Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Seattle Post-Intelligencer is put up for sale

Fri Jan 9, 2009 3:21 PM EST
business, technology, sale, seattle, newspaper, seattle-post-intelligencer
Gene Johnson, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>In this Thursday, June 30, 2005 file photo, a pair of workers stand atop the landmark globe on the roof of the building housing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer during maintenance work, in Seattle. On Friday, Jan. 9, 2009, the Hearst Corp. put Seattle's oldest newspaper, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, up for sale and said that if it can't find a buyer in the next 60 days the paper would likely close or continue to exist only online. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)</p>

In this Thursday, June 30, 2005 file photo, a pair of workers stand atop the landmark globe on the roof of the building housing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer during maintenance work, in Seattle. On Friday, Jan. 9, 2009, the Hearst Corp. put Seattle's oldest newspaper, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, up for sale and said that if it can't find a buyer in the next 60 days the paper would likely close or continue to exist only online. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

Advertise | AdChoices

SEATTLE — Hearst Corp. put Seattle's oldest newspaper, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, up for sale on Friday and said that if it can't find a buyer in the next 60 days the paper would likely close or continue to exist only online.

If it does become an Internet-only operation, the P-I, as the paper is known locally, would have a "greatly reduced staff," Hearst said in a statement. Hearst is a major media company that also owns TV stations, other newspapers and magazines including Cosmopolitan.

"In no case will Hearst continue to publish the P-I in printed form" once the 60 days are up, Hearst said. Steve Swartz, the head of Hearst's newspaper division, broke the news to employees in a meeting Friday.

Seattle is one of two major cities on the verge of losing its second daily newspaper as the industry tries to pull out of a tailspin brought on by falling circulation and advertising revenue. Denver's Rocky Mountain News recently put itself up for sale in the face of steep losses and could close if a buyer isn't found soon.

Hearst said it is not considering buying The Seattle Times, the city's other daily paper, which has handled non-news functions for the P-I since 1983 under a federally approved joint operating agreement. Hearst has owned the P-I since 1921, and the paper has had operating losses since 2000, including $14 million last year.

The mood in the P-I newsroom was grim.

"People are kind of depressed. There's some crying," said Candace Heckman, P-I breaking news editor who has worked at the paper since 2000.

Heckman told The Associated Press that Swartz was peppered with many questions by staffers but declined to say more.

"Our journalists continue to do a spectacular job of serving the people of Seattle, which has been our great privilege for the past 88 years," Swartz said in the written statement. "But our losses have reached an unacceptable level, so with great regret we are seeking a new owner for the P-I."

Chris Grygiel, an assistant city editor, said that while the newspaper's Web site is strong, the print edition has always been the flagship, and it's not clear how an Internet-only operation might work.

"Right now people are just trying to digest what happened," Grygiel told the AP. "No one knows what to make of it."

The news was first reported by Seattle's KING-TV on Thursday night, taking even top editors at the P-I by surprise. Rumors of the P-I's imminent demise have surfaced repeatedly over the years, but the paper's footing seemed a little more solid after Hearst defeated an effort by The Times to dissolve the joint operating agreement two years ago.

Joint operating agreements allow newspapers like The Times and P-I to share business and production operations, which cuts their costs, while keeping their newsrooms separate and independent. They're exemptions to federal antitrust law allowed by the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970, designed to prop up failing papers. Of more than two dozen JOAs created since the law was passed, fewer than 10 remain.

Many industry analysts expected the P-I, backed by Hearst's deep pockets, to outlast The Times, which is controlled by the Blethen family. The Times, like newspapers around the country, has had severe financial troubles of its own and has cut 500 positions in the past year.

Also Friday, the Star Tribune of Minneapolis ended talks with a union representing employees after being unable to agree on a request for concessions, setting the stage for a possible bankruptcy filing by Minnesota's largest newspaper. Canada's Globe and Mail also said Friday it would cut 80 jobs, or 10 percent of its work force.

"We report on this stuff all the time, and everybody here knows this is a business and sometimes business decisions hurt," said David McCumber, the P-I's managing editor. "But even seeing colleagues and friends go through this at other papers doesn't prepare you for when it happens to a paper and to colleagues you love and admire and strive with every day."

In 1999, Seattle's joint operating agreement was modified to allow The Times to switch from afternoon to morning publication, directly competing with the P-I. Hearst began paying The Times $1 million a year for the right of first refusal should The Times be put up for sale.

The Times gave notice in 2003 that it was seeking to end the JOA, saying the agreement was no longer financially viable. Hearst sued to block The Times from doing so, and the matter was settled in April 2007, with Hearst paying The Times $25 million not to end the agreement before 2016.

As part of that settlement, The Times paid $49 million to settle Hearst's legal claims and to erase a provision of the JOA that called for Hearst to collect 32 percent of The Times' profits through 2083 should the P-I go out of business and leave The Times with a monopoly.

Times Publisher and CEO Frank Blethen said in a statement that the JOA structure is inefficient and had been a big part of the deep losses both papers have experienced.

"If the P-I does close and the JOA ends, it will enhance the chances that The Seattle Times can survive the recession," Blethen said.

Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels said he hoped a buyer can be found for the P-I. "And if that proves impossible, I look forward to seeing an electronic version of the state's oldest newspaper. Whatever the outcome, this is a big change for Seattle," he said.

The newspaper's signature 30-foot-diameter globe, spinning "It's in the P-I" in neon lights, is a popular Seattle landmark.

The P-I was founded as the Seattle Gazette in 1863 and has a weekday circulation of 117,000, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations. The Times' circulation is about 199,000.

___

AP writer Donna Gordon Blankinship contributed to this report.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Gene Johnson's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Seattleites, WashingtonVine
  • Regions: United States , Seattle/Tacoma
  • Public Discussion (26)
josh

Wow, real confirmation of the rumor.  The 'if a buyer is not found' possibility seems pretty likely, given the state of the industry and the outcome of recent acquisitions (Zell, McClatchy)

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 3:54 PM EST
tyler

The 'if a buyer is not found' possibility seems pretty likely

I think they'll end up making an effort to go online. CSM's still alive.

Required idiotic hypothetical question: How many new subscribers would it take in the next 60 days for them to become viable?

[A million.]

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 7:33 PM EST
Simplistic Reality

Yikes..! I hope they can survive. What other major newspapers do you have up in the Seattle area? Here in good old Vancouver we get the Columbian or The Oregonian. About it, besides a freebie one called "The Reflector".

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:47 AM EST
RobinEv

Seattle Times is the paper that owns the presses and has the advertising staff. The PI called itself the "failing newspaper" in their joint operating agreement. It doesn't have presses or a business staff.

But the Times has been having significant problems itself, at least partly because of that agreement.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:31 AM EST
Reply
RobinEv

I'm not surprised to see the news confirmed, or to hear that Hearst will not try to repeat in Seattle what they've done in other cities where they were in JOAs -- ie, buy the dominant paper after selling their own. They did that in San Francisco and San Antonio, but in Seattle, they're faced with a local owner of the other paper (seaTimes) who seems willing to do anything to prevent such a sale.

It will now be interesting to hear about what their future plans are for SeattlePI.com.  Because the official statement says the company would consider "a move to a digital only operation", there is sure to be a lot of pressure locally to make that happen.

What isn't clear to me is whether they have the technical staff to do that, or -- more importantly -- the legal authority to do it under the JOA.

Their website (which has actually been seattlepi.nwsource.com) appears to be technically managed by the Times (nwsource.com). Is advertising also handled by the Times as part of the JOA?  I suspect it is.

They could have SF Chron staff manage a new website, but does the JOA allow them to do that?

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 5:16 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

There is a simple reason WHY this happened.

In previous years, the PI was the quick, thinner, more-updated MORNING paper, while the Seattle Times did a more in-depth afternoon edition. It was a good balance.

You had your PI morning fans, and your after-work Times readers.

Then...they both went to the morning format and competition emerged. One of them was bound to lose.

  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:14 AM EST
RobinEv

It was, indeed, a good balance. I've always read the Times for two reasons -- one of them was the schedule.

When I moved here decades ago (before the JOA), I started reading the paper at lunch. The first issue of the Times hit the downtown newsstands just before noon. I was enough of a newspaper geek then that I also enjoyed watching the Times change (often significantly) throughout the day.

The first edition that I'd pick up at noon wasn't nearly as complete as the second edition that would come out mid-afternoon. That was their main home-delivery edition and often replaced the wire copy of the first edition with more in-depth stories written by Times reporters or copy editors.

They even did a third edition back then that would often break news just in time for the evening commute.

The timing was a big part of reason I became a Times reader (although I've never even done more than glance at their editorial page).

The other factor that moved me toward the Times back then was that the Times of that era was a very well-designed paper and the PI was, at the time, a dreadfully ugly paper that was notorious for missing their jumps. (A front page story that said "continued on page 6" wouldn't be continued there, although it might sometimes show up on page 3 or 4 if one was willing to look.)

(Bonus: the Times was the only place to read Calvin & Hobbes.)

That's changed since then. In many ways the PI is better designed for the past few years compared to the Times. (It's at least as well designed.)

But newspaper habits stick. And I still usually pick up the Times on the rare occasions when I buy a newspaper.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:07 AM EST
Reply
Neron Kesar

What's going to be the price for the P-I?

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 6:29 PM EST
Calvin Tang

I would think that Hearst will take what they can get, given that the alternative is simply shutting down operations.  

  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 7:25 PM EST
Neron Kesar

Aren't the Newsvine servers over at the Times, or did you make the switch over across the lake to Redmond? Will the P-I "shutdown" news impact Newsvine operations in any way?

  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 8:20 PM EST
RobinEv

When Hearst bought the Chron in San Francisco, it actually paid someone else (the Fang family) to take over the Examiner.

I too suspect that any price short of what Hearst could make (income minus cost) on a web-only operation would be enough to buy the name.

But remember, if someone else buys the PI,  all they'd be getting is a pretty good local news staff. But they wouldn't get the business staff to support the operation -- no ad salespeople with local contacts, no printing presses or printing contracts, no distribution system (trucks, drivers, delivery people, etc.) All of that is owned by the Times, and the agreement to share the facilities goes away with a sale, as I understand it.

  • 1 vote
#3.3 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 10:21 PM EST
Calvin Tang

Our servers never had anything to do with the Times or the P-I.  We had an independent colocation before the acquisition and now we're hosted out of the same facility as msnbc.com.  

  • 1 vote
#3.4 - Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:27 PM EST
Reply
Calvin Tang

The Times paid $49 million to settle Hearst's legal claims and to erase a provision of the JOA that called for Hearst to collect 32 percent of The Times' profits through 2083 should the P-I go out of business and leave The Times with a monopoly.

Wow, that's quite the hefty settlement.  At the time there must have been doubters, but now it's looking like it was a pretty wise decision by the Times.

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 7:26 PM EST
Neron Kesar

I do not have access to the legal agreement, but based upon your quote I think an argument could be made for negating this agreement should it be proven in court that the Times is not a monopoly. This would necessitate another "paper"-concern arising in Seattle and practicing along traditional lines of journalism; i.e., with a healthy emphasis on local hard news and advertisement. One would have to research the distinction between (if any) and legal standing of online news and paper-based news (in relation to the agreement) should a concern wish to compete exclusively as an online entity.

  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 9:00 PM EST
Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

Calvin: Do you mean '2003' instead of '2083'?

  • 2 votes
#4.2 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:17 AM EST
Neron Kesar

What's it matter? According to the most recent reports, a sale would include a transfer of JOA rights.

  • 2 votes
#4.3 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:37 PM EST
Calvin Tang

Nope, I copy+pasted that text right from the article!

  • 1 vote
#4.4 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:24 PM EST
RobinEv

But that agreement to share profits through 2083 was removed from the JOA when it was renogotiated.

A couple of other items from the renegotiated deal: Times was allowed to move to morning publication. (They had briefly published a morning edition along with their main afternoon edition for a year or two before the JOA went into effect.) The PI was allowed to launch a news website.

  • 1 vote
#4.5 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:21 PM EST
Neron Kesar

I propose that the name be changed to "The Daily Planet" or "Seattle Daily Planet" and the headquarters be relocated to 715 2nd Ave #2001, Seattle, WA 98104.

  • 2 votes
#4.6 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:51 PM EST
Reply
hemphill

There is assuredly an opportunity there for someone. I would think that a world-wide online news discussion site could probably find some interesting and profitable angles there. I suppose it depends on the price. Either way I suspect there would have to be a reorganization to get the buyer's vision and the paper's existing folks in sync.

The first concept that springs to mind for me would be a delivered/subscription sunday paper that already had the prominent sides argued. Sort of like getting the letters to the editor up front for each article.

  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Fri Jan 9, 2009 8:40 PM EST
Pamela Drew

Aww, as much as I love the news interface in cyberspace it is sad to see the papers vanishing.

  • 1 vote
Reply#6 - Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:46 PM EST
gabrielle ashton

BAKE SALE! lets buy it

  • 2 votes
Reply#7 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:21 PM EST
Calvin Tang

Let's see all Newsvine earnings combined would be.....

  • 2 votes
#7.1 - Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:00 PM EST
Pamela Drew

Let's see all Newsvine earnings combined would be.....

Enough to have a farm of sweet fennel?

  • 3 votes
#7.2 - Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:04 AM EST
Calvin Tang

..... and mini horses to graze on it.

  • 2 votes
#7.3 - Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:00 PM EST
tyler

..... and mini horses to graze on it.

Let's teach them inDesign and get to work.

  • 1 vote
#7.4 - Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:01 PM EST
Reply
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com