The debate season that has chewed up its moderators comes to a close Wednesday when John McCain and Barack Obama meet for the third time, with CBS News' Bob Schieffer directing the discussion.
The veteran "Face the Nation" host won't telegraph what he will ask. But he said he will be seeking more details about their potential presidencies than have been evident so far.
"By now we've all heard their talking points," he said. "We've heard the general outlines of what they are talking about. The time has come to be a little more specific."
Jim Lehrer, Gwen Ifill and Tom Brokaw had great plans going into their debates, too. Each had their own frustrations.
Lehrer tried hard to get McCain and Obama to speak directly to the other when it was evident they didn't want to.
During the vice presidential debate, Republican Sarah Palin took pride in not answering Ifill's questions. "She blew me off," a bemused Ifill said later.
The advantages of a town hall style meeting were muted in Brokaw's presidential debate. The longtime NBC newsman was spoofed by his own network's "Saturday Night Live" for overseeing a dry debate: "From this list of penetrating, insightful and provocative questions, I have chosen the eight least interesting," said Brokaw impersonator Chris Parnell.
The "SNL" skit's running gag was about debate rules with time so short that Brokaw cut off the contenders before they could answer a question.
"Why can't we have a debate that allows the candidates to go deeper into the issues and actually engage each other?" wondered Richard Greene, a public speaking coach and author of "Words That Shook the World: 100 Years of Unforgettable Speeches and Events." "At this point the moderator stands in the way and it's the fault of the campaigns for setting up these rules."
The two candidates will sit at the same table for the third debate, so close that will be able to reach out and touch each other. Schieffer hopes this will encourage more interaction.
He's not reluctant to press the men to stay on point.
"It will not embarrass me, if they go off in a different direction, to say `excuse me, could you focus on the question that I just asked?'" he said.
Good luck.
"He'll try," said Vincent Hutchings, a political science professor at the University of Michigan. "But they're pretty good at avoiding that."
It's always a tough call for a journalist in this situation. Do you ask the question, and trust that it's evident to viewers when the candidate is completely ignoring it? Or do you press persistently, taking the risk that your conduct becomes the issue as much as the question itself — as CNN's Campbell Brown found when her questioning of a McCain aide angered the campaign.
Bruce Cain, director of the Washington program for the University of California at Berkeley, said he hoped Schieffer could compel the candidates to speak more specifically about the steps they would take to solve the economic crisis, both short- and long-term.
"We didn't, as many people have noted, hear anything in the (second) debate that we didn't hear three months ago, other than they support the bailout plan," Cain said.
That's not entirely true, as McCain used the forum to discuss a plan to buy the mortgages of struggling homeowners. Making new proposals carry a risk; MSNBC's measurement of what undecided Republican voters were thinking while listening to the debate found an immediate negative reaction to the idea.
To a certain extent, the debates at this stage are almost moderator-proof, Cain said. The candidates have long since figured out what they do or don't want to say, and they've had a year's worth of practice making their points in regular debates.
"It may be that our expectations of what the debates are all about have to be adjusted to reality," Cain said.
Sam Feist, political director at CNN, said he believed the debate's format allows for some flexibility. "It sets the stage for the last debate to be the most interesting of the debates," he said.
Since he knew he would be moderating the debate, Schieffer has been clipping articles and consulting think-tank experts to come up with ideas for questions. He was sitting down to read the transcript of the first two sessions.
When he moderated a Bush-Kerry debate, Schieffer showed up with three times as many questions as he had time to ask. He said he had a nightmare that all of his questions had been used up with a half-hour to go.
He believes the election is still very close and many people will finally make up their minds based on what they see on Wednesday.
"I don't want to think about it too much," he said, "but I think it could very well determine who our next president will be."
___
On the Net:
___
EDITOR'S NOTE — David Bauder can be reached at dbauder"at"ap.org
Go getem Bob, we need someone to ask the hard questions, probe them deeper on the issues, and not let them carry their own agenda. Good Luck Bob, the United States will be watching and making their decisions.
I agree, not a single tough question has been asked of the candidates. Ever since Bush stopped answering hypotheticals, no politicians have been required to. This is frustrating because hypotheticals give an important look into the inner workings of the future presidents mind. Please encourage Bob to probe the candidates w/purely hypothetical questions such as, "Sen. Obama, it's 2010, you are into the second year of your administration and India launches a nuclear assault on pakistan, how do you respond?". It would demonstrate a complex situation where multiple allies go to war against eachother, and an appropriate response would reflect a dynamic understanding of alliances and policy.....that's my $0.02 anyhow
Would love to hear each candidate discuss who they are considering for cabinet positions. It's not just about the leader, it's about the leadership team... Cheney, Rumsfield, Rove, et.
me too honestly....but that would give us way to much time to vet those people....think a little blogger!!! :P
Gawds what is that growing on Schieffer's face????????
I can't take my eyes off of it.
Perhaps they're tying to make McCain look healthy and virile by comparison?
or it's a microphone....duh.
Lol.. I was gunna ask the same thing.. :s i'm relieved it's a mic tho.. phew!
Well I just hope he is willing to let the candidates actually debate, and not silence them like brokaw did...Let them get out there and kick some butt, I want to see an active debate and not fall asleep like the last one.
it's not the moderator....it's the content of the questions that make a debate active/boring. Moderators are there to maintain civility (i.e. prevent name calling or misstatement of facts), not make it more exciting.
More than active, i really need at least one of these candidates to solicit the help of "We The People"... every great President has asked The American Population to take a part of their life and "Do-Something-To-Help" -
After WWII, children were asked to save 'tin-cans' [For Japan]
Kennedy asked a generation to "Serve" to Take Science/Math and "Go To The Moon"
These two keep talking about "Their" Plans, proposals, position papers, policies- and Bush asked us to "SHOP" ...come-on now... we can RE-LEARN how to save, like our great-grand-parents, re-learn to not borrow more than we should (forget those cheating Credit-Rating-Agencies that are a part of the 'usury-system' (credit cards/plastic world-order) and we can re-learn to shut the refrigerator door, cut the DVD/TIVO OFF when we leave our rooms, use lay-away, walk more, ride bikes to the Mall ... + + +
Deggggggg, Ask us to sacrifice something, ask the Rich to pay in more and forego a few "Tax-Loop-holes" for the sake of "...the least among us..."
We are a great people.... challenge us and see!
More than active, i really need at least one of these candidates to solicit the help of "We The People"... every great President has asked The American Population to take a part of their life and "Do-Something-To-Help" -
After WWII, children were asked to save 'tin-cans' [For Japan]
Kennedy asked a generation to "Serve" to Take Science/Math and "Go To The Moon"
These two keep talking about "Their" Plans, proposals, position papers, policies- and Bush asked us to "SHOP" ...come-on now... we can RE-LEARN how to save, like our great-grand-parents, re-learn to not borrow more than we should (forget those cheating Credit-Rating-Agencies that are a part of the 'usury-system' (credit cards/plastic world-order)
A debate is not just to answer questions that they talk about on the stump, its also for the American people to get to know the candidates and their differences...They need to be able to have free dialogue and be able to ask questions of one another
Bob, hope you get a real debate going with these two.Though I realize the debate program is set, I wonder if there would be any time to offer a very brief review of the Constitution, where it specifies that the Legislature shall be in "charge" of the country's revenues and stipulating any call to defense, not the Executive branch, and then if could you ask the following of the two Presidential candidates: "What would you do, as President, if a Majority party rule of the Legislature (not your own) failed or refused to enact measures or legislation necessary to abate or otherwise avoid an economic/defense or like kind crisis".
Looking forward to a revealing debate.
I hope Bob Schieffer succeeds in asking and getting answers to the tough and important questions. And, I hope he will try very hard to hold the candidates accountable with follow ups when he recognizes them evading questions or departing from the truth in their responses.
On some issues I wouldn't even mind if the candidates honestly confessed they didn't know the answer yet, and just replied that they would seek to find out the answer.
And, inevitably there are going be certain things that the winning candidate won't know about until briefings between election day and the day of taking the oath of office. Obviously the career government employees who run much of the government know much more about many aspects of it than the two senators running for President.
Life issue has never been asked in debates, although it is a FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE upon which all other issues are based upon. Without LIFE, EVERTHING ELSE is MEANINGLESS. What benifit does having money have, if the RIGHT TO LIFE IS THREATENED?
Mainstream media TRY TO PROTECT OBAMA, AVOIDING SOMETHING DAMAGING FOR Obama Campaign. I hope that Bob Sheifer ask this IMPORTANT QUESTION, unlike other moderators.
Obama, the MOST LIBERAL SENATOR, VOTED four times AGAINST providing medical care to NEW BORN BABIES, (INFANTICIDE) in Illinois Senate. This is SO CRUEL that even Nanci Pelosi with all other senotors VOTED FOR the identical federal bill, BORN ALIVE INFANT PROTECTION ACT.(Abortion is allowed JUST before UNTILL DELIVERY IN U.S.A. So a woman is allowed to go to a delivery room or to an abortionist TO KILL THE BABY.)
I HOPE HE WILL ASK THE CANDIDATES TO BE HONEST ABOUT THEMSELVES. IT SEEMS THE MODERATORS ONLY ASK QUESTION THEY FEEL WON'T HURT THIER BOY OBAMA. LETS PUT THE CARDS OUT ON THE TABLE OF BOTH CANDIDATES. BETTER YET BOTH CANDIDATES HAVE THIER PROPOSALS ALL SET LETS BRING THEM OUT IN BLACK AND WHITE ON THE TABLE. THE SAME AS THE STATE OF ILL. I LIVE IN A STATE WHERE THE DEMOCRATS SAID ONE THING AT ELECTION TIME AND I GOT RIGHT WHERE I SIT. OBAMA CAN'T PUT A SOLID PROPOSAL DOWN BECAUSE HE DON'T HAVE ONE, THE SAME AS HE CAN'T ANSWER A DIRECT QUESTION WITHOUT STONEWALLIMG IT AS A SMEAR.
REMEMBER THE BUSH TAX CUTS THAT HE WANTS TO SUSPEND MEANS A TAX HIKE WHAT IS HE GONNA DO BLAME BUSH FOR LETTING THE TAX CUT TO EXPIRE WHEN HE IS NOT IN OFFICE.
LOOK AT ALL THE NEWS I MEAN ALL OF THEM DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES ALWAYS GET A ADVANTAGE DURING A ECONOMIC CRISIS WHAT A WAY TO RIDE A WAVE....
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |