Detroit's automakers, making a second bid for $25 billion in funding, are presenting Congress with plans Tuesday to restructure their ailing companies and provide assurances that the funding will help them survive and thrive.
General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., and Chrysler LLC would refinance their companies' debt, cut executive pay, seek concessions from workers and find other ways of reviving their staggering companies.
UAW leaders, meanwhile, summoned local union leaders from across the country to an emergency meeting Wednesday in Detroit to discuss concessions the union could make to help auto companies get government loans.
U.S. automakers are struggling to stay afloat heading into 2009 under the weight of an economic meltdown, the worst auto sales in decades and a tight credit market. General Motors, Ford and Chrysler went through nearly $18 billion in cash reserves during the last quarter, and GM and Chrysler have said they could collapse in weeks.
Top executives from the Big Three failed last month to convince a skeptical Congress that they were worthy of $25 billion in loans. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., ordered them to outline major changes, including the elimination of lavish executive pay packages and assurances that taxpayers would be reimbursed for the loans.
All three companies are filing separate plans. Congressional hearings are planned for Thursday and Friday.
"I believe the industry will make a compelling case for bridge loans that will allow the companies to return to firm financial footing," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.
GM will outline efforts to negotiate swapping some of the company's debt for equity stakes in the automaker, either shares or warrants for them, said two people briefed on the company's plan.
With eight separate brands, GM will also discuss efforts to shed brands but it would prefer to sell them instead of shutting down Pontiac, Saturn or Saab, said one of the people briefed on the plan. Killing off brands, like GM did with Oldsmobile in 2004, would require cash the company doesn't have, the person said. The people briefed on GM's preparations didn't want to be identified because the plan hadn't been completed.
Some members of Congress have urged the Big Three executives to take major pay cuts as part of the deal. Chrysler Chief Executive Robert Nardelli said he would work for $1 a year, and a similar commitment is expected from GM CEO Rick Wagoner. Ford plans to include a pay cut for Ford CEO Alan Mulally, although the size of the cut was not immediately available.
Chrysler is expected to outline changes that would include a swap of debt in the company for equity stakes and reductions in some vehicle models, according to a person who was briefed on the plan. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions were private.
Ford, meanwhile, is not expected to immediately seek the loans. Mulally told Congress last month that the company would only seek funding if the U.S. market continued to deteriorate. He mortgaged factories to arrange a $23.4 billion credit line shortly after taking over the company in 2006 and he has said Ford can last at least until 2010.
Cash stockpiles at GM and Chrysler are dangerously close to the minimum amount required to run the companies, meaning they could have trouble paying all their bills by the end of the year.
GM, according to its quarterly report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, owes creditors $45 billion and it must pay more than $7.5 billion early in 2010 to a United Auto Workers trust fund that will take over retiree health care payments.
Ford owes more than $26 billion, with $6.3 billion due to its UAW trust fund at the end of 2009. Chrysler, a private company, does not have to open its books, but its CEO, Nardelli, has said it would be difficult for the company to make it without federal aid. All three likely are negotiating with the UAW for delays in payments to the trusts.
The companies are expected to seek other concessions from the United Auto Workers, including the elimination of the much-maligned jobs bank in which laid-off workers keep receiving most of their pay.
Alan Reuther, the UAW's legislative director, declined to say on Monday what kinds of concessions the union might take but said "we realize that all stakeholders need to come to the table to do what's necessary to ensure the viability of the companies. We're prepared to do our part."
The UAW leaders subsequently disclosed plans for a meeting in an e-mail, obtained by The Associated Press, to local union presidents and bargaining chairmen.
Among the subjects to be discussed at the Wednesday meeting will be the possibility of restructuring the union-administered health care fund so that the automakers can delay payments to the multibillion-dollar fund, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The union leaders will also discuss potentially eliminating the jobs bank, in which laid-off workers keep receiving most of their pay. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the details of the talks haven't been finalized.
The automakers' plans to Congress may also discuss more symbolic issues such as the use of corporate jets. During the congressional hearings, the executives were sharply criticized for traveling to Washington, D.C., separately by private jets.
Ford said that Mulally will travel by car when he returns later in the week. Chrysler and GM said their CEOs will not fly by corporate jet, but neither company has said if the executives will fly on commercial airlines or drive.
All three companies are expected to resist calls for bankruptcy. The executives said last month bankruptcy cannot be an option because no one would buy a car from an automaker that may not survive the life of the vehicle.
Auto executives plan to discuss the plans at a hearing before the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday and the House Financial Services Committee on Friday.
Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez said in an interview that the plans need to address some of the key structural issues facing the industry, such as costs, their debt structure, their dealer network cost and their product lines.
Gutierrez said auto industry officials have told him they plan to present "strong plans" but he had not been briefed on the details.
"There needs to be a path to viability," Gutierrez said.
___
AP Auto Writer Tom Krisher reported from Detroit. Associated Press writer Julie Hirschfeld Davis in Washington contributed to this report.
Automakers argue that bankruptcy isn't an option, maintaining that no one will buy a car from a company that may not be around for the life of the vehicle.
You don't have to be in bankruptcy for this to be an issue-- I already feel this way about the "big 3". As far as long term prospects go, there is no difference between needing a government bailout and bankruptcy. In fact, bankruptcy pretty much is a government bailout!
Maybe if they released that 65mpg Ford running around Europe I would consider extending my tax dollar to help them. However, they said it would not be profitable for them to do so. I am a sales associate for a retail building supply chain. How will I profit? What real incentive are they passing on to the consumer. Instead here's a 3 step plan to help them 1. Sell off last years models at half price 2. Decrease production by half 3. Get rid of the assistant to the assistant of the assistant
If that doesn't work at least they can say they tried.
RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil (AP): Brazil raised its minimum wage by 9.2 percent Saturday to 415 reals (US$248; euro163) a month, boosting millions of salaries and pensions based on multiples of the base salary.
The increase from 380 reals (US$226.80; euro149.30) was more than twice the 2007 rate of inflation, a traditional index for pay raises in Brazil. Inflation last year was 4.5 percent.
The impact is greatest on lower-class families, with pensioners and salaried workers who earn little more than the minimum wage, economists said.
"It improves the income of more than 12 million pensioners and government retirees (and) heats up the local economy,'' economist Marcelo Neri, of the respected Getulio Vargas Foundation, told government news agency Agencia Brasil.
But the Union Statistics Department, or Dieese, said the raise was still insufficient to cover a family's basic needs, as stipulated in the constitution. An adequate minimum wage for a family of four is 1,924.59 reals ($1,149; euro756), Dieese said.
"That's an estimate of how much the minimum wage should be to adequately compensate labor,'' said economist Jose Mauricio Soares.
MOSCOW — Ford workers in Russia are threatening to strike if management refuses to increase wages by 30 percent and offer other concessions, the head of the plant's trade union said Thursday.
The workers demands come at a time when the company is planning to almost double production at its St. Petersburg plant, putting additional pressure on its workforce, the union official said.
"We are ready to work for a worthy salary. The conveyor belt squeezes us dry," Alexei Etmanov of the plant's trade union said by phone from Vsevolozhsk. The plant's union is affiliated to Moscow-based Trade Union of Machine Builders.
The trade union, which is also seeking year-end bonuses and equal pay for equal work, expects to receive a response from management Friday. If management refuses to budge, the union is threatening to lay down tools for one hour in a warning strike.
"Ford seeks to provide compensation and benefits that are competitive in the local areas where we operate", said Todd Nissen, a spokesman for Ford Europe.
Back in June, U.S.-based Ford said it would sink $30 million into its plant in a move to increase annual production to 60,000 cars from next year.
While Ford plans to add to its 1,700 workforce, the production boost will nevertheless add pressure to workers who already do overtime in the hope of a bigger paycheck, the union said.
Most of the plant's workers earn between 10,000 ($350) and 17,000 rubles ($600) a month, according to the union.
In comparison, Ford workers in Brazil earn between 16,000 rubles ($560) and 26,000 rubles ($911) a month, Etmanov said, as well as receiving 1 percent of the profit a plant makes.
Prices in Brazil are lower than in Russia, with a liter of vodka going for 35 rubles or the rent of a one-room apartment costing $200, Etmanov said, who recently visited Ford operations in Brazil.
Recent discontent over terms and conditions has led to a dramatic increase in union members, with membership rocketing to over 1,100 from just 112 since August.
The plant's workers officially put forward their demands to Ford's management on Monday.
Tensions increased a day later when management denied a top union official access to the plant.
Gennady Trudov, chairman of the Trade Union of Machine Builders, had requested a meeting with the plant's management and the union representatives at the plant.
Ford said it had been unable to accommodate Trudov's visit at such short notice, having received the request on Monday. It was "not a good time" as the plant was getting ready to increase production, said Nissen.
Cheap labor is a key factor to attract multinational companies to set up shop in emerging markets. The wages at Ford's Russian plant do not greatly differ from workers' paychecks at other car plants in Russia.
Vanessa Levy, a spokeswoman for Renault's Moscow-based plant, said starting workers receive 11,000 rubles ($385).
Alexei Klyukin, a shift leader at Ford's plant, said workers have no reason to complain. "Workers count their wages but don't count expenses which they would have had they worked at a different company."
Svetlana Klimova, a labor expert with the Russian Academy of Science's Institute of Sociology said one of the few successful recent examples of strikes includes a strike by St. Petersburg dockers.
Some of this may be a couple of years old but the principal is the same, minimum wages $248 bucks a month. Ford plant workers in Brazil double to triple that? What slave who is being paid next to nothing wouldn`t think doubling or tripling his wages wasn`t a good deal?
All at the expense of the American and or Canadian workers? More profits for the CEO`s and stock holders at the expense of the workers. Real wages in other countries don`t come close to ours here, well Latin American countries and Asian. There wouldn`t be a push to move the work there if they did.
Just global slavery with a different name? You really have to think, is lowering our standard of living to enrich others a global economy?
Ford, GM, and Chrysler need to make their own way or go away.
The gut that drove Kennedy's car from Dallas to Detroit was Lee Iacocca.
I think it would be better if the press would quit calling this a bailout. A bail out it is, as defined in Merriam Websters. As it is seemingly publicly perceived is as a gift. The Big 3 are looking for loan guarantees. Ford is not expecting to need a loan if any of the other Big 3 files bankruptcy according to an article on MSNBC. We do need to help these the industries out for sure. Failure of any of these company's would reverberate though-out our economy. Causing a ripple that might cause a lot of other government expense's that would not get paid back such as economic support and medical programs,housing,welfare and banks stuck with over valued property. It's imperative we stop the bleeding now. Rather than take the risk. Human suffering on a large scale would be the order for this crime. Let's just make sure we get collateral in what we loan, just like a bank. I am writing my representative right after this comment to support these iniatives. I suggest we all do as we wanted a government of the people by the people. We need to do our part and let them know what we want, what ever it may be.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |