Fed announces new plan to help money market funds

advertisement

First, it was the banks. Now the Federal Reserve has come to the aid of money market funds as the government seeks to break the credit logjam that threatens the global economy.

A week after the government announced it would spend $250 billion to buy stakes in U.S. banks, the Fed stepped up Tuesday to help money market funds that have been squeezed by worried investors demanding to cash out their holdings. Meanwhile, the Treasury named two accounting firms to help manage the $700 billion bailout package.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Tuesday night that the government would do whatever it takes to deal with the credit crisis but he cautioned that economic troubles caused by the crisis are likely to persist "for a number of months."

"Through a multitude of powerful actions we have and will demonstrate our commitment to unlocking our credit markets and minimizing the impact of the current instability on the rest of the U.S. economy," Paulson told a New York audience.

The government is trying to combat the worst credit crisis in seven decades, an upheaval that has destabilized Wall Street and raised fears that the country could tumble into a deep recession.

The Fed said it would provide up to $540 billion in financing to money market mutual funds in a new program called the Money Market Investor Funding Facility.

"The government is doing everything it can to break the logjam," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "If these money markets are not working properly, then the economy is significantly threatened because this is where businesses get their short-term financing for their day-to-day operations."

JPMorgan Chase & Co. was chosen to run five special funds that will buy from money market mutual funds certificates of deposit, bank notes and commercial paper, which is short-term debt companies issue to raise money for payroll or supplies.

Money market funds hold about one-third of commercial paper.

Fed officials said that about $500 billion has flowed out of prime money market funds since August as investors worried about their ability to redeem shares. On Sept. 18, the Treasury Department announced it was tapping a $50 billion Treasury fund to provide guarantees for the assets in the money market accounts.

The Fed has already announced that starting next Monday it will begin making direct purchases of commercial paper in a further effort to bolster this market.

Also Tuesday, the Treasury Department announced that it had selected two major accounting firms to help manage the government's $700 billion rescue program for the financial system.

The department announced that Ernst & Young would receive an initial contract for $492,000 to provide accounting services, and Pricewaterhouse Coopers would get nearly $191,500 to set up internal controls for the part of $700 billion program that will focus on buying distressed real estate assets from banks as a way to encourage new lending.

The government could select later this week the five to 10 asset-management firms that will supervise the government's purchases of distressed home mortgages and securities backed by those loans.

The program is initially expected to spend $100 billion of the $700 billion bailout package on those purchases. Another $250 billion will be used by the government to buy stock in hundreds of banks to bolster their reserves, another effort to unfreeze the credit markets.

The initiatives seem to be having a positive effect. Yields on Treasury bills and the interest rates banks charge to other banks have both fallen back to late-September levels.

But Wall Street pulled back Tuesday as investors decided to cash in some of the big gains of the previous session. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 231.77 points, a retreat following a gain of 413 points on Monday.

Analysts said the stock markets were reacting with caution because they expect further turmoil stemming from credit markets that appear to be thawing, but only at a slow pace.

"Interest rates and spreads have come down, but we are not anywhere close to normal," said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's in New York.

The latest announcements came as the House Financial Services Committee held a hearing Tuesday to hear from economists and industry leaders about what needs to be done to overhaul government regulations so that the current crisis is not repeated.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., said his panel would offer legislation in the next Congress that could be the most sweeping changes to the government's financial regulatory system since the 1930s.

"These are historic decisions being made. It is as important a set of economic decisions I think this country will be making since the Depression," Frank said.

Democrats in Congress are also pushing ahead with efforts to assemble a second economic stimulus program that could total $150 billion or more, a proposal that got a timely endorsement on Monday from Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who warned that the country could be facing a pronged stretch of economic weakness.

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino told reporters Tuesday that the nation would probably "see a lot of tough times ahead." She said the administration would consider proposals for increased economic stimulus, but that ideas put forward so far by Democrats were more "campaign talking points" than legitimate efforts to bolster the economy.

"Right now, what we're focusing on is the urgent crisis at hand, which is to stop the bleeding, the get rescue package implemented so that we could unfreeze the credit markets," Perino said.

Democrats say any stimulus bill would include items previously rejected by Bush such as road and bridge construction money, and help for state budgets. Another round of tax rebates is possible, too, to make the measure big enough to jolt the economy, which many economists think has already slipped into recession.

___

Associated Press writers Jeannine Aversa, Deb Riechmann, Madlen Read and Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

  • 4 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.4
0.5
{"commentId":3487222,"authorDomain":"ablueelf"}

Is the word "socialism" starting to ring in your ears??

{"commentId":3487222,"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056","authorDomain":"ablueelf"}
    Reply#1 - Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:42 PM EDT
    {"commentId":3488203,"authorDomain":"blerten"}

    "The big question: Will it work?"

    I understand (great piece in Wash. Post BTW) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/14/AR2008101403140.html
    why the shift in strategy - and that none is foolproof. But are we the fools to prove it?;-/

    Funny thing, I'm a customer of U.S. Bank. Soon, EVERY bank will be U.S. Bank.

    Heh;-/

    {"commentId":3488203,"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056","authorDomain":"blerten"}
      Reply#2 - Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:26 AM EDT
      {"commentId":3488311,"authorDomain":"crashlanding1"}

      I worry about this plan for the same reason I worry about investing my own money. There is great risk. What if the banking institutions continue to loose value and do eventual go under? Either the Government will have to invest more money to keep them afloat or they won't and the Gov. will loose all of it's investment just like regular stock holders.

      {"commentId":3488311,"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056","authorDomain":"crashlanding1"}
        Reply#3 - Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:39 AM EDT
        {"commentId":3493762,"authorDomain":"jdl-28"}

        It would of taken time to come back no matter what so what good was the bailout, it didn't help anyone but the banks here and oversea. Is there anyone in our government that can tell the truth, I do not think so including the two running for President now. Not one honest person left in office. they tell us what is best for us and never listen to the American people any more we are just good little sheep who does what we are told.

        Do you know how to say Good-By American for your country is going down and you have allow it to happen for voting the same stupid people in office over and over.

        {"commentId":3493762,"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056","authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
          Reply#4 - Wed Oct 15, 2008 12:14 PM EDT
          {"commentId":3595139,"authorDomain":"bobbie1217"}

          Well I surely am not a "Banker" nor am I a "Federal" employee, But I do have a brain and it functions fairly well.  I have several questions like, If monies were taken from Social Security and now all of a sudden our Fed has funds to hand out then it would seem smart to put those funds back into Social Security and leave them alone they never should have been touched in the first place.  I understand this particular stimulus to be for Businesses and Banks I truly hope our Gov. does not intend to spread monies around to the people like before as that is a False way of showing growth.  Those monies would have been better served paying back Social Security or paying back some of our own Gov. Debts.  How about calling in some of those Loans to the Third world countries or better yet if they are not making their payments take back what was given to them until they do it's called "Repossession"  the banks here do it all the time.

          {"commentId":3595139,"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056","authorDomain":"bobbie1217"}
            Reply#5 - Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:47 PM EDT
            {"commentId":3595290,"authorDomain":"bobbie1217"}

            I'm sorry but I feel that whatever funds our Fed is about to hand out should be put into the Social Security Fund and left alone.  It never should have been touched in the first place.  The prior Stimulus Package that sent all those funds out across our nation never should have been sent out being that our nation apparently has debts that are not being paid.  and gave a false sense of the economy by injecting those monies back into it for a short time. Umm, hello this is not teaching our kids proper management of money now is it.  IF the Fed has all this extra cash on hand then Pay the Nations debts and control the Gov. spending in a tighter fashion.  If you don't do the job you don't get paid plan and simple.

            {"commentId":3595290,"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056","authorDomain":"bobbie1217"}
              Reply#6 - Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:56 PM EDT
              {"commentId":3595379,"authorDomain":"bobbie1217"}

              On another note, Our President is merely a figure head...anything that is done has to go through Senate and Congress in order to be done.  Maybe it's about time we the people started paying closer attention as to who is Senator and Congressmen/women then Who our figure head is and I've been saying this for years!

              {"commentId":3595379,"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056","authorDomain":"bobbie1217"}
                Reply#7 - Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:01 PM EDT
                {"commentId":3595449,"authorDomain":"bobbie1217"}

                On another note, Our President is merely a figure head...anything that is done has to go through Senate and Congress in order to be done.  Maybe it's about time we the people started paying closer attention as to who is Senator and Congressmen/women then Who our figure head is and I've been saying this for years!

                {"commentId":3595449,"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056","authorDomain":"bobbie1217"}
                  Reply#8 - Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:05 PM EDT
                  {"canLink":false,"threadId":"388840","isPrivate":false}
                  Leave a Comment:
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                  {"threadId":"388840","contentId":"1999056"}
                  Start TrackingStart Tracking
                  Stop TrackingStop Tracking