Log In | Register
2 Comments
Printadvertisement
The Big Three automakers are taking a page out of their unions' playbooks as they deploy grassroots tactics to drum up public support for the proposed $25 billion auto industry bailout, which is on precarious ground in Washington, D.C.
"Mobilize Now!" cries a Web site created by General Motors Corp. at GMfactsandfiction.com. "Tell your U.S. senators and representatives that support for the U.S. auto industry is in America's best economic interest."
As GM, Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC approached Congress with hat in hand, a whirl of activity in the traditional and new media intensified over the last two weeks to mount public pressure on lawmakers.
What happens to the industry "matters on Main Street," according the GM Web site's home page.
"If a plant closes, so does its suppliers, the local stores, the hot dog vendors, and the local restaurants," the site says.
The company ran a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday with a more business-oriented tone calibrated for that paper's readers.
"The grassroots effort was to correct falsities and misperceptions that are out there and help people get accurate information about the significant impact of the U.S. auto industry on America," said Kelly Cusinato, a spokeswoman for GM in Detroit.
GM also placed ads in USA Today and other publications to lay out its case that loaning car companies billions of dollars is good for America. Local dealers also placed ads in their cities' newspapers to support the effort.
Cusinato said some papers offered space at a discount or for free. Automakers and their dealers have long been among newspapers' biggest advertisers.
The company bought banner ads on some Web sites, its executives penned articles for newspapers' opinion pages, and it released a poll Friday that it had commissioned, which showed 55 percent of respondents think the automakers should get the loans while 30 percent disagree.
GM's page on Facebook has links to articles, a YouTube video and the Web site jobspercar.com, where readers can learn how many jobs are supported by a specific vehicle, listed by make and model.
On Chrysler's corporate Web site, the blog section carries an embedded video called "Straight Talk About Assistance."
The video, also in Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and blogs, says 4.5 million American jobs rely directly and indirectly on the U.S. auto industry.
"If those jobs go away, it would be equivalent to putting the entire populations of South Carolina, Kentucky or Louisiana out of work," the video intones.
Chrysler spokeswoman Mary Beth Halprin said the company encouraged employees, suppliers and customers nationwide to contact lawmakers. It also brought dealers to Washington to talk to legislators, and some of its suppliers went on their own, Halprin said.
Chrysler also trolled blogs and encouraged people posting to them to view its video, and it too wrote op-ed articles.
Ford said it asked employees and dealers last week to urge lawmakers to support the case for federal loans.
The United Auto Workers union joined in, posting a column on its Web site from the Detroit Free Press aiming to debunk stereotypes about U.S. automakers as building unreliable gas guzzlers that don't sell instead of investing in hybrids.
The union also placed ads in The Hill, Roll Call and Politico publications in Washington, and its president, Ron Gettelfinger, testified this before Congress.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
1 Vote- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Published to:
- Deborah Yao's Column, All of Newsvine
- Groups: none
- Regions: United States
- Public Discussion (2)
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user
has on the current conversation.
The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd
row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera).
Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group
is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the
left, in their corresponding group.
Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the
number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative
one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their
relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.1
{"commentId":4136531,"authorDomain":"EEEEEMAN"}
What the big three needs to be addressing is how to sell the units already on the lot, without wages and a more stabilized economy the money the big 3 seeks is not going to matter.
Remember the price of oil during the second and third quarters was the straw that broke the camels back, not the so called mortgage crisis, lest we forget the futures trading on oil, gas and chemicals, and one more ditty the ten billion plus to rebuild the Middle East, who just happened to add to the price per bbl of oil futures.
Twenty Five Billion to the big three is just the start, how would GM be able to use that money when in testimony the company states that it alone spends or needs eight billion a month just to break even on a monthly scale domestically. As an added note where is the testimony regarding the defense contractual obligations that these three companies have, does that fall under the non reported income of subsidiary foreign based companies?
{"commentId":4136531,"threadId":"423924","contentId":"2131412","authorDomain":"EEEEEMAN"}
- 1 vote
#1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:06 AM EST{"commentId":4137158,"authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
No Bailout, file chapter 11 and rebuild start with working out a new union contract than cut salary of the top management after all they have not been doing their jobs. Next the GM CEO is making $39,428.26 per day fire him, hire someone at a fair wage to rebuild the company.
GM is building, Chevy, GM, Buick and a few other cut back to just making cars and truck under the Chevy name only after all they are the same cars or truck no matter which name they uses. Cut back to making three model of cars with very good gas mileages and one SUV and a few truck model only.
They should uses their own money to bailout not tax payer money, they have has sense the 80's to re-tools and build a better product but elected not to so shame on them. Looking at all the large corporation going down, I would like to know what does the high price CEO do to earn their keep.
{"commentId":4137158,"threadId":"423924","contentId":"2131412","authorDomain":"jdl-28"}
#2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:18 AM EST{"canLink":false,"threadId":"423924","isPrivate":false}
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
Start Tracking
Stop TrackingCOMPANY STUFF:
LEGAL STUFF:
- © 2005-2009 Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine is a property of
