TON - One thing professional politicians are expert at judging is public relations.
The bipartisan consensus here at the Capitol Thursday was that the Big Three auto executives had failed spectacularly in their testimony this week to House and Senate committees. And by flying to Washington on private, corporate jets they created a monumental public relations fiasco.
In the wake of this disaster, it would have been political poison for the Democratic-controlled Congress to hand them a $25 billion subsidy to stay afloat.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid knew he did not have the 60 votes needed to overcome a likely filibuster against the bailout.
He also knew that any "bailout" is likely to be unpopular right now. The $700 billion bailout, or rescue plan, for financial firms has become even more unpopular than it was when Congress passed it last month.
There are some members of Congress, such as Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss. who won their elections Nov. 4 partly because they voted against the Wall Street bailout. Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R Ga., was forced into a runoff election partly because his vote for the bailout gave his Democratic opponent, Jim Martin, a stick with which to beat him.
Risk of rejection
Reid did not want to put the proposed $25 billion loan to a vote and have his colleagues reject it because that would have further spooked the stock markets. As it was, the stock market tumbled Thursday after congressional leaders announced the bailout vote had been delayed.
“We don’t need to go through a bunch of votes here that fail,” Reid told reporters. “The stock markets, the credit markets are having a lot of difficulties. What kind of message do we send to the American people by having a bunch of failed votes here? We do not have the votes.”
Alluding to the PR fiasco, Reid summed up the obvious: “What happened here in Washington this week has not been good for the auto industry.”
Executives flying to the Capitol on corporate jets to seek a loan “doesn’t send a good message,” he said.
What the Big Three leaders utterly failed to do this week, said Senate Banking Committee chairman Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., was to give “any willing admission of their own culpability in the situation they’re in.”
But while Democratic leaders wanted to be tough on the CEOs, that inevitably entailed hurting workers as well.
The Democrats didn’t want to appear as if they were shrugging their shoulders in indifference about the jobs at stake in Michigan and other states. “We are here to help," said Reid. "We are not against the auto industry. We want to help those people keep those jobs.”
So Reid reverted to the practical rule in politics: “When in doubt, delay.”
How to define 'viability'
Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi insisted in a joint press conference that executives of Ford, General Motors and Chrysler must present a business plan after Thanksgiving.
On Dec. 2, Democratic leaders will begin hearings to judge those plans. The buzzword that Reid and Pelosi kept using as they faced a horde of reporters Thursday was “viability.”
Reid said it would be up to Dodd and House Financial Services Committee chairman Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., to judge what “viability” was and whether the automakers had it.
When a reporter asked Dodd if he and Frank had a common understanding of how “viability” could be determined, Dodd joked, patting his heart, “It’s all right here.”
Dodd said the plans that will be submitted by the Big Three would be analogous to a firm approaching a venture capitalist and presenting a business plan. The taxpayers are the venture capitalists, Dodd said. “They are coming to us to submit a plan on what they’re going to do if we decide to invest,” he told reporters.
But how to define “viability”?
Dodd replied, “Well, I don’t know; that’s a great question. Obviously those are the important issues and we’ll have to sort that out ourselves.”
Asked whether GM for example, would have to tell Congress what product lines it would phase out and what new models it would unveil over the next few years, Dodd replied, “Certainly we want to hear about retooling and reorganization. There will be some detail to this. We are going to want to get as much of a sense (as possible) of where this industry is heading.”
But the decision by Democratic leaders to insist on the auto industry executives proving viability raises this question: if most members of Congress found the Detroit executives so unskillful in their presentations this week, are these really the men whom Congress trusts to chart the future of their firms?
If they cannot manage PR, can they manage retooling, market strategy and all the other challenges of competing with Honda, Toyota and Hyundai?
Those questions will be waiting when Dodd and Frank return to the Capitol after Thanksgiving.
Macho
Macho
Macho............get over machismo, america. Your car isnt a reflection of your penis.
The most amusing thing to me is this spend happy Congress and Senate would bring up the words Acountability and Viability. Our leaders have done neither while leading our country to disaster. I think Dodd, Pelosi, Reid, Franks, etc., etc. should claim culpability, accountability and that having them in power leads to viability.
By the way they will never shelf the aid to there Union brothers who have stuffed there campaign coffers and ballots. The whole thing is a sham. I think no money is to be given to our automakers until all the unions are disbanded. They will return for more money by 2010 if they maintain status quo.
But how to define “viability”?
Dodd replied, “Well, I don’t know; that’s a great question. Obviously those are the important issues and we’ll have to sort that out ourselves.”
Now you know we are in trouble, this is the one of the same guys that started the housing fiasco, and he admits he does not know what viability is....... Just goes to show you how much these idiots know on capitol hill.
To me, the Republican opposition to providing support for the auto industry is the height of hyprocrisy. They say that these companies need to become more competitive by shedding costs - specifically the unsustainable benefits that are paid to retired auto workers - like medical insurance and pensions. Has anyone ever looked into the retirement benefits that our congressmen get - free medical insurance and a pension system no average joe (plumber or otherwise) could ever hope for. With the current US debt level, perhaps our government needs to shed some unsustainable costs - like benefits for current and future retired congressmen. I'll believe the Republican politicians really have the interest of the country at heart and believe what they say about auto bailouts when they put their money where their mouths are - give up their retirement benefits and join the rest of us average people who work until they put us in a coffin. (I'm always amazed at how the Republicans can continually deceive the average joes in the south with their scripted talking points).
No not at all the Republicans see this for what it is a payoff to the unions for their vote and money. Stop cloaking it with anything else. Until these unions go away the 3 will not make it with any bailout.
I'm tired of Republicans being blamed for loss of factory jobs when the real reason is and always will be organized labor period. That is what sent jobs to other countries.
Back in the 90s, GM made electric cars they leased in California. People LOVED them. People wanted to BUY them. But instead of selling the cars, GM confiscated them and CRUSHED THEM. So it isn't that they didn't have the technology to compete, THEY WILLFULLY CHOSE NOT TO. We could have been leading the green revolution with regard to cars, but those yahoos decided to build gass guzzling Hummers and Escalades and crap like that instead and turned their backs on anything green.
And now they want us to bail them out? I say, get rid of all the executives, and start making these electric cars again, along with cars that run on compressed air (like the ones invented in France and Australia).
People need to see the movie "Who Killed the Electric Car."
In addition, why are they blaming the union workers, when the executives are the ones who make millions per year? :rolleyes: What a bunch of tools.
And WHY IS NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THIS ON TV? HELLO!!!
I will agree with you that the decisions made by execs on what to build is one reason for the failure, but please do not let the unions pass in the part they play in the failure. The 3 car makers cannot compete labor wise period. I don't care if they build a car that runs on tears as long as the unions remain as is they will fail again.
Bailout for automaker = payoff to Unions for their votes and money. By the way have no doubt a bailout is coming to detroit. It may or may not happen this year, but it will for sure happen by January early february when the dems have all the votes in place for the payoff.
Jerry D. Williamson
I notice you rant and rave about Barney Frank and Chris Dodd( I do Too), but at the same time you defend unions to the nth degree. The unions put these crooks in congress ever election by donating to these 2 to the nth degree. Raise heck with the unions that donate to Frank and Dodd.
Now that makes sense!!!!
absolutely agree
dodd, schumer, et al deciding whether or not a plan is "viable" ? now there is a joke, albeit a very bad one. these are the people who are taxing and over spending what they take from us as "revenue". they cant stay within a budget and are going to tell businesses how to? those who do, do, and those who cant teach. is that what we're seeing here ? let them go bankrupt. only "viable" alternative.
yes to both
One word - Unions.
really two words. congress and unions. interchangeable. having a love fest. more aptly stated its union "leadership" (there's an oxymoron) and congress.
Why reprieve? They can't even argue and impress the House and Senate then they get a second chance. They better come out with good excuses why Big 3 need bailout money otherwise, the best option is bankruptcy.
why is that noone can see the truth its not the auto companies directly its the oil company who has the most to gain by the big three putting out those gas guzzlers people look at the bigger picture
post this
whoops sorry about that
What I don't understand is why this houly wage keeps coming up and to me it seems as though the country is totally against the UAW workers that we make to much money and our wage is a big contributor to the big three going down. When this week is a perfect example of what is going on in corporate america. Ford has been in buisness for a long time and through the years the money it has wasted is beyond diffineable. The workers have only tried to make these companies give back a little of the money that we have made for them throughout history. I don't think we make to much, I don't think the rest of middle class america doesn't make enough. Toyota and the rest of them haven't been in business long enough to have pension plans to pay. I chose manual labor and I am a hard worker who gives it my best everyday, I wish the rest of the world would have an oppritunity to defend their rights as workers and make corporate america start redinfing how they run their business. They line their pockets and fly around the world why they starve the very people that make their success possible. This has been going on for so long now that we think of it as the norm and it is crazy. If Ford would have made better financial decisions when the money was rolling in and had enough since to look toward the future the mess their in now would of never happened they would of weathered the storm but the big three continued to line their pockets and have a hay day wasting money and throwing away our future. This is where america is at. All of our jobs overseas because its cheaper and we all helped make it possible and the UAW has fought to keep the jobs in America but we're the bad guys we make to much money. Well i'm sitting in my 55,000.00 dollar house with my little economic american made car and hoping that i will be able to continue to live my humble life and I hope the rest of america realizes that we have been trying to tell this country for years that what is now reality was stoppable but no one would listen.
This was not intended to be offensive just me speaking out
Your comment is in no way offensive. In fact, I'm glad that a person, that is directly involved, has given input.
I agree with you. Unions are actually a GOOD thing, because they are for the people who do the actual work. If it weren't for unions, we wouldn't have safety standards, no one would make overtime (which many people aren't again), we wouldn't have ANY fair labor standards and practices (and no, I am not now nor have I ever been in a union). Union wages have kept up with the costs of living every year, other wages have NOT. That is why their hourly wage is higher. Therein lies the problem. If ALL WAGES for ALL JOBS had kept up, the minimum wage would be MUCH higher (probably around $20), and most people would make a LOT more money.
Executive pay has gone through the roof, from about 30x more than the average worker to almost 500x more. In what universe is that fair, or ethical, or moral, or OK? Most industrialized countries, the difference is about 25x more. I will never get why people aren't pissed off about THAT. Instead, they blame union workers, who make a fraction of what the people at the top make. And the people at the top are the ones who make the decisions, and in the case of what is going on today, those decisions are what have caused the collapse of the ENTIRE world economy. And it started, HERE, in America. Because of freaking socialist corporatism and how all the rules favor the uber-wealthy and powerful who are in charge of everything.
The problem is greed, and Corporate America is addicted to CHEAP labor, not QUALITY labor. If we continue down the road we're on, sending all our jobs overseas, or allowing illegals or even legal immigrants to come in on work visas where they are paid a lot less than American workers, then the middle class will completely disappear. You think we're in trouble financially right now? the middle class is what drives the economy. This country will disappear without a middle class.
I do not think you really understand the situation. Through the years you have enjoyed pay increases as well as health and retirement benefits beyond the imagination of most Americans. You seem to equate competive labor with poor quality. Quality is an expectation from your customers. The customers did not abandon the Big Three because they were simply tired of quality automobiles at the best price. They walked away from a tired old industry whose workers and managment are dinosaurs from another period.
The big three have done this to themselves. Every time someone came up with great technology, they bought it and squashed it. They have been anti-environment, anti-gas saving, and anti-safety right down the line.
Now they can't compete with Toyota and Honda. Boo Hoo.
Then get your butts back in the game with something that is better for the environment and uses less gas than a Prius. Do something competitive and stop whining that your dinosaur approach to business isn't working anymore.
Depending on why you buy a Prius they do have somthing better. I assume you are looking for overall economy. The Chevy Aveo is rated #1 most economical car on the road by JDPower and associates. The Prius is rated #34. The Honda Fit is #2. The initail cost + MPG = overall economy.
I admit a lot of people pay the premium price for bragging purposes but if you truely are looking for economy you should drive an Aveo.
i have to pay 1000 amonth in rent and cant have been trying for years to get a 100000 dollar house for a paymnt of 750 and no bank will give me a chance becasue i am not willing to do be a recepticle of the BIG STICK of CREDIT i have always paid for everything with cash never credit so i am considered a credit risk no how BACKWARDS is that the real problem aside from oil is the credit industry so many things on your credit report are wrong and inaccurate and out of date but you are based of this information in my opinion the entire credit rating process should be scrapped it just awat to make the poor pay more what sense does it make to have a person by there standards has a poor credit score have to pay more than someone who has a better credit score now they will blow skoke up your arse saying that som1 who has poor credit is a greater credit risk then please explain why ytou would require this person to pay so much more than a person who has good credit it makes no sense if you ask me it is away to keep the poor even more burden and while the rich to stay rich
Not to be @!$%#y, but could you consider using periods and commas and stuff? It would make it much easier to read your posts, and I am interested in what you have to say.
I agree the whole credit thing is a problem. America is addicted to debt. I will never understand how people can run up thousands and thousands of dollars on credit cards. I have used credit in the past, but I never bought stuff I couldn't pay for within a 3 month period.
It is silly that, when buying a house, a bank wouldn't look at your history of paying rent, like how much you paid every month, if you paid on time, how long you have been renting, etc. Because if someone has been paying $1000 rent every month for several years, then it's pretty obvious they could afford to pay $7-800/month for a mortgage. ONLY looking at someone's credit score is misleading, and it favors people who have debt, not people who live within their means and still use cash. It's sad, really.
I've read all the comments and it seems the majority favors bankcruptcy as a a solution-count me in. The big 3 should be responsible for their own mistakes and should not be turning to their sugar daddy for another lifeline. They failed to compete with foreign cars that are fuel efficient and doesn't breakdown within 5 years. American consumers are looking for quality and reliability so they turn to Japanese cars. These "big 3 " should keep their eyes wide open and don't live on their past glories, they should keep up with the trend. After all America is the land of innovations. Can they not do that-sure they can but first of all they should file for Chapter11.
They will be responsible for their failure. The only problem with your theory is that they will take the rest of us down with them. Say hello to the 2nd Great Depression.
Frank & Dodde! you have to be kidding. They are incompetent, they said Jennie & Sallie mae were strong and look what happened. I can't believe Frank was re-elected, so what does that say about the people who re-elected him. Now, is this what we can expect in the future? Mention of only the changes/re-0rganization of the Little 3 and "NO" mention or media attention on the UAW and the necessary changes involving them. If there aren't drastic changes involving the union then the little 3 and the workers will be on the tax payer tit for a LONG time. Dig deep people and open your wallets, this is only the beginning!
Haha, Mr NOCHANGE and the democrats are laughable, better than a comedy show, and the taxpayers money goes up in smoke. There are republican and democrats that run many of the banks, so both parties stink the house out in regards to taking money from the taxpayar and helping rineds out. Whos going to resign from these companies, owing to poor performance and when are the bonuses being returned by exes from companies that failed, just after tha bonuses were paid.
One would have thought these three CEO's would already have had a plan in place for achieving viability over the next 3 to 5 years before jetting into Washington seeking $25 Billion in loans. The fact that they did not is grounds enough for their immediate dismissal and replacement by their respective corporate boards. Then again, perhaps their respective corporate boards should be dismissed and replace as well. At this point, both are likely to happen as a condition of a public loan.
After all, the handwriting has been on the wall for several years. For national economic, security, and environmental reasons it has been clear that this country must take the world lead in transforming from an oil-based economy to a clean-energy green economy and common sense dictates that it starts with the manufacturing base conversion of gasoline driven to fuel cell driven automobiles with hybrids serving as an intermediary step.
Rather than fight this necessary 21st century economic transformation, the Big 3 CEO's and their Board of Directors should have embraced it willingly and demonstrated their willingness to do so by arriving in Washington in fuel-efficient cars rather corporate jets.
As it is, Congress understands, and more importantly our next President has from the beginning understood, that it and he can not endanger the jobs of 3 million citizens for the pleasure of slapping down 3 CEO's nor take the chance of losing another if not our most essential manufacturing industry to foreign countries if we are are make the 21st century an American one as we did the 20th century.
Henceforth, our automobile manufacturing industry should necessarily be viewed as a critical part of the long-term solution to the economic, security, and environmental issues we face and our focus should be on enabling it to become so.
The Sopranos, a.k.a.Congress...is part of the mob skimming off of this. This handout thing to The Corleones...a.k.a. big business is at the "tip of the iceberg" point. Over the next two years they'll end up doing absolutely nothing to improve anything but methods for increased extortion....a.k.a. taxation.
The Gambinos....a.k.a. the IRS will start whining before the month's out for their cut of the action. Then Bonnie & Clyde....a.k.a. Fannie and Freddie will need yet another "feeding." Won't be long before Capone, a.k.a. CitiBank will muscle in and demand 100 billion. I wouldn't be surprized if the Yakuza a.k.a. Toyota doesn't get into the act for their American plants. Where we'll REALLY get into trouble is when the Crips & Bloods - a.k.a. the "defense contractors" line up for their take. So long as we don't throw money at the Hells Angels...a.k.a. big oil - just give the lobbyists a while... we may even give money away to Dr. Death...a.k.a. big pharmaceuticals because people are buying less Cialis in the weak economy.
A nation fascinated with their little crooks they put in Washington. By the time they get around to us, they're out of funds, so they rob us in the street to keep their rackets going.
I think the members of Congress need to explain to the American public how they are going to "change the way they do business" & turn the economy around and they also need to make wage and benifit concessions!
As a GM car salesman, I certainly have a vested interest in GM's survival. As tough as it may be, a Chapter 11 bankruptcy is the only thing that makes sense. But the REAL problem seems to be the idiots running Congress--- on both sides of the aisle. Can we truly say Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, and Barney Frank have the sense to come in out of the rain? And THEY are going to decide what the best course of action is to save the U.S. auto industry? As badly as they have run the country (and need we mention, the Social Security Trust Fund), while voting themselves bloated retirement plans and multitudes of perks, they are going to berate private industry for doing EXACTLY what they've been doing to the United States of America? When Pelosi took over as Speaker of the House, didn't she DEMAND a FULL-SIZE AIRLINER as HER personal mode of transportation, rather than a very reasonable personal-size jet? When are we going to get these greedy irresponsible representatives and senators in line? We need some "hatchet men" over reorganization of the auto industry AND congress.
Hey while everyone else is getting bailed out, I figured I would ask America for a bailout too. I am in need of a bailout due to 220K in education debt and family of five. I have actually made good financial decisions and have a real plan for bailing myself out. It seems ridiculous to me to keep flushing money down the toilet for bailouts. But since we're all begging for a handout check mine out at bailtravisout.com.
I feel for you in these unstable times. As soon as we can fiqure out how to sneak it through congress the check will be in the mail.
Easy peasy..earmark!
It's all about greed. Corporate greed, union greed and societal greed. It all has to come to a stop. First, Chapter 11 reorganization with two emerging auto manufacturers, fewer dealers, and finance lending in place for unlimited auto loans to the public.
No union participation for two years... then gradual reintroduction with financial restrictions limited to the same cost of non-union auto industry workers and job bank participation limited to two weeks.
Corporate salaries cut to $2 million for CEO's and half that for lesser top management. Fifty percent reduction for all other management positions above $500,000.
All other ammenities such as jet "fleets" will be cut to one jet per company.
Nafta and Cafta (what ever that is :)) will be renegotiated by Congress within the first three months of session. No auto plant in the US is to be closed in the US without closing all foreign plants are closed first. No parts may be ordered from any plant that makes their parts anywhere but totally in the US for use in the assembly or manufacturing of any auto made by the US auto makers.
I think ALL corporate salaraies should be cut. People at the top make way too much at the expense of everyone else, and what has happened to the economy just proves that. The wealth of a company should be spread between all the employees, not just those at the top. EVERY JOB is important, and in this country, we have forgotten that. The janitor who cleans the floors and scrubs the toilets works just as hard (if not harder) as executives, and let's face it, he has a crappier job. And people who make bad decisions should not be rewarded with bonuses. If the company loses money, the first place money should be cut is at the top, where people make the most.
In addition, another problem is, corporations have been allowed to get SO BIG that if they fail, they take down the rest of us with them. Whatever happened to antitrust laws, and laws about monopolies? NO company should be allowed to get SO BIG that they can hold a gun to our collective heads if they get into trouble. It also stiffles innovation and competition. I think we need to start breaking up companies, not continue allowing them to gobble up other companies, like the banks are doing right now.
"Alluding to the PR fiasco, Reid summed up the obvious: “What happened here in Washington this week has not been good for the auto industry.”
Executives flying to the Capitol on corporate jets to seek a loan “doesn’t send a good message,” he said."
Bank CEOs never fly corporate jets. Doh!!!
Obama will give the big 3 50 billions to make AUW happy
If we bailout the three largest US automotive companies then we might as well bailout the remaining blacksmiths or even perhaps our steel industry. The three automotive "giants" are now begging for our money after decades of reckless mismanagement. When my father purchased his first Chevy, the rear bumper fell off on the way home from the showroom. Since 1950, this industry continues on its journey through OZ believing that they can turn an antiquated industry, weighted down with poorly negotiated entitlements, into a bright and shiny ending. When will the automotive industry (workers and management) wake up and realize – You are never going home?
KC77, when the UAW consistently demands more and more and more while profits decline, they ARE part of the problem. You cannot always have growth, not even in your own paycheck, and if you insist on it in bad times for the business, the business goes under. Please explain how that is not related...
Umm, show proof of the UAW asking for more and more.
They have been giving and giving. As far as the VEBA it is going thru courts now.Try doing some research.
Also GettlelFinger DID NOT fly a private jet. Show the made up links
More lies!!
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |