Driver's Seat: GM staring into abyss

advertisement

For mighty General Motors, the news could hardly be worse. The nation's biggest automaker said Friday it lost $2.5 billion in the latest quarter as it was slammed by a slowing economy, a global credit crisis and the effect of high energy prices.

The company is now going through cash at a rate of $2 billion a month and says that without help it will run out of money in 2009.

“This is not necessarily the end of the road for General Motors, but they can certainly see the end of the road from where they are right now,” said Aaron Bragman, an automotive analyst at consultancy Global Insight.

Without a federal bailout, GM could be looking at bankruptcy, he added.

The entire auto industry is in trouble, but GM appears to be in worse shape than its rivals.

Ford burned through $7.7 billion in the latest quarter to keep its operations running but said it has enough cash to make it to 2010, when the economy and auto sales are expected to improve. Chrysler, now privately owned, does not report financial results but has a relatively strong cash position — a major reason that GM was interested in acquiring the company from Cerberus Capital Management.

GM said Friday it was suspending those talks, however, "to focus on its immediate liquidity challenges."

Faced with these sobering statistics, the Big Three are turning to Capitol Hill. On Thursday, the three CEOs and the leader of their biggest union met with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to discuss another $25 billion in federal aid on top of a $25 billion loan allocated just a few weeks ago.

The election of Barack Obama as the nation’s 44th president offers some new hope for the industry.

Obama singled out the auto industry Friday in his first news conference since the election,  calling it "the backbone of American manufacturing and a critical part of our attempt to reduce our dependence on foreign oil."

"I have made it a high priority for my transition team to work on additional policy options to help the auto industry adjust, weather the financial crisis and succeed in producing fuel-efficient cars here in the United States," he added. "I have asked my team to explore what we can do under current law and whether additional legislation will be needed for this purpose."

One big question is whether Congress will act in the upcoming lame-duck session, before the Jan. 20 inauguration.

“GM said they’ll be in trouble sometime next year, but it may come sooner than that,” Bragman said.

“The only scenario left now for GM and the other automakers is for the government to step in with some financial aid,” said Bragman. “The marketplace has not responded to the automakers’ pleas for money, or plans to sell its assets like the Hummer brand, so basically it’s up to the government now, and if they don’t step in quickly we’re looking at bankruptcy.”

In a conference call with reporters and analysts, Wagoner said the company will “take every action we possibly can” to avoid bankruptcy.

“We’re convinced that the consequences of bankruptcy would be dire,” he said. “We need to find a way to get through this, and that’s really our focus.”

Ford, which said Friday it plans to further reduce its workforce by 10 percent, is in a stronger liquidity position than GM, having mortgaged all its assets — including the iconic blue oval Ford logo — to the tune of $23 billion to finance its turnaround plan. Analysts expect Ford to have enough cash to finance its day-to-day operating needs until 2010, when the auto market is expected to pick up again.

For GM, the situation is grimmer. The automaker announced a range of moves Friday to improve liquidity by $5 billion by the end of next year by cutting capital spending, reducing sales promotions and further cutting production in the first quarter. The automaker also said it will lay off about 3,600 workers.

But those cost savings are not enough to save GM.

After the recent $700 billion bailout of the financial industry, there is some opposition to using taxpayer money to rescue yet another industry that has suffered from years of mismanagement.

But industry supports counter that the failure of GM or another automaker would have a severe ripple effect on the broader economy.

About 2.5 million American jobs would be lost in the first year if the industry shrinks by 50 percent, according to one dire report issued this week by the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich. About 239,000 of those job losses would be at one of the Big Three companies, with the rest coming from parts suppliers and related industries.

“I can understand the sentiment — why reward failure? Why reward an industry that has suffered from 25 years of mismanagement?” said Bragman. “The answer is the consequences of a major failure in the automotive industry far outweigh the cost of keeping the major automotive companies going."

Bankruptcy is a poor option because buyers would be unlikely to buy a new car from an automaker that might be out of business within a few years. A bankruptcy also would also lead to more company failures and layoffs at companies that supply the automakers, and the foreign automakers like Toyota and Honda that those companies supply, Bragman said.

The loss of tax revenue would weigh on state and federal governments, and the government also could be liable for pension and health-care obligations to workers, retirees and their spouses. Those costs would ultimately fall to taxpayers.

“The idea that we do nothing and let market forces correct this problem is shortsighted,” said Bragman. “You’re looking at millions of jobs lost if the industry goes under, and a lot of people rely on it for their livelihood. The industry is the largest purchaser of raw products like aluminum and electronics — it’s a huge industry and impacts all aspect our economy.”

Instead of being costly, a government lifeline for the U.S. automotive industry would actually be relatively cheap, said Center for Automotive Research Chairman David Cole. Studies show the economic impact of an automotive industry failure would be far higher than the cost of keeping the industry afloat until 2010, when automotive sales are expected to pick up again, he said.

“The cleanup of a calamity is going to be a lot more expensive than the cost of prevention because you’d be taking one million-plus of people out of the economy,” Cole said. “It’s like Hurricane Katrina — if you could have prevented the disaster it would have been a lot less costly.”

  • 23 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
8.1
4.5
1.8

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5
{"commentId":3969904,"authorDomain":"parthur169"}

Globalization and free trade will soon prove to be the biggest economic failures ever.

{"commentId":3969904,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"parthur169"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 6:02 PM EST
{"commentId":3975816,"authorDomain":"abrushing22"}

That's ignorant

{"commentId":3975816,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"abrushing22"}
  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 4:33 AM EST
{"commentId":3977419,"authorDomain":"wwssr40"}

While Unions put the Autoworker in the middle class, the average rate & benefits that are bestowed upon Union workers is phenominal. You combine that with a vehicle from all 3 automobile makers that isn't worth a damn and doesn't hold it's value makes a receipe for disaster. The American Auto Industry clearly can't see the forest for the trees.

{"commentId":3977419,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"wwssr40"}
  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:44 AM EST
{"commentId":3977925,"authorDomain":"cwappleton123"}

Stupid.

{"commentId":3977925,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"cwappleton123"}
  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:29 AM EST
{"commentId":3979874,"authorDomain":"lurkyeah"}

dont blame unions georgia...blame big oil...these companies(automakers) should have gone on the eco track years ago...big oil just wants us to continue our addiction to it...I know vehicles could get much better mileage if it wasn't for big oil!

{"commentId":3979874,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"lurkyeah"}
    #1.4 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:28 PM EST
    {"commentId":3985091,"authorDomain":"wwssr40"}

    Yea, but big oil didn't cause Union workers to make 20/hour plus. You make a sub par vehicle and demand high wages at the same time. It still adds up to a crappy car. I would love for Emerlou to jump in and explain his/her comment.

    {"commentId":3985091,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"wwssr40"}
    • 3 votes
    #1.5 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:57 PM EST
    {"commentId":3990632,"authorDomain":"brenbowen008"}

    Having worked for G.M. for 10 years, I feel I should be allowed to at least comment. I watched a once great company succumb to complacency and greed and frankly, if the "ripple effect" wasn't so profound, I'd let them sink. First off, please lighten the blame on the union.  Look at the top - after going through an Arab-oil embargo, a receesion in the 80's and now oil peaking at 147.50 a barrel, they Big Three management have "pimped off" the American region and has been producing energy efficient cars all over the world for years. If they want to survive, the big shots need to share-and re-tool the U.S. to produce those cares HERE. And for crying out loud, can't you make a small, plush energy efficient car? Every confounded foreign company can!

    The rest will have to do with our energy and health polices. I NEVER thought I would think this, much yet write it, but it's time for a little Socialism here. Take healthcare costs OUT of the equation.( sorry we will NEED to go to a single pay system. We have too many "Ferengi's" in the insurance industry), monitor executive salary and bonuses, (stupidity calls for a corp. Time Out) and finally re-tool the entire country for CNG. Even the Iranians are re-tooling their cars for CNG!! - hello??!! Another choice would be is to SERIOUSLY invest in the U.S. wind tunnel we have going through the Great Plains, but I seriouly digress. But you have to admit, the jobs alone would help. And make them UNION JOBS, if you want the middle class to survive. HARD CHOICES - you decide.  

    {"commentId":3990632,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"brenbowen008"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.6 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 1:08 PM EST
    {"commentId":6864253,"authorDomain":"facingfacts"}

    I have been harping about CNG powered cars and light trucks for months now. You are the second person to at least acknowledge it. I think it would be the best plan to get greener American made products on the road in a short amount of time. What could it take? Six months for the vehicles to hit the road?When South America went for CNG, there was not a singlevehicle that I rode in that wasn't converted. I don't want a conversion, I want a new CNG powered pickup off the showroom floor. I want the same warranty and a fair price. I am a GM person and have been for 50 years. I am in the energy service business and I need a pickup. I also want the US to use it's vast amounts of Natural Gas Reserves instead of importing foreign oil. I want to quit using coal. Sell it to India and China. Let them pay for the carbon foot print. Whatever the hell that is supposed to be.

    {"commentId":6864253,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"facingfacts"}
      #1.7 - Sun May 3, 2009 4:39 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":3970051,"authorDomain":"dpickering"}

      What i don't see is anyone discussing what caused the problems within the Detroit-3. This did not all begin with the failing economy and the rising gas prices that caused auto sales to drop dramatically.

      The Detroit-3 are begging Congress to throw more money at them to fix their liquidity problems. How about fixing the mismangement of all 3 companies thatcaused this entire scenario in the first place.

      If congress throws more money at the Detroit-3, without stipulations requiring major changes in business practices, all they are doing is wasting out tax dollars yet again as this will solve nothin other then keep 3 struggling mismangaged major corporations from going bankrupt for a few more months.

      then they wil be back asking for more handouts.

      {"commentId":3970051,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"dpickering"}
      • 6 votes
      Reply#2 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 6:14 PM EST
      {"commentId":3976030,"authorDomain":"henrytools"}

      you are correct, i did biz with them for 45 years, i saw waste that would ruin   anything that ever was, theft that would set records

      worker went home for 6 months, came back , was given job back and back pay

      {"commentId":3976030,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"henrytools"}
        #2.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 6:21 AM EST
        {"commentId":3977943,"authorDomain":"cwappleton123"}

        The problem is the unions dummy

        {"commentId":3977943,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"cwappleton123"}
          #2.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:30 AM EST
          {"commentId":3979935,"authorDomain":"lurkyeah"}

          hey emerlou...I suppose you are also on that philosophy of drill everywhere...right? Then once we drill everywhere & pollute our beaches completely then what? Eventually that resource is going to run out...it's not unlimited! THE PROBLEM IS BIG OIL...NOT UNIONS!

          {"commentId":3979935,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"lurkyeah"}
            #2.3 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:33 PM EST
            {"commentId":3982386,"authorDomain":"oracle-1"}

            I worked on the assembly line for Ford 40 years ago for 11 days before they went on a long strike. There was the attitude along the assembly line to only do the minimum work. If a part required 6 bolts they would put 2 on and let the car pass along the line. One worker finished off a pint of liquor then sealed the bottle inside the door panel "They will go crazy trying to figure out this rattle!" he said as the car went on to the next station!

            {"commentId":3982386,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"oracle-1"}
            • 2 votes
            #2.4 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 5:17 PM EST
            {"commentId":3992383,"authorDomain":"ezeques"}
            ezequesDeleted
            {"commentId":4004372,"authorDomain":"ater1ILCC"}

            Absolutely correct they are mismanaged and have been for years. Like I have said these so called business men have no future vision. They are way over paid and they should be forfeiting there salary because of their relentless failure to run a company. You know that their subordinates who get there yearly reviews and who are not preforming to their so called potential don't get a competative raise until they meet their goals and objectives....now its time for all upper senior management to be reviewed for their total ignorance in running their auto company....I know it would hurt the US economy but we should let them fail......if we bail them out the same thing will happen again. Just remove them from the equation. GREED.......

            {"commentId":4004372,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"ater1ILCC"}
              #2.6 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:32 PM EST
              Reply
              {"commentId":3970707,"authorDomain":"galengrounds"}

              being a retired auto worker 30.7 years at general motors,i would like you to know that our weekly pay supported your government to the likes of twenty eight percent.affecting many states ,and the economy of our united states.also general motors over the years has done many things for this country of ours.if you would just take the time to study your history.also with out a union the autoworker would not be in the middle class.they help build the united states auto company with there sweat and shorten years.for those who would rather buy foreign products,what about the new wave of INDIA,CHINA and other countrys taking new jobs from america that many never would have thought of. such as enginering,computer programmers ETC. america needs to keep all manufacturing jobs in the USA,so when in danger we will not have to put a order in to CHINA for F18 jets, or our future ABRAMS tank.please quit bashing the automakers and help these companies to become self reliant so we can have our hydrogen and electric cars and trucks made in the USA.for the better of all our communities and future  programs for all our citizens.galen rounds

              {"commentId":3970707,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"galengrounds"}
              • 3 votes
              Reply#3 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 7:08 PM EST
              {"commentId":3971664,"authorDomain":"cpbglmn223223"}

              Instead of government bailouts these Avaricious morons should be on trial.

              Good riddance !

              {"commentId":3971664,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"cpbglmn223223"}
              • 2 votes
              #3.1 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 8:37 PM EST
              {"commentId":3974762,"authorDomain":"uofmbacker"}

              Couldn't say it better myself!

              {"commentId":3974762,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"uofmbacker"}
              • 2 votes
              #3.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:01 AM EST
              {"commentId":3974833,"authorDomain":"uofmbacker"}

              My last comment was for galen grounds.  Not RJ or any of the other haters.

              {"commentId":3974833,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"uofmbacker"}
              • 1 vote
              #3.3 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:09 AM EST
              {"commentId":3976880,"authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}

              I understand what you said but that doesn't change the fact that  GM and FORD and CHRYSLER  are poorly fun companies that produce cars the public does want .

              {"commentId":3976880,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}
                #3.4 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 8:54 AM EST
                {"commentId":3977815,"authorDomain":"galengrounds"}

                also have a freind who found on the internet-water4gas,to improve miles per gallon.it has increase his mileage seven miles per gallon.it is a old concept of taking baking soda and distilled water,and putting stainless plates with a positive,negative charge in  a quart size jar,hydrogen gas is emitted and connected to fuel intake.he is currently building a improve model using thirty plates the size of a small aquarium.should up the mileage to 30 miles a gallon.this seems to be a great way to improve mileage per gallon.i wish america would consider using this concept to make us more energy effecint.galen grounds

                {"commentId":3977815,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"galengrounds"}
                  #3.5 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:19 AM EST
                  {"commentId":3992397,"authorDomain":"ezeques"}
                  ezequesDeleted
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":3971193,"authorDomain":"kber45xj"}

                  HaHaHa you suck.

                  Stick a fork in GM they are done.  There is no way ever in hell I would spend a cent on there crap ever.

                  HaHaHa

                  {"commentId":3971193,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"kber45xj"}
                    Reply#4 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 7:50 PM EST
                    {"commentId":3971547,"authorDomain":"gb23"}

                    I'm sorry Galen.  You may be right about the importance of the automotive industry to the U.S., but that still doesn't change the fact that these companies have performed abysmally.  In an effort to maximize profits, they have neglected critical R&D and savings for the future.  These companies were making money hand over fist a decade ago.  Where is that money now?  Now, of course our economy cannot afford the failure of these corporations.  As a nation, we need those jobs and that revenue, but unless the government takes some stake in the resolution of this problem instead of handing out cash for nothing, we all suffer more.  If the taxpayers are going to pay for these companies to stay alive and retool, then the taxpayers deserve some of the profits when they return.  The executives have gotten their share, now it's the people's turn.

                    {"commentId":3971547,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"gb23"}
                    • 6 votes
                    Reply#5 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 8:25 PM EST
                    {"commentId":3973368,"authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}

                    What I would find so unfair would be if the government (us taxpayers) bail out GM because of their mismanagement, but give nothing to Ford and Chrysler, because they aren't as big of a failure. It should also only be a loan, not a gift, to be paid back with interest. There should also be conditions that substantially cut executive salaries, along with at least 20-30% pay reductions for the union workers. They can whine all they want, but they will still be paid better than 90% of the country AND they will still have a job!

                    {"commentId":3973368,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}
                    • 2 votes
                    #5.1 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:44 PM EST
                    {"commentId":3975183,"authorDomain":"schwrtzfam"}

                    This is not the time to be worker and union bashing. The workers are not responsible for the company's mismanagement. 

                    {"commentId":3975183,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"schwrtzfam"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #5.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:53 AM EST
                    {"commentId":3975982,"authorDomain":"malemon"}

                    They say layoff but they still get 90% of there pay! I don't want my tax dollars going to pay people to sit home and make more money than me. while I'm working to keep my head above water!  And they have to add that money to the cars price.

                    {"commentId":3975982,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"malemon"}
                    • 3 votes
                    #5.3 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 6:00 AM EST
                    {"commentId":3977404,"authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}

                    We had a General Motors plant in our town and they it was closed.  Why? The cars they were making were not selling.  My friend was given a severance package and now at 50 years old can draw $3k  a month forever.  Do we bailout this kind of behavior?

                    {"commentId":3977404,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}
                    • 2 votes
                    #5.4 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:43 AM EST
                    {"commentId":3978226,"authorDomain":"galengrounds"}

                    i agree the government should demand new standards from the big3,top execs can be removed .or receive bonuses based on results!!!!!!

                    {"commentId":3978226,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"galengrounds"}
                    • 2 votes
                    #5.5 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:54 AM EST
                    {"commentId":3980253,"authorDomain":"greencheck"}

                    If we bail them out and if - a big if - they do actually become profitable, we, the taxpayers, will never see one red cent of that profit. We're nationalizing banking and insurance, now the auto industry. What's next? How about the airline industry? Say goodbye to capitalism.

                    {"commentId":3980253,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"greencheck"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #5.6 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 2:03 PM EST
                    {"commentId":3990022,"authorDomain":"sneila"}

                    GreenCheck

                    You are correct....

                    {"commentId":3990022,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"sneila"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #5.7 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 12:16 PM EST
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":3971588,"authorDomain":"dickums1949"}

                    And this is the company that wants to buy out Chrysler?! Why,

                     so they can burn thru their cash reserves and then they can both go out of business. I say let them sink,and then Chrysler can buy them out for pennies on the dollar. Don't let their poor management destroy two companies.

                    {"commentId":3971588,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"dickums1949"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#6 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 8:30 PM EST
                    {"commentId":3971772,"authorDomain":"rtakers"}

                    As the son of a father who was a loyal GM customer most of his life, I bought my first car from GM. A Chevy Vega in 1972. It ran for about six months and started leaking oil. A lot of oil. I knew from a friend who was a GM worker that GM was aware they had a problem with the aluminum block engine in the Vega. So I took it to the dealership. But the dealership acted completely ignorant and had no interest in helping me solve my problem. That was my last GM and American car. And in my estimation, that attitude about quality was a cultural issue for GM that eventually rotted the company from within. They now deserve what they get. Except we taxpayers will be paying the price.

                    {"commentId":3971772,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"rtakers"}
                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#7 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 8:46 PM EST
                    {"commentId":3975685,"authorDomain":"smoke-it-if-ya-got-it"}

                    I too tried hard to support the American automaker GM.  The initial purchase was a sleazy experience in my estimation... a typical wheel and deal kind of thing that did nothing to dispel the car salesman stereotype.  The new car, a Chevy Citation (Motor Trend "Car of the Year" - LOL) was driven all of 15 miles before it was discovered that the lights didn't work.  An entire wiring harness had to be replaced.  Not long after that a horrendous noise developed that sounded like the engine was coming apart... the torque convertor bolts were coming undone and banging against the inside of the flywheel(!)  The "Check Engine" light frequently came on and after a $50 dollar diagnostic workup, I was told each time that this was "normal."  I had many exchanges with the service manager who tried hard to whitewash it (as he took my money.)  It was around this time that congress enacted the "Lemon Law."  Any ideas why????

                    {"commentId":3975685,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"smoke-it-if-ya-got-it"}
                      #7.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 3:45 AM EST
                      {"commentId":3977301,"authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}

                      HaHa I had a Vega too a orange one I called it slut. Then engine locked up on it too. I went to the GM zone office and complained and I was lucky they replaced it for me. But it still burned oil like crazy. After we were married my wife and I sold it for $300 and we bought a Datsun now Nissan.

                      {"commentId":3977301,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #7.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:34 AM EST
                      {"commentId":3990065,"authorDomain":"sneila"}

                      I owned a citation and two days after I drove it off the lot...the check engine light came on.

                      {"commentId":3990065,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"sneila"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #7.3 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 12:19 PM EST
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":3971782,"authorDomain":"woodym1"}

                      Galen I have two GM vehicles A 01 Silhouette (58k miles and a 04 Colorado 33K miles.) Both receive frequent oil changes and other recommended maintenance..  I spent $2200.00 in repairs to the 01 last spring. A thousand of which in repairs for which the Dextron class action case came up.  Unfortunately I was unaware of (the suit)  until too late! Loose, deteriorated  manifold etc. You may of heard of this.

                       The Colorado sits in the shop awaiting a new cylinder head.  Already had a brake failure, pedal to the floor.  A  heater blower, hoses dangling precariously  underneath my vehicle. 33 thousand miles. My mom bought a new 2000  Chevy which suffered a fuel pump loss. At 18K miles. My 78 Buick had two cracked cylinder heads and permanently leaking gasket less exhaust manifolds prior to 50 thousand. Never overheated! Now the point of all this is:

                       Can you figure out why I will never buy another GM product?

                      {"commentId":3971782,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"woodym1"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#8 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 8:46 PM EST
                      {"commentId":3971958,"authorDomain":"righttowork"}

                      This is simple:  First, the automakers DO need to go bankrupt.  This might finally wake up America to the seriousness of the problem.  The automakers and dealers are no different than the dirty mortgage sellers contributing to the housing crisis.  GM insists on making HUGE gas-guzzling vehicles (Surburban, Tahoe, etc.) that about 90% of people don't really need. The public is no honest broker in this as well. I am sure 90% of gas-guzzling vehicles sold could easily be replaced by a fuel-efficient sedan.  They are mostly driven in the city and rarely see off-road use and almost are never used to tow anything.  And what about the introduction of hybrids.  Am I really supposed to feel good that a Escalade hybrid gets 20mpg highway versus 12 mpg?  20 mpg is still horrible, especially for a vehicle that is hardly ever used for its intended purpose. 

                      I feel that GM and others should start over.  IF THE GOVERNMENT bails them out, the tax payers (via the government), should have a say in stipulations governing the bailout.  No high salary setbacks for CEOs on the way out.  Also, the unions should be abolished.  Who needs $ to install a seat in a car?  The unions bill bankrupt every business and see everything they are supposed to stand for ruin.  They do not have the workers interest at heart, only their own.

                      Back in the spring, my wife and I traded our GM minivan in for an import sedan.  It gets better mileage and will retain its value far longer and is 100% more reliable than the minivan we traded in.  It was only three years old, but it was already starting to fall apart, with only 36K miles on it. 

                      Going bankrupt will finally force retooling of the plants to make fuel efficient vehicles (to the tune of 35-50 mpg).  It can be done, but I fear that the lower price of gasoline these past few weeks will cause people to forget just how bad they do not need their gas guzzler to navigatge through the surburban terrain.

                      {"commentId":3971958,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"righttowork"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#9 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:03 PM EST
                      {"commentId":3977977,"authorDomain":"cwappleton123"}

                      U are so right..Get rid of all unions.

                      {"commentId":3977977,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"cwappleton123"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #9.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:34 AM EST
                      {"commentId":3978873,"authorDomain":"oskeewowwow"}

                      Right-to-Work - You make some good points in that you can't blame it all on the automakers.  Countless consumers were dumb enough to buy those big gas guzzlers that they didn't really need because that was the trend (I include myself in this because we followed the trend for a while too). SUV's and pickups, even though most people bought them mostly for their looks.  Now the public's into crossovers, most of which can only seat 5 people, and still aren't anything to brag about for fuel economy.  We can carry 8 people in our minivan plus a lot of luggage and get better gas mileage than most of them.

                      GM and the others kept building gas hogs because people kept buying them.

                      {"commentId":3978873,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"oskeewowwow"}
                        #9.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 11:56 AM EST
                        {"commentId":3980020,"authorDomain":"lurkyeah"}

                        Yeah right-to-work philosophy is what the illegals & rich love...your moronic point-of-view is simply PATHETIC!

                        {"commentId":3980020,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"lurkyeah"}
                          #9.3 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:41 PM EST
                          {"commentId":6864708,"authorDomain":"facingfacts"}

                          I doubt that I am lucky. Most of my life has been working my butt off and getting kicked in the gut for it. I have owned GM vehicles since my first car in 1961 and have a new GM pickup in the driveway right now. I have never had a problem with any of them. There has never been any reason to even have a warranty on any of them. I think if you do a fairly good job at maintenance and don't drive it like you stole it, GM makes a great vehicle for a fair price. All of the people that bought foreign made cars, bought them at a low price. That is the only criteria they used. When all the US manufacturing is gone, there will be no deals. It has taken 40 years to get to this point and the off spring of the BB are the ones that have brought us to our knees. Thanks boys and girls. Now go plug in your iPods and get some more learning.

                          {"commentId":6864708,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"facingfacts"}
                            #9.4 - Sun May 3, 2009 5:31 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":3972041,"authorDomain":"righttowork"}

                            Corrected Text

                            This is simple:  First, the automakers DO need to go bankrupt.  This might finally wake up America to the seriousness of the problem.  The automakers and dealers are no different than the dirty mortgage sellers contributing to the housing crisis.  GM insists on making HUGE gas-guzzling vehicles (Surburban, Tahoe, etc.) that about 90% of people don't really need. The public is no honest broker in this as well. I am sure 90% of gas-guzzling vehicles sold could easily be replaced by a fuel-efficient sedan.  They are mostly driven in the city and rarely see off-road use and almost are never used to tow anything.  And what about the introduction of hybrids.  Am I really supposed to feel good that a Escalade hybrid gets 20mpg highway versus 12 mpg?  20 mpg is still horrible, especially for a vehicle that is hardly ever used for its intended purpose. 

                            I feel that GM and others should start over.  IF THE GOVERNMENT bails them out, the tax payers (via the government), should have a say in stipulations governing the bailout.  No high salary setbacks for CEOs on the way out.  Also, the unions should be abolished.  Who needs $55.00 per hour to install a seat in a car?  The unions will bankrupt every business and see everything they are supposed to stand for ruin.  They do not have the workers interest at heart, only their own.

                            Back in the spring, my wife and I traded our GM minivan in for an import sedan.  It gets better mileage and will retain its value far longer and is 100% more reliable than the minivan we traded in.  It was only three years old, but it was already starting to fall apart, with only 36K miles on it. 

                            Going bankrupt will finally force retooling of the plants to make fuel efficient vehicles (to the tune of 35-50 mpg).  It can be done, but I fear that the lower price of gasoline these past few weeks will cause people to forget just how bad they do not need their gas guzzler to navigatge through the surburban terrain.

                            {"commentId":3972041,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"righttowork"}
                              Reply#10 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:10 PM EST
                              {"commentId":3972134,"authorDomain":"woodym1"}

                              May I offer an amendment?:  "Who deserves 55.00 per hour to do grunt work?" Otherwise, I agree, GM should fold, the company has worked tirelessly toward that goal!

                              {"commentId":3972134,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"woodym1"}
                                #10.1 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:17 PM EST
                                {"commentId":3980099,"authorDomain":"lurkyeah"}

                                also you seem to forget with the greedy(like you) how do people manage to buy a car let alone a house if everything became right-to-work??? Cost of living keeps going up(due to the greedy) &  I'm sure you think all union workers are lazy like Mr.McCain...funny how most of them pro right to work companies only hire illegals...they live in studios 20+ & are treated like crap...get paid almost nothing & the greedy get richer...I do believe a strong middle-class makes a strong country...just look at Mexico for that anwser...DO THEY HAVE A MIDDLE-CLASS????

                                {"commentId":3980099,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"lurkyeah"}
                                  #10.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:48 PM EST
                                  Reply
                                  {"commentId":3972076,"authorDomain":"mbmoyer"}

                                  There's many glass houses in the automakers' neighborhoods.  Unions have helped build these companies into great pillars of our economy, but they've also helped bring them to their knees with out rageous demands.  Management has made necessary decisions to bring economies of scale so must of us can afford multiple vehicles, but they didn't stay ahead or even keep up with off-shore automakers (you think they'd have learned back in the '70s) and now they're behind the 8-ball.

                                  Gov't stay out.  If GM goes under, it goes under.  Someone will pick up the pieces seeing a great deal.  Everyone (management, stockholders and unions) needs to do some serious team-work and belt tightening.  In short - there's no easy answer, and throwing money at it won't do it.

                                  {"commentId":3972076,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"mbmoyer"}
                                    Reply#11 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:13 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":3975212,"authorDomain":"schwrtzfam"}

                                    The someone you refer to will likely be a foreign manufacturer. Aren't we owned enough by foreign interests?

                                    {"commentId":3975212,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"schwrtzfam"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    #11.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:57 AM EST
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":3972203,"authorDomain":"starlighter2002"}

                                    Since the 1970's they all knew this day was coming. Instead of having a back up plan to poor sales of SUV's etc, the excutives of the 3 have declided that profit NOW was more important. Oh well, right? Kinda like going to Disney World when you knew you were being laid off. You may have done it, but now you are broke. This is the auto industry. They don't have a clue how to build a car I want to buy, and I am NOT buying one, even if I did want to buy one! My own future is uncertain right now.

                                    {"commentId":3972203,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"starlighter2002"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#12 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:24 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":3975309,"authorDomain":"schwrtzfam"}

                                    That's the point of the article. No matter how it is done in my opinion, the industry needs to 1) stay in the US 2) Stay American owned 3) Fire the current management without golden parachutes, 4) Immediately halt production of hummers and large fuel inefficient SUVs 5) retool the factories for fuel efficient or green autos and restructure their business, 6) Actually PRODUCE the concept cars they have shown for years, and REPLACE the LEMONS they sell instead of patching them up constantly. These companies have lost the confidence of the American consumer. It will take time to rebuild that confidence if it is even possible. 

                                    {"commentId":3975309,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"schwrtzfam"}
                                      #12.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 2:10 AM EST
                                      {"commentId":3977224,"authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}

                                      It aint going to happen

                                      {"commentId":3977224,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}
                                        #12.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:26 AM EST
                                        Reply
                                        {"commentId":3972294,"authorDomain":"marktmatthews"}

                                        Stop giving money to GM and Ford, you're just throwing our money away as they both lose! Let one of them go bankrupt and then the other will have less competition and may actually make a profit! They both suck anyways, if the product sucks why do we keep investing in it? ..because it's American? They're starting to make America look average.

                                        {"commentId":3972294,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"marktmatthews"}
                                          Reply#13 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:33 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":3972538,"authorDomain":"BeyondGreen"}

                                          Energy Independence needs to be included in the realm of our economic issues. Our dependence on foreign oil impacts every aspect of our society and economy. This past year we were slammed by high prices at the pump that drained our wallets. The cost of food and every consumer product has risen because of increased production and shipping costs. The average family had no money left over to spend, save or invest. So we tighten our belts, we spend less because we have less and sadly that results in more job losses. We have so much available in the way of FREE energy, solar and wind that can be utilized to replace oil. Hybrid and electric plug in cars would replace another huge percentage of our dependence on foreign oil. The last stimulus checks cost our government 168 BILLION. It did zip for our economy.That money could have gone a long way towards getting America started on the path to energy independence.Jeff Wilson has a great new book out called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence NOW. I highly recommend this book to anyone who is worried about our economy and interested in seeing our country become energy independent!  http://www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com  

                                          {"commentId":3972538,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"BeyondGreen"}
                                            Reply#14 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:47 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":3972944,"authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}

                                            yeah that the answer...except that the tech is not ready...and if it every is there will be a ten year inviromental study before the first solar panel gets built because it might shade a rock that a skink may theoritically use to sun himself...thousands of your buddies chained to a wind mill because it could injure birdlife...

                                            there are half of dozen cases by sierra club trying to prevent corps of engineers for repairing new orleans levees because it could negatively impact lake shrimp

                                            {"commentId":3972944,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}
                                              #14.1 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:12 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":3977221,"authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}

                                              The oil prices were driven up by the Wall Street boys. We have not built a new gasoline refinery in over 30 years. Why? Liberal environmentalists.  People waste so much money on things they don't need. Somebody correct me cause I am taking a stab at what I read but we have bought something like 50 million flat screen televisions is the past few years. We are the worst country in the free world for saving.

                                              {"commentId":3977221,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"WILDWONDERFUL"}
                                                #14.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:25 AM EST
                                                Reply
                                                {"commentId":3972592,"authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}

                                                i think obama is right, it is time to admit defeat and retreat, but not from there...from here

                                                if you have spent most of you life building a successful business....you are now the enemy!

                                                if you have spent your life providing for your family and their future...the new axis of evil!

                                                there are still countries who appreciate your efforts...you still have 2 1/2 months.

                                                america no longer has the back bone to be a reliable ally to the free world,  good luck and I'll miss you all.

                                                {"commentId":3972592,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}
                                                • 2 votes
                                                Reply#15 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:50 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":3975917,"authorDomain":"tyrantsaretalking"}

                                                Do you haveany idea what you are talking about. Get a grip.

                                                {"commentId":3975917,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"tyrantsaretalking"}
                                                  #15.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 5:27 AM EST
                                                  Reply
                                                  {"commentId":3972692,"authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}

                                                  Between the powerfull unions demanding outrageous pay and benefits for generally low-skilled work, while demanding that the companies remain inefficient to keep these low-skilled workers paying union dues, I don't have much sympathy for the American auto industry. I find it interesting that I haven't been hearing about the American factories of foreign-branded vehicles suffering the same quality and profitability problems. It's too bad that GM, Ford and Chrysler never seemed to learn how to compete effectively with Toyota, Honda and Nissan vehicles that are also built in this country.

                                                  I strongly believe that unions are generally like a cancer to our national economy, sucking the life right out of our economy until it kills the host. Maybe the unions should use some of their massive funds to bailout the very companies that they are killing!

                                                  {"commentId":3972692,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"jgbennett56"}
                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  Reply#16 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:57 PM EST
                                                  {"commentId":3978009,"authorDomain":"cwappleton123"}

                                                  You are so right..This country needs to rid itself of all unions,and do so now.

                                                  {"commentId":3978009,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"cwappleton123"}
                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #16.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:36 AM EST
                                                  {"commentId":3978213,"authorDomain":"wattsd12"}

                                                  Unions breed mediocrity! Civil service jobs breed mediocrity!  Sad to say but mediocrity and the lack of common sense will be the downfall of America.

                                                  {"commentId":3978213,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"wattsd12"}
                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #16.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:53 AM EST
                                                  {"commentId":3978976,"authorDomain":"evr"}

                                                  The greater problem is the unions spend a lot of money in political elections, advertising, etc.  I don't know if they have massive funds, but they should be forced to use those funds to help their members, especially to meet pension and healthcare promises made.  The last thing the taxpayers need is to become responsible for making these payments.  Already, PBGC (a/k/a taxpayers) has absorbed responsibility for making these payments for other failed companies.  If you lay on the sweet retirement promises made to county, state and federal employees, who are unionized, there is a tremendously significant unfunded liability there.  Lierally, the taxpayer cannot absorb these.

                                                  {"commentId":3978976,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"evr"}
                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #16.3 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 12:07 PM EST
                                                  {"commentId":3981521,"authorDomain":"andreasdullin"}

                                                  Yes, and don't forget about these perverted safety policies:

                                                  "wear your PPE, forget productivity!","saftety first!"

                                                  Q:what are 100 safety people on the bottom of the ocean?

                                                  A: A damn good start!

                                                  {"commentId":3981521,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"andreasdullin"}
                                                    #16.4 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 3:53 PM EST
                                                    Reply
                                                    {"commentId":3972696,"authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}

                                                    the death of almost 5000 brave American soldiers in 5 years doing the job they signed up for:   a bush war crime

                                                    the murder of 2,000,000 babies a year (mostly for convienience):  my right

                                                    why does this not make sense to me

                                                    {"commentId":3972696,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}
                                                      Reply#17 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 9:57 PM EST
                                                      {"commentId":3972916,"authorDomain":"woodym1"}

                                                      Yeah, big whoop amos, right on target! Now go pound sand!

                                                      {"commentId":3972916,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"woodym1"}
                                                        #17.1 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:10 PM EST
                                                        Reply
                                                        {"commentId":3972968,"authorDomain":"baffledguy"}

                                                        I once read the average hourly rate for a GM worker with everything taken into account was around $73. Many will disagree, especially ones who worked/work in the auto industry, but I can't comprehend the sanity of such compensation. Individuals with Masters and Doctorates do not make this kind of money. How can anyone substantiate an assembly line worker with simple labor skills earn this type of money? Yes, a lot of it is loaded on the back end but it still has to be paid. Unions WERE great, unfortuantely they're driving many American company's out of business. It's also very easy to say overseas workers, businesses, governments, blah blah blah create unfair conditions which are the main problems but reality is labor costs are just too high for these types of jobs. The fight for middle class, which I feel is far beyond middle class wages, is starting to create a new "once employed" class. Don't blame others, look in the mirror. This is not the only reason but certainly a big contributor.

                                                        {"commentId":3972968,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"baffledguy"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        Reply#18 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:14 PM EST
                                                        {"commentId":3975149,"authorDomain":"josephcoburncook"}

                                                        while a kinda high salery it is not that high

                                                        Wage Rate of GM/Ford/DaimlerChrysler

                                                        UAW Represented Assembly Workers as of March 5, 2007

                                                         

                                                        GM Assembler                                     Hourly Rate                             $26.09

                                                                                                                        COLA                                            1.77

                                                                                                                                                                           $27.86

                                                         

                                                        FORD Assembler                                 Hourly Rate                             $26.10

                                                                                                                        COLA                                            1.83

                                                                                                                                                                           $27.93

                                                         

                                                        DAIMLERCHRYSLER                     Hourly Rate                             $26.86

                                                        Assembler                                             COLA                                            1.89

                                                                                                                                                                           $28.75

                                                        {"commentId":3975149,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"josephcoburncook"}
                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        #18.1 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 1:48 AM EST
                                                        {"commentId":3975658,"authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}

                                                        a large portion of the 73 (if it is 73) is company paid benefits, life insurance, health insurance, unemployement insurance, paid vacations, assorted regulations from osha for safety training, etc. etc.

                                                        {"commentId":3975658,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #18.2 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 3:37 AM EST
                                                        {"commentId":3978174,"authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}

                                                        Have you ever checked out what you state senator and congressman makes?  Or for that matter their net worth?  Our Senator Feinstein's net worth is 99million dollars !  The average union worker's wages pale to what our tax dollars support on capitol hill.  But I think these auto companies should approach the coutries who are doing American jobs (outsourcing) for a hand out.  My 2000 Ford had a sticker saying "Assembled in Mexico", so let Ford ask Mexico for the money they need.

                                                        {"commentId":3978174,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"lmaccarato"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #18.3 - Sat Nov 8, 2008 10:49 AM EST
                                                        {"commentId":3991829,"authorDomain":"indigohalo"}

                                                        So what? Do you want a car that's been built on WalMart wages? Also, the Detroit-3 gripe about Union wages but they never want to talk about executive compensation (a billion dollars per year for sitting on your a$$ doing nothing). At least people on the front line actually WORK.

                                                        {"commentId":3991829,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"indigohalo"}
                                                          #18.4 - Sun Nov 9, 2008 3:03 PM EST
                                                          {"commentId":6853831,"authorDomain":"gpnlee"}

                                                          And you think thats reasonable? for a labor style position. More so obviously a lower educated employee... that is the factor here..

                                                          I was a "Civil Servant" retired law enforcement from Florida. I didn't earn that hourly rate. actually much less. The state doesn't pay any of my benefits just a measly 80% of annual. with a small 1.5% cola.

                                                          My son is Air Force he is paid less than 1400 a month ? wow and you say a assembly line worker is worth more...  I think that is an outrage. Just like all of these athletes being paid millions and most of them are criminals. but thats ok they had a rough life.. 

                                                          wow I must say I really feel warm and fuzzy now that I understand the mis treatments your about to endure..  

                                                          {"commentId":6853831,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"gpnlee"}
                                                            #18.5 - Sat May 2, 2009 7:41 PM EDT
                                                            Reply
                                                            {"commentId":3973084,"authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}

                                                            i haven't got it yet, but i just went from have a pack a day to three packs a day so you anti-smoking nazi's can pay for my cancer treatments. i just wish i was a drinker

                                                            {"commentId":3973084,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}
                                                            • 2 votes
                                                            Reply#19 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:22 PM EST
                                                            {"commentId":3973097,"authorDomain":"bobket"}

                                                            if gm files chapter 11 the judge can start looking at union contracts including pension and medical,they did this to the coal mines in southern illinois some years ago,they claimed they couldn't sell the mines to satisfy their creditors with the union contracts and pension,medical benifits to retirees,so poof! no more medical and pensions were shifted to the feds,the uaw went for obama in a big way and now it's payback time...the bailout will go through

                                                            {"commentId":3973097,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"bobket"}
                                                              Reply#20 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:22 PM EST
                                                              {"commentId":3973311,"authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}

                                                              the right and opportunity to succeed goes hand in hand with the right and opportunity to fail.  survival of the fittest

                                                              {"commentId":3973311,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}
                                                              • 1 vote
                                                              Reply#21 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:38 PM EST
                                                              {"commentId":3973493,"authorDomain":"j--rafol"}

                                                              Precisely what a capitalist country should do. The best companies bring profits to the business and dividends to stock holders.

                                                              {"commentId":3973493,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"j--rafol"}
                                                              • 1 vote
                                                              #21.1 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:56 PM EST
                                                              Reply
                                                              {"commentId":3973366,"authorDomain":"MoonWatcher"}

                                                              Chrysler was already bailed out twenty years ago.  I remember the government servants driving around all these crappy K-cars as part of the bailout.  The Big Three already were given government money to make 80 MPG sedans back in the 90s and squandered that and focused on the good times a-rollin SUVs and huge pick-em-up trucks. I  bought two God-awful Dodge Caravans, both of which dropped their transmissions...now I own Mazdas and Hondas.

                                                              Let the so-called 'Big 3' go the way of American Motors Corporation.

                                                              The government should provide venture capital to help small upstarts like Tesla and Aptera and Miles Motors make the new generation of electric and hybrid elecric vehicles. GM could sell its Volt design to help pay its creditors.

                                                              If Uncle Sugar does step in, it should impose strict conditions that the companies it saves make cars with at least 40 MPG and trucks with at least 28 mpg.  Impose these restrictions on imports as well to level the playing field.

                                                               

                                                              {"commentId":3973366,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"MoonWatcher"}
                                                                Reply#22 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:43 PM EST
                                                                {"commentId":3973417,"authorDomain":"woodym1"}

                                                                I don't think the unions alone are causing the failure at GM. I do think unions served a useful, and wonderful purpose during the days of John L Lewis.  In the mines.

                                                                Today? The "union" is a cash skimmer. Nothing else. Get your hand out of my pocket!

                                                                {"commentId":3973417,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"woodym1"}
                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                Reply#23 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:48 PM EST
                                                                {"commentId":3973484,"authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}

                                                                the biggest reason for not bailing out these or any other company....

                                                                if a tree falls in a forest it creates a hole in the canopy that allows the next generation of flora to flourish...propping up these companies prevents the next generation of innovators from getting started.

                                                                the biggest reason to keep government out of the business of green tech...

                                                                government funded science has an insurmountable advantage over the next great discovery

                                                                {"commentId":3973484,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"amos-riddels-ctr"}
                                                                  Reply#24 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:54 PM EST
                                                                  {"commentId":3973528,"authorDomain":"drexxle"}

                                                                  What I find ironic is that many Japanese auto makers like Toyota have built plants in Fremont, CA and Kentucky and are churning out "Japanese" cars with American skilled labor. Why can't GM do that? Find out why and change it. I think everything needs to be overhauled. Why would things be so inefficient at GM? Maybe they should go bankrupt. This would give them an opportunity to shutter the most inefficient factories and when the economy turns around they can produce newer more efficient factories. At NUMMI, which is a coordinated effort between GM and Toyota to produce cars in Fremont, California, they employ this idea called "Kaizen" which means "continuous improvement". When workers see a way to do things better, safer, or more efficiently, they get rewarded. Does GM do this with all their plants? If not, why not. The answer is easy, take a page out of the Japanese book of doing things. Just copy them, it obviously works. You're already churning out cars side by side with them, so you're pretty much copying anyways.

                                                                  {"commentId":3973528,"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594","authorDomain":"drexxle"}
                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  Reply#25 - Fri Nov 7, 2008 10:59 PM EST
                                                                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5
                                                                  {"canLink":false,"threadId":"413180","isPrivate":false}
                                                                  Leave a Comment:
                                                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                  {"threadId":"413180","contentId":"2086594"}
                                                                  Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                                  Stop TrackingStop Tracking