What Robert Gates once called "inconceivable to me" — his remaining as defense secretary beyond Inauguration Day — is looking a bit more conceivable to the rest of Washington.
The 65-year-old former spymaster has turned publicly mum on the circumstances under which he would stay, even briefly, after President-elect Barack Obama takes office. But one of the leading scenarios for a wartime transition at the Pentagon has Gates holding the fort, at least for some months.
If Gates does stay on, the announcement could come soon.
A national security spokeswoman for Obama, Brooke Anderson, said Thursday she had no comment on Gates or on whether the president-elect has held discussions with any candidate for the Pentagon job.
By keeping mum, both camps may preserve the option of walking away without hard feelings.
The apparent logic in keeping Gates for an extended transition — but perhaps not for a full presidential term — is that it would allow time for a secretary-in-waiting, who might come aboard in January as Gates' deputy, to assemble a new team of senior defense policy officials before the top boss departs.
It also would reflect a widely held view among Republicans as well as Democrats that Gates has the experience, demeanor and policy priorities to manage U.S. defense under a president of either political party. On the other hand, he has said he supported President George W. Bush's decision to invade Iraq in March 2003, whereas a central theme of Obama's campaign was that he opposed it from the start.
One of the strongest indications of Obama's interest in possibly keeping Gates came in early October when Richard Danzig, a senior national security adviser to the Obama campaign and himself a possible selection to succeed Gates, told reporters that Gates has proved himself an effective Pentagon chief.
"He'd be an even better one in an Obama administration," Danzig said. "Why do I think that? Because many of the kinds of efforts he's made are in tune with what we are trying to do." He mentioned, as examples, Gates' efforts to get more U.S. combat forces to Afghanistan and to expand the size of the Afghan army.
Picking Gates, even with a tacit understanding that a Democrat such as Danzig would take over after a period of months, could be hard to swallow for liberals and strong critics of the Iraq war. Those groups nursed Obama's candidacy through an improbable infancy, motivated by his firm anti-war stance.
"I'm rooting for Gates. I think it's a great move politically," Michael O'Hanlon, a defense analyst at the Brookings Institution, said in a recent interview. He said he thinks Gates is a good fit in part because of his calm, measured response to rising tensions with Russia, saying one Cold War was enough.
The Defense Department is one of the largest and most complex organizations in the U.S. government, and with two wars under way there is extra concern about security vulnerabilities during the transition. This is the first wartime presidential transition since 1968, when the Vietnam war was under way.
Gates has run the department since December 2006, reluctantly giving up his post as president of Texas A&M University to replace Donald H. Rumsfeld at a point when the Iraq war seemed to be failing.
Should he go gracefully now, Gates would enter retirement on a high note, having carried off his assigned role as a soothing influence after the turbulence of the Rumsfeld years, with a significant — and largely unpredicted — turnaround in Iraq under his belt.
Until speculation about his future intensified in the weeks before Obama's victory, Gates routinely responded to questions about his interest in staying at the Pentagon by saying he and his wife, Becky, would return to their lakeside home in Washington state as soon as President Bush finished his term. Gates carries a small digital counter — a kind of gag gift from a friend, labeled "The Gates Countdown" — that shows the days, hours, minutes and seconds until Jan. 20 and the end of his commitment to Bush.
On April 23, when asked if he thought he would be asked to stay, Gates replied, "The circumstances under which I would do that are inconceivable to me."
By October he seemed a little less firm. "Let me just say that I'm getting a lot more career advice and counseling than I might have anticipated. I think I'll leave it at that. I'm still planning on heading to Washington state."
And in his most recent remark on the subject, last week, he said, "I have nothing new to say on that subject."
On Thursday Gates met at the Pentagon with the leaders of Obama's defense transition team, Michele A. Flournoy and John P. White.
The 45-minute session covered a wide range of topics, Gates spokesman Geoff Morrell said. He would not be specific about what the Obama team wanted to know.
So, did the possibility of Gates staying come up?
"Not to my knowledge," Morrell said.
___
Associated Press writer Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.
___
On the Net:
Gates's official biography at http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/biographydetail.aspx?biographyid115
Remember when political experts at Time, Newsweek, National Review and others wrote that Obama would be forced by conservative & moderate Democrats and Republicans in congress to move to the "center" rather than embrace the "far left". Well it's happening. In today's LA Times an interesting headline: "Antiwar groups fear Obama may create a hawkish Cabinet".
Here are some examples:
1. Obama has already backed off his campaign rhetoric about withdrawing troops within 16 months of being elected. Now he's said he will " meet with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and my national security apparatus* and we will start executing a plan that draws down our troops". No surprise here. The Iraqi government and the US have been negotiating a pact to withdraw US troops from Iraq for several months.
2. *Hillary Clinton is likely to be appointed as Sec'y of State. She's a born again hawk who voted for the invasion of Iraq and never really backed off her support of the war during her campaign for President.
3. Retain Defense Secretary William Gates* (a Bush appointee), also a hawk.
4. Also on the short list for a cabinet post, Sen. John Kerry, a hawk who voted for the war.
5. Sen. Richard Lugar, a Republican, a hawk who voted for the war is on the short list for a cabinet post.
Like everyone knows, on the campaign trail, the candidates say whatever will get them elected, but once elected the realities of Washington and the need to work with both sides of the aisle become part of the harsh realities facing any new president.
Political experts have long discussed the truly conservative nature of the American people. Everyone, regardless of party affiliation, wants a secure US free from terrorist threats or attacks, any country unfriendly to America to not have nuclear capability and everyone wants lower taxes, which makes it very difficult to pass sweeping measures that come with high costs such as universal healthcare and immigration reform.
We are in troubling times, but observing how are new commander-in-chief and his cabinet respond to the issues facing our nation will be very exciting. Stay tuned ....
Blah blah blah
Obama knows what he wants to do and will assemble a team that knows how to do it.
Gates knows how to manage a DoD that is in a war, and He can probably manage one that is pulling out as well.
That some how Obama is a "pillow" like Bush was (takes on the last opinion that is laid upon him) is ridiculous, and for people to fear that Gates being left in office indicates some sort of problem with future opportunities to choose war or diplomacy is unfounded.
I think Gates should stay. He seems to be doing well, and there is no reason to replace him.
And there is nothing wrong with governing from the center. It's pragmatic, and signature Obama.
Moder8: You are absoluely right. Mr. Blah, blah blah, does not want to address the right wing corruption and despotism of his insiders, preferring the code words the corporate media uses over real analytical examination.
Eric,
Don't dare insinuate that I am a sell out or a right wing hack or anything that would indicate that I am not dedicated to advancing the cause of the poor and middle class against the corporatist elite.
Pragmatism gets things done. Pragmatism is not the same thing as caving or selling out, etc. Ideologues got this country into the partisan hell hole it is in right now, it is going to take pragmatists to get us out.
The usual definition of Pragmatism, within a Class regime, is always to capitulate, appease the false centrism i.e. imperial and corporate polcies. Since there are no progressive policies pragmatism there has no meaning, except more of the same corrupt insiders being pragmatic with Bush's policies, when they should have prosecuted him instead of hiring their warmongers as advisors.
PRAGMATISM IS CAPITULATION AND DOES GET THE IMPERIAL AGENDA, "THINGS DONE"
I wouldn't be shocked if Gates were to stay as Defense Secretary.
Pragmatism gets things done. Pragmatism is not the same thing as caving or selling out, etc. Ideologues got this country into the partisan hell hole it is in right now, it is going to take pragmatists to get us out
You have a good point there, Behind My Screen.
The only "ideologues", SuperSaiyan, are the "partisans" of illegal war policies, both democratic and republicans, who have destroyed the middle class with its militarism and corporate fascism.
Here's your definition of pragmatism Eric Albert....
Doesn't sound like capitulation to me...sounds like thinking with your head instead of your dick....Dick Cheney, that is.....
Today on Democracy NOW, there was an examination of Obama's corrupt, imperial, "insiders", some of which were within the Bush criminal regime, some of which are Democratic NEOCONS, or Democratic Zionists, and some which are liberal warhawks like Biden and Hillary.
Obama used demagaugery, false populism, during the Primaries, just like Bush and Hitler used words like "democracy" or "socialism" to hide their corporate fascist policies and class Empires. Still, during the phony corporate media debates, it was already clear that the class elites were filtering out anti war voices, promoting their imperial and class candidates, like Hillary and OBAMA over KUCINCIH or NADER, who were far better on social positions.
The corporate elites, including the corrupt corporate media, AP included, cheerled illegal wars, and their two corporate parties, and their class ideologies, were complicit in the fascism and police corruption of democracy, the Constitution, and their failure to uphold it by impeaching, prosecuting their war criminals. All three branches of government have been complicit in this fascist rot, police state laws and now are once again promoting "Centrism" which is a code word for Corporate despotism, imperial agendas, in the same way "Experience" was code word to support the warmongers of Biden and Hillary who supported international law breaking and are war criminals themselves.
Obama has not followed through on his phony populism, instead has surrounded himself with the same NEOCONS, ZIONISTS, imperial liberal warhawks, who supported Bush's criminal policies. The NEW YORK TIMES and that Zionist, warmongering cheerleader, Ignateus, is whispering into OBAMA'S EAR to continue to corrupt his cabinet with pro war people. Rham Emanuel was the first Zionist thuggish example, and the list got even worse.
The two party system, class thugs, warmongers, and phony "Bipartisanship" is another codeword for continuing class Empire, corporate crimes, bail outs and a system that has destroyed families through its militarism or through its slavery, unpaid labor, declining wages, and trickle down supply side Reagainsim and Clintonism that brought us the current Depression.
The Corporate elites, and the corporate media are to blame for the failure of OBAMA'S presidency of CHANGE WE CANNOT BELIEVE IN.
For those interested in real facts, ideological connections and exposure of the betrayal by these rotten insiders, please click on this link below. Gates is an imperial insider who should be fired along with all the anonymous NEOCONS, ZIONISTS, WARHAWKS, who are too afraid to show their ugly faces on the fascist imperial policies they are craftin.
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/11/20/agents_of_change_or_hawks_clintonites
WOW...I thought I was a conspiracy theorist...your rantings are so jumbled and mind numbing I cant even make it through to the end.....
Christian Areas: The corporate media could not define how they arrived at the "center", because it is just a codeword, dogma, for more of the same imperial corporate thugs that ruled under Bush, now under OBAMA, the black face of American Empire. "Pragmatic" is also a code word for the same class and imperial ideology, and so this is more propaganda.
God, your language is so cliche.
Christian Areas:
The cliched language of corporatists, imperial militarists does not bother you, but the only thing you can say of my arguments, is not to address them, for what reason.?
AP, has a habit of posting similar pictures, and stories, to manipulate answers. I found this out quite by accident, where suddenly the same story shows up elsewhere, and the seed you are responding suddenly dies.
Miss Cyprah responded to this very same story, picture, here is the manipulative link
http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2008/11/19/2128901-gates-rice-defend-us-iraq-security-agreement
With two wars and other diplomatic difficulties, it might be wise not to change horses immediatetly in the middle of the stream. If Gates is an effective manager, which I suspect he is; then he should be able to manage under any administration. Biden and Obama both work on the foreign relations committe. I'd like to see him stay for continuity! (msp?) At least until some decision is made on Afghanistan and troop re-deployments or withdrawal. As with the economic crisis, none of this will be solvent in four years but maybe by then, we can see some type of drawdown on both fronts. Well, that's what I think anyway....................
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |