Automakers grab loans, look to Obama White House

advertisement

WASHINGTON — President George W. Bush gave the U.S. automakers $17.4 billion in emergency rescue loans, but the fate of the industry is in the hands of President-elect Barack Obama.

Simply letting the carmakers collapse was not an option amid a recession, housing slump and financial credit crunch, Bush said Friday in announcing the short-term loans and demanding tough concessions from the automakers and their employees.

"The more responsible option is to give the auto companies an incentive to restructure outside of bankruptcy and a brief window in which to do it," he said.

Detroit's Big Three cheered the action and vowed to rebuild their once-mighty industry, though they acknowledged it would be tough to fight their way back from the brink of bankruptcy. If the carmakers fail to prove viability — a positive cash flow and ability to make good on the loans — by March 31, they will be required to repay the government loans.

That's something they would find all but impossible to do.

The autoworkers union complained the deal was too harsh on its members, while Bush's fellow Republicans in Congress said it was simply bad business to bail out the industry using money from the $700 billion rescue program for financial institutions.

Obama, who takes office a month from Saturday, praised the administration action but warned, "The auto companies must not squander this chance to reform bad management practices and begin the long-term restructuring that is absolutely necessary to save this critical industry and the millions of American jobs that depend on it."

Obama will be free to reopen the arrangement from the government's side if he chooses, and the head of the United Auto Workers said the union would be appealing to the new president and the strongly Democratic new Congress on that subject. Obama was noncommittal on possible changes but said he would "make sure that when we see a final restructuring package that it's not just workers who are bearing the brunt."

Some $13.4 billion of the rescue money will be available this month and next — $9.4 billion of it for General Motors Corp. and $4 billion for Chrysler LLC, the two auto giants that have said they could be facing bankruptcy soon without government help. GM is slated to receive the remaining $4 billion in loans after more money is released from the financial rescue account. Ford Motor Co. says it doesn't need federal cash now but would be badly damaged if one or both of the other two went under.

Under terms of the loans, the government will have the option of becoming a stockholder in the companies, much as it has with major banks, in effect partially nationalizing the industry. Bush said the companies' workers should agree to wage and work rules that are competitive with foreign automakers by the end of next year.

And he called for elimination of a "jobs bank" program — negotiated by the United Auto Workers and the companies — under which laid-off workers can receive about 95 percent of their pay and benefits for years. Early this month, the UAW agreed to suspend the program.

The deal also calls for two-thirds of the automakers' debts to be converted to stock in the companies.

Also, Chrysler, GM and Ford were to pay billions into UAW-administered trust funds that will pay health care bills for hundreds of thousands of retirees starting Jan. 1, 2010. The trusts, called Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Associations, were to last at least 80 years.

  • 6 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
11
6.9
1.5
{"commentId":4412138,"authorDomain":"rdonaldsnyder"}

Preserving our industrial base is as much a national security issue as anything else. A nation without an industrial base can not manufacture the weapons, vehicles, etc. to fight and survive a war. The auto industry is the heart of our industrial base. If we let it die we do so at our own peril.

{"commentId":4412138,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"rdonaldsnyder"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 AM EST
{"commentId":4412289,"authorDomain":"zuma6195"}

I totally agree on the idea of preserving our industrial base industry (like the auto industry) but the average pay for an assembly line worker including benefits for the US auto-maker is about $78.00 an hour !!  while the U.S. based Japanese assembly line worker including benefits makes about $48.00 an hour. 

The Union of the US auto-maker went beyond the protecting mode.   That is why the quality of US made car suffers because we have to cut "corners" in order to make a profit.  The drawback of making $48.00 an hour is that the assembly person may have to work a little more and a little harder for the money.  Are we prepare to do that ?  Seems like our nation is full of lazy people and the Union is there to protect them.

In short, laziness is a big price to pay in our modern society.

{"commentId":4412289,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"zuma6195"}
  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:03 AM EST
{"commentId":4412340,"authorDomain":"cheshireak"}

I am so sick of hearing this argument.  I believe that the members of UAW should make concessions, but to use, as part of the argument, that they make $78 an hour, or whatever figure you want to throw out, is unfair.

I make $ at my job, but if you want to lump my health benefits, vacation pay, etc into it I would be making close to $30/ hour, but how much can I actually put toward my house payment?  Should my income be based on the $30/hour or $21?  I think $21/hour is just fine for what I do, and I'm not looking for more (though I wouldn't refuse it if it came without asking  :D), but if someone were to come to me and say that what I do isn't worth $30/hour, and demand that I have my pay, and benefits cut, I would have a HUGE problem with that.

How much do you make per hour?  If you are salary, break it down to a 40 hour work week (even if you work more than that, this is only for comparative reasons).  Now, add all of your benefits to that hourly wage.  Now, do you think there could be someone out there who would think that your adjustedpay-rate is too high for what you do?  What would you say if they demanded that you cut your pay, so that the company could be more profitable, while those who have been making the decisions (CEO's, executive management), keep their salaries and bonuses. 

And, yes, I know that at least one of the Big 3 CEO's have offered to reduce their salary to $1, but they haven't said jack about refusing their multi-million dollar bonuses they get, that aren't even based on performance.

{"commentId":4412340,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cheshireak"}
  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:36 AM EST
{"commentId":4414938,"authorDomain":"tirionoyara"}

Bush would rather see our children and grandchildren fail, which is what is going to happen if we keep nationalizing everything.  Kind of ironic that he slams Huego for nationalizing his oil fields.

{"commentId":4414938,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"tirionoyara"}
  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:36 PM EST
{"commentId":4424456,"authorDomain":"bevos4"}

Good Greif. I know how you feel about giving up part of your wage, and noone is saying you're not worth what you make. But if the CEO of your  Co. came and said, (Everyone is going to have to take a cut in pay, for us to stay in business) What would you do?  I'm not talking about just the workers taking a cut. All the way up to the CEOs need to take cuts. They need to TOTALLY restructure their pay scale. Renegotiate their parts costs,  cut out ALL bonuses and redesign their cars to make them more economy friendly. Until they do all of those things, I wouldn't give them a penny. They PUT themselves where they are.

{"commentId":4424456,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"bevos4"}
  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:51 PM EST
{"commentId":4502537,"authorDomain":"rickace"}

Getoutandstayout

Bush would rather see our children and grandchildren fail, which is what is going to happen if we keep nationalizing everything.

Bush? When he first heard about the crap sandwich he thought it was a bad idea.

It's the Democratic Congress that's voting to nationalize.

{"commentId":4502537,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"rickace"}
  • 2 votes
#1.5 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:41 AM EST
{"commentId":4502653,"authorDomain":"panicklaus"}

How much do you make per hour?  If you are salary, break it down to a 40 hour work week (even if you work more than that, this is only for comparative reasons).  Now, add all of your benefits to that hourly wage.  Now, do you think there could be someone out there who would think that your adjustedpay-rate is too high for what you do? 

I'm sick of that argument too.  But for a different reason.  It's not always as clear cut as you claim.  I did as you asked, and I make roughly $118/hr.  But I'm straight commission.  Does that mean I get to SUBTRACT my health insurance, supplies, cell phone bill, land line bill, DSL and travel expenses?  Or does it mean I'm part of the 'evil-rich' because I gross over $240,000 yearly? 

The bailout/loan is a farce, IMO.  The 'Big 3' have been given until March 31, 2009 to pay back the $17B.  There is absolutely no way they can restructure their business plans, restructure their companies, design and produce a product people want to buy and realize a big enough profit from that product to pay back the loans by then.

Had they gone the bankruptcy route, they would have bought themselves enough time to do all of the above and have protection from their creditors to boot.

{"commentId":4502653,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"panicklaus"}
  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:01 AM EST
{"commentId":4507703,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

pat n

 you are a idiot, i'm sure that you do just that when you do your taxs. take off all your subtract's health,supplies,cell, travel, if you don't you need new tax guy. and what the hell are you worry about what we get payed anyway 240 a year fine some thing else to worry about

{"commentId":4507703,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
    #1.7 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:11 PM EST
    {"commentId":4508453,"authorDomain":"panicklaus"}

    pat n

     you are a idiot, i'm sure that you do just that when you do your taxs. take off all your subtract's health,supplies,cell, travel, if you don't you need new tax guy. and what the hell are you worry about what we get payed anyway 240 a year fine some thing else to worry about

    MFK...feeling a little classs warfare?  'Good Greif' suggested that people here figure out their wages with bennies kicked in.  I merely pointed out that it doesn't always work that way.  My income at the end of it all...probably isn't that much different than most people here.  Considering I have a disability, I might even be making LESS, given my insurance premiums.

    Also, I don't see how your post addresses the thread.  Your goal seems solely to bash an individual who you perceive as 'rich'.  You sir, are the idiot, as the point I was making sailed right over your head.

    I'll put it in elementary language you can understand....

    It doesn't matter what the union workers make because 3 months is not long enough for the Big 3 to restructure.  They will end up declaring bankruptcy anyway.

    Get it now?  Or do I need to draw you and your ever so angry disposition a picture?

    {"commentId":4508453,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"panicklaus"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.8 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:59 PM EST
    {"commentId":4509013,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

    pat n

     your disability are my tax $ paying you? if so i want them back, how about that for addressing the thread? i pay upward of $100 a month for my free as you call it health care and that is not counting the pay for hbp meds i take, and live on $1800 a month, that not 240 a year go away . most people here get 240 a year they can go with ya. thanks for the rebut ,but i don't need anymore but like you!

    {"commentId":4509013,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
      #1.9 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:33 PM EST
      {"commentId":4509421,"authorDomain":"panicklaus"}

      your disability are my tax $ paying you? if so i want them back,

      Wow.  You are one angry individual.  No...your tax dollars aren't going to me at all.  I take no disability whatsoever.  Incidentally, if you're a liberal, shouldn't you be thrilled to death with your tax dollars going to the disabled?

      i pay upward of $100 a month

      And I pay $830.  What's your point? And what does this have to do with bailing out the Big 3?

      My point is, we are not doing any of the workers of the Big 3 any favors by providing this $17B short term loan.  In fact, long term...it's only going to create a larger welfare class. 

      If you don't want to discuss the topic of the thread and you just want to be angry with my earnings on straight commission, take it to e mail.  Other's here shouldn't be exposed to your ugliness.  Your last post has been reported as 'no value'.

      {"commentId":4509421,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"panicklaus"}
      • 1 vote
      #1.10 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:33 PM EST
      {"commentId":4515574,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

      well

      you are the one that brought up your disability and were crying about making less not me, ok now who is going to pay out all this welfare, you have no clue what would happen if they all 3 when out i don't one person here has spent a day in a auto workers place but they all them not to be payed for doing a job

      {"commentId":4515574,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
        #1.11 - Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:59 PM EST
        {"commentId":4515968,"authorDomain":"panicklaus"}

        you are the one that brought up your disability and were crying about making less not me,

        Wrong.  Had you been paying attention, you would have noticed I was pointing out to another poster that not all of us get a salary and benefits.  For some of us, our earnings are directly tied to what we produce and we foot the bill for our own bennies.  I wasn't crying about anything.  In fact, I'm pretty proud of my income level.  That's another thing that comes with having your income tied to how hard you work.  A sense of accomplishment.

        ok now who is going to pay out all this welfare, you have no clue what would happen if they all 3 when out i don't one person here has spent a day in a auto workers place but they all them not to be payed for doing a job

        I seriously don't understand the above statement.  I'm not being sarcastic.  I'm truly not.  But the grammar is so convoluted, the comment is very difficult to understand.

        I think what you're trying to say is that it's unfair to the auto worker if don't bailout the 'Big 3'.

        If that's what you're saying, I disagree.

        We are doing a greater disservice to the auto workers by giving their employers a $17B loan with an impossible to meet timeline for payback.  For starters, Chrysler alone is worth about $2B and has over $100B in debt to it's suppliers.  $17B will not pay for salaries, benefits, product development, R&D, etc.  And 90 days is not nearly long enough to allow for the strategic planning necessary for realignment of the company's business plan.

        It is much better to the auto workers if the Big 3 declare bankruptcy.  They get protection from their creditors and have the time to build a viable business plan.  It's going to take time to design, fund and build a product Americans want to buy.  Under the current package, they will take the $17B and declare bankruptcy in 90 days anyway.

        Then you, me, our kids and everyone else, including the auto workers, will be left holding the bag for the $17B the Big 3 owes us.

        {"commentId":4515968,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"panicklaus"}
        • 1 vote
        #1.12 - Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:01 PM EST
        {"commentId":4516487,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

         let me say, convoluted you'll have to forgive I'm just a auto worker. is that to say that i don't make any sent? just give us time, with help this time we well get the big money takers out and well come back.

        marry Christmas

        {"commentId":4516487,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
          #1.13 - Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:14 PM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":4412292,"authorDomain":"princecharmeing"}

          weapons?? Mr Snyder its bush's weapons of mass destruction that got the U.S. in this mess in the frist place,, stop the war, bring the troops home, let the auto makers and banks sort out the own problems the only thing that need to be done is lower the intrest rate for home buyer's and stop taxes on any company manufactoring , this would bring compays back to the U.S.,, thus bringing jobs as well  

          {"commentId":4412292,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"princecharmeing"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#2 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:04 AM EST
          {"commentId":4420531,"authorDomain":"rdonaldsnyder"}

          Bush's weapons of mass destruction are in the US military and we haven't used any since 1945. I too support stopping the war and bringing the troops home, but I'm not naive enough to think we don't need a defense from other nations that do hate us, esp as world resources get tighter and tighter. Yes Bush's war in Iraq was the very height of ignorance, but being against the war does not mean being against defense and we need a strong industrial base to be able to defend ourselves. What happens if we get into another major shooting war? Are we going to beg Japan to sell us the trucks and machinery needed to fight and win it? A nation without a good strong industrial base is a nation exposed and weak.

          {"commentId":4420531,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"rdonaldsnyder"}
          • 3 votes
          #2.1 - Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:09 AM EST
          {"commentId":4421095,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
          PartysOverDeleted
          {"commentId":4424168,"authorDomain":"bevos4"}

          Are you implying that the Big Three are going to employ our soldiers when they come home? If they are able to employ anyone, why are you unemployed? Even if the Big Three go under, The factories will still be there. If we need War Machines built, the factories can be fired up again. It is so simple! Let the Big Three go under, where they belong, Then some Billionaire can buy the Factory and start another Automobile, with more reasonable wages, Ins. Vacations and sick pay. Also lower priced economy cars, and still be waaaaaaaaaay ahead.

          {"commentId":4424168,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"bevos4"}
          • 1 vote
          #2.3 - Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:26 PM EST
          {"commentId":4424399,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
          PartysOverDeleted
          {"commentId":4424596,"authorDomain":"bevos4"}

             I know what a World War is, My husband was in the last one.    Are you saying to get out of a Depression, we will have to pick a fight with three or more countries and go to World War Three to get out of the depression?   Actually, I was kind of hoping our Leaders had learned a little bit FROM history.  

          {"commentId":4424596,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"bevos4"}
          • 1 vote
          #2.5 - Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:05 PM EST
          {"commentId":4424854,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
          PartysOverDeleted
          {"commentId":4502563,"authorDomain":"rickace"}

          PartysOver

          I'm saying the closing the Big 3 will cause the depression

          There will be a depression anyway. The suits and the workers at the Big Three just get to keep their jobs longer than the rest of us.

          Have a nice Christmas.

          Detroit certainly will.

          {"commentId":4502563,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"rickace"}
          • 3 votes
          #2.7 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:45 AM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":4412322,"authorDomain":"cheshireak"}

          I don't think the TARP money should be used for this purpose.  I never supported TARP in the first place, but it was never intended for this, and while I wholeheartedly believe that we should be preserve American manufacturing, this is not the way.

          If the Big 3 are to be given and loan, or federal funds, both sides need to make concessions.  The UAW need to take a modest pay cut, eliminate the Job's Bank & bring their health care more in line with average Americans.

          The CEO's need to be replaced; the new CEO's, and executive management, need to eliminate any bonuses that are not based on positive performance, and bring their salaries more in line with their foreign competition. 

          {"commentId":4412322,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cheshireak"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#3 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:21 AM EST
          {"commentId":4412345,"authorDomain":"zuma6195"}

          You are absolutely correct.  There must be a complete overhaul of the internal structure of the US auto-industry and some sort of accountability before any loan or bail out money is given out.

          {"commentId":4412345,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"zuma6195"}
          • 2 votes
          #3.1 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:39 AM EST
          {"commentId":4412459,"authorDomain":"PartysOver"}
          PartysOverDeleted
          {"commentId":4412486,"authorDomain":"jeaingram"}

          And don't forget about helping Spain

          "Just one week after receiving a pledge of $306 billion in support from US taxpayers, Citigroup announced the intended $10 billion acquisition of a debt-laden Spanish toll road group. Citi Infrastructure Partners will hand over $3.6 billion in cash and assume $6.3 billion in debt from Sacyr Vallehermoso, the parent company of the Intinere Infraestructuras toll road group."

          Also the $500 Million dollar for the naming rights to that new sports field

          Guess Spain and Sports owners need bailing out too. Our United States Senate thinks we can do just fine without a manufacturing base.

          As to the auto bridge loan - Thank you George, you may have FINALLY gotten something right (maybe, will truly believe it when I actually see it)

          {"commentId":4412486,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"jeaingram"}
          • 4 votes
          #3.3 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:02 AM EST
          {"commentId":4507735,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

          so when our pay comes down you don't think your pay is next what is wrong with you stupid people

          {"commentId":4507735,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
            #3.4 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:14 PM EST
            {"commentId":4577980,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

            mfk. Like Pat N said, "Wow.  You are one angry individual."

            {"commentId":4577980,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
            • 2 votes
            #3.5 - Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:06 PM EST
            {"commentId":4579099,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

            i'll ask again what is wrong with you people? you don't think your next?

            {"commentId":4579099,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
              #3.6 - Sun Dec 28, 2008 8:23 PM EST
              {"commentId":4592740,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

              mfk. If I am it's not because I sat back and didn't learn anything new.

              Also, look into using you're instead of your.

              {"commentId":4592740,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
              • 2 votes
              #3.7 - Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:41 PM EST
              {"commentId":4592894,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

              mfk. I suspect you're a UAW member. Yes, unions have done good things for this country, especially 40-80 years ago. Yes, it's kind of a shame that the world is much more open / flat  than it was years ago. Yes it stinks that we have to compete with Brazilian, Mexican, Malaysian, Japanese, European, Chinese and Korean workers.

              These things are not going to change. Will your attitude? Go out and learn something new, like a new skill. You are competing with millions of people that will, and not @!$%# while they're doing it. They consider it a privilege to learn, work and move up.

              {"commentId":4592894,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
              • 1 vote
              #3.8 - Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:00 PM EST
              {"commentId":4593009,"authorDomain":"panicklaus"}

              These things are not going to change. Will your attitude? Go out and learn something new, like a new skill. You are competing with millions of people that will, and not @!$%# while they're doing it. They consider it a privilege to learn, work and move up

              (applauding wildly!!!)  Excellent post.  It's a competitive market right now.  mfk owes it to himself and anyone who depends on him to prove that he's a valuable resource. 

              What GM, Chrysler AND the UAW did to the auto worker is appalling.  But for the average auto worker to sit back and b*tch about it rather than view it as an opportunity...is even more appalling. 

              {"commentId":4593009,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"panicklaus"}
              • 1 vote
              #3.9 - Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:11 PM EST
              {"commentId":4593139,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

              Amen Pat!

              {"commentId":4593139,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
              • 1 vote
              #3.10 - Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:24 PM EST
              {"commentId":4593559,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

              again i will ask what do you people do for a living? me as a UAW member set here all day every day answer these post and I'm payed ever well for it. just thought I'd let ya all know AMEN TO ALL.

              {"commentId":4593559,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
                #3.11 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:08 AM EST
                {"commentId":4595402,"authorDomain":"panicklaus"}

                again i will ask what do you people do for a living? me as a UAW member set here all day every day answer these post and I'm payed ever well for it. just thought I'd let ya all know AMEN TO ALL.

                I'm an Executive Recruiter.  I find people jobs.  I've placed a number of your coworkers in positions in the Wind Energy as well as the Transortation industry lately.  And I have a feeling that they are going to realize a greater sense of accomplishment, a more stable future, better job security and more career opportunities down the road than you will by sitting on Newsvine.

                I have a feeling you would be the type of candidate that I wouldn't work with though.  No drive.  No committment.  Angry.  No sense of responsibility.  Incidentally...you wouldn't have had to ask what I do for a living if you had just clicked on my avatar.  Evidentally, you are to lazy to do even that much.  Surprising.  Especially since you consider Newsvine your new 'career'.

                Should make an interesting resume for you though.  "10/2008 - Present:  Sitting on my arse, posting on a message board."  Good luck getting a job in the future.

                {"commentId":4595402,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"panicklaus"}
                • 2 votes
                #3.12 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 7:42 AM EST
                {"commentId":4595760,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

                Good post Pat. In your position, you get to help people come out of this mess OK if they have the right stuff, especially motivation.

                People like mfk don't realize that they are part of what has turned the public against the UAW. If you want a public handout, you shouldn't reinforce the public's low opinion of you.

                {"commentId":4595760,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
                • 1 vote
                #3.13 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:29 AM EST
                {"commentId":4596143,"authorDomain":"panicklaus"}

                People like mfk don't realize that they are part of what has turned the public against the UAW. If you want a public handout, you shouldn't reinforce the public's low opinion of you.

                You just hit the nail on the head.  It's hard to have compassion for anyone thats looking to you and me to support them when they refuse to do anything to help themselves.  They insist on biting the hand that feeds them, and then have the nerve to complain about the food.  That's the image the UAW has created for themselves.  mfk only reinforces that image.

                I know this is just ancedotal and based on one person's experience..But I was recently working with a UAW candidate.  He was an assembly line worker.  Talk about drive.  This guy was upbeat, jumped through a million hoops to find a new job, even bought a new suit for interviewing.  Took my coaching for the interview process, followed up with prospective employers and we placed him last week (Christmas Eve) in the position of Director of Maintenance for a mid sized trucking company making 22% more than he did at his previous job.  We negotiated benefits to kick in from day one and the company is giving him a full relo package to move him to the Chicago area.  He's actually RELIEVED to remove himself from the UAW.

                {"commentId":4596143,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"panicklaus"}
                • 2 votes
                #3.14 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:09 AM EST
                {"commentId":4598682,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

                Excellent. That man deserves to prosper, and probably will (as do you with the important role you're playing).

                {"commentId":4598682,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
                • 1 vote
                #3.15 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:12 PM EST
                {"commentId":4607292,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

                all right pat

                 i'm 60 have h/b/p only have one good eye and 4 disk pined together in my back. my pay is from 33 years of work that i'm sure came from the 33years of work. i put 2 sons thur school one is gone now sep10-2004 Iraq i've had what i will call my life, now i just have what i was told i'd have. sorry for the bad felling, today is a good day for me at less.

                {"commentId":4607292,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
                  #3.16 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:02 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4607720,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

                  mfk. Sorry, that didn't make much sense dude, tell us more about yourself.

                  {"commentId":4607720,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #3.17 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:50 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4607752,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

                  is that a hahaaaaaaaaaa you say

                  {"commentId":4607752,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
                    #3.18 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:53 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4607760,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

                    mfk. I think you're tweaking us, yes?   ::::::)

                    {"commentId":4607760,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #3.19 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:54 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4607862,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

                    what i say is true you have reason not to belive me?

                    {"commentId":4607862,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
                      #3.20 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:03 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4607996,"authorDomain":"panicklaus"}

                      mfk...Yep.  It's kind of hard to believe coming from a guy who feigned outrage and claimed he wanted his tax dollars back when he found out I was disabled.

                      LetsComeTogether...Great minds think alike!  =)

                      {"commentId":4607996,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"panicklaus"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #3.21 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:17 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4608297,"authorDomain":"mfk"}

                      you wanted your taxs back for the auto load i want mine back because no one asked me weather i wanted to give to you. great minds that think alike most of time are one sided.  tax$ have noting to do with me story or my life.

                      {"commentId":4608297,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"mfk"}
                        #3.22 - Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:49 PM EST
                        Reply
                        {"commentId":4412655,"authorDomain":"bevos4"}

                        Enstead of standing around crying about how they are running out of money, WHY don't they start selling off some of their possessions? They have BILLIONS in POSSESSIONS. Artwork, Extra mansions, Cabins that would put our houses to shame, Corporate Jets. Let them GET OFF THEIR FAT ASSES and do SOMETHING to help themselves.

                        {"commentId":4412655,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"bevos4"}
                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#4 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:50 AM EST
                        {"commentId":4492684,"authorDomain":"vinylgod1963"}

                        It all boils down to greed! because the banks were ran poorly ,... They were not ran poorly they new what they were doing,the top of the pyramid was making money, thats all that mattered... and because of this the auto industry which was run the same way (pyramid) has there hand out also. why ? how can this be ? well we will not hold them accountable thats why this has happened. we will not hold the banks , freedie ,fannie ,the car industry or others accountable. so its ((free)) money.

                        {"commentId":4492684,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"vinylgod1963"}
                          #4.1 - Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:07 PM EST
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":4417916,"authorDomain":"beagles4me"}

                          This isn't just about wages, workers, executives, cars, and corporate problems, the whole financial house of cards has fallen, banks and investors are scared and will hoard our money and assests till they feel secure.

                          First some intelligent regulations, the do's and dont's of good fiscal plans.

                          Second Government watchdog groups that do their job and are not just window dressing

                          Third discontiue tax cuts for companies that move jobs and headquarters from the country

                          Fourth monatary insentive for people to save more money

                          Fifth rein in credit card companies and do not let everybody and their mother offer credit to those who cannot afford it

                          Sixth smarter trade policies

                          We have had eight lazy years of hands off deregulation, we cannot afford this free for all game that the pretend free market has given us.

                          {"commentId":4417916,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"beagles4me"}
                          • 4 votes
                          Reply#5 - Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:09 PM EST
                          {"commentId":4423982,"authorDomain":"bevos4"}

                          I say let them All figure out how to get out of the trouble they are in. The reason is , Look at what the banks did with their money they got. They didn't do anything for Americans. They started buying up more banks. They plan on helping themselves. PERIOD! The auto industry gave themselves $30 Million in bonuses. Let them give that back before they get any help. I'll bet their workers didn't even get one dollar of those bonuses either. Ford figured out what they needed to do so, let the others figure it out too. That is if they have a brain, that doesn't involve GIMME GIMME GIMME11111

                          {"commentId":4423982,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"bevos4"}
                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#6 - Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:10 PM EST
                          {"commentId":4496301,"authorDomain":"rlcr55"}

                          This is just a smoke screen...  Congress voted down the auto bailout on purpose so that Congress would break, Bush would do the auto loan as an executive order using TARP funds, and since the first 350 BILLION is LONG GONE, Hank Paulson needs the second $350 BILLION to be able to give the auto companies money.

                          Hank needs Congress to approve the release of the second $350 Billion of the $700 BILLION TARP money.  Congress has 15 days to approve the release of funds and/or set any restrictions on the money.  Congress has left for the holiday break and won't be back until the Inauguration.  If Congress doesn't vote on it, Hank Paulson gets ALL the money and he can do whatever he and his friends in the financial markets want (minus the 13.4 million of course).

                          I am so going to miss this kind of stuff when Obama gets into office.   

                          {"commentId":4496301,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"rlcr55"}
                            Reply#7 - Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:37 PM EST
                            {"commentId":4502490,"authorDomain":"rickace"}

                            The autoworkers union complained the deal was too harsh on its members,

                            These sons of @!$%#es should be happy the government is stepping in to save their damned jobs. Instead they take an opportunity to @!$%# and moan.

                            Only in entitled America.

                            {"commentId":4502490,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"rickace"}
                            • 3 votes
                            Reply#8 - Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:34 AM EST
                            {"commentId":4578004,"authorDomain":"cg-walters"}

                            Amazing isn't it? The industry will go bankrupt, but how much money has to go down the drain before then?

                            {"commentId":4578004,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"cg-walters"}
                              #8.1 - Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:09 PM EST
                              Reply
                              {"commentId":4512433,"authorDomain":"andream68"}

                              wah wah wah thats all i hear from auto workers. your getting what you deserve ive seen what people do on assembly lines and its a joke. your getting paid well beyond what u should be .skilled labor my ass i can pop in a windshield or stick a hose in a hole for 30 dollars an hour.i bust my ass every day get all greasy .seting up machines and have more labor skills in my forefinger than half of these over paid auto workers do in there hole damn body.these people are getting paid way to much and living beyond there needs.i mean do you reallyneed a 200 thousand dollar house all those big exspensive cars.its time to come back to reality and start making regular blue collar wages.By the way how much of an education do these skilled laborors have?Most of them dont there making thos big bucks because momy or dady got them in in or unkle bob put in a good word for them .the union has screwed the american worker .that outragious pay and benefits was awesome ..huh ..now what are you gonna do since all that big pay has cut profit and your companys sinking.Like i said before time to do real work for real pay ....welcome back to america were hard work pays off.. ps.  my companys doin just fine

                              {"commentId":4512433,"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936","authorDomain":"andream68"}
                                Reply#9 - Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:06 AM EST
                                {"canLink":false,"threadId":"442939","isPrivate":false}
                                Leave a Comment:
                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                {"threadId":"442939","contentId":"2208936"}
                                Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                Stop TrackingStop Tracking