Paulson: crisis happens once or twice in 100 years

advertisement

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson called the financial crisis now plaguing the world economy a "once or twice" in a 100 years event, even as he warned Thursday against imposing too-strict regulations to prevent a repeat calamity.

Paulson's remarks follow pledges by world leaders attending last week's emergency economic summit to begin an overhaul of the world's financial regulatory system.

With the next summit slated for the spring, the work on fleshing out details for the Herculean task will fall to the incoming administration of President-elect Barack Obama and his new Treasury secretary.

Paulson, whose boss President George W. Bush leaves office on Jan. 20, acknowledged that the financial crisis was caused by many factors including "government inaction and mistaken actions, outdated U.S. and global financial regulatory systems, and by the excessive risk-taking of financial institutions."

Still, he cautioned against the U.S. and other countries developing a too-onerous regulatory response.

"If we do not correctly diagnose the causes, and instead act in haste to implement more rather than better regulations, we can do long-term harm," Paulson said in a speech in Simi Valley, Calif.

Earlier this week, lawmakers blasted Paulson for his handling of a $700 billion financial bailout package to help ease the crisis and restore stability and confidence to unhinged markets.

Paulson on Thursday again defended his management, including his decision last week to officially abandon the original rescue strategy: buying rotten mortgages and other bad debts from banks to free up their balance sheets and get them to lend more freely.

"By proactively addressing the problems we saw coming and being pragmatic enough to change strategy in the face of changed facts and despite the inevitable criticism — we prevented a far worse financial crisis," Paulson insisted.

Focusing the bailout program on infusing billions into banks — and possibly other types of companies — to pump up their capital and bolster lending to customers was deemed a faster and more effective approach to stabilizing the financial system than the original centerpiece of the plan, he said.

"There was no playbook for responding to a once or twice in a hundred year event," Paulson argued, saying he needed to shift strategy to respond to worsening financial and economic conditions.

Fielding questions after his speech, Paulson repeated his opposition to tapping the bailout fund to help Detroit's Big Three auto companies. "It doesn't do any good to spend money if there is not a clear path to viability," he said.

Paulson again said he believed the Bush administration has taken the necessary steps to prevent a financial market collapse, but he cautioned that it will take time for markets and lending conditions to return to normal.

So far, the Treasury Department has pledged $250 billion for banks and has agreed to devote $40 billion to troubled insurer American International Group — its first slice of funds going to a company other than a bank. That leaves just $60 billion available from Congress' first bailout installment of $350 billion.

Although Treasury won't use any of the money to buy rotten assets, "we are actively engaged in developing programs to be implemented when ready" to help expand credit, Paulson said.

___

Associated Press Writer Jeff Wilson contributed to this report from Simi Valley, Calif.

  • 2 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.0
{"commentId":4141715,"authorDomain":"beagles4me"}

I have lost any confidence that Paulson knows what he is doing. Come on January!

{"commentId":4141715,"threadId":"424252","contentId":"2132682","authorDomain":"beagles4me"}
    Reply#1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:21 PM EST
    {"commentId":4141903,"authorDomain":"rdonaldsnyder"}

    Paulson, like the moron Bush and some others, cling to the idea that this is not the result of deregulation when nothing could be clearer. Deregulation is dead center as the fault for the banking and mortgage crisis, which (granted also because of poor management on their part) has affected the big three auto industry. Paulson can say this is a once or twice per 100 years occurrence, but he conveniently leaves out the fact that when it does happen it's because the free market fanatics have deregulated the markets too far and greed and legal theft sets in. Sensible regulation is needed to contain the markets. In spite of what some would have one believe the markets can not and will not regulate themselves because that would require a total lack of greed and pure ethics on the parts of the people in the markets. That just ain't gonna happen. Make theft and corruption legal and people will steal.

    First Hoover, now his ideological evil step-child Dubya.

    {"commentId":4141903,"threadId":"424252","contentId":"2132682","authorDomain":"rdonaldsnyder"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:30 PM EST
    {"commentId":4144239,"authorDomain":"cricketticket"}

    Thats a stroke of genius being its happened once or twice already- the economy wouldn't have crashed if the curent administration hadn't cut domestic spending- steadied inflation and stuck the checks from the Gulf war oil deal in their provebial pockets...

    The economy didn't just crash because of Wall Street- the job market changed with internet- people are cautious to purchase good which are unqualified and I think people understand the world in in danger- and if we keep consuming and mass producing garbage and luxury we will destroy ourselves. Why would a great many people go to work in an offce when you work online at home and do the same amount of work- instead of meeting in stale enviroment- pushing paper?

    -MikeAlike (recording artist, album title "Model Male")

    {"commentId":4144239,"threadId":"424252","contentId":"2132682","authorDomain":"cricketticket"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:49 PM EST
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"424252","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"424252","contentId":"2132682"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking