President Bush reached out to European leaders on Tuesday to urge coordination on efforts to solve the financial crisis spreading around the globe. The White House said Bush was open to the idea of a leaders' summit on the economic upheaval.
Bush talked with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi.
With unemployment rising and businesses unable to get credit, White House press secretary Dana Perino offered a gloomy forecast for the economy. "Obviously, this next quarter is probably not going to be a very good one," she said. She said Americans are feeling the impact. "They're probably not looking forward to next month's statement, when they get their retirement fund or their college fund bank statement," Perino said.
Bush was to speak about the economy later in the day during a visit to an office products firm in suburban Chantilly, Va.
"He will acknowledge the concerns and the anxieties that Americans are having about the funds that they've saved for college or the funds they've saved for retirement, and the still-volatile financial markets, and the understandable anxiety that that has created over the past several weeks," Perino said.
"He will explain how the credit freeze is a problem that could affect everybody up and down the economic food chain," she said.
Perino said the administration was focusing on a meeting at the end of the week of finance ministers from the United States, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Canada and Japan, the so-called G-7. At the same time, she left the door open for Bush to attend an emergency leaders' meeting suggested by Sarkozy.
"The president obviously talked to President Sarkozy about his idea to have a meeting. The president's open to that," she said.
"But the immediate focus is on this weekend's meeting because we're still in a situation where we have an emergency where we need to act today and not worry too much about a meeting," Perino said. "We want to make sure that everyone's on the same page when they get there so that it can be an effective and efficient meeting."
She said the United States was satisfied with the level of cooperation now among European allies on the crisis.
"I think that he would say that it is sufficient and that they are talking and that they're communicating," Perino said. "It's critical that everybody gets on the same page."
"Not everybody has dotted all the i's and crossed the t's yet on their plans," she said. "I think that they're continuing to work on them. So we're satisfied with the level of effort and coordination, but I don't think anybody has an end result yet."
Not just no, but hell no! No more lifetime appointments of any kind until after the inauguration of President Obama.
RDS, padding the judiciary is one of the oldest tricks in the book (dispicable, yes--but typical). Its history goes back to Marbury v Madison (1803), where exiting President John Adams appointed a Justice of the Peace, Marbury, to office in the eleventh hour of his presidency (one of many he appointed in this manner). Jefferson, the incoming president, decided he would not recognize the appointment. This gave rise to perhaps one of the most important decisions in Constitutional Law history--the power of Judicial Review. Marbury never did get his office; but Chief Justice Marshall really rammed it to the Executive and Legislative branches.
Another big example of padding is under FDR. He didnt like the fact that (based on the Marbury decision) Jusitices were decimating his New Deal. FDR decided to "expand" the Supreme Court by adding more Justices (all of which would, of course, be his appointees). Well, as we all know (or should know) there are still only 9 justices on the Supreme Court. So that ploy didnt go over.
I cant think of an exiting President who hasnt try to "pad" the courts with their appointees as they make their way off the national stage. Bush is no exception. We can only hope that we've learned something from the past and not allow, even outlaw, 11th hour life-time appointments.
If this isn't enough to remind Democrats that they can't take anything for granted, then we're just not paying attention.
I am Jeremiah Johnson and I say "Hell No" til after the election and swearing in.
"Hurry and pass this law, pass that one, time is running out! Put my friends on the Supreme Court before I leave! Hurry! Democrats will be to blame if the world destructs in the next few weeks...... unless you hurry up and make my fantasies come true!"
Bye, W.
Sadly, amidst all the fears of economic collapse, home mortgage foreclosures, energy costs out of control and the Iraq and Afghan wars, most people dont stop to consider the ramifications of Bush's 11th hour appointees to the Federal Courts. This kind of talk rises to the foreground, if at all, chiefly during appointments to the Supreme Court.
What people have to understand is that these (federal) judges are the ones who will interpret and implement the laws, as they view them, on a daily basis. Their decisions affect us more closely than the Supreme Court's. Matters will only get to the Supreme Court if (a) there is a large disparity in opinion on a single issue among the sister circuits (b) the issue involves a constitutional question (c) if the Court elects, suo sponte, to review a case.
Blocking or prohibitng 11th hour appointments by an outgoing administration--especially one with the disasterous record of the Bush Administration-- should be a national imperative. We dont need the ghost of Cheney/Gonzalez/Rove haunting us years into the future.
God forbid.
Careful, I believe "God" is now an officially owned copyright of the GOP. Or at least they think so.
Bush is to stupid to know when to stop, that why we have a bail out bill that will help other countries banks. To bad Bush, McCain and Obama wasn't honest with us sense they all new. How does it feel to have your tax dollars going to help other country banks and lenders.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |