Bill Clinton is playing a starring role in a John McCain commercial. And here's the ad's kicker: "You're right Mr. President."
Fancy that. The Republican presidential nominee with a tip of the hat to the last Democratic president.
A new minute-long McCain commercial features the former president asserting that congressional Democrats could have done more to regulate the nation's major mortgage financiers.
In a clip taken from a Sept. 25 interview on ABC's "Good Morning America," Clinton says: "I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress, or by me when I was president, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."
The ad is one of a flurry of commercials with economic themes that emerged Tuesday as Congress continued to struggle with a rescue plan for tanking financial markets. Obama released a new two-minute commercial denouncing the tax policies of the past eight years, and the Republican National Committee went on the air with $5 million worth of air time in Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.
The McCain ad casts the Arizona senator as an advocate of tighter regulation on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That assertion is true. McCain was a co-sponsor of legislation in 2006 that would have placed more restrictions on the mortgage finance companies.
Though not shown in the ad, Clinton goes on in the interview to blame a decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission to do away with a rule that restricted short selling.
"The biggest mistake, by the way, that contributed to the current circumstance that almost nobody talks about is the repeal, after decades, of something called the uptick rule, which allows the hedge funds, heavily leveraged and others, to just drive down the market without any kind of automatic stoppers," Clinton said.
While too complicated to pitch in an ad, that view also seems to support McCain. The Republican candidate has called on SEC chairman Christopher Cox to resign.
Indeed, the Clinton interview holds several nuggets that McCain can savor.
Commenting on McCain's suggestion last week that the first presidential debate be delayed until the rescue package was negotiated, Clinton said: "I presume he did that in good faith since I know he wanted — I remember he asked for more debates to go all around the country and so I don't think we ought to overly parse that."
The McCain ad and its finger-pointing at Democrats came out on the same day McCain was in Des Moines, Iowa, issuing a call for bipartisanship on the financial crisis. "I will continue to do whatever I can to aid in a constructive answer to the challenge before us," he said.
The campaign announced the ad about the same time.
The Republican National Committee's ad takes an even tougher line, taking a critical tone on the bailout even as McCain says he is working on a deal.
"Wall Street squanders our money and Washington is forced to bail them out with, you guessed it, our money," an announcer says.
The ad states Obama plans to increase spending, beyond the bailout, by about a trillion dollars.
"New taxes, new spending, new debt," the ad states. "Barack Obama's plan. It'll make the problem worse."
One of the most detailed analysis of candidates spending is by the National Taxpayers' Union Foundation, a group that is generally opposed to higher spending. Under its analysis, Obama's various government proposals would increase yearly spending by $293 billion.
The trillion dollar figure is reached by expanding that spending over a four-year presidential term.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton accused the RNC of seeking to "demagogue a rescue plan that he supports in order to score cheap political points." Brad Todd, the Republican strategist in charge of the RNC's independent expenditure arm, shot back: "In last Friday's debate Sen. Obama struggled to name even one spending proposal he'd rescind in light of our current financial problem."
I have never liked the Clintons as much as I have in the past few years. Yes, it true I am looking forward to a head to head in 2012, Clinton vs. Palin. It is my thought that both Hillary and Sarah rock. I will whole heartily vote for a female for President or Vice President, before I vote for a Arab passing as a black man.
Wow. You know what's great about this country?
Even idiots like you have the right to vote.
Of course, idiots like you got us INTO this mess in the first place...but that's DEMOCRACY for ya.
You go get 'em, Diana.
Then... just keep going.
Far, far away... to the Land of Long Ago Debunked Email Lies.
Pittsburg Dan
SnotRag Dave
FYI, I voted for Kerry, so just keep thinking you know everything. And you know who I am. The depth of your understanding of anything is 2cm.. Hope you know what your assumption makes you to look like. lol
Both Clintons have done their part to contribute to McCain ads, and they knew what they were doing when they did it. They sat on their hands in 2004 when Kerry could have used their support so 2008 would be Hillary's shot. Hillary's last shot will be 2012 because 2016 will be a little late.
I do believe the Clintons don't think our country will survive another four years of Republican leadership, but I also kinda sorta think they don't really care. But they're in a tough spot, having to act like they wholeheartedly support Obama, and they did a pretty good acting job during the convention.
I think Hillary has tried hard to support Obama more than Bill has.
I agree with that. Hillary has been a pretty good sport.
The more we try to blame Democrats or Republicans, the more the guilty ones actually get away.
Cut the corporate ties to our government to solve the problem. Put the government in the people's hands, not the businesses!
Both Sides Suck but ones worse that's McCain and Palin who are Weak and Behind so they will try anything most people are fed up and who listens to Bill Clinton anyway.
i am impresed by senator mccains attemptes to help the country through this economic failure.
He suspended his campaign to go to Washington supposedly to convince his colleagues in the House to support this bill. They didn't... by a two to one margin. I see nothing "impressive" about that...
Apparently, on the morning of September 24, Harry Reid told the White House that Democrats wanted McCain's support for the Bush administration bill or democrats would not sign on. From September 24 CFO.com: "Fearing a political backlash against Democrats, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has told the White House that it must serve up support from Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) if it hopes to ensure bipartisan backing for a massive economic bailout package by week's end." Based on Reid's demand that McCain be involved, McCain announced he would return to Washington to try to get the bill through with Republican support. Then, according to ABC News, as soon as McCain said he would return, Reid announced that it would "not be helpful" for McCain to "inject presidential politics" into the negotiations.
Folks? This is what we call a set up. I try very hard not to resort to vile epithets but, boy, I just can't think of enough foul things to say about Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the Democrats. This is just awful... just unspeakably awful.
.
Thanks for your service, Vet. But did you know that McCain has one of the worst records in the senate for supporting Vets? Checkout VoteVets.org. He also voted against the GI Bill.
The time for President Clinton's lukewarm endorsement of Senator Obama at every opportunity and the great respect he so easily pays to Senator McCain at every opportunity must come to an end today or he will risk being labeled by his political party as "just another Lieberman" and in turn lose his great legacy he so obviously cherishes.
With Bill Clinton, it's always, ALWAYS personal. Even though I never voted for Clinton, I readily accepted the "will of the people" and wished him well in office. I appreciate that he did a pretty good job for eight years, and I was better off when he left office than I was when he started.
And I could never work up the insane, obsessive hatred for Bill that my (at the time) fellow Republicans did just because he has a roving eye and a taste for knick-knacks. Like Republican politicians don't get "sexual favors" from women who are not their wives?
I sure as hell would have voted for a third Bill Clinton term over George W. if I could have, and I still would.
But just when I'd begun to miss Bill, he comes back and reminds me "Okay, NOW I remember why I never voted for this guy..." Hillary would have fared much better without him. He didn't help HER, either.
Apparently Bill has gotten today's message as he is finally without any reservation and with great passion campaign speaking on Senator Obama's behalf right now on MSNBC.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |