Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Baby boomlet: US births in 2007 break 1950s record

Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:02 PM EDT
us-news, health, united-states, med, boomlet, baby-boomlet
Mike Stobbe, AP Medical Writer

Graphic shows number of births in the U.S. since

Advertise | AdChoices

ATLANTA — More babies were born in the United States in 2007 than any year in the nation's history, topping the peak during the baby boom 50 years earlier, federal researchers reported Wednesday.

There is both good and bad news from the more than 4.3 million births:

_The U.S. population is more than replacing itself, a healthy trend.

_However, the teen birth rate was up for the second year in a row.

The birth rate rose slightly for women of all ages, and births to unwed mothers reached an all-time high of about 40 percent, continuing a trend begun years ago. More than three-quarters of these women were 20 or older.

For a variety of reasons, it's become more acceptable for women to have babies without a husband, said Duke University's S. Philip Morgan, a leading fertility researcher.

Even happy couples may be living together without getting married, experts say. Some cited a growing trend among all adult women to have children regardless of their marital status.

The new numbers suggest the second year of a baby boomlet, with U.S. fertility rates higher in every racial group, the highest among Hispanic women. On average, a U.S. woman has 2.1 babies in her lifetime. That's the "magic number" required for a population to replace itself.

Countries with much lower rates — such as Japan and Italy — face future labor shortages and eroding tax bases as they fail to reproduce enough to take care of their aging elders.

But it's not clear the boomlet will last long. Some experts think birth rates are already declining because of the economic recession that began in late 2007.

"I expect they'll go back down. The lowest birth rates recorded in the United States occurred during the Great Depression — and that was before modern contraception," said Dr. Carol Hogue, an Emory University professor of maternal and child health.

The 2007 statistical snapshot reflected a relatively good economy coupled with cultural trends that promoted childbirth, she and others noted.

Meanwhile, U.S. abortions have been dropping to their lowest levels in decades, according to other reports. Some have attributed the abortion decline to better use of contraceptives, but other experts have wondered if the rise in births might indicate a failure in proper use of contraceptives. Some earlier studies have shown declining availability of abortions.

Cultural attitudes may be a more likely explanation. Morgan noted the pregnancy of Bristol Palin, the unmarried teen daughter of former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin. The young woman had a baby boy in December, and plans for a wedding with the father, Levi Johnston, were scrapped.

"She's the poster child for what you do when you get pregnant now," Morgan said.

Teen women tend to follow what their older sisters do, so perhaps it's not surprising that teen births are going up just like births to older women, said Sarah Brown, the chief executive for the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.

Indeed, it's harder to understand why teen births had been declining for about 15 years before the recent uptick, she said. It may have been due to a concentrated societal effort to reduce teen births in the 1990s that has waned in recent years, she said.

The statistics are based on a review of most 2007 birth certificates by the National Center for Health Statistics, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The numbers also showed:

_Cesarean section deliveries continue to rise, now accounting for almost a third of all births. Health officials say that rate is much higher than is medically necessary. About 34 percent of births to black women were by C-section, more than any other racial group. But geographically, the percentages were highest in Puerto Rico, at 49 percent, and New Jersey, at 38 percent.

_The pre-term birth rate, for infants delivered at less than 37 weeks of pregnancy, declined slightly. It had been generally increasing since the early 1980s. Experts said they aren't sure why it went down.

_Among the states, Utah continued to have the highest birth rate and Vermont the lowest.

CDC officials noted that despite the record number of births, this is nothing like what occurred in the 1950s, when a much smaller population of women were having nearly four children each, on average. That baby boom quickly transformed society, affecting everything from school construction to consumer culture.

Today, U.S. women are averaging 2.1 children each. That's the highest level it's been since the early 1970s, but is a relatively small increase from the rate it had hovered at for more than 10 years and is hardly transforming.

"It's the tiniest of baby booms," said Morgan in agreement. "This is not an earthquake; it's a slight tremor."

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Mike Stobbe's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Puerto Rico , Atlanta
  • Public Discussion (35)
John Whittet

The U.S. population is more than replacing itself, a healthy trend.

A healthy trend according to whom? Population growth leads to overpopulation, leading to food an energy shortage, which we're already seeing. You could argue that this "healthy trend" is actually a bad thing.

"She's the poster child for what you do when you get pregnant now," Morgan said.

Have the kid and scrap the marriage? What!?

births to unwed mothers reached an all-time high of about 40 percent

Two-fifths seems crazy-high to me. I'd like a breakdown by age and socioeconomic status, please. Not to mention family size: are these responsible 35-year-olds who just want a child, or women like the octomom whose uteruses are revolving doors?

Bottom line: this article is all over the place and draws no discernible conclusion. D+ at best.

  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:24 PM EDT
Adam Hobson

Population growth leads to overpopulation

But they didn't say our population was growing, just that it was replacing itself. In fact, if you exclude immigration, the United States has a pretty stable population.

Bottom line: this article is all over the place and draws no discernible conclusion. D+ at best.

Well, it is an AP article, more of a collection of random facts and quotes than anything else ;-)

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
ComSen

We need someone to pay off all of the bank loans and stimulus money.

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:57 PM EDT
Consultant13Deleted
John Whittet

But they didn't say our population was growing, just that it was replacing itself.

Au contraire, mon ami.

more than replacing itself

Rationally, by the natural selection of the Laws of Nature, None of the Women were destined to have offspring.

The Law of Natural selection is pretty much moot for humans in civilized society. We have healthcare and medicine and government intervention. Short of eugenics, there's no way to weed out the "weak" genes.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:53 PM EDT
EllieP

Well, at least for 2007 we won't be losing ground to population growth in countries who cannot support themselves or whose radicals would seek to destroy us.

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:59 PM EDT
Reply
Shawn [a.k.a. "Shadow"]

Extrememly high birth numbers, younger and younger kids having kids, more people doing away with family values, and more and more jobs being lost.

Oh yeah, that's a great equation for America's success... :(

    Reply#2 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
    determined0a1

    I see more children and babies from foreign countries than ever.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:39 PM EDT
    dontbh8n

    One might have also heard that comment made on the streets of any major US city in the mid 19th to early 20th century.

    That said, there is no mention of how many of the births were anchor babies, born to illegal aliens or whatever the current term may be.

      #3.1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:08 PM EDT
      caroaber

      @ #3: Yeah, that's what the Pequot Indians said, way back when.

      • 2 votes
      #3.2 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:29 PM EDT
      BIFFBIRD

      parasites having anchor parasites!!!

        #3.3 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:44 PM EDT
        Reply
        Responsible-Adult

        tell this to all the christians that think having children is their right and duty but raising them isnt their responsibility, thats jesus' and the medias!

          Reply#4 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:59 PM EDT
          Anjillina

          Ok, now that's just a rediculous statement. Chrisitianity specifically teaches that a parent is responsible for the well-being of a child and in fact for it's every action until it reaches a certain age. People that neglect their kids and then claim to be Christian aren't following the guidebook given to them. (And Christians probably do no better or worse than any other demographic I'm sure - some do what they are supposed too, some do not).

          • 5 votes
          #4.1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:35 PM EDT
          Responsible-Adult

          i agree with you, my statement was very blanket, and a bit rediculous, but i would really like to see the figures on how many were christian ( or the demoninations of) compared to the others

          ill just say now that i live in utah, and have seen more families that feel its their duty to god to have children, than i have responsible parents who think about it before they commit to it, maybe its just a mormon thing. but im just talking from personal experience and no statistics, although id bet money on it

          and how often do you meet christians who actually follow what their book teaches them? i for one have met very few who are consitent, but are rather more content with being reasured they are good people because they are on the right team and concern themselves more with hot button issues to ruffle their feathers over, and even then its usually not in line with what jesus taught

          then again it might be high for christians just because we have a majority of them in our borders, my point is though, many people dont take it seriously enough

            #4.2 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:00 PM EDT
            Anjillina

            I think you're right about that - not enough people take parenting seriously. I'd say about half do what they're supposed too and I live in the the so-called "Bible belt", so know a lot of Christians (or people that say they are - lol). I'd honestly say among the "Christians" I know, it's about 50% good parenting/50% bad. I'd say out in general society where I don't know who is who, it's a little more 70% bad parenting/30% good. I may be off, but that's just my personal perception.

            But I totally agree that people need to think before bearing children. I understand that there's the whole "be fruitful and multiply" thing, but anybody who reads the rest of the Bible (and I think most other major religious texts I've heard much about) are also told what a sacred responsibility parenthood is and what a major, life-altering thing it is. I've always personally felt that my daughter didn't ask to be born - I made the decision to get pregnant and bring her here. Therefore it is 100% my responsibility to do the best job possible preparing her for life and teaching her how to be a mature, productive adult by the time she reaches 18 (or shortly thereafter).

              #4.3 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:24 PM EDT
              newsox

              I read that the highest birthrate by state is Utah, I would think that that would correlate with the high percentage of Mormonism. I also know that the United States boasts one of the highest percentage rates of teen pregnancy in the world, some say due to the casual attitude toward sexuality that teens now have...however that's a whole other topic.

              Regarding Christianity - I don't feel that someone who is sincere in their beliefs as a Christian just believes in the act of giving birth and not being a responsible parent. Pretty much any religion can have within it irresponsible people and bad parenting, Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Judaism...whatever...ignorance rears its head anywhere.

              I rarely meet anyone who actually follows what their doctrine teaches and sets an example.. be it Christianity, Buddhist, Islam, Sikh, whatever religion you want to pick. Most mainstream media and a lot of people seem to pick on Christianity however when it comes to blame - it seems to be the trendy thing to do. We are human though after all... and like I stated above...ignorance, fault, cheating, lying..whatever other million negative qualities and positive qualities too I should add..appear in every religion and culture.

              • 1 vote
              #4.4 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:33 PM EDT
              Reply
              Steve-975281

              The elephant in the living room: (from the Pew Hispanic Trust)

              The fertility rate of Hispanic women is considerably higher than that of non-Hispanic women. Immigrant Hispanic women have higher fertility rates than native-born Hispanic women.

              Hispanic women are more likely to give birth than their non-Hispanic counterparts. In 2005-2006, Hispanic women had 84 births per 1,000 women compared with 63 births per 1,000 non-Hispanic women.

              Among Hispanic women, immigrants are more likely to give birth than their native-born counterparts. Immigrant Hispanic women had 96 births per 1,000 women while native-born Hispanic women had 73 births per 1,000 women.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#5 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:18 PM EDT
              determined0a1

              The problem created if those parents are illegal immigrants they could be deported and separated from their kids.

              • 3 votes
              #5.1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:27 PM EDT
              Anjillina

              No, the problem could be that they're NOT deported and once again the American taxpayer is forced to pay for the choices of someone who came into the country illegally.

              • 3 votes
              #5.2 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:37 PM EDT
              Reply
              Z00CREW

              YA KNOW WHAT PART OF THE PROBLEM IS????????????? BET YOU CAN'T GUESS!!!!!!!!!!!!

              The number of illegal aliens coming across the borders giving birth. I wonder if they broke down the numbers, how many illegal aliens they would find coming and creating anchor babies.

              We need to say enough is enough before the babies are born!!!!!!!!!!

              • 1 vote
              Reply#6 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:04 PM EDT
              sushicat

              John, does this help? The following is from the Population reference Bureau and is discussing the rate of teens (15-19) having babies and gives some neat maps on which states have the highest teen birth rates.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#7 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:52 PM EDT
              Jim-975549

              J realize this article is about a babyboom here in America. But UNlike in the late 40's, 50's (when illegal immigrants were deported to make room in the job market for returning servicemen) how many of these babies born in the U.S. in 2007, have illegal immigrant parents? Who are now able to receive American Taxpayer funded assistence because of the "anchor"baby they now have! We, and our elected representitives,(the congress & senate & the president) know there are between 35 MILLION and 50 MILLION "Illegal Aleins" in this country, and NO ONE is doing anything to rectify the problem.

              How sad. Shame on us for letting this happen and continue to happen. You're right ZOOCREW

                Reply#8 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:02 PM EDT
                Z00CREW

                Unfortunately, the American public doesn't know the half of it.

                We, the American Taxpayer, are throwing away so much money it is ridiculous!!!!

                Illegal aliens are taking our tax dollars and I think everyone of the politicians who allowed this to happen should be taken out back to the woodshed!!!!!!!!

                First, the illegal alien illegally crosses (1st felony) the border and ...

                Then steals, buys or borrows social security numbers (2nd felonly) and...

                Then lies on an employment application by using the SSN (3rd felony) and....

                Doesn't pay taxes because they claim so many damn exemptions and ....

                Then when they hear about amnesty, they file tax returns ....

                Then they claim children that don't live in the household, and when I say children, they claim nieces and nephews, and neighbor children and brothers and sisters and any and all adults. Every exemption claimed takes away tax liability.

                BUT the kicker, every child claimed, gets an additional $1000.

                Sickening!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Disgusting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                Not only do these illegal aliens not pay employment taxes through out the year, like the legal Americans, but they get HUGE refunds when they file their tax returns.

                  #8.1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:53 PM EDT
                  BIFFBIRD

                  zoocrew,

                  you left out all of the illegal paper license plates they use and don't pay taxes or insurance on their vehicles. some even have the expiration date of 2-31 and they aren't stopped by the police. it's all amazing how people have been told to turn their backs on the illegal activity for votes.

                    #8.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:54 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    sushicat

                    John, this is from the Population Bureau again, and the people are discussing the U.S. growth is not from American women but from immigration.

                    cyndi lee:

                    The vast majority of US population growth is from immigration -- post-1970 immigrants and their descendants. The charts at NumbersUSA.com show this quite clearly. Why does PRB go to such lengths to downplay the impact of immigration?

                    Mary Mederios Kent:

                    Immigration is clearly an important source of population growth in the United States. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, net international migration acounts for between 40 and 45 percent of annual growth in recent years. Researchers calculating the contribution of immigrants and their children to U.S. population growth over the past 30 years or so concluded that these 1st and 2ndgeneration residents accounted for about 55 percent of growth. Several papers from the Pew Hispanic Center discuss the assumptions behind these estimates.

                    PRBdoesn't downplay the role of immigration, we tend to report the official statistics. Births to non-immigrants are also an important source of population growth.

                    please keep in mind just because it says immigrants does not mean "illegal."

                    The birth rate of women is 2.1. The replacement rate is 2. So if she doesn't have the third child the family isn't growing, it is replacing the original family members (Mom an Dad).

                    This is where we are going to see changes in race in society due to the changes in the birth rate among women. I think it has changed to 2045, but the white race will be about 50% of the US population with the other groups making up the other half.

                    The following is for the link above, #7, and contains the information. http://www.prb.org/Articles/2009/teenagefertilityrate.aspx

                      Reply#9 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:30 PM EDT
                      olddog1

                      I guess when you have no job and nothing better to do, you do what comes natural. And with no money to buy contraceptives, babies are made. If you where out there working and making money, like you should be, less babies would be brought into this world. Education and economics play a major factor in the process. Just say no doesn't make it.

                        Reply#10 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:28 PM EDT
                        Besibug-561369

                        olddog - Assuming you are old, you know that there are birth control methods that have been around for along time (even if they aren't 100%, it's better than just giving up)that don't cost anything. :)

                          Reply#11 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:30 PM EDT
                          Harry Schell

                          Golly gee, condoms-for-free and sex ed as early as possible is sure working to reduce out-of-wedlock births!

                          Abstinence is so old-fashioned...

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#12 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:25 PM EDT
                          dawnypawny

                          Anyway about it, many, many are all the "boomers" grandchildren and great-grandchildren. So we win the population explosion!

                            Reply#13 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:15 PM EDT
                            sushicat

                            Dawn,

                            I know it appears that way, but, because many baby boomers stayed single and don't have children, the birth rate here has been slow. In 1970s, families were having 2.5 children. That .5 is important as it is that number that showed the population is growing. It is down to 2.1 today.

                            Most families were having at most 2 children or just one. Those two children are just replacing the original Mom and Dad so the population was not growing, it was maintaining.

                            Hispanics and if you read the other comment #9, have on avg. 2.8 children per family. So their numbers are growing. This is 2nd, third generation families, families that are Americans but immigrated over here to the U.S. long time ago.

                            Just because they are Hispanic don't think they are illegals as most people here on this page are doing.

                              #13.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:04 AM EDT
                              Reply
                              Jim-975549

                              Sushicat,

                              I don't beleive that most of the people on this page think that if you are Hispanic in America you are an illegal alien. It just so happens that facts are that the vast majority of the 10's of millions of illegals here in the U.S. today, ARE from Mexico!

                              I've noticed since I read this story, that the mainstream media hasn't gotten into illegal immigrants births in this record setting 2007. (and I'm sure that they won't, can't go there, might step on some political toes, lose funding) They are jumping on the unwed births (near 40%) Which is pretty alarming actually in it's own right. I find that a moral, and a family (or lack of both) issue. Which truly NEEDS addressing.

                              But "my" curiosity which was raised after reading the original article, was just how MANY of those 2007 births in the U.S.of A., were births to people who ARE here "ILLEGALLY", and are now put into the welfare system, i.e. healthcare, foodstamps, welfare payments for said child's care. "Anchor" baby tying the parents here also. At MY taxdollar expense.

                              And just so you know, I have nothing against immigrants here to the U.S. But we do have a "LEGAL" and "LAWFUL" way to become a citizen. ; )

                                Reply#14 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:58 PM EDT
                                sushicat

                                Jim, I found this and see if this helps.

                                http://www.cis.org/articles/2005/back1105.html

                                They are just looking at 10% of the births are illegal immigrants, the Population Bureau where I get the other information also sees the immigrant birth rate as not being a major significance, but one that does influence the birth rate.

                                Because this topic is so "emotional" to most of society, it is hard for most to see that the majority of Hispanics here in America are legal citizens.

                                  #14.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:14 PM EDT
                                  Reply
                                  howdy1242

                                  I was the eldest of nine in the 40's. There was'nt any fertility games being played (poor excuse for words) and folks had babies 1 and 2 at a time. Now it's 5,6 and 8.

                                  Really.8 kids kicking at the same time?

                                  I my day a loaf of bread was $.19 eggs were about the same .But then wages were less and the IRS did'nt hand out child deductions.

                                    Reply#15 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:32 PM EDT
                                    breelaboyDeleted
                                    breelaboyDeleted
                                    breelaboyDeleted
                                    Leave a Comment:
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                    Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                    FUN STUFF:
                                    • Leaderboard |
                                    • E-Mail Alerts |
                                    • Top of the Vine |
                                    • Newsvine Live |
                                    • Newsvine Archives |
                                    • The Greenhouse
                                    COMPANY STUFF:
                                    • Code of Honor |
                                    • Company Info |
                                    • Contact Us |
                                    • Jobs |
                                    • User Agreement |
                                    • Privacy Policy |
                                    • About our ads
                                    LEGAL STUFF:
                                    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com