Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama may get the votes of his neighbors in the Hyde Park section of Chicago, but at the moment they’re mighty unhappy with their senator. And they’re going to stay that way at least until Election Day.
Tourists jostle with security agents in the 5000 block of South Greenwood Avenue, where Obama’s home has been fortified on both sides with concrete barriers. Only residents — who have to show ID to get to their homes — are allowed to drive along the street, but there’s not much point: Practically every tree and light pole has a “No Parking” sign on it.
“It’s probably 20 or 30 cars that park between these two areas that now have to find someplace else to park in an already parking-strained neighborhood,” grumbled Rod Sawyer, who lives on the street.
And forget about catching the bus. Until recently, the Chicago Transit Authority had a stop on Obama’s corner, but no more. CTA drivers zip right past now.
“All of that has stopped,” Sawyer said.
Who foots the bill?
Obama’s neighbors are learning firsthand the hassles that come with close encounters with presidential campaigns. And they are not alone. Across the country, when the candidates come to town, local taxpayers often pay dearly for the privilege of a quick glimpse or a handshake, not only in irritation but in cash.
Chicago officials won’t reveal how much it’s costing taxpayers to keep gawkers and cars away from Obama’s home. Some of that cost is borne by the FBI and the U.S. Secret Service, but other expenses fall on police, public works and transit agencies.
If other cities are any indication, it’s quite a chunk of money. When Obama visited Middletown, N.J., last month for a private fundraising dinner at the home of rock star Jon Bon Jovi, police estimated their overtime costs at $14,000.
And if you’re in a so-called battleground state, where the candidates drop by again and again, the costs skyrocket. In 2004, when President Bush, Sen. John Kerry, their running mates and their relatives visited Ohio frequently, Columbus and Franklin counties alone tallied more than $600,000 in police overtime, The Columbus Dispatch calculated.
The same story is playing out this year in Kansas City, Mo., where officials were already wrestling with a budget shortfall reaching into tens of millions of dollars. Obama and his Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, have campaigned there repeatedly because Missouri is seen as a swing state.
Obama made his fifth stop Saturday in Kansas City; McCain has made at least four. Every visit adds up to expenses that aren’t in the city’s budget.
At the request of the Secret Service, Kansas City police declined to tell msnbc.com how much the visits have cost. But City Manager Wayne Cauthen told NBC affiliate KSHB of Kansas City that by the time Election Day rolls around, administrators will have scrounged for hundreds of thousands of dollars for police overtime, airport security and disrupted transportation, severely aggravating a budget crisis that has already strained the city to near the breaking point.
“It’s something we hadn’t planned on,” Cauthen said. “We don’t know when a candidate is coming to our city and how long they’re going to stay and what they’re going to do.”
Reimbursement not required
Some cities have managed to work out reimbursement arrangements with the candidates’ parties. But such arrangements are ad hoc, and they are not the norm, because there are no laws or regulations saying the parties — or the federal government, when the FBI and the Secret Service are involved — have any obligation to pony up.
Money is tight in Johnstown, Pa., where Treasurer Michael Gifford told the Common Council this month that preliminary budget numbers showed that the city might have to raise property tax rates by 3 percent to 5 percent next year.
When Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, McCain’s vice presidential running mate, stopped in town this month, City Manager Curt Davis turned down the Secret Service’s request for a bomb-sniffing dog, because there was no money in the budget for the handler’s overtime.
The city also sent the local Republican Party a bill for police overtime. The amount — just $294 — wasn’t the point, since only a couple of extra officers were needed. It was the principle: The city is tired of being short-changed and wants political campaigns to pay their fair share, officials said, noting that neither Obama nor his primary opponent, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., had reimbursed agencies for their visits in the spring.
Jerry Matysik, police chief in Eau Claire, Wis., which rang up $28,000 in unbudgeted expenses four years ago after visits from the Bush and Kerry campaigns, acknowledged that “it’s nice to have candidates visit — I think some people find that exciting and interesting.”
But “it’s not without cost,” said Matysik.
“Various communities, sheriff’s departments, police departments in the past have tried to collect money that is spent on these,” he said. “It’s been turned down consistently.”
The Wisconsin State Patrol, which is also involved in security efforts, doesn’t even bother asking.
“That’s the price of doing business,” Sgt. Jerry Voight said. “We try to limit the amount that we’re going to spend on it — keep people on straight time, limit the amount of overtime.”
‘Sense of community obligation’
Likewise, Jeff Rea, mayor of Mishawaka, Ind., never sought reimbursement for $2,000 in unbudgeted costs his city incurred when the Clinton campaign came to town last spring.
“We ... feel a certain sense of community obligation to work with the FBI and Secret Service when they call for help,” Rea said.
But some residents say they shouldn't have to bear the burden.
“The campaign should pay,” said Dan Aryea of Mishawaka. “That’s what they raise money for, for things like that.”
Debbie Greenslees, another resident, agreed, saying, “Our county and city government are already taxed.”
Spokesmen for the Obama and McCain campaigns said they could not comment on security matters. But Obama acknowledged the issue last month when he explained why he didn’t visit Mississippi as Hurricane Ike approached the Gulf Coast.
“The thing that I always am concerned about in the middle of a storm is whether we’re drawing resources away from folks on the ground,” Obama said. “Because [of] the Secret Service and various security requirements, sometimes it pulls police, fire and other departments away from concentrating on the job.”
McCain took a different tack in June, turning down a request from Iowa Gov. Chet Culver to cancel a campaign visit while resources were diverted to recovering from floods that swamped the state.
David Roederer, McCain’s state campaign chairman, said aides made sure McCain’s trip wouldn’t hamper the recovery operation. But Obama canceled his June visit at the request of state officials.
Go Obama, he's putting money back into the communities. Business should be great all these Americans following the next president of our country. 100,000 people spending money at a political rally should really be a boost for the locals. So let shout out a thank you to all who are helping revive the economy from streets of our community. God Bless and keep president Obama safe. God Bless America.
I don't understand why this story mentions Barack Obama so many times and John McCain comparatively few times. I also don't understand why it doesn't mention current or past presidents and vice presidents. It sounds like this has been a problem for several campaigns. I highly doubt that candidates for the upcoming administration receive more security protection than incumbent presidents.
There are plenty of good reasons to protect the lives of our presidential candidates, including ones we don't suport. One major reason is that our political system is based on free, fair and transparent elections. We don't want our elections decided by snipers. The mentality that taxes are always bad only infects those who think they got to where they are completely on their own with no help, ever, from anyone. Those of us who understand that we have been helped by many people see things differently. Public services, public safety, education, roads, justice system etc. are necessary. We adults understand that these things have to be paid for. Those who harbour the illusion that all wealth belongs to them also harbour the illusion that they should not have to pay taxes. As a result, we see CEO's running a company into the ground only to walk away from the wreckage they caused with $400 million in "bonus" payments. These people believe we honest workers should pay for the cleanup because we don't have their kleptomaniacal mindset. This is our national climate flowing from a president who drove every enterprise he ran into the ground while coming out very well himself. Now, predictably, he has managed to run the US economy into the ground with the prospect that all the contractors he has enriched with his policies will reward him handsomely.
Let us please attend to this elephant in the room while giving appropriate weight to the necessary cost of safety and security for our presidential candidates.
It is my understanding that one of the reasons why the Secret Service is assigned to candidates is so that they can do personnel screenings for crazies and the area. At the event I went to I provided information to the planners ahead of time so that they could run me through their databases. Local and state police are mostly for traffic and crowd control since their command and control is not necessarily very good.
That said, I agree that providing security, including security for political figures and major candidates is something that should be paid for by taxpayers. This role is part of providing domestic tranquility, which is in the Preamble to the Constitution. It is up to the local governments management to see that local costs are covered and that any additional costs are minimized. For example, I don't see why there should be any extra cost for "firefighters" and expect that they are just trying to pile on so that they can rack up some extra overtime pay.
Security for any political candidates on a campaign should be paid by their campaign funds to off duty police officers or other security that provide the service
These candidates such as Obama and McCain are promising tax relief for citizens so set an example by doing this without putting additional burdens on tax payers and cities that are already hurting from the financial crisis. Their actions will outperform any words and promises.
Go Obama, his rally is bringing in 100,000 americans in to local communities, spending and bringing money this helps the local economy thrive, talk about taking it to streets. God Bless and keep our next president safe. Wish Obama's rally would come to my local area outside of my business WOW! what a boost in my bottom line. Get ready the best is yet to come.
God Bless us all. United we stand divided we fall.
I say any cost to local governments should be picked up by the campaign. I know most people will not agree with this but, unlike concerts, etc., individuals go to campaign to hear a speech and not to be entertained. If Madonna pays for her own security, so should Obama and McCain.
Safety first should be a no brainer. It is not unreasonable to expect cooperation from local authorities. Quiveling over who should pay is small minded and short sighted. Most of the cost of security is born by the Feds (secret service) and the campaign (security staff). Would you like for a candidate to be assasinated in your town?
Would you want a candidate to be assasinated in your town? The secret service and the campaigns do incur most of the costs related to securtiy. Local police are asked to support those activities. Thats their job. Quiveling over who pays for what should be secondary to insuring public safety and helping to protect our future presidents life. Safety first. Its a no brainer.
Would I actually care? Not enough to voluntarily fork over my own money.
Obama should pay for all the costs he's incurred at the town's expense with his $150,000,000 he questionably raised last month.
Questionably raised AK??? I can tell you I gave him a whopping $5.00 last month. Lets see 5 goes into 150,000,000? Because Obama has raised more from the small donations. And over100,000 people at one rally in one state Saturday, followed by another rally 50,000 plus, 80,000 showing up in Denver. Wow, math was never my strength, but you get my point...millions will be voting for Obama.
http://www.wasillaproject.com/index/2008/10/sarah-palin-fis.html
Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing at least a dozen or so, less political advertisements every day (on the radio, in the mail, on the TV, on the internet) and let them use this extra money for their own protection. Churches, local concerts, etc. all pay for the extra police presence during their functions. Unfortunately in this day and age, political candidates are at more risk than ever from unbalanced and hatred filled people, so they do have to have that protection, but it should not come out of the cities allready tight budgets.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |