Kids and cell phones: A crosswalk hazard?

advertisement

More parents are looking to cell phones to help keep their children safe. But mom and dad should be aware: Kids who talk on a cell phone may be more likely to step into traffic, a new study shows.

Children should learn to end phone conversations before they step up to the curb and prepare to step into traffic, says David Schwebel, an associate professor and vice chair in the department of psychology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and co-author of the study.

While research shows that older kids and more experienced users also don't navigate streets as well while on a cell phone, younger children tended to find gadgets more distracting.

“Kids this age are just learning to cross the street on their own,” says Schwebel. "They're novices."

A third of the 20 million 8- to 12-year-olds in the United States already have a cell phone, with more than half of "tweens" expected to be carrying them by the end of next year, according to market researchers. The research from the University of Alabama researchers highlights how important it is for parents to teach kids about cell phone safety while they’re out walking around.

In the study, which was published in latest issue of Pediatrics, researchers watched as 77 pre-teens individually navigated a virtual reality street crossing. The children were first allowed to familiarize themselves with the street scene before actually starting the test. Then they were asked to run through the simulation 12 times, six while on the phone, six while undistracted.

While on the phone, children were asked questions such as, “What’s your favorite television show?” or, “What do you like to do for fun?”

More helpful than harmful
The researchers found that children speaking on a cell were 43 percent more likely to be hit or to have a close call in the simulated street crossings than kids who weren’t on the phone. They also kept track of how many times a child would look left and right before stepping into the street and found that number fell by 20 percent when a phone conversation was going on.

There was no difference whether the participant was a boy or girl.

One weakness of the study is that it relied on a virtual realty simulator. But, Schwebel says, the simulator has been validated in other experiments in which the researchers compared VR results to tests run in a real world.

Kids don't need to be banned from chatting on the phone when outside, however. Instead, parents simply should instruct them to finish their conversations before crossing the street.

“I don’t think this means parents should take phones away from their kids,” says Schwebel. “I encourage families to get cell phones for their children. They’re more helpful than harmful, if they’re used in a safe way.”

Other distractions, such as conversations with friends, listening to music, and text messaging, may also cause problems for children in this age group. The University of Alabama researchers expect to study the impact of those types of distractions in the future.

Experts in child safety applauded the cell phone study.

“If you’re talking on a cell phone, you’re not paying as much attention to the environment around you,” says Susan Baker, a professor at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore.

Brooke Carlson, a 44-year-old mom from Morgan Hill, Calif., has noticed how riveted her 9-year-old son is when he's talking on the cell phone. Although she’d never thought of the dangers of crossing traffic while on the phone, Carlson says, “Now that I know about it, it makes total sense.” She plans to have a chat with her child about cell phones and street safety.

The preteen study adds to the mounting evidence that cell phones can be a big problem when mixed with motor vehicles. Other studies have shown that any kind of distraction can adversely impact teen driving, so it’s not surprising that preteens might not do such a good job crossing streets while chatting on the phone, says Dr. Barbara Gaines, director of the Benedum Pediatric Trauma Program at the Children’s Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

For younger kids, parents might consider purchasing a phone with a plan that only allows the child to dial up his or her parents, suggests Gaines. That way the cell can be used for emergencies, but not for chatting with friends for hours.

  • 13 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
5.0
3.2
0.8
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
{"commentId":5001255,"authorDomain":"reidje"}

It's not just kids.  Here at VT we have students and staff that simply step into a crosswalk without looking.  They seem to think that a car can stop instantly or they have some kind of personal shield.

{"commentId":5001255,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"reidje"}
    Reply#1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:08 AM EST
    {"commentId":5012981,"authorDomain":"sherimw"}

    It's not the cell phones that are the danger . . . it's the pure lack of common sense. If people actually used some once in a while we'd all be better off!

    {"commentId":5012981,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"sherimw"}
      #1.1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:16 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":5001787,"authorDomain":"microdot62"}

      Why was a study needed to figure out the obvious? People are getting dumber by the day. Here's one for you- Birth is the leading cause of death.

      {"commentId":5001787,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"microdot62"}
      • 7 votes
      Reply#2 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:53 AM EST
      {"commentId":5003005,"authorDomain":"andreame6"}

      Amen.

      {"commentId":5003005,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"andreame6"}
        #2.1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:10 AM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":5002547,"authorDomain":"capn"}

        Simple solution, don't give them a phone, problem solved.

        Saves you $120 a year (if you already have a couple phones and are cheap and tramatize your kids with voice only plans) or up to $1,200 for those who give their kids the $100/month unlimited text and data plans.

        Pretty scary how much these cost when you multiply that 'reasonable' monthly bill by 12.

        {"commentId":5002547,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"capn"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#3 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:45 AM EST
        {"commentId":5003021,"authorDomain":"andreame6"}

        Exactly. My generation grew up without cell phones and we survived just fine.

        {"commentId":5003021,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"andreame6"}
        • 2 votes
        #3.1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:11 AM EST
        {"commentId":5003551,"authorDomain":"auldane"}

        Same here.  Of course, it would have been hard to service cell towers what with the roving mastodons, and the snow blowing eight miles uphill both ways in the corn fields, and being respectful to our elders, and TB kept us mindful, I tell you what.

        {"commentId":5003551,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"auldane"}
          #3.2 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:43 AM EST
          {"commentId":5017752,"authorDomain":"jamessf"}

          Andrea, your generation also grew up with pay phones at every corner. Try to find a pay phone nowadays.

          {"commentId":5017752,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"jamessf"}
          • 2 votes
          #3.3 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:17 AM EST
          {"commentId":5022770,"authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}

          EXACTLY!!! Try and find a pay phone in your town. I would be willing to bet that there are exactly NONE. I don't know of ANY pay phones where I live. Everyone, it seems, has a cell phone, including me. I also have text messaging, internet, music, and who knows what else on my phone. Its like my own personal mini-computer, and a great way to stay in touch with the world while out and about.

          {"commentId":5022770,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}
          • 1 vote
          #3.4 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:53 AM EST
          {"commentId":5030810,"authorDomain":"evenstarbns"}

          Well, the kids learn from their parents. I see people who are constantly on their phones, in the grocery store, at the check out, in the movies, in the car swerving into my lane...everywhere. Some people think they will die if they aren't talking to someone.

          Get off the damn phone! It's not that important to be running your mouth 24-7!

          {"commentId":5030810,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"evenstarbns"}
            #3.5 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:17 PM EST
            Reply
            {"commentId":5004250,"authorDomain":"jupitersky43"}

            ALL of the responsibility lies with the drivers of cars.  It is the driver's fault if a pedestrian steps into a crosswalk into traffic and the pedestrian is struck by the vehicle.  When a driver approaches EVERY marked and unmarked crosswalk a driver must assume that someone could step into the crosswalk.  Just because you are in a big, fast, and heavy tin can doesn't mean you have priority over pedestrians.  Pedestrians shouldn't have to watch and yield to cars, drivers should watch/yield for pedestrians.  Drivers who don't practice this are acting inconsiderate and disrespectful and exhibit diminished value for human life.

            {"commentId":5004250,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"jupitersky43"}
              Reply#4 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:19 PM EST
              {"commentId":5006186,"authorDomain":"rubysmama35"}

              Drivers who don't practice this are acting inconsiderate and disrespectful and exhibit diminished value for human life.

              BULL!!!  It's your responsibility to watch where you're going AT ALL TIMES, whether you're in a car or on foot.  As James 303405 (post#2) says, people are getting dumber by the day!!

              It's also your responsibility to teachyour kids that they're not the only people on the planet; it's a shared existance and we all need to be aware of each other.

              Kids, ages 1 through 15 or so, usually are thoughtless, so yes, I'll be especially careful around them.  You, however, profess to be an adult, so act like one.  You can't pick and choose which parts of your life you want me to stay out of .  If you want to make it my responsibility to hold your hand while crossing the street, then fine; I also should control your every other move e.g., I'll decide where/how you'll live and give you an allowance.  I'll also see to it that your're neutered so that one day my job of 24 hour child maintenance will end! 

              {"commentId":5006186,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"rubysmama35"}
              • 2 votes
              #4.1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:56 PM EST
              {"commentId":5007055,"authorDomain":"capn"}

              As far as the law is concered, Do Something is correct sadly. If your vehicle hits a pedestrian you are at fault. The circumstances of the accident will determine how stiff a fine you get or what you get charged with, but in the end it is still your fault.

              Scary, but true.

              This is kind of like if you rear end another car, it is your fault. Even if they slam on their breaks for no apparent reason. Why? Because you should not have followed them so closely.

              As for his later comments ... I don't agree with. Sometimes people really do step out in front of you and I don't think that means you devaule human life. People should know, and kids should be told that you always look before steping out. Sure, it may be the drivers fault, but that's cold confort if your dead.

              {"commentId":5007055,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"capn"}
              • 1 vote
              #4.2 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:37 PM EST
              {"commentId":5008998,"authorDomain":"wraithgt"}

              That is just not true.

              A vehicle has to yeild to a pedestrian in a cross walk, but a pedestrian also has to yeild to vehicles before stepping into that cross walk unless there is a lighted "WALK" sign. If there is no electronic device or if that device is steady or flashing "DON'T WALK" a pedestrian also has to yeild before stepping from the curb. If a pedestrian steps from the curb and fails to yeild and is struck, the driver will not be charged if said driver did not have enough time to yeild to the pedestrian.

              And, back to the story, WTH does a 10 year old need a cell phone?

              {"commentId":5008998,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"wraithgt"}
                #4.3 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:04 PM EST
                {"commentId":5013429,"authorDomain":"sarahdavis1980"}

                I know a lady who got her foot run over in a crosswalk but she was crossing against the light. She made such a stink about how the driver was at fault that the responding officer actually came to the hospital to give her a ticket!

                Teach your kids some sense and personal responsibility.

                {"commentId":5013429,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"sarahdavis1980"}
                • 1 vote
                #4.4 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:40 PM EST
                {"commentId":5014648,"authorDomain":"policespeeder"}

                Just what makes you think they are actually using the cross walks? To do that they would have to go to the corner, way too much effort for the typical kid these days.

                {"commentId":5014648,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"policespeeder"}
                • 1 vote
                #4.5 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:01 PM EST
                {"commentId":5017840,"authorDomain":"md588909"}

                mom2two is correct. The pedestrian can be at fault too. A good friend of mine's brother was hit by a car (prob talking on a cell phone... I don't know), but despite the fact that he had to go to the hospital and such, he was actually held responsible for the accident because he wasn't paying attention to traffic and had not appropriately yielded right of way. He had to pay for the damages to the car.

                I walk to work a lot so I lean towards the side of pedestrians and have had a lot of jerk drivers not try to give me the right of way when it is mine (aka when the walk sign is lit). However, I have no respect for pedestrians who just walk out w/o looking or when it is not their turn. On the same streets I walk, I've been in a car when a pedestrian stepped out while we had a green light. The speed limit on the road is 45mph so that is pretty stupid.

                As for DSV, I don't know where you live but I can't imagine traffic in my city if people stopped at every intersection that was green just to make sure no moron was trying to cross at the wrong time.

                {"commentId":5017840,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"md588909"}
                • 1 vote
                #4.6 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 4:01 AM EST
                {"commentId":5020077,"authorDomain":"otto-2"}
                NeverWorriedDeleted
                Reply
                {"commentId":5005437,"authorDomain":"jdavis02rr"}

                Natural selection will take care of the problem.

                {"commentId":5005437,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"jdavis02rr"}
                • 4 votes
                Reply#5 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:20 PM EST
                {"commentId":5005464,"authorDomain":"jdavis02rr"}

                Unfortunately for "Do Something Valuable", this means he or she may not be with us much longer.

                {"commentId":5005464,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"jdavis02rr"}
                • 1 vote
                Reply#6 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:21 PM EST
                {"commentId":5006725,"authorDomain":"erismack"}

                It is not just children who do not pay attention, on or off the phone. I have witnessed people just walking right out into traffic. We have taught our children to be self absorbed.

                {"commentId":5006725,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"erismack"}
                • 1 vote
                Reply#7 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:22 PM EST
                {"commentId":5013220,"authorDomain":"kris-baron10"}

                I have to agree with you. I see more adults walking out into traffic and into each other wihout missing a beat! Everyone with a cell phone needs to be responsible when they use it.

                {"commentId":5013220,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"kris-baron10"}
                  #7.1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:28 PM EST
                  {"commentId":5023812,"authorDomain":"richard-p-smith"}

                  It's a little off subject, But I actually was driving next to a young lady the other day that was talking on a cell phone with one hand and eating an ice cream cone with the other and driving with her knees. Parents need to start parenting! And as far as the comments made about pay phones. Why do you think there are no more pay phones? DUH! Because everybody and their brother has a cell phone. It made pay phones obsolete. Maybe people should use their heads for something other than to put a hat on. That might help.

                  {"commentId":5023812,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"richard-p-smith"}
                    #7.2 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:42 PM EST
                    {"commentId":5023864,"authorDomain":"fayeweickert"}

                    Living in Key West, FL, which is a tourist town, I can tell you that there are enough people who don't need help from a cell phone to step into traffic without looking. Our main drag is "Duval Street", with lots of short blocks and traffic lights. I've lost track of how many tourists on foot and in cars just plow through red lights without another thought. Parents push strollers with their precious children right into traffic.

                    On that same note, I ask those same idiot parents to not only stop and look before you cross, but also please put a hat and sunscreen on your little babies. At least pull the stroller canopy over your child, while you walk 14 blocks, both ways, under the blazing sun. This is Florida, people.

                    {"commentId":5023864,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"fayeweickert"}
                      #7.3 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:45 PM EST
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":5007181,"authorDomain":"miallen76"}

                      The problem doesn’t necessarily conclude with kids; it continues straight through adulthood. I live in the Washington, DC area and have lost count of the number of adults who walk out into the intersection without hesitation. Moreover, DC passed a law fining drivers $500 if a pedestrian is hit while crossing the intersection. Unfortunately, they don’t take into account those individuals who cross the street against the light, those individuals who dash out into the street to catch the light, talking/texting or are in the drivers blind spot. If all parties paid closer attention while walking or driving these types of problems would not be as prevalent.

                      {"commentId":5007181,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"miallen76"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#8 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:43 PM EST
                      {"commentId":5009296,"authorDomain":"wraithgt"}

                      I also work in DC and have looked up the law. I've delt with people who keep crossing after the "DONT WALK" is steady and had to get a police officer involved once when an individual placed his hands on the hood of my car when he failed to yeild at a cross walk.

                      DC law pretty much says that a vehicle has to yeild to a pedestrian in a cross walk, but a pedestrian also has to yeild to vehicles before stepping into that cross walk unless there is a lighted "WALK" sign. If there is no electronic device or if that device is steady or flashing "DON'T WALK" a pedestrian also has to yeild before stepping from the curb. If a pedestrian steps from the curb and fails to yeild and is struck, the driver will not be charged if said driver did not have enough time to yeild to the pedestrian.

                      {"commentId":5009296,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"wraithgt"}
                        #8.1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:17 PM EST
                        {"commentId":5024080,"authorDomain":"richard-p-smith"}

                        WraithGT, The only problem I see with that law is if you do hit someone crossing against the light or sign, How do you prove it unless there were witnesses? Sounds kind of like a no win for the driver to me.

                        {"commentId":5024080,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"richard-p-smith"}
                          #8.2 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:55 PM EST
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":5011743,"authorDomain":"Hardyman1966"}

                          If you need to be told to put the damn thing down and look before stepping into traffic, then I agree completely... let natural selection weed you out and say hi to roadkill.  Cell phones are not a right and the majority of people on them while out in public doing something else at the same time is pathetic.  No one is that important, the call can wait, that's what you have voice mail for.  Idiot.

                          {"commentId":5011743,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"Hardyman1966"}
                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#9 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:13 PM EST
                          {"commentId":5011986,"authorDomain":"pj1963"}

                          Back in our day it was get off your bike and push it across the crosswalk.  Now they'll have to push it across the street texting too? I'm sure there are some idiots texting and riding at the same time.  Man am I glad to have come up in the 70's.

                          {"commentId":5011986,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"pj1963"}
                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#10 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:26 PM EST
                          {"commentId":9558032,"authorDomain":"james--98888"}

                          There are. I've been mowed down by brats on bikes texting and riding. I doubt they're using the GPS function on that iPhone...

                          {"commentId":9558032,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"james--98888"}
                            #10.1 - Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:45 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":5012051,"authorDomain":"ddstern2"}

                            Many of today's kids are in electronic la-la land. Too much, too soon. They can text, but will they be able to read and write? Our next generation of unemployed, that is, if they servive their inattentiveness.

                            {"commentId":5012051,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"ddstern2"}
                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#11 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:29 PM EST
                            {"commentId":5012102,"authorDomain":"c4andmore"}
                            Ashamed of peoples stupidityDeleted
                            {"commentId":5019475,"authorDomain":"capn"}

                            lrn 2 speak in #s

                            I r 2 smrt 4 u

                            That's the new english although these days I near more spanish than english when in public.

                            {"commentId":5019475,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"capn"}
                            • 2 votes
                            #11.2 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:55 AM EST
                            {"commentId":5020030,"authorDomain":"ddstern2"}

                            I "near " you Cap - I see you are already a victim of texting.

                            {"commentId":5020030,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"ddstern2"}
                              #11.3 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:30 AM EST
                              {"commentId":9558069,"authorDomain":"james--98888"}

                              R A S: That looked more like a typo. N is under H, so it is possible, depending on typing speed, time spent awake, skill level, and many other factors, that Capn-1 made a typo. I doubt it was intentional.

                              {"commentId":9558069,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"james--98888"}
                                #11.4 - Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:47 PM EDT
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":5012083,"authorDomain":"c4andmore"}
                                Ashamed of peoples stupidityDeleted
                                {"commentId":5012578,"authorDomain":"kathychris420"}

                                I'm 33 and do not own a cell phone, never have. Prolly never will.
                                Stupid slaves............

                                {"commentId":5012578,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"kathychris420"}
                                  Reply#13 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:56 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":5012629,"authorDomain":"c4andmore"}
                                  Ashamed of peoples stupidityDeleted
                                  {"commentId":5012776,"authorDomain":"andreame6"}

                                  Agreed.

                                  {"commentId":5012776,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"andreame6"}
                                    #13.2 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:04 PM EST
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":5013335,"authorDomain":"figboo2"}

                                    well DUH!!

                                    {"commentId":5013335,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"figboo2"}
                                      Reply#14 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:34 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":5013750,"authorDomain":"james--98888"}

                                      Yep, even though I'm in my 'elder teens,' I know to hang up the phone or not answer if crossing streets. Either that, or wait until I have the right of way.

                                      {"commentId":5013750,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"james--98888"}
                                        Reply#15 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:58 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":5014052,"authorDomain":"steve72054"}

                                        While I do realize that cell phones can distract you and make you more prone to accidents, I'm appauled at the lack of mention of how dangerous the EMF field is for anybody talking or texting on a cell phone. The dangers are far more serious and in my opinion will be an epidemic of increased brain tumors, which is already happening at an alarming rate, and also testical and prostrate cancer, from wearing the phone on your hip.

                                        THe FCC is the only controlling agency that looks into cell phone safety, and has done nothing to stop this huge problem. They are not in the heath business and have no interest in stopping this huge industry.

                                        I do hope we as Americans will learn from our overseas neighbors who take this subject much more seriously. as they are actually doing something about it after their studies see a very high rate of blood/brain damage after just a short period of time on a cell phone.

                                        Take heed!!

                                        Steve in Oregon

                                        {"commentId":5014052,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"steve72054"}
                                          Reply#16 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:18 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":5014140,"authorDomain":"jhouseman93"}

                                          Great, another chicken little the sky is falling kinda person. Next I guess you will want some government rule or legislation to prevent this so called risk of yours, after of course we spend millions of tax payer dollars on studies, with the results being slanted to favor the opinions of those doing the study....you know like global warming.

                                          {"commentId":5014140,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"jhouseman93"}
                                          • 2 votes
                                          #16.1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:25 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":5019745,"authorDomain":"capn"}

                                          Ah, the old standby argument that cell phones give you cancer.

                                          Did you know that dihydrogren monoxide kills thousands of people every year? It's a proven fact and I think we need to work on getting it outlawed first. It can be found everywhere, even your own house. The government knows about it, but they refuse to take action. People need to rise up and let their voice be heard!

                                          {"commentId":5019745,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"capn"}
                                          • 2 votes
                                          #16.2 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:13 AM EST
                                          {"commentId":5020308,"authorDomain":"c4andmore"}
                                          Ashamed of peoples stupidityDeleted
                                          {"commentId":5023674,"authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}

                                          BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! This "argument" is nothing short of ridiculous. Also for someone who claims to be "ashamed of people's stupidity," you seem to be buying right into the "argument" with your "logic" or lack thereof. Those of us who use cellphones are NOT braindead. We are just in touch with the world around and realize that life in the 21st century is not life in the 1950's.

                                          {"commentId":5023674,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}
                                          • 1 vote
                                          #16.4 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:36 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":9558112,"authorDomain":"james--98888"}

                                          Capn-1: Ah, good old H2O. Yep, everywhere it is, and many people it does kill.

                                          Another one is skin cancer caused by all that bright light in the sky. We must banish it!

                                          {"commentId":9558112,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"james--98888"}
                                            #16.5 - Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:49 PM EDT
                                            Reply
                                            {"commentId":5014094,"authorDomain":"jhouseman93"}

                                            Yeah, and I am sure this study was funded with some sort of government grant. Great..money wasted again. Just like the study I heard on the news today. They are saying...now stay with me. That limiting kids recess time, may lead to unrulely kids in the classroom. Well DDDAAAA. Kids especially small one, need to release pent up energy. Takes a study to realize all this stuff?

                                            {"commentId":5014094,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"jhouseman93"}
                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#17 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:22 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":5014149,"authorDomain":"mgmh"}

                                            Trust me it's not just kids. Today I saw an dult female, just talking way while the walk light came on, causing a traffic jam.

                                            Whatever happened to those law against using a cell or testing while driving? I can't tell you how many people doing just that, and I don't see anyone out there ticketing them. Yes I have a cell phone, no I don't text or talk on the phone while driving, except whenusing a Bluetooth.

                                            {"commentId":5014149,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"mgmh"}
                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#18 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:25 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":5014228,"authorDomain":"jhouseman93"}

                                            Well, beware Mardi. Now some states are going after Bluetooth as well, saying that it is just about the same distraction as not using hands free. And I would bet that soon we wont even be allowed to have a conversation with anyone who is sitting in the car with us.

                                            Yes, bring on more big brother goverment regualtions. Just what we need.

                                            {"commentId":5014228,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"jhouseman93"}
                                              Reply#19 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:31 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":5023609,"authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}

                                              The government can control my right to use MY phone, that I pay for, when they pry it from my cold dead hand!!! I use hands free in the car, but if the phone rings, I'm gonna answer it. If the overbearing government doesn't like it, TOO BAD. Give the government an inch, they take 10 miles.

                                              {"commentId":5023609,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}
                                              • 2 votes
                                              #19.1 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:32 PM EST
                                              Reply
                                              {"commentId":5014246,"authorDomain":"benlam1"}

                                              I work at a company where cell phones are prohibited for security reasons. You would be amazed how all new employees act when told they cannot have their cell phone on the job. Their reaction is not unlike that of an alcoholic who just had his or her bottle taken away. I believe psychiatrists will soon have a name for this disorder.

                                              {"commentId":5014246,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"benlam1"}
                                                Reply#20 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:32 PM EST
                                                {"commentId":5015848,"authorDomain":"nabadm"}

                                                Me too. And who are the worst offenders? Upper management. They're worse than teenagers. GROW UP. Really. I had one corporate vice president (of HR no less) tear me a new orifice in the middle of my forehead because I told him he had to leave his cell phone in his car. And then he broke my chops "Who are you?! Do you know who I am?!" Really, I don't give a flying fig who you are, no cell phone in the building. Rules are for everyone, not just peons. And then he lied to me, telling me he had special permission. No, no one gets special permission because my company doesn't make that rule, our customer makes that rule, it's in our contract.

                                                {"commentId":5015848,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"nabadm"}
                                                  #20.1 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:33 PM EST
                                                  Reply
                                                  {"commentId":5015815,"authorDomain":"nabadm"}

                                                  Oh puh-leeze, adults have been doing this for years.  Just today someone on a cell phone stepped out and started walking down the middle of the lane in a parking lot and was astonished when he saw my car 10 feet in front of him.  Wake up people.

                                                  {"commentId":5015815,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"nabadm"}
                                                    Reply#21 - Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:31 PM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5017639,"authorDomain":"carolinajohn"}
                                                    Carolina JohnDeleted
                                                    {"commentId":5018580,"authorDomain":"ceedubbleyu"}

                                                    Let's get back to the topic at hand for a second - kids and cell phones. I'm failing to connect how having a cell phone keeps kids safe.

                                                    One of the primary things an assailants look is someone who is distracted. What better target than Little Mikey texting little Johnny or playing Texas Hold'em on his walk home from school? Or is it so that the police can "triangulate the coordinates" of the cell phone location like an episode of 24 if Mikey doesn't make it home.

                                                    Is it really a safety issue? Or is it (a) parents unable to say no to the kid that demands one because everyone else has one; (b) because due to "hectic schedules" we can't say "I'll pick ya up at 3 after soccer" like the good old days; (c) another form of electronic babysitter where kids spend hours texting, facebooking, etc...

                                                    If we know that kids are even more distracted by having cell phones, and awareness is known to be a critical factor in safety - why are we giving our children something to further distract them on the increasingly crazy streets of our society?

                                                    {"commentId":5018580,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"ceedubbleyu"}
                                                    • 3 votes
                                                    Reply#23 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:28 AM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5019856,"authorDomain":"capn"}

                                                    a and c

                                                    Sadly these days kids run the household, parents are afraid to tell their kids no. I think too many parents are trying desperatly to be their kids best friend, when they should really be their parent.

                                                    {"commentId":5019856,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"capn"}
                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #23.1 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:20 AM EST
                                                    {"commentId":5020122,"authorDomain":"otto-2"}
                                                    NeverWorriedDeleted
                                                    {"commentId":5020383,"authorDomain":"c4andmore"}
                                                    Ashamed of peoples stupidityDeleted
                                                    {"commentId":5023477,"authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}

                                                    Try none of the above. My cell phone has proven to be invaluable in several situations where there are no pay phones nearby. Try finding a pay phone in today's world. Not even in NYC or Washington DC can you find one, ANYWHERE. Unfortunately there are too many people in the world who refuse to evolve and realize that this world is no longer the "leave it to beaver" kind of society of the old days.

                                                    {"commentId":5023477,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #23.4 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:27 PM EST
                                                    Reply
                                                    {"commentId":5020981,"authorDomain":"bevdiva1971"}

                                                    my kids have cell phones for emergency use only.

                                                    {"commentId":5020981,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"bevdiva1971"}
                                                      Reply#24 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:22 AM EST
                                                      {"commentId":5021344,"authorDomain":"torchwood-1"}

                                                      Anyone who gets hit in a crosswalk because they were on a phone and didn't pay attention, needed to be run over. Its not phones that are the problem, its stupid children, and stupid adults.

                                                      {"commentId":5021344,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"torchwood-1"}
                                                        Reply#25 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:39 AM EST
                                                        {"commentId":5023004,"authorDomain":"c4andmore"}
                                                        Ashamed of peoples stupidityDeleted
                                                        Reply
                                                        {"commentId":5021467,"authorDomain":"otto-2"}
                                                        NeverWorriedDeleted
                                                        {"commentId":5023372,"authorDomain":"ceedubbleyu"}

                                                        ... and I still do not understand what "emergency use" for a 10 year old is. What emergency does a 10 year old kid run into that they (1) absolutely must, and (2) are actually able to dial for help. Isn't that what school teachers, principals and other such positions are for. To facilitate in making the decision as to what necessitates "emergency responses" or not and in turn how to handle them. Or have we given up on our educators as responsible for this function in society. Instead we give out youth a cell phone and tell them to use it in case of an emeregency - whatever that may be. "Mom, I was just hit by a car"? "Hi Mom, there's a black van.... (sounds of tires squealing away)"? We give our youth these 'comforts' enabling them to walk around with technological blinders on, in a state of perceptual oblivion thinking that if anything happens, help is just a phone call away. It's the blind leading the blind.

                                                        {"commentId":5023372,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"ceedubbleyu"}
                                                          Reply#27 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:22 PM EST
                                                          {"commentId":5023555,"authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}

                                                          Oh evolve already!!! FYI, 10 year olds are a lot smarter than you give them credit for being. And in today's society, where kids can be kidnapped just getting off the school bus (and don't say it hasn't happened) its no wonder parents are worried about their child's safety. This is not the "leave it to beaver" world that it once was.

                                                          {"commentId":5023555,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"gabriellejimmienjefffan2448"}
                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #27.1 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:30 PM EST
                                                          Reply
                                                          {"commentId":5023692,"authorDomain":"ceedubbleyu"}

                                                          And a cell phone is going to prevent a kidnapping? Or is just going to distract a really smart kid from observing their surroundings and potential danger as they get off that bus and occupy one hand so that can't so much as hope to struggle to get away? It's called being aware - not evolving. It's called powers of observation - not cell phone reception. I might not have followed the evolutionary curve and still practice the good old fashion look-both-ways-before-you-cross type of approach, but I guarantee the people attempting to harm your children are already there!

                                                          {"commentId":5023692,"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104","authorDomain":"ceedubbleyu"}
                                                            Reply#28 - Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:36 PM EST
                                                            Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                            {"canLink":false,"threadId":"481393","isPrivate":false}
                                                            Leave a Comment:
                                                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                            {"threadId":"481393","contentId":"2355104"}
                                                            Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                            Stop TrackingStop Tracking