WASHINGTON — Coach Marcus Borden used to bow his head and drop to one knee when his football team prayed. But the Supreme Court on Monday ended the practice when it refused to hear the high school coach's appeal of a school district ban on employees joining a student-led prayer.
The decision on the case from New Jersey could add another restriction on prayer in schools, advocates said.
"We've become so politically correct in terms of how we deal with religion that it's being pretty severely limited in schools right now, and individuals suffer," said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, a civil liberties organization that focuses on First Amendment and religious freedom issues.
But Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said some parents had complained about Borden leading prayers before the East Brunswick, N.J., school district ordered him to stop and banned all staff members from joining in student-led prayer.
"The bottom line is people in positions of authority, like a coach, have to be extremely careful about trying to promote their ideas, or implying that if you don't pray, you may not play," Lynn said.
The high court without comment refused to reconsider the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision upholding the ban.
The district established the ban in 2005 after parents complained about Borden, coach at East Brunswick High School since 1983, sometimes leading prayers at the Friday afternoon team pasta dinner or in the locker room before games. Borden said he wanted to show respect for the students engaged in prayer by bowing his head silently and dropping to one knee.
The district, Borden argued, was violating his free-speech rights by ordering him to stop action he called secular signs of respect. After the ban, the coach stood at attention for the remainder of the season while the students prayed.
Judge D. Michael Fisher, writing for the Philadelphia appeals court, said Borden's past action of leading the prayers made his head-bowing seem inappropriate. "A reasonable observer would conclude that he is continuing to endorse religion when he bows his head during the pre-meal grace and takes a knee with his team in the locker room while they pray," Fisher said.
Messages left for Borden and lawyer Ronald Riccio were not immediately returned Monday.
"With teachers and students, individual expressions are being limited. There's just a concept out there that religion doesn't belong in schools," said Whitehead, whose group acted as co-counsel for Borden. He said he does not know what Borden would do now.
School employees should avoid looking like they're endorsing religion in any way, said Lynn, whose group represented the school district.
"Coaches are not supposed to be promoting religion; that's up to students and parents and pastors," Lynn said.
The Supreme Court ended school-sponsored prayer in 1962 when it said directing that a prayer be said at the beginning of each school day was a violation of the First Amendment. The justices reaffirmed the decision in 2000 by saying a Texas school district was giving the impression of prayer sponsorship by letting students use loudspeakers under the direction of a faculty member for prayers before sports events.
The case is Borden v. School District of the Township of East Brunswick, 08-482.
___
Associated Press writer Samantha Henry in Newark, N.J., contributed to this report.
Good! The Constitution wins again!!!!!!!!
American Spirit? The majority our constitution's framers were Envangelic Christians. America is (supposed to be) a Christian nation. That 'seperation of church and state' mumbo jumbo is not mentioned in our constitution.
So pray at home. Besides, you insult god by praying for something frivolous and selfish like a football game. There are children dying of cancer but idiots want to think god would care about who wins a frigging unimportant game. Do that in church.
May be the idea of praying for safty as the kids play, is not a bad idea, even if it is just an unimportant game,
That 'seperation of church and state' mumbo jumbo is not mentioned in our constitution.
Nor is there any specific mention in the Constitution that robbing banks is illegal. There is, however, a pretty clear indication that causing harm, financial or otherwise, to others for your own gain should be prohibited. Similarly, the Constitution's inclusion of the phrase "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" has been interpreted to mean that no state-funded function may establish, or give the appearance of establishing, a state-sponsored endorsement of religion. The fact that the specific phrase "the separation of church and state," which was Jefferson's slogan for the Establishment Clause, does not appear in the Constitution is immaterial. The point is still clearly there.
May be the idea of praying for safty as the kids play, is not a bad idea, even if it is just an unimportant game,
If it makes you feel better, go right ahead. But don't make the mistake of thinking it's going to make a bit of difference to actually protecting the players, for it won't. The rather lengthy history of injuries in high school football games, despite widespread prayer, demonstrates that.
Since the coach apparently initially instituted the prayer custom some years ago and at times in the past led it, I can reluctantly respect the court's decision.
However, I do think a voluntary ecumenical prayer led by students is acceptable.
And, in certain situations I personally think even a brief ecumenical prayer led by a school employee might be appropriate. Many city, state, and national meetings are opened with prayer.
Many city, state, and national meetings are opened with prayer.
That doesn't mean it's Constitutional, though. The reason that prayers in those venues are generally not objected to has to do with the fact that most people don't attend things like city council meetings and the fact that most people in this country are religious. The nonreligious minority in this country would be perfectly within their means -- and in fact, keeping with their civic duty -- to object to such prayers, but most of us realize that doing so would only marginalize us further.
I'm all for religious freedom and tolerance, because I have tremendous respect for the Constitution. But unfortunately, we've allowed ourselves to drift from our Constitutional responsibilities in the last several decades to the point that objecting to such things as school administrator-led prayer has been equated with stifling religious freedom, which it certainly is not.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |