Big Three carmakers line up for another bailout

advertisement

All aboard, there may be another bailout train leaving the station on Capitol Hill. Talk of a $25 billion emergency loan package for the Big Three carmakers that could see a vote in a postelection session of Congress next week has a wave of business lobbyists clamoring for action — and a slice of the pie.

They're dusting off their call lists and preparing for a furious round of vote-hunting that comes little more than a month after lawmakers approved the $700 billion bailout designed for banks and other financial firms.

Now with the three major U.S. car companies warning they could face a collapse before year's end without new government help, Democratic congressional leaders are pushing to carve out a portion of the financial rescue money for them.

It's far from certain the package will become law — or even see a vote. Republicans and President George W. Bush are reluctant to send new money to the carmakers, saying they should instead speed distribution of a $25 billion loan package Congress approved in September to help automakers develop fuel-efficient vehicles.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., plans a vote next week on the package, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., a leading proponent of additional action to help the Detroit auto companies, has yet to schedule one, as leaders continue to hunt for the support to pass it.

Senate Republicans hold the key. Supporters of the auto industry bailout are hopeful they can snag 12 to 15 of them to join with Democrats in pushing through the carmaker bailout. They're targeting lawmakers who represent states with auto plants and auto suppliers.

That's where the business groups come in.

General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., and Chrysler LLC, along with the United Auto Workers union, have clamored for the aid for weeks.

But strategists in both parties say it's pressure from the thousands of dealerships across the country — in every state and congressional district — that is most likely to sway lawmakers in both parties. Auto dealers have hefty political clout that could bring crucial support for the package.

They'd like just a little something in return.

The National Automobile Dealers Association is urging that their sector get a slice of any additional help for car manufacturers.

"That legislation needs to operate to ensure the presence and the viability of the dealer network. The two go hand-in-hand. You can't have one without the other," said Andy Koblenz, an association executive.

The group also wants Congress to approve new tax breaks for buying cars and trucks. Once the final auto bailout bill emerges, the group is ready to unleash a barrage of anxious car dealers to pressure lawmakers to back it.

"We've put them on a high state of readiness," Koblenz said. "We're expecting to activate that network within the next few days."

Such requests will turn up the heat on Republicans and Democrats alike. Many lawmakers who initially opposed the $700 billion financial industry rescue package last month reversed course and backed it after hearing from local businesses in their area, particularly the car dealers.

Bruce Josten, top lobbyist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the group is using its considerable muscle to round up support for automaker aid.

"They're in a tailspin — it is like the perfect storm," Josten said of the auto firms. Dealers' involvement in the lobbying effort can bring "a lot of heat" on lawmakers, he added. And because the Big Three are the largest purchasers of domestic steel, aluminum, glass and computer chips, among other things, their woes will likely be felt by all 535 members of Congress.

"It's a very long tail," Josten said.

The companies that supply the materials that go into cars, which employ about 800,000 workers in the United States, say they should get a piece of any new emergency loan package from the government.

The auto supply industry has a large manufacturing presence in states such as Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Tennessee.

"We are all connected by some very thin threads and if any piece of the chain from the manufacturers to the small suppliers fails, the whole thing could fail," said Ann Wilson of the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association.

Their argument already seems to be working.

Republican Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio, who co-chairs the Senate Auto Caucus, said through a spokesman Thursday that he would support using bailout money to assist the companies because "helping the automakers remain viable is truly putting Main Street over Wall Street."

And Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., also says he's open to the idea.

"While I have real concerns with another taxpayer-funded bailout, there are also thousands of workers in Missouri whose jobs are on the line so the devil will be in the details," Bond said in a statement.

___

Associated Press writer Ken Thomas contributed to this report.

  • 9 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
12
3.2
{"commentId":4060266,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

Just say no. DARE to keep corporations off welfare.

{"commentId":4060266,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:10 AM EST
{"commentId":4060651,"authorDomain":"SthPacific"}

Well If they dont get welfare they will go under, The Big European Credit insurers just pulled the plug on GM and Ford. They are now Blacklisted, so bankruptcy is almost inevitable. So the USA will not have an Auto industry, Oh the irony, :) 

{"commentId":4060651,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"SthPacific"}
  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:53 AM EST
{"commentId":4060784,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

Somehow I doubt the US will ever not have an auto industry. What will happen if we withhold a bailout is that one or more of these companies will go down. But eventually something will take their place. There is just too much demand for America not to have an auto industry.

But instead, we'll bailout these failing archaic auto companies, companies that are failing for a reason, and instead of some new innovative companies rising from their ashes, the archaic behemoths will continue to fail, and they'll need yet another bailout in a decade or so.

By keeping these loser auto companies afloat, we are preventing new and innovative companies from being able to form and succeed.

{"commentId":4060784,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:22 AM EST
{"commentId":4061606,"authorDomain":"SthPacific"}

This is so true, There are actually a number of US auto makers that could in time, if there was sufficient infrastructure and energy that could fill this gap. The lesson should have been learned from the US motorcycle industry, which, literally invented motorcycles as we know them in the early days of the 20th century. However they never recovered, and I have to wonder if the car industry will suffer the same fate. 

{"commentId":4061606,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"SthPacific"}
  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:56 AM EST
{"commentId":4063356,"authorDomain":"jdl-28"}

I agree let them  file for bankruptcy and uses their own money to rebuild and maybe cut down on the number of model cars they make. I also read if they do laid someone off the union see that they are pay anyway do to the contract unless the person take another job that should be change.

They build a lot of their car south of the border but still sell them for a high price here and that is wrong. Maybe the union worker should take a cut in pay in order to have job the company only make two or three model of car and build some that will get good gas mileages they would sell. They have had sense the 80's to build cars with better gas mileage and elected not to.  No bailout , how many other companies are going to also be asking for bailouts.

{"commentId":4063356,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
    #1.4 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:53 AM EST
    {"commentId":4071649,"authorDomain":"lvstudiowest"}

    How are the foreign auto companies ( that produce vehicles here ) faring in America at this time? I'm sure they have slowed but I haven't heard them using the word crisis yet. I think most Americans would agree that the big three have been mismanaged for many years. Any financial help they receive from taxpayers has got to be somehow tied to producing a more viable product in the future. The near future. It seems to me that one, if not all three, need an i-pod. A game changing product that can be so overwhelmingly embraced by consumers as to make the companies profitable again. Remember in Business 101 it all starts with a good widget!

    {"commentId":4071649,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"lvstudiowest"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.5 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:42 PM EST
    {"commentId":4093682,"authorDomain":"yorkark"}

    How many of you would have a different opinion if the Big three workers were not represented by the UAW?  I sure would like to know if you are willing to let thousands of non-unioned suppliers go down the tube just to make a point.

    {"commentId":4093682,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"yorkark"}
      #1.6 - Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:54 AM EST
      {"commentId":4101618,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
      PartysOverDeleted
      {"commentId":4106141,"authorDomain":"SthPacific"}

      Sally York, I agree with you in principle, I hate the lack of Union organization in the USA, but there comes a time when even Unions must accept reality. We dont still make steam engines just to keep boiler makers in a job, and thats the position detroit has got itself into. 

      {"commentId":4106141,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"SthPacific"}
      • 3 votes
      #1.8 - Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:22 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4060277,"authorDomain":"mbanneh"}

      OMG....here we go again. Seems like the name of the game is bail me out,  I could use a million!

      {"commentId":4060277,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"mbanneh"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#2 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:13 AM EST
      {"commentId":4060377,"authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}

      Seems like the name of the game is bail me out,  I could use a million billion!

      {"commentId":4060377,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}
      • 1 vote
      #2.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:02 AM EST
      {"commentId":4060382,"authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}

      The million in that comment should be crossed out, but the comment thing is not accepting it, sorry!

      {"commentId":4060382,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}
      • 1 vote
      #2.2 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:06 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4060302,"authorDomain":"hpjacobs"}

      Detroit should start thinking smart.... Get off the gasoline and into alternatives such as hydrogen and electric... This should be a matter of National Security to get off the oil dependence....

      {"commentId":4060302,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"hpjacobs"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#3 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:27 AM EST
      {"commentId":4060305,"authorDomain":"hpjacobs"}

      OK... I'll bite... $25B for a stake in the company with an executive order that all cars produced be green and alternative...

      {"commentId":4060305,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"hpjacobs"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#4 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:29 AM EST
      {"commentId":4060337,"authorDomain":"swissrudie"}

      Let the Big 3 file for bankrupcy. Give the money to the unemployed auto workers, and unemployed suppliers. 25B will keep us alive until the GREEN ECONOMY takes over!

      Screw Cerberus.

      {"commentId":4060337,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"swissrudie"}
        Reply#5 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:43 AM EST
        {"commentId":4060544,"authorDomain":"yorkark"}

        Yes just let them file bankruptcy and if you live on a pension you worked 30 years to get it will be gone, because the bankruptcy court will liquidate all cash.  I am not in favor of a bail out, but we can give million/billion a year to foreign countries who hate us, but we cannot give a loan  LOAN I said to our Country. 

        We gave billions to the banking industry so they can party no one seems to care about that, they are using that money to buy banks, give raises and bonuses that OK.  But a Loan to the Auto Industry is a bailout give me a  break. 

        I hope you guy are independently wealthy because you are going to need  it if the Auto Industry in this Country disappears.

        {"commentId":4060544,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"yorkark"}
          #5.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:21 AM EST
          {"commentId":4060616,"authorDomain":"swissrudie"}

          I don't want it to disappear, but it has to re-tool in order to survive. That has to mean that shareholders take a loss like the rest of us. I 've lost a lot in this meltdown. It's a lot to me but not to the corporations.

          {"commentId":4060616,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"swissrudie"}
            #5.2 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:43 AM EST
            {"commentId":4060624,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
            PartysOverDeleted
            {"commentId":4060630,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
            PartysOverDeleted
            {"commentId":4060660,"authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}

            Sally York, see old_newby in #6.2 below.  I think that's a far better idea.  If you're going to socialise things then socialise society, not the losses of mega-corporations.

            {"commentId":4060660,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}
            • 1 vote
            #5.5 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:55 AM EST
            {"commentId":4060708,"authorDomain":"yorkark"}

            All of your points are well taken.  There is already moves in this direction.  The Volt for GM, many alternative fuel products coming out of Ford and Chrysler, but the economy caught them as it did most of us. 

            There is a pattern to follow with this, the Chrysler LOANS, all of which was paid back with interest ahead of time.  I cannot justify in my mind a give away of 700 + billion dollars to the Insurance and Banking Industries with no strings attached and making the Auto Companies jump through hoops just to get an audience with its government.

            I add one more thought if all of these companies agreed tomorrow to ditch the Union the loans would flow.  Business does not want those working for them to have any kind of say over their lives.  They do not want to rent your body for 8 or 10 hours they want to own you 24/7.  Those days will never return so they may as well give up. 

            I don't know your ages but I am 71 and I remember as a kid that a vacation in my family was a three day weekend and that Friday or Monday was without pay.  My dad work for Chrysler and I remember the big deal it was when they got Holiday pay, up until then Holidays there was no work no pay and if there was any overtime assigned the next week it was at straight time because you didn't have 40 hours in.  We are getting back to that real fast.    

            {"commentId":4060708,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"yorkark"}
              #5.6 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:07 AM EST
              {"commentId":4060833,"authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}

              I agree with you on the other bail-outs, those are crazy.  I'm 34, for the record :)

              {"commentId":4060833,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}
              • 1 vote
              #5.7 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:29 AM EST
              Reply
              {"commentId":4060433,"authorDomain":"replytoj001"}

              NO, NO, AND NO!!!!!!!!

              Where will this all end?

              Let it fall, there has to be some level of accountability here........and every where else.

              America will survive, we will be better in the end.

              At some point, all of this credit being extended will have to be paid.....but there will be no money to pay.  Individuals know this.

              If people are not buying the cars now.....what will change if the bailout happens?

              We do not even know, cannot even be sure, if this bailout will work, example; AIG getting an additional $50,000,000,000.00

              Detroit is all ready scheduled to receive $25,000,000,000.00, so somehow this is not enough???

              All of these mis-managed businesses continue to receive all of these trillions of dollars....fine...but the average citizen has received nothing.....I would rather have seen taxpayers get a rebate!!!

              replytoj001

              {"commentId":4060433,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"replytoj001"}
                Reply#6 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:36 AM EST
                {"commentId":4060578,"authorDomain":"swissrudie"}

                replytoj001;

                Let the Big 3 file for bankruptcy, take the 25 billion bailout, and give it to the unemployed auto workers and unemployed suppliers, as workers compensation.

                We can live on that for years while we retrain for GREEN JOBS, the jobs that should replace the standard automobile mentality. Then the failed corporations will have to re-tool, if they want to stay in business, it's only justice.

                {"commentId":4060578,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"swissrudie"}
                • 1 vote
                #6.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:32 AM EST
                Reply
                {"commentId":4060503,"authorDomain":"johnryanpowell"}

                Publicly subsidised, privately profitable. 

                Let them fail and spend the billions on hiring the displaced workers for public projects like improving our infustructure.

                {"commentId":4060503,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"johnryanpowell"}
                • 2 votes
                Reply#7 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:06 AM EST
                {"commentId":4060593,"authorDomain":"swissrudie"}

                Right on! That's what I say.

                {"commentId":4060593,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"swissrudie"}
                  #7.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:37 AM EST
                  {"commentId":4092709,"authorDomain":"hpjacobs"}

                  I really liked that... Publicly subsidised, privately profitable... You said it ALL !!!

                  {"commentId":4092709,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"hpjacobs"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #7.2 - Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:38 AM EST
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":4060606,"authorDomain":"travelbizcash"}

                  TAXPAYERS get it again !

                  THX   REPUBLICANS!

                  Taxpayers would have to bail out the RETIREES and pay their PENSIONS

                  Just say NO.

                  Okay this is getting old and ridiculous , send letters, emails, calls to your congress critters and just say NO MORE .......

                  Bad enough we are spending kazillions to bail out every damn wall street bum and every credit card company that just raised our rate BECAUSE "due to the economic downturn we are raising your APR to 29 %" .............. 29 % !!!!

                  The republicans are OUT OF CONTROL!

                  Remember this in 2010 and 2012 and tell palin to get her ass back in Alaska and stay there and shut up already, we don't want her we DO NOT want any republican and their
                  "SMALLER GOVERNMENT" blah blah blah, They are just plain full of crap.

                  Smaller government conservatives???

                  REALLY??

                  GTH republicans and stay there.

                  We are mad as hell and not going to take it any longer

                  {"commentId":4060606,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"travelbizcash"}
                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#8 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:40 AM EST
                  {"commentId":4060742,"authorDomain":"yorkark"}

                  Dan you bet I am writting my letters and making my phone calls but it is for a Loan please get that in your head it is a Loan.   The 700 billion was a bailout all the way after Paulson changed the rules, what is Paulson a Republican, a Nixon republican and he and Bush just out and out stole this money so their buddies can go party and get raises and naturally to keep the stockholders happy. 

                  Why didn't we make the 700 billion a loan.    You have already taken it in the rear you just havent felt the pain yet obviously.

                  {"commentId":4060742,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"yorkark"}
                    #8.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:13 AM EST
                    {"commentId":4060749,"authorDomain":"swissrudie"}

                    Dan,

                    I think the whole duopoly is full of crap. the Republicans say "You can keep your guns, but we want control of your morals ( read anti-gay marriage, pro life, church telling you how to vote?)...or...the Democrats saying "we want to take your guns away because guns kill and we can't have guns in the hands of people...because guns kill! 'scuse me! Rebublicans start wars. Guns do not kill. Bad people kill people...all over this world, and this Republicrat duopoly sides with the big money corporations that profit from world conflict. And these bailouts are just another example of corporate control of our country. I believe I've said enough.

                    {"commentId":4060749,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"swissrudie"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #8.2 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:14 AM EST
                    {"commentId":4060802,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

                    Dan, read the article, this is the Democrats pushing for this bailout. That's because a good portion of the bailout money will end up right back in Democratic pockets through the Detroit Auto Unions.

                    {"commentId":4060802,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #8.3 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:25 AM EST
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":4060992,"authorDomain":"travelbizcash"}

                    Adam Hobson and therein lies the problem.....Unions

                    {"commentId":4060992,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"travelbizcash"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#9 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:55 AM EST
                    {"commentId":4061313,"authorDomain":"danny-soapbox"}

                    Don't forget that at the start of all this, a Giuliani aide was overheard rushing to the McCain plane...he was on his cell to God knows who...and spoke these cautionary words:

                    "...we're gettin' on the plane now.  Yeah.  We have to figure out how to get a piece of this bailout action."

                    Thing is, no matter who we align with, democrat or republican...WE are being so completely screwed with this thing.

                    If you or I (out there in that Free Market) run our businesses badly, we GO OUT OF BUSINESS.  This is the nature of the capitalist beast we serve and live under...and if you start messing with the "need" for bad companies to go out of business...you upset the equation.  In fact, business failure is in the very definition of capitalism if you'd like to look it up.

                    The point is, all 2 million of you folks in this industry are responsible...not just the makers, but the dealers and salesmen as well...you worried about making money rather than making progress in a world that was OBVIOUSLY changing under your feet.  Not a single one of you rose up to say "we gotta CHANGE what we're making, or we're not going to be in business in 10 years!"

                    It didn't help, of course, that GW Bush was handing out MASSIVE tax credits for 2 years after 9-11 to anyone who bought a car that weighed OVER six thousand pounds...but as a business, you have to look forward and prepare for the future...or be run over by businesses that are better than yours.

                    We need to let failure happen, or we're ALL going to be in far worse trouble four years from now.  Pull the tooth while it aches...or risk the far-more-damaging infection it can cause if we just leave it to rot.

                    {"commentId":4061313,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"danny-soapbox"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#10 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:29 AM EST
                    {"commentId":4061391,"authorDomain":"cyan412000"}

                    didnt we already approve a seperate 25 billion in loans for them earlier...they have not even received that money.

                    {"commentId":4061391,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"cyan412000"}
                      Reply#11 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:38 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4061410,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
                      PartysOverDeleted
                      {"commentId":4061421,"authorDomain":"gerben"}

                      I agree with most people here, GM and Chrysler should not be saved by government equity. Going bust and restarting after a large reorganization is the only way for the American car industry to become the lean and consumer oriented industry it should be in this day and age. Overhauling the entire production line and firing ten thousands of workers will not be viable as long as the company keeps on burning away money.

                      {"commentId":4061421,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"gerben"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#13 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:41 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4061467,"authorDomain":"ghetto-otaku"}

                      It's been said so many times, but i'll say it here....

                      Stop before it's too late.....

                      {"commentId":4061467,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"ghetto-otaku"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#14 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:45 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4061511,"authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}

                      There is no reason that failed auto execs should make more than their workers! Same with the banking industry! You are breeding failure!

                      {"commentId":4061511,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"paulpeg1"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#15 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:48 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4061539,"authorDomain":"ghetto-otaku"}

                      *golfer's clap*

                      That says it all man!

                      {"commentId":4061539,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"ghetto-otaku"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #15.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:51 AM EST
                      {"commentId":4062139,"authorDomain":"mercureo"}

                      You are breeding failure!

                      Its to late Pandora's box is already open!!  Once they bailed out the banks and HOLLYWOOD, please for the love of all that is holy don't forget that, and decided to change how they plan to disperse the money, it's open season for anyone else left in a lurch!!

                      We are just pushing off the inevitable until a later date.. Our children, or grandchildren, but the crash will come.  I would much rather take this responsibility now so our future families learn from our mistakes, and do not repeat this awful trend!

                      We can't keep sweeping painful times under the rug!  This time we have to teach the future about what is happening.

                      {"commentId":4062139,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"mercureo"}
                        #15.2 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:34 AM EST
                        Reply
                        {"commentId":4061578,"authorDomain":"danny-soapbox"}

                        Thing is...why not use "bailout money" to simply shore up unemployment compensation in auto-producing states..let these companies go into reorganization under bankruptcy protection and come out as 21st century auto manufacturers.  The workers would have additional support for unemployment, and likely have jobs when the big three got their sh#t together.

                        You know...the way many companies have had to restructure all these years!  Restructure and survive, by the way.

                        I don't want my money going to this. You don't want your money going to this.  It's time for a national bailout referendum and let the people be HEARD!

                        {"commentId":4061578,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"danny-soapbox"}
                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#16 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:53 AM EST
                        {"commentId":4061608,"authorDomain":"ghetto-otaku"}

                        You mean like a safety net for workers they don't need?

                        {"commentId":4061608,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"ghetto-otaku"}
                          #16.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:56 AM EST
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":4061636,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

                          To let the auto companies go down the drain is absolutely the wrong thing to do.  However there are things that can be done that will certainly take the pressure off.

                          Let the manufactures bring cars into the country that do not quite meet the federal regs.  Both Ford and GM have wonderful vehicles overseas that are exactly what we need, but because of some minor differences in many cases these cars can not be sold here.  Give a  temp relaxation of some rules.

                          Help the companies bring different products to market more quickly.   Everyone is talking Hydrogen cars.  But the technology is not yet prefected and even if it was, there is no infrastructure to support these vehicles.  Designing and bringing new car to market is time consuming and difficult.  Part of my business is in motorsports and we have been working on a new car for the 2010 season for the past two years.

                          It may even come down to mergers.  That could mean dumping the union contracts and getting everyone on the same page.  Make the industry much leaner and easier for it to react to market changes.   

                          No one likes the financial mess we are in, but we need to take steps to clean it up and a loan rather than a bailout of the auto industry is the right thing to do

                          {"commentId":4061636,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
                            Reply#17 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:59 AM EST
                            {"commentId":4061662,"authorDomain":"bulletlora"}

                            Here is now the American way to seek bailouts and dump mistakes on taxpayers. It will not end util no more bonds are sold. Neve was USA government to save any businesws that want help to deceive taxpayers.

                            {"commentId":4061662,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"bulletlora"}
                              Reply#18 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:01 AM EST
                              {"commentId":4061887,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
                              PartysOverDeleted
                              {"commentId":4061943,"authorDomain":"j--rafol"}

                              Taxpayers don't have to shoulder the cost of corporations failure. The government is not in business to save mismanaged corporations. I am in need of bailout myself and the government is not there to rescue me. So NO to bailout.

                              {"commentId":4061943,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"j--rafol"}
                              • 2 votes
                              Reply#20 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:22 AM EST
                              {"commentId":4062308,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

                              The auto companies are not asking for a bailout.  They are asking for a loan with interest.  Much different from a bailout.  They have never asked for a bailout.

                              {"commentId":4062308,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
                              • 1 vote
                              #20.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:46 AM EST
                              {"commentId":4062591,"authorDomain":"j--rafol"}

                              It doesn't matter if you call it a loan or a bailout, it is doubtful if they could repay the government after they file for bankruptcy. Who would want to buy products from a near bankrupt company like GM and Ford? They should ask the UAW and the oil companies to loan them the funds they need and not the government. Granted they were loaned the amount they need to stay afloat, can they sell their products? GM's market share last month is 28% that means, more than half of Americans are not interested in their products for their lousy reputation in quality and reliability. So who can they sell their products to?

                              {"commentId":4062591,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"j--rafol"}
                              • 2 votes
                              #20.2 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:02 AM EST
                              {"commentId":4062728,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

                              The loan is designed to keep them from filing bankrupcy.  As for the lack of sales, that can be attributed to the financial mess.  People can not get loans to purchase vehicles.  All of my people are extremely well paid and still could not qualify for auto loans and I assisted several with vehicle purchases in the past few weeks.   

                              I am not sure where those bad quality vehicles are you mention, but it is certainly not from the U.S. auto companies anymore.  They compete quality wise with everyone else.

                              {"commentId":4062728,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
                                #20.3 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:10 AM EST
                                {"commentId":4062941,"authorDomain":"j--rafol"}

                                I have long given up on GM and Ford products due to their poor quality and unreliable, mostly in the shop for repairs than on the road. They might have caught up with imports on quality but it is too late to bring customers back to the showroom. In my neighborhood alone, most drive import brands and very satisfied with their purchase. I spent many days driving a rental car cause my domestic POS was in the shop most of the time. What a relief it is to drive an import with no interruption and inconvenience to my hectic schedule. My loyalty is to the brand that deliver satisfaction to my driving needs.

                                {"commentId":4062941,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"j--rafol"}
                                • 1 vote
                                #20.4 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:24 AM EST
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":4062830,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
                                PartysOverDeleted
                                {"commentId":4062920,"authorDomain":"ezeques"}

                                All bankruptcy means is that all the thieves and pigs who loaded this company with liabilities like over generous salaries, bonuses, health care liabilities, pension liabilities, and stupid products will get their rewards and a new group who can manage the factories will come in build a competitive auto business. And it may or may not happen but they should be given a chance. The old guard has certainly proven they can’t do it.

                                {"commentId":4062920,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"ezeques"}
                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#22 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:22 AM EST
                                {"commentId":4063049,"authorDomain":"fasracer"}

                                A very large percentage of the auto mess can be laid right at the feet of the UAW and their ability to get what thay have wanted over the years thru the threat of long costly strikes.  51% of the cost of a vehicle comes directly from wages and benefits.  The womb to tomb package, job banks etc all take huge dollars to manage.

                                No argument the product lines have been lacking until the past few years.  Just when the Big 3 get their act together in that regard, the financial mess hits them

                                As for the bonus paid to management, there is little that can be done about that.  You need good people and to have good people, it cost money.  I have 4 people in my company that make more than I do and I own the company.  

                                {"commentId":4063049,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"fasracer"}
                                  #22.1 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:32 AM EST
                                  {"commentId":4084124,"authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}

                                  51% of the cost of a vehicle comes directly from wages and benefits.

                                  .......

                                  As for the bonus paid to management, there is little that can be done about that.  You need good people and to have good people, it cost money.

                                  That does not only apply to upper management.

                                  {"commentId":4084124,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"dungbeetlemania"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  #22.2 - Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:56 AM EST
                                  Reply
                                  {"commentId":4064094,"authorDomain":"ezeques"}

                                  As for the bonus paid to management, there is little that can be done about that.  You need good people and to have good people,

                                  It does not appear that’s been the case with the auto companies. Rick Wagner should have already been fired already and Bob Nardelli should have been fired, tried and shot after he stole the $200 million from Home Depot.

                                  I had a rule in my last company: If they are layoffs they start at the top. And that’s exactly what happened in one instance. 

                                  {"commentId":4064094,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"ezeques"}
                                  • 2 votes
                                  Reply#23 - Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:35 AM EST
                                  {"commentId":4093906,"authorDomain":"yorkark"}

                                  Do you  know what will happen if bankrupcy is the path taken?  Will let me explain, there are laws that give government protection to pensions in this country, if they file bankrucpy the court will insist on them stopping paying the pension which will mean that the government guarantee will kick in and you my dear sir are the governent.  That  will cost many times more then the LOAN they are asking for. 

                                  We give millions to countries we know we will never get back why not LOAN TO BE PAID BACK TO OUR OWN.

                                  {"commentId":4093906,"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582","authorDomain":"yorkark"}
                                    Reply#24 - Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:23 AM EST
                                    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"418949","isPrivate":false}
                                    Leave a Comment:
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                    {"threadId":"418949","contentId":"2110582"}
                                    Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                    Stop TrackingStop Tracking