US contractors lose immunity in Iraq security deal

advertisement

Thousands of contractors, both private Americans and non-Iraqi foreigners working in key roles for the United States in Iraq, will lose immunity and be subject to Iraqi law under new security arrangements, Bush administration officials say.

Pentagon and State Department officials notified companies that provide contract employees, like Blackwater Worldwide, Dyncorp International, Triple Canopy and KBR, of the changes on Thursday as the Iraqi parliament continues contentious debate on a security deal that will govern the presence of American forces in Iraq after January.

That so-called Status of Forces, or SOFA, agreement, which gives the Iraqi government only limited jurisdiction over U.S. troops and Defense Department civilians, excludes Defense Department contractors, two officials said.

The officials spoke to reporters on condition of anonymity after giving the same information to representatives of 172 invited contracting companies in two separate meetings earlier Thursday in Washington.

"Contractors and grantees can no longer expect that they will enjoy the wide range of immunity from Iraqi law that has been in effect since 2003," a State Department official said, reading from the text of a statement presented to the contractors.

Iraq will have "the primary right to exercise jurisdiction over" such workers, who are employed in various support roles for the U.S. military, including food service, transportation and sanitation, they said.

The agreement does not mention State Department contractors, who mainly provide security for U.S. diplomats in Iraq, but their immunity is expected to be revoked by the Iraqi government after the agreement takes effect pending Iraqi parliamentary approval, the officials said.

"In the future, contractors and grantees can expect to be fully subject to Iraqi criminal and civil laws and to the procedures of the Iraqi judicial system," the official said, adding that contractors faced similar situations in all other areas of the world, including in Afghanistan.

It was not immediately clear if any contractors would choose to stop working in Iraq because of the changes. The Pentagon official allowed that some contractors had expressed concern, but stressed that none so far had said specifically that: "If I lose immunity, I will walk."

The Pentagon employs some 163,000 contractors in Iraq. Of those, about 17 percent are U.S. citizens, 34 percent are third-country nationals and 49 percent are Iraqis. The State Department employees 5,500 contractors in Iraq, of which all but 1,000 are U.S. citizens. The U.S. Agency for International Development employees another 4,800 contractors. A breakdown of their nationalities was not immediately available.

Under existing rules that date from 2003 and the occupation government of the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority non-Iraqi citizens working for companies under contracts to U.S. government agencies in Iraq are immune from Iraqi law.

That status has become increasingly controversial, particularly after a September 2007 incident in which private Blackwater security guards protecting a State Department convoy opened fire in a crowded Baghdad square, killing 17 Iraqi civilians and prompting a huge outcry in Iraq.

The State Department official said he expected the U.S. and Iraqi governments would be able to reach a separate understanding under which private security guards protecting American diplomats would be allowed to use "appropriate defensive force" if they were attacked. But, he could not say when that understanding might be reached.

  • 4 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.1
{"commentId":4146762,"authorDomain":"itsathought"}

Black Water and other "Contractors" who comit torture, rape, murder, robbery ect....War Crimes, Crimes against hummanity, have been getting a free ride throughout this war...buh-bye boys! And take Cheney with you! 

Thank God, no more protecting these criminals!

{"commentId":4146762,"threadId":"424589","contentId":"2133574","authorDomain":"itsathought"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:53 PM EST
{"commentId":4147503,"authorDomain":"rdonaldsnyder"}

GOOD! It's about damn time too! Those Blackwater "security" thugs need to be reigned and then thrown out of the country and into prison! Most of them are no better then a well armed street gang! there's no place for mercenaries in US foreign policy! Esp not murderous ones like these killers!

{"commentId":4147503,"threadId":"424589","contentId":"2133574","authorDomain":"rdonaldsnyder"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:55 PM EST
{"commentId":4149462,"authorDomain":"solardude"}

Unfortunately, the worst offenders are the security contractors working for the State Department, and seem not to be directly affected by this development, unless they are added later under a separate agreement.  One of the more troubling aspects of the current administrations prosecution of the this war they have thrust upon us, is the fact that Blackwater and others are somehow above the rules that govern the conduct of the armed forces.  Its not that they are more efficient, or more effective than standard military troops.  Their main benefit to Bush, Cheney, et al, was the fact that they did not have to answer for their actions, either in US courts or military court.  Lets hope that this will go away with Guantamamo, the Iraq war, and the rest of Bush's gifts to America and the world.

{"commentId":4149462,"threadId":"424589","contentId":"2133574","authorDomain":"solardude"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:48 PM EST
{"commentId":4150771,"authorDomain":"millsapril"}

I agree, in general, with what everyone is saying -

There is NO place for 'contractors' in a war zone - my son tells me that instead of doing his job as a network admin, he had to stand guard to protect the civilian who was brought in to do it. The only financial sense that makes is to the contract company. Makes NO safety sense. Plus, they aren't held to the same accountability standards that soldiers are under the Geneva convention.

Second, maybe now we can stop paying the multi-billion contracts for substandard, unfinished work.

Third..hope there aren't any women in these contract agencies. If there are, they better leave - there's no way to protect them from the sharia law.

{"commentId":4150771,"threadId":"424589","contentId":"2133574","authorDomain":"millsapril"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:58 AM EST
{"commentId":4182775,"authorDomain":"christopher-calbat"}

Lafen,

If your son is an E-5 w/o BAH and 6 years in, he's making just over 3500/mo to protect a guy that's making close to 3500 a week doing the job the military trained him to do.  I know, it's pretty sad.  

Gotta love those 'no bid contracts' 

{"commentId":4182775,"threadId":"424589","contentId":"2133574","authorDomain":"christopher-calbat"}
    #4.1 - Mon Nov 24, 2008 3:12 AM EST
    {"commentId":4195278,"authorDomain":"millsapril"}

    Hi Sgt

    That's about right... except he's still an E-4... he keeps talking about re-enlisting to get the 'bonus'...I ask him if they'll let him re-up with both legs broken *Evil Mom Grin*

    {"commentId":4195278,"threadId":"424589","contentId":"2133574","authorDomain":"millsapril"}
      #4.2 - Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:24 AM EST
      Reply
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"424589","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"424589","contentId":"2133574"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking