Log In | Register
6 Comments
Printadvertisement
The Postal Service is investigating whether the nation's postmaster general improperly received a sweetheart deal on a mortgage from Countrywide Financial Corp., the chairman of the service's governing board said.
Postmaster General John E. Potter is one of several prominent current and former U.S. officials who received discounts and other benefits from the mortgage giant. The Postal Service has hired an outside investigator to review the deal, which reportedly included one shaved point and waived fees for Potter's $322,700 loan.
"We're taking it seriously enough that we wanted it reviewed and we didn't want it done internally," the chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors, Alan Kessler, told The Associated Press.
Details of Potter's deal with Countrywide was first reported by Conde Nast Portfolio magazine earlier this summer. The disclosure touched off calls for a Capitol Hill investigation into how prominent lawmakers and others received VIP loans.
Countrywide, a leading subprime lender, is at the heart of the mortgage crisis. It has been criticized for using initially low teaser rates that later ballooned higher than borrowers could afford. The company agreed in January to be acquired by Bank of America Corp. for about $4 billion in stock.
Potter did not return an e-mail seeking comment, and a Postal Service spokesman said the postmaster general would have no comment. Potter told the magazine in August that he did not know he was getting a deal on the loan.
Kessler did not say how much the investigation would cost the Postal Service, which is cutting hours and overtime for its employees after finishing its fiscal year $2.8 billion in the red. He said the board was working to keep costs down.
"But something like this is serious enough where I don't want someone to do a cut-rate investigation," he said. "We want a professional review."
He did not say how long the investigation would take.
To run the investigation, the Postal Service hired Abbe Lowell, a Washington defense attorney who has taken on some of the city's most sensitive and high-profile cases. Lowell said he would not discuss the matter and referred questions to the Postal Service.
Sens. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and Kent Conrad, D-N.D., have acknowledged receiving mortgages through the VIP program but have said they were unaware of any favorable treatment. Dodd was instrumental in crafting a $700 billion bailout for the financial industry.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
2 Votes- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Published to:
- Matt Apuzzo 's Column, All of Newsvine
- Groups: none
- Regions: United States
- Public Discussion (6)
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user
has on the current conversation.
The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd
row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera).
Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group
is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the
left, in their corresponding group.
Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the
number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative
one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their
relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.0
{"commentId":4092892,"authorDomain":"joelearley"}
I personally think ANY government employee including military should get VIP treatment, as long as it does not involve a trade of government services. I mean really, what was the postmaster going to do for countrywide, free stamps for a year?
Government employees do not make the kind of money the private sector does, as a service we should do anything we can to help their lives. So what, they shaved a point and waived the fees, big deal!! we're spending tax money on something that should be looked at, is there a trade? No? ok, carry on....
{"commentId":4092892,"threadId":"421224","contentId":"2119378","authorDomain":"joelearley"}
#1 - Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:19 AM EST{"commentId":4093717,"authorDomain":"boonsorama"}
Really? So this poor guy is a pauper, when his salary is $258,000???
What a crackup.
{"commentId":4093717,"threadId":"421224","contentId":"2119378","authorDomain":"boonsorama"}
{"commentId":4093792,"authorDomain":"joelearley"}
Ok, maybe not a pauper, and I never said so....my point is comparative which you obviously didn't bother with......What does the CEO of UPS, or DHL, or FED EX make in comparison?? That's my point!!
{"commentId":4093792,"threadId":"421224","contentId":"2119378","authorDomain":"joelearley"}
{"commentId":4094575,"authorDomain":"boonsorama"}
What does someone working at McDonald's make in comparison? Maybe THEY should get the sweetheart loan.
I don't feel sorry for anyone pulling in that salary who thinks he needs a break!
{"commentId":4094575,"threadId":"421224","contentId":"2119378","authorDomain":"boonsorama"}
{"commentId":4095299,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
{"commentId":4093955,"authorDomain":"joelearley"}
UPS's CEO $6,200,000 John Mullen, CEO of DHL approx. $2,200,000 (converted from 1.74 million euros) Fredrick W. Smith CEO of Fedex $6,170,000......so yeah the Postmaster deserves a break!
{"commentId":4093955,"threadId":"421224","contentId":"2119378","authorDomain":"joelearley"}
#2 - Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:28 AM EST{"canLink":false,"threadId":"421224","isPrivate":false}
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
Start Tracking
Stop TrackingCOMPANY STUFF:
LEGAL STUFF:
- © 2005-2009 Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine is a property of
