The first race card of the Obama era is now in play. In an apparent bid to save his political life — or perhaps just irritate and confound his enemies — Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich is trying to wedge a black man into the all-white Senate. On Tuesday, Blagojevich's choice, Roland Burris, was turned away on Capitol Hill when he tried to take his seat.
So far, the episode has not produced a full-throated cry of racism, and many black political leaders are lying low instead of lining up behind Burris. The fact that America's first black president has come out against seating Burris may be preventing the dispute from turning into a major racial flare-up.
Still, the drama has forced racial politics, once again, to center stage. And how it ultimately plays out could affect hopes for the "post-racial" society supposedly heralded by Barack Obama's election.
The symbolism is very powerful," said Laura S. Washington, a politics professor at DePaul University and columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times. "The fact that this is an overwhelmingly white Senate that's stopping Roland Burris, a qualified, distinguished, by all appearances senatorial appointment, and white men are standing in the door, I think that's very powerful, and it sends a very powerful message to African-Americans who have always distrusted the system."
Blagojevich clearly understands those sentiments, as does Rep. Bobby Rush, the former Black Panther who represents a congressional district on the South Side of Chicago.
Less than a month after calling the corruption charges against Blagojevich "so heinous that he has forfeited his right to appoint someone" to Obama's Senate seat, Rush stood next to Blagojevich and Burris last week and pleaded: "I will ask you to not hang and lynch the appointee as you try to castigate the appointer." Later, Rush called the Senate the "last bastion of plantation politics."
"If there ever was a playing of the race card, this was it," said Chris Rabb, an activist with afronetizen.com and former legislative assistant for Carol Moseley Braun, a black woman who preceded Obama in the Senate seat. "Blagojevich may be crazy, but he's not stupid."
But Rush's accusations have not caught fire among large numbers of blacks. Warren Ballentine, a syndicated black talk radio host, said that in the view of many of his listeners, "This is Blagojevich sticking it to people. It's not a black or white issue."
It's certainly a complicated one.
Obama himself has said Burris should not be seated because of the taint of corruption surrounding Blagojevich, who is charged with trying to sell the Senate seat. And Obama's opposition to seating Burris could sorely undermine any attempt to make a racial issue out of the matter.
Moreover, Burris was officially denied entry to the Senate because his credentials were not signed by Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White — who is black.
Some political observers have speculated that Blagojevich appointed Burris, the 71-year-old former Illinois attorney general, to win over black support in his bid to stave off impeachment, or to influence the jury pool if he stands trial on the corruption charges.
Groups like the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus have not publicly supported Burris, though they may be working behind the scenes to get him seated. The Rev. Al Sharpton, whom some might have expected to be leading a march or three, has been muted in his support.
Sharpton acknowledged that the Senate would have objected to anyone Blagojevich appointed.
But "Blagojevich has really checkmated everyone and used race as a cover. I think it's interesting that Roland was never on his list before," Sharpton said. "So when did he get this conversion to Roland and why, no one knows. But at the end of the day it doesn't matter to many in the African-American community ... he's put us in the position to get an African-American senator."
Although many blacks expressed disgust with Rush's naked racial rhetoric, others were moved by Burris' quest to gain entry to the Senate.
"It's a travesty," said Rod White, the owner of Bertha's Soul Food in Los Angeles, where he said his customers had been talking about it all day. "The man walked over there this morning and he was rejected. It reminded me of my father. He's 72. An old black man walking in the rain and they closed the door in his face."
In Chicago's black neighborhoods, there is talk of a conspiracy to keep blacks out of the Senate. The government arrested Blagojevich to keep Illinois Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. out, the theory goes, and now it is trying to stop Burris.
Bryce Colquitt of Orland Park, Ill., a 20-year-old college student, formed a "Roland Burris for Senate" group on Facebook.
"As far as Mr. Burris being black and he'd be the only black (in the Senate), I think it's a factor. I don't think it's the most important and defining factor," he said. "I'm black, as much as I'd like to see black people in the Senate, I'd also like to know Illinois is being duly represented as every state is."
That will take some time, as the legal and political fight plays out in Washington.
"Blagojevich made what the hip-hoppers call a gangster move," Sharpton said. "You got to give it to him. Whatever his motive, he put on a move that put everybody in this situation."
___
Associated Press Writers Mike Blood in Los Angeles and Sophia Tareen in Chicago contributed to this report.
African Americans should be offended at this blatant attempt by Blagojevich and Rush to turn this into a race issue instead of what it really is: an appointment by a corrupt governor that should not be accepted.
Exactly. The senate would have reacted the same way to ANY appointee. Actually, the fact that he is black is getting him better treatment than if he was white. If it was a male white appointee, he would be outright ignored. Even laughed at. Since he is black, they can't get in his face as much. He and his supporters are playing into the race card. They don't seem to care if they are being appointed by a creep. They just want the power. Disgusting.
What is with Harry Reid? He has backed down to the Republicans on virtually every issue but now refuses to seat a fellow Democrat in the Senate. He even backed down to an Independent. To coin a phrase...with Democrats like Reid, who needs Republicans? The man needs to do everyone a favor and resign.
Harry Reid is not the only one who thinks this appointment should be rejected. Nearly everyone does, including most Democrats and including Obama. How can you blame this on Reid? For once he's doing the right thing.
Please. Do you have any sense of ethics at all? It looks like you just want your guy in however you can get it. That is disgusting. Reid is looking a little silly, but not for the reasons you are suggesting. He is looking bad because he is considering doing what people with no sense of ethics want him to do. Disgusting.
That's quite a bit of speculation in this AP "report." Why is this not labeled as an editorial?
The whole notion of a "race card" is de facto biased and diminishes the role of racism in America's history. Moreover, to state that the NAACP and the CBC "may be working behind the scenes to get him (Mr. Burris) seated" without offering a shred of evidence to bolster that charge is promoting a conspiracy. So, too, is it irresponsible to speculate what Rev. Al Sharpton will or will not march about.
Senator Diane Feinstein, D-California, has already broken ranks with her party leadership and come out in support of seating Mr. Burris.
I believe the Illinois Secretary of State should certify Mr. Burris's credentials, and I support his appointment as the junior senator from Illinois.
Then, apparently, you are ok with being played by a corrupt governor.
No, but if I lived in Illinois I'd find it objectionable that my state was not being fully represented in the senate.
Blago may be corrupt, but you know what he isn't? Convicted.
And until he is, or until Prosecutor Fitzgerald gets him thrown out, he will continue to invoke the powers and privileges of his office. Blago had the right to make the appointment because he is still the governor.
Only because the partisan legislature didn't want the people to decide who would represent them.
Even Sharpton recognizes how disgusting it is.
And Feinstein? She is a left wing nut job. Of course she wants a democrat at all costs.
I don't care if he is governor or not. It is disgusting that anyone who he appoints would be in our nation's government. Every state can determine who makes such decisions. It isn't a god given right of a governor. Governors are given the responsibility because it is assumed that they will try to make the best appointment possible, not try to create a circus to cover their own ass.
This appointment proves Blago didn't deserve the right to make it and Burris doesn't deserve to get it. To support it shows a complete lack of ethical standards.
Some people don't care about ethical standards though, as long as things are going their way.
Blagojevich has the power (not the right; be careful with wording) to make the appointment. He does not have any right to have that appointment accepted by his state (which it has not been) or the Senate itself.
I reject the argument that Mr. Burris' decades-long career as a public servant has magically become tainted because he didn't say no to this appointment. He is qualified to serve as the state senator, and I challenge Sen. Harry Reid, Jesse White, and the rest of the cabal to prove otherwise.
He is not the man under indictment.
I'm sure Mr. Burris is comfortable with his ethical standards, and I am with mine.
His service is not tainted, but his appointment is. Seriously, it doesn't matter if Blagojevich appointed Jesus Himself. The Senate must reject that appointment because it cannot be trusted as a good-faith appointment. Mr. Burris can run for the position if they hold a special election, and I wish him luck, but he should not be seated under these circumstances.
BREAKING NEWS:
Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid now supports seating Mr. Burris. He will be the junior senator from Illinois.
MORE DETAILS TO FOLLOW.
I agree with Adam Kemp. Mr. Burris himself should want to be seated by the proper authority, not under these circumstances.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |