Sold to American taxpayers for up to $700 billion: an unprecedented plan to buy distressed banks' least desirable mortgage assets.
What started as a fairly simple three-page proposal giving the Treasury Secretary unchecked power to orchestrate a bailout of the country's financial system ended up as a complex rescue package, with enhanced congressional oversight, some added protections for taxpayers and a slap on the wrist to highly paid, underperforming executives.
The ultimate goal of the plan remains the same: buy bad mortgage-related bets from weakened financial companies so they can raise fresh capital and resume normal lending operations to businesses, municipalities and consumers.
Under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which is expected to come to a vote in the House on Monday, the Treasury Department gets $250 billion immediately to start buying up banks' and other financial institutions' least valuable mortgages and complex financial instruments backed by those mortgages.
If needed, an additional $100 billion is available at the discretion of the president, and a final $350 billion is on the table, unless Congress resolves to take it back. The president has the authority to veto such a resolution.
The measure also proposes limited caps on the pay and benefit packages of companies who receive the government rescue, strengthens government oversight of the program and adds an insurance program for financial companies' bad assets.
While Democratic negotiators made significant changes to the plan Paulson sent Congress a week ago, they did not get everything they had sought, particularly more help for troubled homeowners.
House Republicans, meanwhile, fought hard for — and won — a provision that would establish a program whereby banks could buy government insurance to back the principal and interest on certain troubled assets, rather than selling them outright. They argued this was a better deal for taxpayers, and would reduce the overall cost of the rescue package.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson told negotiators that he believed the insurance plan would have only limited benefits.
While the plan broadly aims to prevent banks from profiting on the sale of troubled assets to the government, there is an exception made for assets acquired in a merger or buyout, or from companies that have filed for bankruptcy.
This detail could allow JPMorgan Chase & Co. to sell toxic mortgages and other assets it gained control of last week when it purchased Washington Mutual Inc. for a higher price than the failed thrift paid for them.
The government will only buy mortgage investments originated on or before March 14, 2008.
Responding to the outcry of constituents, Congress structured the bailout in a way that sets limits on executive compensation at companies whose bad debt is purchased by the government. Lawmakers also established various oversight boards including one with members appointed by Congress and another whose members will include the Treasury secretary and the chairman of the Federal Reserve.
Despite all the oversight and restrictions Congress added to Paulson's original proposal, the Treasury secretary will still have wide latitude in deciding such things as how to value the toxic assets and what experts to hire to run the program.
Paulson, who lost in an effort to have his decisions exempted from congressional review, has indicated that he expects to use a type of "reverse" auction in which the companies with the winning bids will be the ones willing to take less, say 50 cents on the dollar rather than 60 cents on the dollar, for the assets.
Private analysts said they believe the plan will give critical support to the financial system, helping to establish a vibrant market for hundreds of billions of dollars in mortgage assets that at the moment can't be priced because no one wants to purchase them.
Brian Bethune, chief U.S. financial economist for Global Insight, a Lexington, Mass., economic consulting firm, said Sunday that he believed the bailout plan "will provide some critical life support for the U.S. financial system, which has been hit by a very dangerous escalation in volatility in turmoil since early July."
Asked on CBS's "60 Minutes" Sunday night what the government will do if the $700 billion plan doesn't work, Paulson said, "It's gotta do it and we're going to make this work and we're going to do what it takes to work."
Among the key segments of the bill:
_EXECUTIVE PAY. Restrictions would be imposed on the compensation received by executives whose companies sell some of their bad assets through the government's purchase program. There would be tax restrictions on executive pay over $500,000 and limits on so-called "golden parachutes" for executives who leave the companies getting government bailouts.
_OVERSIGHT. The Treasury will be required to provide details of its purchases of bad assets within two days of the transaction. Oversight boards would be created including one with members selected by Democratic and Republican leaders in the House and Senate and one that will include top government officials.
_TAXPAYER PROTECTION. Taxpayers would be given ownership stakes in companies whose bad assets are purchased and after five years if the government is facing a loss in the program then the president will be required to submit a plan on how to recoup a portion of the losses from the companies that participated in the program.
A proposal floated that did not make the final version of the bill:
— HELP FOR TROUBLED HOMEOWNERS. They failed in an effort to give judges the power to modify mortgage terms for people who have filed for bankruptcy and Democrats were unable to get approval for part of any profits the government might receive to go to help people facing mortgage defaults.
Due 30 Sep. 2008, link: Http://www.investopedia.com.
Article Title: Today's Macro Economy - '' Candid Suppressed Inflation ''
What makes impeccable ' Trade Balance ' tick and push economies on a rebound scale - notched echoed by:
1. > Control of Trade Surplus. - Bountiful existence of commerce by the able international traders leave the domestic market open handed to accept their price distinguished export goods ( and on such period - giving less competition to imports ) - For example. American firms making electronic chips possibly economically ( like cheaper ) export them from outside internally accepted Manufacturing firms ( like Taiwan ) which could estimate half ( 0.5 ) billion of US Dollars per year.
2. > Igniting Trade deficit (as impaired imbalance). - Craft wares kind of commerce within select A.T.Z. - Advance Technology Zone areas relieve a hassle-free profit when they could import - either as parts or carry-over products - to their benefiting overseas client traders ( on such period exceeding exports ) - For example, Leather goods often are derivative from ' tanned - skin ' of farm animals - yet overseas market (producers-often) pay at - cost from USA firms ( Somehow, stores of the big malls show the ' expensive ' quality price attached to each item around ( like duty-free shops around the world ) - could estimate to a quarter (0.25) billions US Dollars per year.
My analysis goes. Economists never dictate but calculate ( are there really unproductive executives as mentioned in the article above? ). Such phenomenon forsake itself ( unintentionally ) on a candid suppressed ( like resisted price increases) inflation. Ridiculously, irreversible impact of either excessive trade on imports or exports - merely encourages ' opportunistic ' business firms. (Specially, those with a lot of retail store branches.
[Invitation to all: View my ideas at: Http://www.jerwelman.newsvine.com]
Odd how "they" did the same exact bailout in the 1990's when other banks were able to buy the "good" assests and the American taxpayer obtained the bad debt.
I believe that the American taxpayer still made money on that "bad debt" or so the government says.
As a moderate-conservative, I just hope that the Democrats can package a bill that these silly House Republicans will buy off on. Hard to believe that a handfull of House Republicans can bring Wall Street and Main Street to their knees with the shooting down of just one bill... Hey, remember when you had money in your 401K? Ahhh, those were the times!!!
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |