Banks asking for credit card debt forgiveness

advertisement

With defaults on credit card debt spiraling amid a global financial downturn, banks already reeling from the mortgage crisis are losing billions more from unpaid credit card bills.

Big banks have formed an unusual alliance with consumer advocates to urge the government to allow huge portions of credit card debt to be forgiven, a turnabout from recent years when the banking industry lobbied strenuously to make it harder for consumers to erase their credit card debts in bankruptcy.

The new pilot program — which the banks hope will become permanent — could involve as many as 50,000 people struggling with credit card debt. On an individual basis, the amount of debt to be forgiven would rise according to the severity of the borrower's financial situation, up to a maximum of 40 percent.

"There's obviously a financial benefit to the financial institutions to step up to the plate right now," said Susan Keating, president and chief executive of the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, which has 108 member organizations around the country. "We absolutely support the proposal."

In an increasingly tough economic climate, banks and other mortgage lenders already have been agreeing to modify loans of distressed homeowners to help them avoid foreclosure. Now, banks making credit card loans have reached a point where they can lose less by forgiving part of the debt than seeing the consumer walk away entirely.

Credit cards — the ubiquitous plastic rectangles that have become an integral part of American life and the economy — now look to be the latest domino to drop in a financial crisis that started with subprime mortgages and continually takes new twists.

Amid rising job losses, consumers — even those with strong credit records — have been defaulting at high levels on their credit cards. Banks already battered by the mortgage and credit crises are bleeding tens of billions in red ink from the losses. The largest credit-card banks each set aside between $1 billion and $3.5 billion in the third quarter for losses on card loans as their profits plummeted.

The biggest credit card lenders include Discover Financial Services LLC, Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Capital One Financial Corp., American Express Co. and HSBC Holdings.

Credit card charge-off rates, balances written off as unpaid, rose to 6.8 percent in August, up 48 percent from a year earlier, according to Moody's Investors Service.

Americans are lumbering under about $900 billion in credit card debt, according to the latest available Federal Reserve figures. People who are in credit counseling, on average, carry seven cards.

Many of the people now having trouble making their credit card payments are in a double or triple whammy: their mortgages or car loans also may be under stress.

And for many, the torrent of envelopes bearing credit card offers at low initial rates — much like the old "teaser" rates on subprime mortgages — has recently been replaced by more somber notices of crimped credit lines, hikes in interest rates or even accounts being closed as lenders tighten the reins to reduce their risk.

The new proposal pitched to federal regulators by the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents more than 100 big banks and other financial companies, and the Consumer Federation of America, would allow lenders to reduce by as much as 40 percent the amount of credit card debt owed by deeply indebted consumers in a pilot program.

It recognizes that "there are some critical problems with credit card debt," said Bert Ely, a banking industry consultant based in Alexandria, Va. "We're going to see more of these efforts to try to minimize the situation."

Under the groups' proposal to U.S. Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan, whose Treasury Department agency oversees national banks, a pilot project would allow big credit card companies to sharply reduce the amounts owed by consumers in over their heads who don't qualify for the repayment plans now available.

Nearly all the biggest credit card banks have agreed to such a pilot program in which lenders would forgive as much as 40 percent of the amount consumers owe, allowing them to pay back the remainder over time.

The test program could reach as many as 50,000 borrowers, said Scott Talbott, senior vice president at the Roundtable. Borrowers would have to be in a counseling program for their credit card debt. The amount of debt to be forgiven would be determined case by case, depending on the borrower's financial condition; those receiving close to the maximum forgiveness level would be nearing a personal bankruptcy filing.

And there would be a tax benefit. Borrowers would be able to defer payment of income taxes they owe on the forgiven part of the debt until after the remainder was paid off. The lenders could wait until then to book their loss on the forgiven debt.

"Both parties win," Talbott said.

Current government rules don't allow lenders to offer repayment plans that reduce the amount of principal owed and borrowers to repay the balance over a period of several years. In cases where the principal can be reduced, under credit card settlements, borrowers normally are required to pay off the remainder over months rather than years.

Kevin Mukri, a spokesman for the comptroller's office, had no immediate comment on the new proposal Thursday. Peter Garuccio, a spokesman for the American Bankers Association, also declined to comment.

June Selby, who nearly filed for bankruptcy three years ago when she was buried under nearly $32,000 in school loans, saw both sides but said she didn't like the idea of anyone getting a free ride.

Selby, 60, worked with credit counselors to pay off nearly half the balance and is on track to be debt free by 2011.

"If (the proposal) makes it possible to maintain a sense of integrity and pay back debt without going into bankruptcy, that's one thing," said Selby, a certified nurse in Lawrenceville, Ga.

But she said she was against the idea of a free handout for people who've simply been irresponsible.

"There just has to be some accountability. Nobody is bailing me out. I had to work very hard to keep from bankruptcy and foreclosure," she said.

_____

AP Business Writer Candice Choi in New York contributed to this report.

  • 3 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.1
0.4
{"commentId":3798931,"authorDomain":"powerisknowledge"}

People struggle with credit card debt because of their greed and not living within their means. Why should their debt be forgiven? Many people should not be granted credit cards and yet they are because of the income banks and credit card companies receive, their greed. If the credit card debt bailout is realized then these people should be placed on a no credit card reissue probation. Or, a limit of the number of credit cards they can hold. Or, no credit card reissue and, instead, issued debit cards.

{"commentId":3798931,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"powerisknowledge"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:49 AM EDT
{"commentId":4046695,"authorDomain":"phosinski"}

Let me tell you its people like you that are helping the down spiraling of the economic mess. Credit Card companies made it difficult for people to afford their normal payments on their credit cards by tripling the APR when it did not need to be tripled. They were greeding and now that the American People are out of work and having a difficult time finding employment this is when we the people need help. Its ok to give the banks a mess of money to help them through our difficult financial situation but its not ok to help the people who are also struggling thru this mess. We are in this mess because of the financial mess, unemployment in my state is the second highest in the nation the first thing to go for me was my credit card bills, I have a family and that will always come before my credit cards. I always for years made my payments on time and doubled my minimum amt. now that I cannot find employment and unemployment pays me less then a 1/4 of what I use to make I have no choice but to hold on to my house and car and food, we need help as much as our banks do.

Think before you speak next time.

{"commentId":4046695,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"phosinski"}
    #1.1 - Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:03 AM EST
    {"commentId":4056710,"authorDomain":"powerisknowledge"}

    Phmystic, you have credit card(s) because you wanted to satisfy your wants. You are in debt because of your behavior. Don't hate the companies who issued you the cards. You made the debt because of your greed to have things you didn't need. What would you do after you were bailed out? Would you quit the credit cards and live strictly on debit cards? No! And why? Because you have to buy every cute little thing you see in a store. If it was up to me, I wouldn't bail any of you out. Why should the money I spend in taxes go to bail you out when you chose to be in the predicament you're in. I work too hard for my money to support irresponsible people and businesses. I don't have any credit cards. If I don't have the money to pay for it, I don't buy it. If I want something, I save to buy it. Oh! Forgot to mention! I'm not in debt and I'm able to save each pay day as the result of my not having credit cards.

    {"commentId":4056710,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"powerisknowledge"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.2 - Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:17 PM EST
    {"commentId":4056873,"authorDomain":"psychotic-wanderer"}

    Im sorry Phmystic, but why are you (were you) only paying minimums anyway?  Or even double minimums?  You realize that mathematically, paying the minimums usually doesnt get you debt free for several years worth of payments.  And by the time you finish those years of payments, you are left paying three, four or even two hundred times the amount you could have originially owed?

    I dont mean to pick on you, but its those kinds of credit management skills that gets people into problems.  You realize that every cent you pay in interest is money you've literally thrown in the garbage can right?

    And every month that you compound your principal drags your interest up, and more of your hard earned money hits the can with no returns.  You wouldnt go out and buy $200 in lotto tickets every month would you?

    I dont advocate a wholesale credit rejection like PowerisKnowledge... but you really should read in depth analysis of your credit terms.  You should never use your card to live, that is just asking for a bigger hole.

    If you cant pay it off at the end of the month, or you cant use your credit responsibly enough to pay down your principal in a matter of months, you really have no business using credit.

    I do not understand how people can blindly charge things and only pay the minimums... and expect the balance to go to zero.  Credit card companies seriously have a bunch of suckers on the line for them.  It's like gambling I guess... people continually pay into a sink hole thinking they are winning big time.  Was that TV worth the debt you are in now?  Debt so deep you have to use more debt in order to live... 

    {"commentId":4056873,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"psychotic-wanderer"}
      #1.3 - Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:31 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":3804957,"authorDomain":"upswing"}

      PowerIsKnowledge:

        If the credit card debt bailout is realized then these people should be placed on a no credit card reissue probation.

      It's hard to know where the blame comes down here; with the card issuers?  With the card holders? With Congress for lack of oversight?

      But, whoever is to blame, I doubt that the banks would agree to foregoing their predatory issuance of credit cards to anyone, irrespective of the user's credit strength and history, since the collection of fees and the resale of the ensuing designed defaulted loans is such a money-spinner for the CC issuers.

      So I hope that we all tread carefully around this potential credit card company scam.

      Currently, credit card holders who default on their credit card repayment are eventually offered percentage reduction deals by collection agencies as a matter of course.

      My reading of this situation is that, if the CC companies are allowed to retain these debts (currently they are forced to write them down, so that they can't carry them as offsetting losses ad infinitum) and effectively function as their own debt collections agency, then they likely will not fall under the restrictions of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, since this act refers only to third party debt collectors.

      This opens the CC holder to -- and effectively legalizes - a vast array of tried and trusted debt collection abuse scams and practices.

      Whether I'm right about this or not, I do believe that we should not get too overjoyed at the thought of a 40% "reduction" in a debt that eventually would heve resulted in a similar offer of reduction anyway, and that will likely come with a truckload of new  and oppressive legal obstacles to the CC holder's divestment of the remaining 60%.

      Banks and CC companies NEVER do anything that does not enrich them at the expense of the conumer.

      I also wonder what this would do to the arbitration clauses in Cerdit Card User agreements, which illegally force defaulters into biased arbitration environments, such as the National Arbitration Forum, where they are forced to "repay" alleged debts without any consideration for whether or not the dent is actually owed.

      As an aside:  It always fascinates me that the private credit card holding individual is held to -- and holds him or hersaelf to -- a much stricter code of conduct and morality regarding the repayment and possible default of his or her loans than the unscrupulous banks that issue those loans.

      Bottom Line:  Caveat emptor.

      {"commentId":3804957,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"upswing"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
      {"commentId":3811733,"authorDomain":"ibvaughan"}

      Ms. Marcy Gordon's article was interesting, but I believe there should have been more focus on the manner in which credit card companies have been operating for years unregulated.  And should have also showed how these institutions have helped exacerbate the debt problems many consumers are facing today.  No where did this article address the exhorbitant fees and interest rates banks have been allowed to charge which is a direct result of increasing consumer debt. 

      Has anyone seen the Frontline Special in conjunction with PBS on "The Secret History Of The Credit Card" -- this goes as far back as 2004.   

      The information on this site states it all -- everyone needs to view this.  The banks do not care about the consumer and has taken advantage of the consumer for years without any penalty to them.  Consumers are made to look like they are deadbeats while these greedy institutions continue to create and generate creative ways to suck more money out of the consumer by charging late fees, over the limit fees, exhorbitant interest rates, etc.  Often times, these fees are equal to the actual amount owed which is just outrageous and wrong.  And these fees continue to be generated for active and inactive accounts.  I say these banks should be handled in the same disrespectful manner they treat the consumer -- they shouldn't be allowed to catch a break.  And perhaps they too need some debt counseling -- suggest to them to call someone to negotiate better terms.  If Banks really want to help the consumer, they can start by returning all the fees they have legally extorted from the consumer and lowering interest rates - some banks are charging more than 29.9%.  The balance due for many people wouldn't require consumer debts to be foregiven if they were to just return the money they have legally stole and charging a reasonable interest rate.  Just doing this by default would lower balances and lower consumer debt so that the debt is the actual debt, not an amount increased due to the bank's creative ways to make money.  Credit Card Companies/Banks  should never have been allowed to charge interest at 29.9% or more -- even a balance as low as $200 takes forever to get paid at that interest rate if you're only able to make the minumum payment.    Bottom line, they do not want the consumer to be debt free -- it is in their best interest for consumers to pay them for years and at 29.9% that's exactly what will happen!   In addition there should be a limit on the number of times banks can charge the late fee and perhaps they can lower the fee some charge $29 or more -- what's with the number 29 anyway -- is that some type of magic number?

      Credit Card Companies Need to be regulated!  As a consumer and if asked I would reject and not bail them out!  As far as I can see -- they've amassed so much money by legally stealing from consumers -- forcing people to pay back a great deal more money than actually owe.  They should have managed all that legally stolen money better. 

      Bottom Line:  Extortionists beware -- somebody hopefully will start watching you!

      {"commentId":3811733,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"ibvaughan"}
        Reply#3 - Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:01 PM EDT
        {"commentId":4047154,"authorDomain":"daveaug1945"}

        if your having a hard time paying your credit card than you never planned your future, why did you run up your credit card, why did you not wait until you could pay for something, but no, you probably bought thinks you wanted, and not really needed, as so many people do, the banks are greedy there is no doubt of that, but you when you run up your credit card, you are as much the blame as the banks, live within your means, seems everyone that is having a problem, including the banks are looking for someone else to blame for their own stupidity, look in the mirror you will see the problem..now that they are receiving a bailout, this will only give them to green light to repeat the same things, looking in the future for another bailout,, when does the greed end, hmmm probably never., buy the way i am retired live on a pension, not much money, but i do fine living within my means, and enjoy life,

        {"commentId":4047154,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"daveaug1945"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#4 - Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:38 AM EST
        {"commentId":4047982,"authorDomain":"upswing"}

        I think everyone should simply stop paying their credit cards until the CC company fraud and excesses are reigned in.

        Screw 'em.

        Screw the credit rating agencies.

        Screw the banks.

        Screw Wall Street.

        Screw Bush, Paulson, Bernanke and their entire whoreson Ivy League mafiosa.

        Screw them all.

        Vile Parasites!

        {"commentId":4047982,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"upswing"}
          Reply#5 - Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:28 AM EST
          {"commentId":4058555,"authorDomain":"georgearchibald"}

          They are still trying to lighten the top of the pyramid when it is the bottom stones that are crumbling. This solution will make things worse.

          We are in this mess by a series of bad decisions. I am beginning to believe it was an engineered crisis. $2Trillion was just handed out by the fed to a undisclosed recipients. That  money is above and beyond the 700B that was authorized by our misrepresentatives.

          It is going to get alot worse before it gets better. When it is done, the few in control of our economy will be in control of the world economy and the public will see them as our saviors.

          You've been punked. Rockefeller, Kennedy are almost complete with their plan, ahead of schedule.

          {"commentId":4058555,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"georgearchibald"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#6 - Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:44 PM EST
          {"commentId":4059856,"authorDomain":"jfmeyers"}

          Damn I'm still fuming I didn't take that zero down interest only loan and upgrade to a huge home I couldn't afford.

          Just think I could have had my mortgage principal reduced, interest lowered and my payment lengthened to 40 years.

          To add more insult I now found out I should have opened more credit cards and run them up to the max and I could have had that forgiven.

          Damn I really missed the boat. I really wanted that $750,000 home, 50" plasma TV, new car and vacation to Hawaii. My best friend was smart she got it all now she gets it all for a much better price and some of it even free.

          Well I guess I just have to keep living with in my means, darn it.

          {"commentId":4059856,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"jfmeyers"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#7 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:23 AM EST
          {"commentId":5138675,"authorDomain":"arp-no-id"}

          Wow imagine paying ontime everytime for years and then in November your 401k gets halved and you go to the doc and find out you have cancer and when that happened you lost your job because the boss closed up shop. Now your a bum because you can barely pay your medication costs, your trying to find a job, unemployment pays 275.00 a week and you need whats left in the 401 to make sure you pay for your house. Looks like the credit card companies who have now tripled your rate and received billions of dollars from King George are not going to get paid for a while. Why should they? Your deal was for 6% not 36% and you have always paid them for over 25 years. They broke the trust not you. Where is the sense in making it harder for someone to pay when they are having a rough patch. Maybe they should just kill themselves because they were greedy and did not plan for the future and its their fault that they got cancer. Say a prayer Mr. . The camel will get to heaven before you do.

          {"commentId":5138675,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"arp-no-id"}
            Reply#8 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:01 PM EST
            {"commentId":5140253,"authorDomain":"upswing"}

            Bert:

            Very well put.

            {"commentId":5140253,"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250","authorDomain":"upswing"}
              #8.1 - Mon Feb 2, 2009 11:24 PM EST
              Reply
              {"canLink":false,"threadId":"404927","isPrivate":false}
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              {"threadId":"404927","contentId":"2057250"}
              Start TrackingStart Tracking
              Stop TrackingStop Tracking