Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Troops to leave Iraq in 18 months, officials say

Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:13 PM EST
politics, barack-obama, iraq, united-states, withdrawal, iraq-withdrawal
Anne Gearan, AP National Security Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>In this June 22, 2003 file photo, a US Apache attack helicopter provides cover to a US military convoy as they travel along the highway at  Hit, Iraq, 150 kilometers (90 miles) northwest of Baghdad , Iraq. The American military is shipping battlefield equipment through Jordan and Kuwait, testing possible exit routes in advance of a U.S. withdrawal in Iraq, military officials said. The convoys — carrying armored vehicles, weapons and other items — mark the Pentagon's first steps in confronting the complex logistics of transporting the huge arsenal stockpiled in Iraq over nearly six years. (AP Photo/Ali Haider)</p>

In this June 22, 2003 file photo, a US Apache attack helicopter provides cover to a US military convoy as they travel along the highway at Hit, Iraq, 150 kilometers (90 miles) northwest of Baghdad , Iraq. The American military is shipping battlefield equipment through Jordan and Kuwait, testing possible exit routes in advance of a U.S. withdrawal in Iraq, military officials said. The convoys — carrying armored vehicles, weapons and other items — mark the Pentagon's first steps in confronting the complex logistics of transporting the huge arsenal stockpiled in Iraq over nearly six years. (AP Photo/Ali Haider)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is expected to order all U.S. combat troops to leave Iraq by August of next year, administration officials said, closing the door on a war that has led to the deaths of at least 4,250 members of the U.S. military.

The pullout recommended by Obama's security advisers would free up troops and resources for the war in Afghanistan, where Obama has said the threat to national security is acute. The Iraq withdrawal would be completed 18 months from now.

"We are now carefully reviewing our policies in both wars, and I will soon announce a way forward in Iraq that leaves Iraq to its people and responsibly ends this war," Obama said in his address to Congress on Tuesday.

An announcement could come as early as this week, a senior White House official said Tuesday, adding that Obama has not yet approved the final details. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because an announcement was not yet planned, said Obama could discuss Iraq during a trip to North Carolina on Friday.

Obama built enormous grass-roots support for his White House bid by promising a quick end to the unpopular Iraq war. His 16-month withdrawal plan, based on removing roughly one brigade a month, had been predicated on commanders determining that it would not endanger U.S. troops left behind or Iraq's fragile security.

Officials said that upon entering the White House, Obama requested a range of options from his top military advisers, asking for plans ranging between 16 to 23 months.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had recently forwarded three withdrawal alternatives for Obama's consideration — 16, 19 and 23 months, the longest an alternative preferred by Iraqi officials and some of Obama's Iraq-based generals. The 19-month plan, which was selected, was pegged to his January inauguration.

Other senior military officials were more sanguine about a quicker pullout. Marine Maj. Gen. John Kelly, who just left his job overseeing U.S. operations in Anbar Province, said Tuesday that violence there has dropped to an almost "meaningless" level over the past year. Kelly told reporters Tuesday most U.S. forces in Anbar could have pulled out months ago.

The emerging plan now leaves Obama two months off his campaign pledge, and with between 30,000 and 50,000 troops still in Iraq to advise and train Iraqi security forces and to protect U.S. interests.

The residual force would include intelligence and surveillance specialists and their equipment, including unmanned aircraft, according to two administration officials and a Pentagon official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the plan has not been made public.

The complete withdrawal of American forces will take place by December 2011, the period by which the U.S. agreed with Iraq to remove all troops.

About 142,000 U.S. troops are in Iraq, roughly 14 brigades, about 11,000 more than the total in Iraq when President George W. Bush announced in January 2007 that he would "surge" the force to put down the insurgency. He sent an additional 21,000 combat troops to Baghdad and Anbar province.

Although the number of combat brigades has dropped from 20 to 14, the U.S. has increased the number of logistical and other support troops. A brigade is usually about 3,000 to 5,000 troops.

Congress has approved more than $657 billion so far for the Iraq war, according to a report last year from the Congressional Research Service.

As the Obama White House prepared to address the Iraq pullout, the man Obama defeated for the White House challenged suggestions by administration officials that the United States should lower its expectations in Afghanistan.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., insisted in remarks prepared for a speech Wednesday that Afghanistan could be turned around with sufficient resources.

In a speech planned at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, McCain said the United States should brace itself for violence in Afghanistan that worsens before it gets better.

McCain said that while "some suggest it is time to scale back our ambitions in Afghanistan," the U.S. should start spending more on development to keep Afghans from being seduced by the Taliban.

But McCain also echoed recent cautions from Obama, Gates and Mullen that the Afghan conflict would be hard going in the coming months.

"The scale of resources required to prevail will be enormous, and the timetable will be measured in years, not months," said McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

A recent classified Pentagon report urged Obama to shift the military strategy in Afghanistan to de-emphasize democracy-building and concentrate more on targeting Taliban and al-Qaida sanctuaries inside Pakistan with the aid of Pakistani military forces.

___

Associated Press writers Jennifer Loven, Robert Burns, Lolita C. Baldor, Steven Hurst, Anne Flaherty, Richard Lardner and Pauline Jelinek contributed to this report.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Anne Gearan's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Iraq , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (24)
Christian Areas

The change in the timetable indicates he's making this decision based on the facts on the ground. It's about time we had a President who made thoughtful and intelligent decisions.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:43 PM EST
BKER1492

You mean making decisions based on facts on the ground as opposed to eight years of rhetoric based on politics?????

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:58 PM EST
Reply
Christian Areas

Maj. Gen. Michael Oates, who commands U.S. forces in central and southern Iraq, told reporters earlier this month that he believed the gains in stability in that area were now irreversible.

Incredible news.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:47 PM EST
Chuck1968

sorry, I'm not ready to believe that quite yet. We'll surely see in 2010.

    #2.1 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:20 PM EST
    Christian Areas

    I thought we were supposed to listen to the Generals on the ground? :p

    • 1 vote
    #2.2 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:52 PM EST
    Reply
    BKER1492

    I love how someone can spin "all troops gone in 16 months" into "2/3 gone in 19 months" as keeping a campaign promise.

    I promise to vote "liberal" next time............y

      Reply#3 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:56 PM EST
      Christian Areas

      You know what I love? When people don't understand things, and pretend they do via smart-alec remarks. The promise had to do with combat troops. He always planned on leaving a residual force behind to help train Iraqis, etc. DUH!

      • 4 votes
      #3.1 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:01 PM EST
      greck

      I love how if Obama isn't more perfect than Mary Poppins, he's automatically a liar and a failure to some.

      I wonder why these people hate their country?

      • 3 votes
      #3.2 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:31 PM EST
      BKER1492

      We just hate tax cheats.....................

        #3.3 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:17 PM EST
        Tomas Sivan

        Typical MSNBC spin... Disagree with Osama, and you hate your country.......sound like they've picked up the rhetoric of a certain source who called us " Cowards " because we didn't want to have a barbeque with Blacks after Work..

          #3.4 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:17 PM EST
          lvh-865640

          Hate is a very strong word to use just because someone doesn't not applaud everything he says or does. He is only human and, like the rest of us, has faults.

          Oh! to be perfect! :)

          • 1 vote
          #3.5 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:21 PM EST
          Christian Areas

          Tomas, you bring childishness to the conversation. Put together some intelligent, constructive thoughts, or spare us and go punch a pillow.

          • 3 votes
          #3.6 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:31 PM EST
          Chuck1968

          BKER1492
          We just hate tax cheats.....................

          Then you really ought to HATE Corporate America. Do you?

          • 2 votes
          #3.7 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:21 PM EST
          BKER1492

          As the #2 of a small business I AM corporate america. And I legally paid more taxes in the past 6 years than 4-5 people in Obama's cabinet.

            #3.8 - Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:30 AM EST
            Reply
            Tomas Sivan

            Yeah, out of Iraq and right into Afghanastan , or Pakistan.. Then he can say he inherited that from Bush. Not to worry, we won't have any money left from his stimulus package to wage a sandbox fight, let alone a war.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#4 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:15 PM EST
            Blearc

            Being broke has never stopped us from going to war. You forget on Jan 19th the debt was roughly 11 trillion dollars. Stimulus 1 trillion, so until you complain about the 11 trillion, you gripe of "oh won't you think of the grandchildren" sounds like the fat chick complaining about the calories in a diet coke while eating a pizza.

            • 3 votes
            #4.1 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:40 PM EST
            lvh-865640

            No grandkids huh?

              #4.2 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:50 PM EST
              Blearc

              No actually I have toddlers and I've very concerned about the debt that I leave to them, unlike the generations that left debt to me.

              • 1 vote
              #4.3 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:52 PM EST
              lvh-865640

              And so are we all. Have a good one :)

                #4.4 - Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:10 AM EST
                Reply
                CrimsonKing59

                I thought getting out of Iraq was the whole point of the surge.

                We needed to stabilize, then split. If it happens to be Obama vs. Bush when we're out (with a stable government) who cares? We're out and the country is not left in turmoil...tell me what the downside is here.

                Don't worry too much about which politician gets credit...posturing is part of their job.

                I give credit to the troops and those that shaped the strategy and the tactics that effectively utilized the added resources to save lives.

                Kudos and thanks to those that serve(d). Ooh Rah!

                  Reply#5 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:09 PM EST
                  WAKEUP-895002

                  The surge helped a lot. I remember a drastic downturn in activity a couple of months after the extra manpower was added. I'm just glad we are leaving the country in a state where it can fend for itself and that we resisted the urge to cut and run.

                    #5.1 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:14 PM EST
                    Reply
                    Elvis-362920

                    With all the men in Iraq and Afghanistan, why have they not been drafted to fill the ranks of their military to relieve Coalition forces? Same mistake was made in Vietnam. Although President Nixon "Vietnamised" the war by having ARVN do more. Could it be that like Vietnam, ARVN did not fight the insurgents very well. Could it be that Iraqi's and Afghanistanis probably will do the same?

                      Reply#6 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:19 PM EST
                      Blearc

                      Great news, let other countries handle their own stuff, lets finish afganistan and bring all our troop home, if the world needs us to pay world police they can start paying us.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#7 - Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:42 PM EST
                      kbbwin

                      Correct me if I am wrong, but are not most of our troops currently serving in Iraq members of the National Guard as opposed to permanet members of the Armed Forces (ie., Air Force, Army, Navy, etc.)? When they all come home, they will be guaranteed their old jobs which will mean that those people who are currently filling those positions will be out of jobs. I wonder if Obama has considered how this will affect an already crumbling economy and job market. If so, has anyone heard how he intends to counteract that? I know that he has said that he is going to step up the war in Afghanastan, does this mean that our troops will not be coming home, simply being sent to another war zone?

                      We all want our troops to come home (soon and safely), but we need to plan well, we need to consider the future safety of our country and the peril that our current economy is in, and find away to accomplish both without putting our economy in worse condition that it is now and without also subjecting our troops to further danger. Also, we don't want to be misled by the President that so many of us have put our faith in by finding out that he is simply sending our troops to another war zone (one that is not being protested so angrily) simply to gain votes for his next election by saying that he ended the war in Iraq. Is not a war a war, no matter where it is being fought? Are not the deaths of our troops deaths no mater where they loose their lives?

                      Any ideas on how to save our troops and not wreck our economy?

                        Reply#8 - Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:53 AM EST
                        Leave a Comment:
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                        FUN STUFF:
                        • Leaderboard |
                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                        • Top of the Vine |
                        • Newsvine Live |
                        • Newsvine Archives |
                        • The Greenhouse
                        COMPANY STUFF:
                        • Code of Honor |
                        • Company Info |
                        • Contact Us |
                        • Jobs |
                        • User Agreement |
                        • Privacy Policy |
                        • About our ads
                        LEGAL STUFF:
                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com