Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Walters: Style sells, but USC might make case with D

Sun Nov 9, 2008 5:40 PM EST
only-on-msnbc-com, college-football, tech, texas, bcs, big-ten, usc, points, texas-tech, trojans
msnbc.com News — John Walters, msnbc.com - Only on msnbc.com

Southern California head coach Pete Carroll is shown prior to a NCAA college football game against Washington State, Saturday, Oct. 18, 2008, at Martin Stadium in Pullman, Wash. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)

— Speed-limit scoring is the new black in college football. 69. 66. 63.

As in, USC 69, Washington State 0. Or Oklahoma 66, Texas A&M 28. Or Texas Tech 63, Kansas 21. Or Florida 63, Kentucky 5.

Final scores and Helen Mirren: Two things that are at their most striking in their 60's.

Of course, style points, like chinos and plain white Ts, have never gone out of style in college football. Each week, a limited number of contestants vie for the role of America’s Next Top ... Ranked Team, and each week that team is almost always the one that excavates the most paydirt.

After all, 3rd-down stops rarely make the SportsCenter highlight reel.

Two teams will play in the BCS national championship game on Jan. 6, and there still exists a possibility that only two schools from power conferences, Alabama (SEC) and Texas Tech (Big 12) will be undefeated at that time. And nothing is more fashionable than a zed in the loss column.

However, that will likely not be the case. Most of us outside of Lubbock and Tuscaloosa believe that either the Red Raiders or Crimson Tide (or both) will lose once between now and Christmas. Should that happen, there will almost certainly be a few one-loss programs preening for a spot in the national championship. And if it comes down to a “walk-off”, well, nothing says sexy like a blowout win or four.

Except that this season is different. Only one school, USC, stands to gain much via style points this season and the Trojans of Pete Carroll have a curious quandary: Their most striking pose is a defensive stance.

"I don't care about style points," said USC coach Pete Carroll. "I never have in all of the years I've been here. It feels like a popularity contest at times. It's unfortunate that it is the way it is."

Pretty is as pretty does, and nothing is more comely in college football than scoring barrages. And so Oklahoma, mindful that it needs to remain photogenic following that 45-35 loss to Texas last month, has averaged 62 points per game in its last three contests. Florida, another one-loss team in search of a Miami booking, has been updating its portfolio by averaging 51 points per game in its last four victories -- against SEC foes with winning records, mind you. And Texas Tech, because well, they’re Texas Tech, launched a drive with five minutes to play and a 29-point lead on Saturday night in which five of the seven calls were pass plays.

But, now that Penn State has lost at Iowa, style points matter only to one team: USC. That's because there are six BCS conferences and three of them -- the ACC, Big East and now Big Ten -- have absolutely no shot this season of sending a representative to the national title game.

The Big Ten fell out of the frame whent the Nittany Lions lost 24-23 loss in Iowa City. And though they happen to be a one-loss team with a style-points win of their own (66-10 over Coastal Carolina in the season-opener), the voters are not about to allow a third consecutive Big Ten champ to serve as BCS roadkill in January.

Which leaves three conferences: The Big 12, SEC and Pac-10. One can haggle all they want over whether Texas Tech is better than Texas is better than Oklahoma who may be better than Texas Tech. It doesn’t matter. One of those three is going to win the Big 12 South -- the college football universe will be centered in Norman come Nov. 22 -- and most likely the Big 12 championship game after that. No other Big 12 school will be considered for the BCS title game.

Next up: The SEC. Undefeated and top-ranked Alabama (10-0) is already slated to face 8-1 Florida in that conference’s title game. The winner will be the second viable candidate for selection in the national championship game.

Thus, for the five schools currently ranked atop the two major polls and in the BCS standings (Alabama, Texas Tech, Texas, Oklahoma and Florida), style points are, well, pointless.

Then there’s USC. The Trojans are the Green party candidate, if you will. If the Big 12 and/or SEC produce a one-loss champion, USC has the right to start politicking. And if I were their campaign manager, I’d have them run on a national security platform.

Graham Harrell and Michael Crabtree are fun to watch. Tim Tebow is an extraordinary talent and a charismatic figure. But no unit in college football is more dominant than the Trojan defense. Each of the teams in the top five have allowed at least 30 points in one game this season and at least 21 in another. USC allowed 27 points at Oregon State and a grand total of 33 points in their eight other contests -- all nine games of which were played against BCS conference foes.

The Trojans have allowed just one touchdown in the past five games. One! And that happened as a result of quarterback Mark Sanchez fumbling on his own 15 yard line. USC, whose 11 defensive starters will likely all wind up on NFL rosters (half of them will be first-round picks), leads the nation in scoring defense, total defense and pass defense. And the Trojans are third in the nation in rushing defense, behind TCU and Nevada.

USC’s biggest problem may be our lack of imagination. It’s easy to visualize 66 points being more of a rout than 44 points. But how does one get less than zero (unless he’s Bret Easton Ellis)?

And so that is why I believe that anyone with a weak stomach or even an iota of fondness for Notre Dame best not tune in to USC’s game against the Irish on Nov. 29. By that time, this national championship picture will have more clarity. By then, it will be common knowledge that unless Alabama and Texas Tech are both undefeated (Utah, Boise State: We love you, but it’s not happening), then there will be two spots for three teams: The Big 12 champ, the SEC champ and USC (which may not even be the Pac-10 champ, but that won’t matter).

There will be a mandate for USC, which has already racked up three shutouts and a pair of only-a-field-goal-allowed wins, to produce a high-profile win to catapult themselves ahead of one of the other two candidates. And while there are no ranked foes left on USC’s calendar, who’s more high-profile than Notre Dame?

Carson Palmer cemented his Heisman Trophy with a season-ending 31-point demolition of the Irish in the Coliseum in 2002. Tyrone Willingham sealed his fate with a season-ending 31-point loss to the Trojans in the Coliseum two years later. Come Nov. 29, the stakes for both USC and Notre Dame may both be extreme, albeit at opposite poles.

Style points? It could get ugly.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • John Walters's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (12)
A Smith-719746

I think it is a joke how USC is always mentioned in the title hunt.  It's like they have the media in their back pocket.  I would love to see them try to hang in a tougher conference like the SEC.  They can't hold a candle to the top five teams in the country right now, but I guess we will never know for sure because they play nobodys all season long.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:53 PM EST
Keith-720237

Agree.  Week after week in the SEC or Big 12 and USC wouldn't have any defense left.  Shutting out Pop Warner teams isn't the same as dealing with Florida, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Texas and Alabama.  Oh by the way, there's still Missouri or LSU or Georgia or Oklahoma State for good measure. A one loss team in either the SEC or Big 12 is not even close to a one loss USC team.  The "whining bowl" won't get them a national title...and on the field it may not even be a PAC 10 title.

    #1.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:16 PM EST
    Reply
    Paul-512513

    You USC honks make me sick. They lost to a mediocre team, not a ranked team. Without a playoff they shouldn't get a shot at the title. OK, Florida, or a future even a future one loss Alabama deserve it more

      Reply#2 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:56 PM EST
      JD Dallas

      Paul...couldn't agree with you MORE!  As usual, USC is OVERRATED!

        #2.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:58 PM EST
        Reply
        JD Dallas

        The whole damn nation is sick & tired of hearing about USC.  Offensive point scoring for USC is NOT stylish now that their offense can't run up huge numbers like 6-7 other teams are across the nation on a weekly basis.  You make it sound like scoring 66 points in a game is EASY.  Go try that playing NEIGHBORHOOD BALL!  In 2005, we had to hear that USC was the greatest team on the planet & Vince Young and Texas went out & beat their butts.  In 2006, we had to hear that the USC team then assembled was the GREATEST OF ALL TIME!  Come on!  Two weeks later they LOST!  Go do what you guys do best...Go surfing!

          Reply#3 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:52 PM EST
          JP Jackson

          Why should USC get a shot and not the other undefeated teams(Utah, Boise State), none of them play a tough schedule. But of course USC has to play in the Rose bowl since it will sell a ton of tickets since it is a home game. And they will play the weakest team they can possibly be put up against.

            Reply#4 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:05 PM EST
            Beaver Nation

            USC is so overrated.  Mention that game against Washington, it should have been 100 to zero and there loss was a big one, to our unranked Beavers.  Penn State should be ranked way higher than USC, evean after last week.

              Reply#5 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:15 PM EST
              Everett Thompson

              Everyone keeps forgetting that if Oregon State beats Arizona and Oregon to finish the season USC will not win the PAC-10.  How can any team go to the championship game without winning there own Conference?  Nobody talks about the fact that Oregon St. controls its own destiny and possibly a Rose Bowl berth!!

                Reply#6 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:27 PM EST
                drdirt

                What a scary thought -- another Oregon State - Penn State matchup in the Rose Bowl.

                I actually think a USC-PSU game would have all the panache of the NC title game (Texas-Florida is my vote), but perhaps just not for all the marbles. How cool would it be to have those two games, plus Alabama and Oklahoma; might make a fun New Years (or the beginnings of a playoff).

                PSU 76, 81

                  #6.1 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:38 PM EST
                  Reply
                  Maggie-684713

                  I'm admittedly a biased PSU fan, but I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one saying USC is overrated. Notre Dame has been a good team, but they're 5-4 this year. If you're going to say USC should be in the title game talk, that is a joke to suggest the ND game will even be interesting. Unless this author truly knows USC really doesn't play anyone hard in the conference.

                  In the end, we need playoffs. It will stop punishing good team in hard conferences and show the truth about okay teams in easy conferences.

                    Reply#7 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:29 PM EST
                    Auzziegirl

                    Maybe I'm just biased, but in my opinion USC rocks!  Sanchez's arm is better than any of the other PAC-10 quarterbacks that I have witnessed.  I'm a girl so Idon't know much about the rankings, but whenever I see a USC game, it always impresses me how they always take control of the ball and SCORE!  They may not make it to the playoffs, but they have my vote.  By the way, does anyone know why USC doesn't have their player's names on their jerseys?  I was just wondering because all the other teams do.

                      Reply#8 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:55 PM EST
                      Tennessee man

                      USC, what is the conference they play in? In days gone by they were good but style points won't add up to Texax Tech and Mr. Harrell and Mr. Crabtree are the "cock of the walk".

                        Reply#9 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:15 PM EST
                        Buszman

                        two questions:

                        1.  Why is there such a large focus on USC.  Get over it.

                        2.  Why is ND considered a high profile win?  They are not even ranked or bowl eligible! Come On!

                        Seems the writer is a USC alumni trying to get them into the championship discussion, and in turn is insulting other programs.  So much for unbiased journalism. (I know--unbiased unjournalism is an oxymoron).

                          Reply#10 - Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:55 PM EST
                          CFFAN

                          Yes, the one thing that conveniently gets left out when articles are written about the "great" USC defense is that they haven't played anyone.   Most decent BCS teams would have the same stats against the schedule they have played.  And that "tremendous" offense doesn't seem to be able to score many points when they come up against an average defense.  The media ALWAYS seems to love USC.  When two-thirds of the BCS rating is composed of subjective polls, USC always gets the love.   

                            Reply#11 - Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:39 PM EST
                            Leave a Comment:
                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                            You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                            (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                            Newsvine Privacy Statement
                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                            FUN STUFF:
                            • Leaderboard |
                            • E-Mail Alerts |
                            • Top of the Vine |
                            • Newsvine Live |
                            • Newsvine Archives |
                            • The Greenhouse
                            COMPANY STUFF:
                            • Code of Honor |
                            • Company Info |
                            • Contact Us |
                            • Jobs |
                            • User Agreement |
                            • Privacy Policy |
                            • About our ads
                            LEGAL STUFF:
                            • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                            • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                            • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com