OPEC slashes production; crude continues to tumble

advertisement

VIENNA — OPEC said at an emergency meeting Friday that it will slash oil production by 1.5 million barrels to stem the "dramatic collapse" of oil prices, but crude prices plunged 5 percent anyway as financial markets spiraled downward across the globe.

Demand for crude has evaporated and the supply levers held by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries appear to have little influence in the current economic climate.

Iran and Venezuela pushed for a cut of 2 million barrels a day, but there were concerns among other OPEC members that a more severe production cut would exacerbate a deteriorating economic crisis and further destroy demand.

OPEC officials, however, signaled they were prepared to slice deeper quickly if crude continues its freefall.

The world's biggest crude consumer immediately blasted OPEC.

"It has always been our view that the value of commodities, including oil, should be determined in open, competitive markets, and not by these kinds of anti-market production decisions," White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto said Friday. "The high oil prices from the past year contributed to the slowdown in demand and the subsequent downturn in the economy, and we would ask that everyone keep that in mind going forward."

OPEC is already producing 300,000 barrels a day above its own quota of about 29 million barrels.

If that overproduction is stopped, and all members comply with the 1.5-million cut, OPEC would produce about 1.8 million fewer barrels of oil a day.

OPEC officials, however, left no doubt that they were ready to slice production again quickly if Friday's decision does not end the price freefall.

The emergency meeting was initially scheduled for Nov. 18, but that was abruptly rescheduled for Friday in response to prices that have entered a tailspin since their historic high of nearly $150 in July.

Crude has tumbled 56 percent since then. A barrel of oil costs $41 less than it did just 30 days ago.

OPEC President Chakib Khelil said OPEC was ready to convene another emergency session before its next planned gathering in December in Algeria "if there are further decisions that have to be made.

Analyst John Hall of London-based John Hall Associates said the OPEC decision will not have a dramatic effect, adding he assumed any upward trend would stop at between $80 and $90.

But there was no such trend Friday as markets plunged global and fear of an extended recession spread.

Wall Street joined world stock markets in a sharp sell-off Friday, with the Dow Jones industrials dropping more than 200 points in early trading and all the major indexes falling more than 4 percent.

Oil futures slid $3.33 to $64.51 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Prices at one point tumbled to below $63, prices not seen since June 2007.

"It's clear that the ministers are attempting to underpin at $60 a barrel," said James R. Crawford an analyst with Inter Emirates. "But where the market will settle remains open."

OPEC statement Friday reflected alarm over the erosion of revenues for oil producing nations, as did the unusually short deliberations leading to its decision.

"Oil prices have witnessed a dramatic collapse — unprecedented in speed and magnitude," said the 13-nation organization. "This slowdown in demand is serving to exacerbate the situation in a market which has been oversupplied with crude for some time.

It also warned of hard times ahead for suppliers, saying "the fall in demand will deepen" in the coming months.

OPEC indirectly asked Russia and other major oil exporters outside the organization not to undercut efforts to prop up prices.

"OPEC cannot be expected to bear alone the burden of restoring equilibrium," said the statement.

OPEC Secretary-General Abdullah El-Badri said before a meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Wednesday that he would not ask Russia for oil production cuts as global prices fall. Some analysts have said Russia was unlikely to agree to production cuts, given that it already is battling with falling output as West Siberian oil fields mature.

But others spoke of behind the scenes negotiations between Moscow and OPEC on the issue.

The fall in crude prices despite OPEC's move suggested the organization's power to raise prices by cutting supply may be fading amid a global economic crisis that has crimped demand for oil. In the past, sizable cuts in OPEC production have led to significant jumps in prices.

The latest weekly report from the U.S. Department of Energy shows that demand has fallen in 38 of the past 42 weeks. U.S. demand is down nearly 10 percent during the past four weeks year on year. The U.S. still consumes one out of every four barrels of oil produced.

El-Badri on Friday took pains to emphasize that OPEC's move was predicated by a need not to raise prices but to put a floor underneath them. Iran, Venezuela and other OPEC members have suggested that for them, selling oil under $80 was a loss-maker, and Iraq on Thursday said it would have to rethink next year's national budget if prices remain under that level.

That line of thinking did not rest well with U.S. lawmakers.

"OPEC has a talent for cutting its nose to spite its face," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "At a time when oil prices are declining because the world economy has stalled, OPEC's actions will only make things worse."

___

Associated Press writers Veronika Oleksyn and Angela Woebking contributed to this report.

On the Net:http://www.opec.org

  • 30 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
7.7
7.0
2.2
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
{"commentId":3667796,"authorDomain":"incredulous"}

Great photo AP. You've been a real class act lately, unbiased journalsm we can all be proud of...NOT.

Anyway, the pic is pretty funny. Looks like he saying EFFYOU, doesn't it? "EFFYOUY, we got the oil."

{"commentId":3667796,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"incredulous"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:42 AM EDT
{"commentId":3667865,"authorDomain":"PeteZaHutt"}

Looks like he saying EFFYOU, doesn't it? "EFFYOUY, we got the oil."

That's what I thought too. Great crotch-grab photo. I see a lot of this in Cleveland, but usually I think it's a way to pull up your pants.

{"commentId":3667865,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"PeteZaHutt"}
  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:57 AM EDT
{"commentId":3667983,"authorDomain":"wude121"}

Yes Urban culture has hit OPEC!

Yo we got the stuff that make you Go, So if you want Mo we gona jack it down so we wont be Po.

{"commentId":3667983,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"wude121"}
  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:23 AM EDT
{"commentId":3671903,"authorDomain":"denise-doobydoo"}

"You want crude? I got some crude for ya right here!"

{"commentId":3671903,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"denise-doobydoo"}
  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:37 AM EDT
{"commentId":3672707,"authorDomain":"babin"}

I hear they are making a skrewed version of their latest OPEC dub tape. I DL the single the other night. It hits pretty hard.

Nuts to us I guess. Rich bastards.

{"commentId":3672707,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"babin"}
  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:12 PM EDT
{"commentId":3674915,"authorDomain":"aperspective"}

If ever there was a reason to cut OPEC out of the American market---this is it.

We really need to have an energy policy, auto industry, utility supply which is independent of foreign manipulation----

The only problem is---OPEC is NOT just the Saudi princes-----there ARE American business interests involved in this as well----

It is an incestuous relationship----apparently alot of American corporations have no national loyalty to the country which provides the base for their operations and profit as well.

Everything and everyone is just a commodity....from which to profit.

{"commentId":3674915,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"aperspective"}
  • 3 votes
#1.5 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
{"commentId":3676365,"authorDomain":"alkimija"}

It's somewhat comforting to see others had the same impression of that photo that I did. What a galling display.

{"commentId":3676365,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"alkimija"}
  • 3 votes
#1.6 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:51 PM EDT
{"commentId":3677313,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

He is a Saudi, they typically wear robes and that hitch is just a habitual move to hold the robe up when stepping onto or off something. Yall are reading way too much into the photo.

{"commentId":3677313,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"kylen"}
    #1.7 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:32 PM EDT
    {"commentId":3678566,"authorDomain":"spookybee1074"}

    Am i the only one who saw Biggie Smalls in the back?

    {"commentId":3678566,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"spookybee1074"}
      #1.8 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:32 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3679929,"authorDomain":"insert"}

      Kyle, that's an overcoat, worn over a suit.  It's not an Arab robe.

      {"commentId":3679929,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"insert"}
        #1.9 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:45 PM EDT
        {"commentId":3692139,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

        I know but he probably wears robes 95% of the time, the overcoat is robe-like, hence the habit.

        {"commentId":3692139,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"kylen"}
          #1.10 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:09 PM EDT
          {"commentId":3694678,"authorDomain":"laef"}

          for some reason i thought i might be the first to comment on that crotch grab photo when i saw it, so i eagerly scrolled down.  damn.

          {"commentId":3694678,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"laef"}
            #1.11 - Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:34 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":3667852,"authorDomain":"cathryndarkwind"}

            I like the fact that even though they have made billiions of dollars off all of us "oil junkies" they are now upset that their "drug" isn't selling and they aren't making money hand over fist. So they are attempting to what? Hold the oil hostage so the price goes up? Didn't they save any over the last couple of decades to ride out the current bump in their wallets? I have no sympathy for them. If I could afford it, I'd buy an electric car.

            {"commentId":3667852,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"cathryndarkwind"}
            • 4 votes
            Reply#2 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:54 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3668093,"authorDomain":"gamerk2"}

            "Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay for it." ~ Adam Smith, the Wealth of Nations

            If you pay for it, you have no right to complain about its prices.  Thats one of the defining features of Capitalism.

            {"commentId":3668093,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"gamerk2"}
            • 5 votes
            #2.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:38 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3668482,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

            Theresa:

            I get a kick out of his statement regarding the "unprecedented" fall in prices.

            Uh, what about the "unprecedented" rise in prices?

            What goes up, must come down.  And what goes up quickly, comes down quickly.

            Just an excuse for them to take more money and more money.

            Gamerk:

            Got that right.  Everyone needs to really start to consider how to reduce, by 50% or more their use of oil and gas.  Really, can't be that hard.

            {"commentId":3668482,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
            • 5 votes
            #2.2 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:25 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3669551,"authorDomain":"msdx1949"}

            gamerk2 the system can be gamed though when competitors are allowed to agree on production. Don't forget the oil market is not a capitalistic thing. It is opposite to Adam Smith's teachings because the supply side is oligarchically maintained and agreed on by most oil producing countries. If it was truly capitalistic then the price would always be lower until the supply "really" began to diminish. Also there are the refining oligarchies in various countries. America is no exception. Refining capacity has not increased since the sharp increase in gas prices. It has decreased creating a price bottleneck so that refiners can "skim off of the top" of the American economy. They can basically agree on output. It artificially inflates both gas prices and oil prices.

            {"commentId":3669551,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"msdx1949"}
            • 6 votes
            #2.3 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:40 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3669653,"authorDomain":"msdx1949"}

            wmolaw you are right as well. The price especially for oil and gas futures for various reasons including African unrest and the Iraq war have inflated prices as well as increased specualtion which is fleeing the market right now. It is telling though that even with the speculation out of the market we are still at over $2 in gas prices. That is that refinery oligarchy I was talking about. Its like they are shoveling cash in their pockets. If the gas price were directly tied to oil we should be at or near $1.50. I'll do the math though and see.

            {"commentId":3669653,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"msdx1949"}
            • 4 votes
            #2.4 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:45 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3670291,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

            msdx:

            Good posts and points.

            {"commentId":3670291,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
            • 2 votes
            #2.5 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:20 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3670351,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

            Oil prices were very low last decade in the 90s, the price was in the mid $20s. I'm not saying that as an excuse for them just a fact they didn't always have super high prices. By the late 90s to early 2000s other countries like China and India started seriously importing oil causing a huge price runup as supply, while increasing, wasn't increasing anything like demand was. Speculation that the trend would continue led to even more runup but when demand collapsed, or rather is thought to collapse, the price tumbles.

            Refining has it's own bag of troubles. Refineries are built for specefic types of crude oil, oil isn't oil there are large differences in the stuff from place to place. Refineries built to process heavy sulfur containing crude that's shipped via ocean have to be on the coast and are more 'messy' thus suffer more environmental regulation. Those haven't been built in 30 years just maintained, they process stuff out of the gulf and South America. The refineries based on Texas sweet crude are different again but as no major production increase has occured in 30 years again they built no new refining capacity - what good would it do if there wasn't more sweet crude to pump into it?

            Prices on gasoline are dropping and in a similar way to how they rose, quick but not overnight. Oil jumped $20 a barrell a day in summer but gas prices only drifted up a cent or two a day we are seeing the same thing backwards right now.

            {"commentId":3670351,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"kylen"}
            • 1 vote
            #2.6 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:23 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3671171,"authorDomain":"msdx1949"}

            Since George Bush took office refinery (the business his family was in before politics) markup has increased by over 2000%. Thats a HORRENDOUS increase and is not solely explained by spikes in oil prices from OPEC. We need to start pointing fingers at the local culprits that have been strangling the American consumer. The refiners shoulder a HUGE share of the blame for both gas prices and economic suffering with increased cost to commute and increased cost of groceries. CHECK THIS OUT:

            http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/gasoline1003.pdf

            I know this was in 2003, but IMAGINE WHAT THEIR PROFIT LOOKS LIKE NOW. OMFG!

            {"commentId":3671171,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"msdx1949"}
            • 1 vote
            #2.7 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:04 AM EDT
            {"commentId":3672096,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

            The publicly audited annual reports for all oil majors are online and easy to read. Any of them tell the story that refining isn't where they money comes from. I'm not saying they haven't had profit growth, but it's in production not refining. A little time, income statement, and calculator tells you the 2000% figure is absurd.

            {"commentId":3672096,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"kylen"}
              #2.8 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:46 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3672322,"authorDomain":"ElliePhat"}

              msdx,

              Don't forget there hasn't been a new refinery built in US in 30 years.  Causes: environmental objections, NIMBY, etc.  Even a few new refineries could make a huge difference in gasoline price stability.  One proposal is to use abandoned military bases as new refinery sites.

              As to natural gas, Russia, Iran, et. al., are proposing a cartel which could be very scary for Europe and Asia.

              {"commentId":3672322,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ElliePhat"}
              • 2 votes
              #2.9 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:56 AM EDT
              Reply
              {"commentId":3668106,"authorDomain":"mr-bellies"}

              If this isn't an indication of OPEC member countries greed, I don't know what is. While the two largest oil consuming countries and their citizens face economic ruin; these countries, which would be dust mops otherwise, decide to kick us when we are down. Just when we are seeing some relief at the pump and able to use the savings for food and other essentials; a spike in oil prices and subsequently gas prices is inevitable.We really need to find a way to put OPEC in its place!

              {"commentId":3668106,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"mr-bellies"}
              • 4 votes
              Reply#3 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:40 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3668196,"authorDomain":"brinsmaid"}

              The reason economies across the globe are failing is because of high oil prices.  Don't blame mortgage defaults; blame the price of gas.  It all started with the price of gas.

              {"commentId":3668196,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"brinsmaid"}
              • 4 votes
              Reply#4 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:52 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3671695,"authorDomain":"comsen"}

              I think the rise in oil several years ago is mostly responsible for the mortgage and economic crisis now. The higher cost of gas and oil over the past few years made it more difficult for people to pay their mortgages, along with questionable loans. This was enough to begin this economic crisis and now the oil producers will pay with oil demand declining. It will be interesting to see how this affects Iran, Venezuela, and Russia.

              {"commentId":3671695,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"comsen"}
              • 4 votes
              #4.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:28 AM EDT
              Reply
              {"commentId":3668242,"authorDomain":"brinsmaid"}
              "Oil prices have witnessed a dramatic collapse — unprecedented in speed and magnitude," said a statement from the 13-nation organization.

              Poor OPEC.

              I really feel sorry for them when...my 401k witnessed a dramatic collapse - unprecedented in speed and magnitude

              The price of my stocks has witnessed a dramatic collapse - unprecedented in speed and magnitude

              The cost of bread and milk has witnessed a dramatic increase - unprecedented in speed and magnitude

              Shall I go on?

              {"commentId":3668242,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"brinsmaid"}
              • 7 votes
              Reply#5 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:57 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3668347,"authorDomain":"TomJoad"}

              The picture is great.  I'm curious how true the story actually is.  If this is true, it's going to cause a huge uproar.  Hang on tight, ya'll.

              {"commentId":3668347,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"TomJoad"}
              • 3 votes
              Reply#6 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:10 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3668446,"authorDomain":"susibv"}

              Yeahhhhhhhhh you know we gotcha by the short and curlies....dontcha........yeeeeeeeahhhhhh babyyyyyyy......................and it feels good.........yeahhhhhhhhhh.........I got my flasher coat on.............Take that!

              {"commentId":3668446,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"susibv"}
              • 2 votes
              Reply#7 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:22 AM EDT
              {"commentId":3673892,"authorDomain":"celebratetonight"}

              LMAO at the post, but not at the gas prices :(

              {"commentId":3673892,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"celebratetonight"}
                #7.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:02 PM EDT
                {"commentId":3680227,"authorDomain":"susibv"}

                lol thanks.  Gas prices, I think, are the only silver lining in a season of storm clouds. I filled up the tank yesterday and paid $2.81 and that was at 7am.........at 5 pm......it had gone down to 2.72.

                But with winter around the corner.......house heating gas I am sure is going to go orbital..........things will go back to $4 a gallon.

                Sigh.

                {"commentId":3680227,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"susibv"}
                  #7.2 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:01 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":3668471,"authorDomain":"waynef415"}

                  Isn't the guy in the picture the same guy who walked out on the last meeting because Iran and Venezuela were trying too hard to 'punish' the U.S.?

                  I guess someone gave him a pretty good hand job to get him to change his mind, hence the adjusting/scratching.

                  {"commentId":3668471,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"waynef415"}
                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#8 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:25 AM EDT
                  {"commentId":3668479,"authorDomain":"jdl-28"}

                  OPEC was price fixing all year long and now they want to do it again, it is time to product our own oil and keep it in this country for our uses only. We have been paying high prices because of there greed, we are told prices are high because we are using to much oil so when we cut back and the price go down they will cut back on production to get the price back up.

                  So they control the price if we use to much and when we do not use enough we lose either way. Our government has known about this all long, gee we are not making $100.00 dollars or more per gallon so produce less as if we have shortage to get the price back up.

                  Bend over they want to give it to us again.

                  {"commentId":3668479,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#9 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:25 AM EDT
                  {"commentId":3681249,"authorDomain":"cavicore"}

                  While the US may have cut back on it use, the rest of the world has not and is actually using MORE today than last year by 200,000 bbl a day.  The ‘demand’ may have slowed, but it hasn’t stopped or decreased overall.  OPEC also cut its output last month by 520,000 bbl a day and have seen prices slide nearly 41% since and cut another 1,500,000 bbl a day just this morning.  There is now 2,000,000 bbl a day LESS available oil while the world needs 200,000 more from last year yet we are watching the price plunge….why?   Investment money is leaving the commodities….that bubble burst back in July.  When most of that money is gone from the oil/commodity markets and only those who take possession of oil to make products (i.e. refiners, chemicals, airlines) with are left, the true laws of supply and demand will play out and set a more realistic price. You will pay below $2 a gallon by spring and there won’t be another spike for years to come.  The ‘investment money will find another sector of the market to create it’s next bubble.

                  In 2003. there was 13 billion dollars of ‘investment’ money in oil for those not taking delivery (you have come to know them as speculators) and oil was at 20-25 bbl.  By July of 2008 that amount had grown to 260 billion and oil was at 147 while world demand increased by only 5%.  That is a 600%-700% increase in price for a 5% increase in demand.  At best, demand like that can be called ‘Speculative Demand” not actual demand.  While the US has cut back on it use, the rest of the world has not and is actually using MORE today than last year, and the year before that…

                  My logic is purely based on contrarian belief in that you can’t make money doing or believing what the herd does, basically what is told on the tube is a lie.  The herd believed we wouldn’t see $150 bbl….it happened.  When everyone was told that we are running out of oil and the high prices are here to stay, the herd believed it, hence the run on hybrid vehicles and the push for alternative energies, which is not a bad thing at all.  Now that the herd’s mindset is high oil (and other commodities), investors have started pulling their money knowing the price would fall.  Notice that a lot of people, both industry and general public are saying the drop in oil is temporary, again herd mentality.  If your 'hearing' that this price plunge is temporary and you hear it often enough, chances are it wrong.

                  {"commentId":3681249,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"cavicore"}
                    #9.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:06 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":3668685,"authorDomain":"cyan412000"}

                    the market is not buying into it...fund managers are pulling from oil contracts and have been..if only the people that actually use oil could buy it...then oil would be 20 a barrel.

                    but since its on the commodities market, the price can be driven up as hard as its driven down.

                    they talk like oil has always been 100 a barrel...its just falling to where it was 2 years ago..when it wasnt driven up by hedge fund managers trying to save themselves

                    {"commentId":3668685,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"cyan412000"}
                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#10 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:42 AM EDT
                    {"commentId":3673660,"authorDomain":"jackmarc6"}

                    absolutely right.wall street manipulation is what drove oil prices up to begin with.the bastards cheat to control prices regardless of supply and demand.this is not capitalism,and its worst than communism.it is corruption to allow certain zealots to control prices of products,for greedy proffits.the currant us govt. has its hand in this price manipulation as well.for now at least,the market is correcting itself.but still no accountability of the looters.

                    {"commentId":3673660,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"jackmarc6"}
                      #10.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":3668736,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

                      Cyan:

                      Exactly, though Opec itself had quite a role in the buy up.  Either way, what has a meteoric rise, generally has a meteoric fall.

                      {"commentId":3668736,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
                      • 4 votes
                      Reply#11 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:46 AM EDT
                      {"commentId":3668823,"authorDomain":"cyan412000"}

                      poor bastards bet the farm on oil staying at $100.00  now all we have to do is get jobs going, cut off aid to the foriegn countries that have no value to us and life will be good

                      {"commentId":3668823,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"cyan412000"}
                      • 3 votes
                      #11.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:53 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":3668992,"authorDomain":"lstcaress"}

                      ugh. gluttonous pigs.

                      {"commentId":3668992,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"lstcaress"}
                      • 3 votes
                      Reply#12 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:05 AM EDT
                      {"commentId":3669179,"authorDomain":"Rixar13"}

                      Force them to see how good grain grows in the sand...............

                      {"commentId":3669179,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"Rixar13"}
                      • 3 votes
                      Reply#13 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:17 AM EDT
                      {"commentId":3670465,"authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}

                      OH yeah I so agree ! I think they should trade OIL for grain! Why should we the American people be held hostage when they have all the OIL and well we have all the grain yet we give them this grain for free ? no I say every time the price of OIL goes up then the price of grain should go up 2 fold and when they cut back on production then we do the same 2 fold ! I am sick of letting these rag heads get every thing from us and we get what ? that is right HATE and high prices ! Let them grow there oun food in that SAND PIT THEY CALL HOME ! I say stop all AID to every one ! NOW !!

                      {"commentId":3670465,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}
                      • 2 votes
                      #13.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:29 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":3669576,"authorDomain":"ronblack66"}

                      I'm no economist.  I just like to play one on the computer.

                      Seems that if they cut production to prevent further reduction in prices, demand will continue to decrease due to the global economic climate.  People only have so much to spend and once it's gone, it's gone.  With the cost of living going up on everything else such as food, insurance, utilities, and residential prices, to name but a few, cuts will have to be made elsewhere in family budgets.  One of the few areas that this can be done is in fuel usage.  Fewer vacations and increased carpooling will eventually become the norm as we ween ourselves off of foreign oil and gradually implement alternative sources.

                      Also, currently there are those that continue to drive gas guzzling vehicles with the assumption that gas prices will eventually lower.  With the aforementioned cost of living continuing to outpace rises in salaries, gas guzzling vehicles will also become obsolete as families finally give up on the cost of fuel ever coming back down and trade these in for more economical means of transportation.

                      In my opinion, the greed that OPEC is showing in the short term with regards to the price of oil will eventually become their long term financial undoing.  And when this happens, we will all be better off because of it.  

                      {"commentId":3669576,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ronblack66"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#14 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:42 AM EDT
                      {"commentId":3669716,"authorDomain":"neal242"}

                      HAHA riding my bicycle has paid off!!

                      {"commentId":3669716,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"neal242"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#15 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:49 AM EDT
                      {"commentId":3682345,"authorDomain":"cavicore"}

                      HAHA riding my bicycle has paid off!!

                      Good for you!  How long is your commute and what is your route like?  A guy I know got his licencse suspended and had to use his bike for work and lost 50lbs getting around on it.  He said it was the best thing he ever did.  Still rides it.

                      {"commentId":3682345,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"cavicore"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #15.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:13 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":3670397,"authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}

                      Funny how when the price of oil went up every day so did gas prices , Each day the price went up the price of gas went up as well till they reached an all time high of 5 bucks a gallon now the blood sucking PIGS cut production and gas prices are still high why is this ? shouldn't they be falling as fast as the price of OIL??? Oh we need to suck more cash for that crap from Americans NOW ! God we are so BLIND ! We are giving money to people that hate us ! These people want us all dead and we are giving them BILLIONS each Year for this stuff? I thought we went to war to get this stuff ( OIL ) for our selves ?? What are we there for then if not for the OIL ? why the HELL are we paying 10 Million a month for a war if this is not for OIL ? I really think they should Impeach that retard BUSH ! God this makes me so mad ! I see this country in war and paying for Oil from countries that HATE us . They have Trillions of our money and we get poorer ! GREAT JOB America !

                      {"commentId":3670397,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}
                        Reply#16 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:25 AM EDT
                        {"commentId":3682418,"authorDomain":"cavicore"}

                        If you look at the price of oil during the entire commodity boom/bubble (2003-2008) and compare it to gas, you will see that oil went up further in percentage terms as did gasoline.  Using what I watched happen in my area as an example…back when oil was trading around 20-25 bucks bbl, gas was about $1.30/gal (ah, the good 'ol days) for regular unleaded.  From that point oil went to the high we all know now as $147 bbl which translates to roughly a 600-700% increase.  Had gas increased as much, prices would have been as high as $7-$9 a gallon and my area saw $4.20, that is only (and I do use that loosely) a 320% increase, half the increase in oil. 

                          Coincidently, when oil was rising between $60-90/bbl, gasoline prices hardly rose at all.  We are now again in that range but on the way down so I would not be surprised to see the price of gas level off until oil falls further.  FWIW, R/U gas in my area is around $2.65 this morning down from a high of around $4.20 back in July.  That's a 37% decline opposed to the 57% decline in bbl of oil.  I personally see think oil can 35-40 and you'll see gas under $2 (again, using my area) a gallon by spring and I will be willing to bet is stays there.  Do I think that we will get back to pre bubble levels….no because demand has legitimately increased across the globe since 2003 so to see $20-25 I think is wishful thinking.

                        {"commentId":3682418,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"cavicore"}
                        • 1 vote
                        #16.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:20 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        {"commentId":3670898,"authorDomain":"rmbrest"}

                        They are our allies? I don't see it. We're in an economic crisis and they want more profit.  Why we continue to finance these goverments while they bleed us dry I'll never understand. Keep our hard earned tax dollars at home, invest in better public transporation, clean fuel alternatives, domestic oil production etc. So, how does your presidential candidate feel about this?? If you don't know, find out quick, November 4th is fast approaching.

                        {"commentId":3670898,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"rmbrest"}
                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#17 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:51 AM EDT
                        {"commentId":3670952,"authorDomain":"ajovaag"}

                        Simple supply and demand tells me consumers are about to get screwed at the pumps AGAIN!  Right now supply is up and demand is up, sp prices are dropping ever so slightly, which you would think is a great thing! 

                        So why cut the supply off when the demand will still be high?  So you can put MORE money in your greedy little pockets?  I was SO excited when I filled up for $2.59 a gallon last night, and I never thought when I started driving I would be excited about that price!  This is just pure greed and some one needs to put their foot down.  Keep production up, let prices fall just a little more.  You'll still drive your Bentley's and live in your huge overpriced mansions I promise.  Maybe just let the average joe fill up his tank so he can take his kid to school and head to his blue collar job in the mornings. 

                        {"commentId":3670952,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ajovaag"}
                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#18 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:54 AM EDT
                        {"commentId":3671249,"authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}

                        I say this we need to stop all food supplies to these countries ! stop feeding them and once they have had there food taken away start the trade oil for food . each one of these countries including AFRICA ! Why are we all so concerned when they are the ones taking advantage of us and our money and our lives ? I think if you can not give us oil at a cheep price and we can and will give you food for free there is some thing wrong there ! I know this if we stop giving food out grain and the such to every country that hates us and have OIL and terrorists that do us harm I just bet they would stop and hand over the OIL freely as well as stop there waring and killing not only of there own people but us as well .

                        We have the food and that is far more imprtant than OIL and WAR stop the flow of food to EVERY ONE NOW ! This will stop the war and the terrorists !

                        {"commentId":3671249,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}
                          Reply#19 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:08 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":3671700,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

                          Thomas:

                          We would be excoriated across the globe.  Not that I care, but we would be.

                          Hell, we were when we tried to use ethanol, "How could America make oil out of food that's needed elsewhere in the world."

                          {"commentId":3671700,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
                          • 2 votes
                          #19.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:28 AM EDT
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":3671297,"authorDomain":"dish"}

                          That picture is worth a 1000 words...really sums it all up. Infact, I dare say if that picture wasn't accompanied by the story informing of the 1.5mil barrel cut I would still know exactly what the outcome was.

                          {"commentId":3671297,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"dish"}
                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#20 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:10 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":3671476,"authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}

                          Yeah nothing is wrong with him or Opec ! Seems like a fat cat making tons of cash . maybe they need a BAIL out as well ? Just look how that has help us ! We are so screwed up here we give so much cash to big fat cats and we suffer untold hardships and send food and aid and all kinds of great American innovation all over the world and get nothing at all for it . How screwed up is that ? And when on earth are we as a people going to wake up to this stuff ? when are we going to say enough is enough ? Is it going to take us going into a full blown depression to do this ? We are almost there folks !

                          {"commentId":3671476,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}
                            #20.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":3671370,"authorDomain":"rick-thompson808"}

                            nice picture...sounds like it is saying the same thing they think of their customers - s***w you or something...they must be a bit pissed about all the electrical alternatives that are cropping up but then again, they are business people so they probably will make cash off of that too...

                            {"commentId":3671370,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"rick-thompson808"}
                              Reply#21 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:14 AM EDT
                              {"commentId":3671793,"authorDomain":"lrclark"}

                              No one would take the suggestion seriously, but It might be a good time to start modifying vehicles to run on alcohol. Before prohibition all vehicles ran on alcohol! Gasoline was a waste by-product from the oil refineries and they didn't know what to do with it so they decided to sell it for fuel, imagine how much money they made when the production of alcohol was made illegal. Incidentally prohibition was heavily backed by the Rockefellers, who were running some of these refineries-does anyone smell a rat?
                              I know we aren't supposed to post links on here but if you google running on alcohol you should get a hit. I am not affiliated with these people but think they have hit the nail on the head. Here is an attempt to post their link-the information and some instruction is free. So it shouldn't hurt. They have instructions on adapting carburators for using alcohol as well as building stils to produce it.

                              http://running_on_alcohol.tripod.com/index.html Just imagine how upset all these Opec nations would be if we could all start burning alcohol in our engines and generator, oil would only be needed for lubrication. What they have to sell would be devalued very quickly. And alcohol burns cleanly without polution, and you don't have to raise corn to make it-you can use all kinds of things to produce it.

                              {"commentId":3671793,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"lrclark"}
                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#22 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:32 AM EDT
                              {"commentId":3675946,"authorDomain":"jimmernick"}

                              The only negative to alchohol is that it burns with a colorless flame; a huge danger to emergency and rescue personnel in an accident.  Other than that, I see nothing wrong with the suggestion.  We can make alchohol our of grass clippings in a solar still.

                              But how would the government tax us for it?  To quote Shakespeare, "There lies the rub."

                              {"commentId":3675946,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"jimmernick"}
                                #22.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":3671930,"authorDomain":"prez"}

                                Greedy little bastards. I can't wait for the day we don't need them anymore.

                                {"commentId":3671930,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"prez"}
                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#23 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
                                {"commentId":3672060,"authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}

                                I bet if we cut all the AID we give these greedy little bastards they would be giving us oil for aid then ! Why not what have we the people ever gotten from them ? Just what has America gotten from them ? Higher gas and oil prices ? higher food prices ? higher home prices ? We give way too much to countries that want to see US go down . I think it is HIGH time we do the SAME !

                                {"commentId":3672060,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}
                                  Reply#24 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:45 AM EDT
                                  {"commentId":3672260,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

                                  Thomas:

                                  It is a bit bizarre that we give them aid, isn't it?

                                  {"commentId":3672260,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  #24.1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
                                  {"commentId":3672610,"authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}

                                  Yes it is and we do ! When they need more food who do they call ? when they have a natural disaster who do they call upon ? We give out MORE AID to countries that HATE us than we do to our own people , this makes me sick . We have people suffering HERE IN AMERICA and we give out more food and Aid to other countries than to OUR OWN PEOPLE ! And yet we pay higher prices for OIL than we should , We give them so much cash it is not even funny . Just what do we get from OPEC ??

                                  {"commentId":3672610,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"ericksontom33"}
                                    #24.2 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:08 PM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":3672200,"authorDomain":"cathryndarkwind"}

                                    I would love to ride a bike to work...but living in florida (humidity), and the fact that it would take at least 30 minutes to get there, I'd be all icky sweaty by the time I got to the office. I dress in suits, I like skirts but would have to wear pants on the bike thereby increasing the sweaty factor. Trust me, when I tell you, as a woman going through the first stages of menopause (without the medication to help as I can't afford health ins. and even if I could get the health ins. wouldn't have the $$ for the meds anyhow) my coworkers are quite pleased I drive to work LOL. Although that's about the only time I use the car. I go to work 10 min one way, and once a month to the grocery store....so I am saving gas, mainly cause I can't afford it LOL

                                    {"commentId":3672200,"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246","authorDomain":"cathryndarkwind"}
                                      Reply#25 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:51 AM EDT
                                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"398063","isPrivate":false}
                                      Leave a Comment:
                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                      {"threadId":"398063","contentId":"2035246"}
                                      Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                      Stop TrackingStop Tracking