Scientists ask: Is technology rewiring our brains?

advertisement

NEW YORK — What does a teenage brain on Google look like? Do all those hours spent online rewire the circuitry? Could these kids even relate better to emoticons than to real people? These sound like concerns from worried parents. But they're coming from brain scientists.

While violent video games have gotten a lot of public attention, some current concerns go well beyond that. Some scientists think the wired world may be changing the way we read, learn and interact with each other.

There are no firm answers yet. But Dr. Gary Small, a psychiatrist at UCLA, argues that daily exposure to digital technologies such as the Internet and smart phones can alter how the brain works.

When the brain spends more time on technology-related tasks and less time exposed to other people, it drifts away from fundamental social skills like reading facial expressions during conversation, Small asserts.

So brain circuits involved in face-to-face contact can become weaker, he suggests. That may lead to social awkwardness, an inability to interpret nonverbal messages, isolation and less interest in traditional classroom learning.

Small says the effect is strongest in so-called digital natives — people in their teens and 20s who have been "digitally hard-wired since toddlerhood." He thinks it's important to help the digital natives improve their social skills and older people — digital immigrants — improve their technology skills.

At least one 19-year-old Internet enthusiast gives Small's idea a mixed review. John Rowe, who lives near Pasadena, Calif., spends six to 12 hours online a day. He flits from instant messaging his friends to games like Cyber Nations and Galaxies Ablaze to online forums for game players and disc jockeys.

Social skills? Rowe figures he and his buddies are doing just fine in that department, thank you. But he thinks Small may have a point about some other people he knows.

"If I didn't actively go out and try to spend time with friends, I wouldn't have the social skills that I do," said Rowe, who reckons he spends three or four nights a week out with his pals. "You can't just give up on having normal friends that you see on a day-to-day basis."

More than 2,000 years ago, Socrates warned about a different information revolution — the rise of the written word, which he considered a more superficial way of learning than the oral tradition. More recently, the arrival of television sparked concerns that it would make children more violent or passive and interfere with their education.

Small, who describes his modern-day concerns in a new book called "iBrain: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind," acknowledges he doesn't have an open-and-shut case that digital technology is changing brain circuitry.

Still, his argument is "pretty interesting and certainly provocative," although difficult to prove, says brain scientist Tracey Shors of Rutgers University.

Others are skeptical. Robert Kurzban, a University of Pennsylvania psychologist, said scientists still have a lot to learn about how a person's experiences affect the way the brain is wired to deal with social interaction.

Life in the age of Google may even change how we read.

Normally, as a child learns to read, the brain builds pathways that gradually allow for more sophisticated analysis and comprehension, says Maryanne Wolf of Tufts University, author of "Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain."

She calls that analysis and comprehension "deep reading." But that takes time, even if it's just a fraction of a second, and today's wired world is all about speed, gathering a lot of superficial information fast.

Wolf asks what will happen as young children do more and more early reading online. Will their brains respond by short-circuiting parts of the normal reading pathways that lead to deeper reading but which also take more time? And will that harm their ability to reflect on what they've read?

Those questions deserve to be studied, Wolf says. She thinks kids will need instruction tailored to gaining reading comprehension in the digital world.

Some research suggests the brain actually benefits from Internet use.

A large study led by Mizuko Ito of the University of California, Irvine, recently concluded that by hanging out online with friends — sending instant messages, for example — teens learn valuable skills they'll need to use at work and socially in the digital age. That includes lessons about issues like online privacy and what's appropriate to post and communicate on the internet, Ito said.

Rowe, the 19-year-old, said he and his buddies often debate whether technology might actually be bad for you. That includes kicking around the argument that computer use makes people socially inept.

Of course, he added, "we spend a lot of time on the computer and still have totally normal and perfect social lives."

  • 7 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.6
0.3
{"commentId":4292232,"authorDomain":"zapman9103"}

This article brings up some interesting points about our culture and values.   What do we value and with what emphasis?

How much time do we spend on computers and how dependent on them have we become.  Could today's youth comprehend a world of their grandparents, whereas technology was relatively limited in daily tasks?    As for the future, will it uphold more use of technology?

As this article points out, technology is now in every aspect of our lives.  We socialize and chat on-line.  We shop and gather information on-line.  We negotiate, purchase and even pay on-line.   And now, the entire framework of our thought process is based on-line through the Internet.   Its not just technique and process, but even metaphor.

This virtual world allows us to manipulate our transactions and relationships in new ways, seemingly changing our more profound behavior.  We don't have to see a person at face to face, nor even talk to them in "real time."  Indeed, "real time" is a concept that was recently invented with the use of technology.  We can now distance ourselves from others, many times in very anti-social ways that are passive-aggressive.   We can ignore calls, change the means by which we channel a message, create anonymity and even divorce ourselves from accountability.

Like Socrates, as well as other social philosophers, you could question if this all leads to more freedom, or if it in fact leads to an escape from freedom.  The pursuit of personal freedoms, such as those based in self-expression, are seperated from the relationship with the recipient.  As modernity and technology evolves, our expression is communicated seemingly with less intimacy to other human contact, as well as to other tangible participation.

{"commentId":4292232,"threadId":"434707","contentId":"2173393","authorDomain":"zapman9103"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Dec 4, 2008 2:53 PM EST
{"commentId":4292514,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

Not quite like Johnny Mnemonic, 1981, yet.

{"commentId":4292514,"threadId":"434707","contentId":"2173393","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
    #1.1 - Thu Dec 4, 2008 3:08 PM EST
    {"commentId":4299499,"authorDomain":"zapman9103"}

    I thought about that, too.   I could not place the name on the movie, however.   I didn't realize that it was conceptualized as early as 1981.  That's crazy!   Wow!

    I was also wondering about other movies with like scenarios as its plot.

    {"commentId":4299499,"threadId":"434707","contentId":"2173393","authorDomain":"zapman9103"}
      #1.2 - Fri Dec 5, 2008 3:11 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4339384,"authorDomain":"kahaire"}

      This is an interesting question.  Where do we draw the line?  Social networks like Facebook help people stay in touch with each other, which is great, particularly given how often people move these days.  But it also makes more and more of our interactions virtual.  

      I'm 28 - young enough to have grown up with the Internet and to be proficient and comfortable on the Internet, yet old enough to have grown up socializing with friends the old fashioned way - in person.  (In person socializing as old fashioned - yikes!)  I do worry about the younger generation lagging in social skills, as I see them more hooked into technology at younger and younger ages.  I am interested to see where this research goes.

      {"commentId":4339384,"threadId":"434707","contentId":"2173393","authorDomain":"kahaire"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Mon Dec 8, 2008 2:25 AM EST
      {"commentId":4376934,"authorDomain":"setjeff-1"}
      setjeff-1Deleted
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"434707","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"434707","contentId":"2173393"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking