been through 3 mergers with 3 different companies..ALL these corps are the same...they only look out for the shareholders. Period.

They deserve what they get.

"Looks like they screw their own just as hard...at least they're consistent."

Thanks for the laugh...I needed it.

Just had to vent, since they took down the company "blog" all of a sudden. HA!

{"commentId":3133508,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"perceptions1"}
  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:54 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3132900,"authorDomain":"cyan412000"}

maybe this is why they needed the 700 billion so quickly? JpMorgan is gonna make a ton of money off this trust me.

maybe we should let the markets devoure each other...its cheaper anyway. Thats when assests become cheap...AFTER the failure...although am sure some fat cats lost a bundle on WaMu...oh well i wasnt invested with them lol

{"commentId":3132900,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"cyan412000"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:28 PM EDT
{"commentId":3133042,"authorDomain":"perceptions1"}

Hell im an employee (for the time being) and I never invested with WAMU!!

{"commentId":3133042,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"perceptions1"}
  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:33 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":3133899,"authorDomain":"cyan412000"}

The deal will cost JPMorgan Chase $1.9 billion, and the bank said in a statement it planned to write down WaMu's loan portfolio by approximately $31 billion. JPMorgan Chase, which acquired Bear Stearns Cos. last March, also said it would sell $8 billion in common stock to raise its capital position.

The FDIC, which insures bank deposits, said it would not have to dip into the insurance fund as a result of the seizure.

sounds like JpMorgan should be allowed to buy up all the toxic debt...they seem to want it. could be smart and drop the interest on every failing mortgage and make a ton of money...if they took the paper..wrote down the interest to say 3% very nice incentive for people to keep thier homes..they would be making a solid 3% interest over 30 years..house regain value over time...they sell them for a profit.

hell let JP morgan be the new fannie and freddie

{"commentId":3133899,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"cyan412000"}
    Reply#3 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
    {"commentId":3133942,"authorDomain":"cyan412000"}

    acutally i think the banks need to fail for this to work...thats what actually happened with the RTC..and people who had more than 100k in one account and didnt spread it out knowing that banks were in trouble deserve to lose...pain in the ass to do..i now have 3 banks and and several other assets spread out all over.

    {"commentId":3133942,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"cyan412000"}
      Reply#4 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:16 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3134139,"authorDomain":"qeckit"}

      No bailout, let them all fail and let the chips fall where they may.

      {"commentId":3134139,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"qeckit"}
        Reply#5 - Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:25 PM EDT
        {"commentId":3136740,"authorDomain":"boredwell"}

        what is the real fallout of the bailout? well, jp morgan, chase and berkshire hathway are two that come to mind. of course, japan has bought lehman bros euopean and middle east operations intact. while, yes, the so-called free market should let the dominos fall and let them lie there, too, the other story has not yet emerged.

        between the bickering parties, there are those banking entities that, already giants, are,via their bargain basement purchases today of yesterday's goliaths, now gargantuan banking monopolies. that the resources of capital are in the hands of so few does not bode well for free market enterprise. where's the competition going to come from? and, what next? will faltering bank of america become part of morgan chase, too? will warren buffett snap it up thereby becoming overnight the latest mega-banker of the hour?

        herein lies the consequences of the bailout and the attendant kneejerk reaction to clear it up. but at what price exactly willl lit cost to us just for getting swept out from beneath the carpet? vultures of all stripes national and international are hovering to pick the carcass while some meat still remains of its bones.

        we seem not to be paying attention. have we not learned that for every balance there is a counter balance?seems we've decided to sweep deregulation, scrutiny and federal oversight under another carpet and deal with it later instead of deciding on how we might put in place better measures to help prevent a future reoccurrence. i wager that once the table is cleared the remains of the day will come back to haunt us tomorrow.

        {"commentId":3136740,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"boredwell"}
          Reply#6 - Fri Sep 26, 2008 2:52 AM EDT
          {"commentId":3137277,"authorDomain":"medwardallen"}

          well now as a counter proposal i'd like to suggest the following agenda.i propose that we give the mafia10 billion dollars ,a list of all the top executives and brokers involved and amnesty to go get the truth.first we know the mafia are crooks,we also know they never lose money,and by paying them to question all parties involved,we know they'd find something.it's a better idea than giving 700 billion to a political hack and the head of the fed. reserve as i'm fairly positive that he is just as guilty as his crony friends on wall street.i'd also like to suggest that company ceo's be paid not one cent more than 500 times the amount as the lowest paid employee,that thier bonus be directly tied to a companies performance,with a mandatory retirement of 2/3 of thier best 5 year as ceo.that proxy votes be polled to prevent a companies board from rubber stamping ceo performance.it's time to get back to honesty,integrity,and justice in America.this could not have happened in the 50's,when the world looked at our leaders,both political and financial as models of ethical morality,and not as corrupt demi-gods with no more honor than a common whore.well thats my thought on that ,

          {"commentId":3137277,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"medwardallen"}
            Reply#7 - Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:02 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3137976,"authorDomain":"bcsnc"}

            So, once again after fighting with WaMu about bad loan decisions, that I should be removed for the overall pile of dead loan with no possible recovery, folks already months in the rears etc., then there were the loans in the same pile that needed to be reviewed for potential help or assistance and worked out, and finally guys like me that made every payment on time, in full, but they said they are taking them all off the top of the pile as they work through this situation, no exceptions. It took truly covert tactics to get to the guys at the top, there was one 800 number and you never could get somebody to answer a question, they refused to refer it to a supervisor, and never gave up a corporate customer service persons name or phone number. I only was able to get them to listen by reading all the articles I could via the internet, and get names then act like I was a friend of business person that had business with the bank, you know VIP, (in reality I did have business and as it seems maybe more of the little guys like me were VIP's had WaMu taken action). Again, after pounding them for 9 months at a depletion of my funds as well at $3413., a month, never late and an interest rate of 8.9%, they finally... after me calling their corporate office and visiting every office and VP they had in town, they in August 08 almost a year later, adjusted my good standing to a win/win not greed situation. I pay them 3.1 percent for the first year of the loan amount which reduced the loan payment to $1914. as they were probably paying for their money at a rate of 2.1, not a huge profit for them but it allowed them to make some money and me to keep my house and the loan current. I predicted and told everyone at WaMu I talked to, that if they didn't change their ways of handing the reality of the realty and people and work with situations, they would fall hard, and I got no way we have plenty of reserves, now this! It's hard to get my head around their positioning like currently with government... if they give these old boat anchors of Corporate America the Bailout, you know they are going to take it, pass it around amongst themselves, do nothing for us and run with it... oh and I am sure a few of our politicians will have something in their pockets too for their fine efforts of diverting the real deal, and to tell us to be very afraid... everyone, we are going to save you from yourselves. Yes the same guys that cause this mess the crooks that took this country down the day the Bush Administration took over the Clinton White House with about one trillion dollars in reserves, and a projection if they stuck to the plan of 6 trillion over 5 years, not to mention houseing and job were very healthy, the economy was great, lenders were not making silly deals, the balance was getting better for offshore American companies to hold fast on not to much selling off of American commerce, and jobs with a reasonable return were to be had, we didn't have several wars known and secret, the Russians were not restarting their military USSR mind set as they are at this time, and this list could go on. So, I am so confused as to why the people of this country allowed 8 years of the current administration... to allow what they did politically and to allow and encourage Corporate American to sell the people off like slaves to their whims? To terrorize the population though certain known situations and completely diverted and make up bad policy, to basically blindfold the country while they and Corporate American pillaged the countryside, what did it do to make anything better? This will go down in the history books like some awful Stalin dictatorship, or bad on top of bad administration, and that pretty much includes all of the politicians. I just don't know how they honestly believed they could pull this off and not eventually get caught with their hand in the cookie jar?

            {"commentId":3137976,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"bcsnc"}
            • 1 vote
            Reply#8 - Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:47 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3148099,"authorDomain":"netprophet"}

            I just don't know how they honestly believed they could pull this off and not eventually get caught with their hand in the cookie jar?

            because all they needed was a few scare tactics and diversions come election time and all was forgotten...the American people voted for these people like sheep and now they're wondering where all their wool has gone...

            a bit verbose, Le, but yea, it sounds like the corporate culture to me

            {"commentId":3148099,"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433","authorDomain":"netprophet"}
              Reply#9 - Fri Sep 26, 2008 2:54 PM EDT
              {"canLink":false,"threadId":"368700","isPrivate":false}
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              {"threadId":"368700","contentId":"1914433"}
              Start TrackingStart Tracking
              Stop TrackingStop Tracking