Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Govt. seeks to reverse Ted Stevens' conviction

Wed Apr 1, 2009 7:27 AM EDT
politics, justice, justice-department, ted-stevens, stevens
Devlin Barrett, Associated Press Writer

In a Nov. 29, 2008 file photo Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, leaves the Senate chamber after making his last formal speech on the Senate floor. National Public Radio said Wednesday April 1, 2009, that the justice department will drop all charges against Stevens. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke/file)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — Faced with embarrassing revelations about withheld evidence, the Justice Department on Wednesday moved to reverse the conviction of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, who lost his bid for re-election just days after a jury found that he had lied about gifts and home renovations.

Justice Department lawyers asked a judge to dismiss the indictment against Stevens and toss out his conviction — effectively killing their own courtroom victory with a shocking admission of misbehavior by prosecutors.

The Stevens case, the government's highest-profile attack on congressional corruption in recent years, was plagued by problems that continued to pile up even after a jury found him guilty. The last straw, apparently, was the failure of prosecutors to turn over notes of a crucial interview in which a witness contradicted a statement he made later under oath at trial.

"I have determined that it is in the interest of justice to dismiss the indictment and not proceed with a new trial," Attorney General Eric Holder said. He said the department must ensure that all cases are "handled fairly and consistent with its commitment to justice."

The prosecutors who handled the trial have been removed from the case and their conduct is under investigation.

Stevens is expected to be back in court Tuesday when U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan holds a hearing on the government request. Stevens had appealed his conviction and had been awaiting sentencing.

"I always knew that there would be a day when the cloud that surrounded me would be removed," Stevens said in a statement. "That day has finally come. It is unfortunate that an election was affected by proceedings now recognized as unfair."

Stevens, 85, had held the Senate seat since 1968. Alaskans voted by a narrow margin to oust him last November, ending a political career that began before Alaska was granted statehood. When he was defeated, Stevens was the longest-serving Republican senator.

While reaction in the Senate was muted, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, called the whole episode grossly unfair.

"I am deeply disturbed that the government can ruin a man's career and then say, 'Never mind.' There is nothing that will ever compensate for the loss of his reputation or leadership to the state of Alaska," Murkowski said.

Noting Stevens' age, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said, "He's already been punished enough."

Stevens was convicted of seven felony counts of lying on Senate financial disclosure forms to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars in gifts and home renovations from a wealthy oil contractor.

In their court filing Wednesday, Justice Department lawyer Paul O'Brien told the judge they recently discovered prosecutors' notes from an April 2008 interview with Bill Allen, a key witness against Stevens. The notes indicate that Allen said he did not recall talking to a mutual friend about giving Stevens a bill for work done at the senator's home in Alaska.

Yet when he testified at the trial, Allen claimed he did have such a conversation. Under trial rules, such contradictory statements must be given to the defense team, and they weren't.

The trial was beset by similar government missteps, infuriating Sullivan. He held Justice Department lawyers in contempt in February for failing to turn over documents as ordered and called their behavior "outrageous."

The judge had ordered Justice to provide the agency's internal communications about a whistle-blower complaint brought by an FBI agent involved in the investigation. The agent objected to Justice Department tactics during the trial, including failure to turn over evidence and an "inappropriate relationship" between the lead agent on the case and the prosecution's star witness.

Stevens' lawyer, Brendan Sullivan Jr., praised Holder as "a pillar of integrity" for his decision to disregard a jury verdict that they said was obtained unlawfully. He called the prosecutors' behavior "stunning."

"They were hell-bent on convicting a United States senator," Sullivan said. "His name is cleared. He is innocent of the charges as if they had never been brought."

William Canfield, a former Stevens staffer and longtime friend, said some of the trial's effects may never be undone. Specifically, he said, at least one Senate colleague — John Sununu of New Hampshire — lost his bid for re-election after Stevens' legal problems became a campaign issue.

Still, Canfield said, the Justice Department decision is an admission that "they failed miserably in an attempt to bring him down based on some crazed notion of him being corrupt."

The Justice Department decision was first reported by National Public Radio.

_____

Associated Press writer Matt Apuzzo contributed to this report.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Devlin Barrett's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Law Vine
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (41)
PilotKINW

What a surprise ...

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 8:14 AM EDT
ftmackinc

An honest to god innocent politician?

no @!$%#...lol

never thought i would live long enough to see that...

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 6:02 PM EDT
Catch22

Actually a decision not to pursue further prosecution due to prosecutorial misconduct isnt exactly an exoneration or declaration of innocence.

The fact that the prosecutorial team broke the rules doesnt make Steven's innocent, it just means he is not going to be punished.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Thu Apr 2, 2009 11:01 AM EDT
DeMock

Time for a re-do election according to Sarah Palin ... It will never happen... I think this may be a good sign about Holder Check this out please ->

http://demock.newsvine.com/_news/2009/04/02/2630105-the-stevens-holder-gitmo-connection

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Sat Apr 4, 2009 4:25 AM EDT
Reply
Paul-534930

Wonder what that costs?

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 8:34 AM EDT
Ryan-

I guess this is what you get when politics get in the way.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 8:42 AM EDT
Catch22

What politics do you imagine to have gotten in the way?

The mistakes were made during the Bush administration.

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 1:55 PM EDT
Reply
MIGeezer

Yeah, what are the odds? A republican from the same state as the republican VP candidate convicted after the VP candidate is announced, but now information that it is acknowledged was known at that time is suddenly brought to light by those who would look foolish if they ever had to go to trial. I'm sure that the prosecutors just overlooked it or forgot about it during the case right? It couldn't be yet another example of election by manipulation could it?

We're going to give you 40 acres and a mule! 'Cause we're your friends! And you'll get to vote, and you'll want to vote like your friends vote!

Sounds alot like ACORN trying to get bad loans created doesn't it? I wonder if there's any connection...

  • 6 votes
#4 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 9:13 AM EDT
dwillie

MIGeezer, Stevens was prosecuted by the Justice Department under the Bush Administration. This is just one more example of the slipshod, corner-cutting, expediency at all costs manner with which the last Administration approached the Constitution. Your attempt to link this fiasco to an Administation is simply not credible.

  • 5 votes
#4.1 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 9:55 AM EDT
MIGeezer

Not an administration, a way of conducting politics, Chicago style.

    #4.2 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 10:15 AM EDT
    Mimfort

    MIGeezer,

    Are you suggesting that the Bush-appointed Justice Department initiated bogus prosecution against Stevens in order to discredit its own party prior to an election?

    That's an interesting strategy.

    • 5 votes
    #4.3 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 10:19 AM EDT
    MIGeezer

    No, but I am curious why that event during the final months of the year you would attribute to Bush. Remember that the justice department was acting on the information they were provided by the prosecutors. You know, the ones that now admit they didn't have a case, and so the JD is dropping the charges. Who's pocket were they paid out of?

    It sounds like the justice department (call it Bush's if you still want to) was acting in an ethical manner, but the prosecutors were not.

    • 4 votes
    #4.4 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 10:30 AM EDT
    Archie Haase

    MIGeezer --- Give us a break your attempt top connect Obama with this diaster shows just how partisan you are and it takes aways some of your credibility. This kind of spin your spouting is why the republicans lost in 2006 and 2008. This parisan spin and garbage

    • 4 votes
    #4.5 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 11:57 AM EDT
    MIGeezer

    Sorry, not partisan. Don't believe in either party. Just call it like I see it.

    • 1 vote
    #4.6 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
    Archie Haase

    Thinking Americans have this word for people like you. Ostrich

    • 1 vote
    #4.7 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
    MIGeezer

    Actually, they normally credit my observations, since I don't allow my personal feelings to be the starting point.

      #4.8 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
      nmbg

      Thinking Americans call it like they see it.

        #4.9 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
        Archie Haase

        Thinking like you Americans ---- They must be dangerous for civil liberties. As for Stevens he was guilty as a black sin. Yes Washington is corrupt, but they sent more innocent people to prsion then Stevens. Trafficat for one. Traficant was guilty of being stupid and corrupt, Stevens was guilty. What got Stevens into trouble was he became so arrogant.

        • 1 vote
        #4.10 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
        Catch22

        No, but I am curious why that event during the final months of the year you would attribute to Bush. Remember that the justice department was acting on the information they were provided by the prosecutors.

        Who else would you attribute and investigation done during the Bush administration overseen by a Bush appointed official and completed during the Bush adminstration.

        The Federal proscecuter was a Bush administration official.

        It sounds like the justice department (call it Bush's if you still want to) was acting in an ethical manner, but the prosecutors were not.

        You seem confused since these the prosecutor works for the Justice Department. Until Obama took office the Justice Department stood behind the prosecution 100%.

        • 2 votes
        #4.11 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 1:59 PM EDT
        MIGeezer

        Actually, until the prosecutors decided they didn't really have a good case after all. I guess that for some it's hard to see that if the JD was corrupt due to being under the Bush thumb, that no charges would have ever been made. The JD acted on the information it was given, in this case information that was less than good.

        If the JD under the current administration wishes to demonstrate equally good ethics, then in addition to making sure that there isn't a case against the Senator they should also go after those who committed inappropriate actions last fall. We'll have to wait and see on that one.

        • 2 votes
        #4.12 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 2:06 PM EDT
        Archie Haase

        Maybe these guys in Bush's JD wanted to save the US from another 4 years of republican corruption in the senate? It is not==== t h a t===== long of stretch to think there are republicans who love America! :)

        • 1 vote
        #4.13 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 2:10 PM EDT
        Catch22

        If the JD under the current administration wishes to demonstrate equally good ethics

        You seem to continue to be confused by the fact that the proscecutor in this case was in the justice department. Its also unclear why you believe the past adminsitration demonstrated good ethics.

        Actually, until the prosecutors decided they didn't really have a good case after al

        It was the current Attorney General that decided that because of prior prosecutorial misconduct they should not pursue the case.

        • 2 votes
        #4.14 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 2:47 PM EDT
        Archie Haase

        Who knows why this happened. But however it happened it cannot bode well for confidence in government. The Bush administration it seems spent much of their time goofing off if can use and please excuse the expression.

        • 1 vote
        #4.15 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 3:14 PM EDT
        Jerry Verlinger

        On July 30th last year, I posted the following comment on a Post by Grey Wolf about the Stevens indictment;

        "Somethings not right here.

        I'm no supporter of the GOP as of late, but this man has served Alaska for over 50 years, since before it was a State. And now , suddenly he becomes unaware of what is not proper?! Seems like a set up to me. The Dems would have us believe that the GOP is the only political party in this country that uses unethical campaign tactics, but they also have their bag of dirty tricks.

        I truly hope this man, who has devoted his life to public service can exonerate himself of these charges. I would like to see the Dems obtain enough seats in '09 to make the Senate filibuster proof, but this is not the way I would like to see it happen."

        [Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:25 AM EDT]

        I truly hope they reverse the conviction. I just don't think, that after over 50 years of public service, the man deserves to die in disgrace.

          #4.16 - Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:43 PM EDT
          Reply
          Mimfort

          Is there an honest person in Washington?

          Our president can't seem to find an appointee who can pay taxes. Republicans and Democrats alike seem to have a conflict of interest between their constituency and corporate influence.

          Is this an 'In the course of human events' time? Is there a rational solution to this issue that doesn't require that we tear down the system and rebuild it?

          I'd like to see my government protect the rights of the individual, and ensure justice to all.

          I feel that our current government has gotten far too interested in ensuring rights rather than justice. Protecting rights leads to justice. Ensuring rights leads to totalitarianism.

          • 3 votes
          Reply#5 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 9:17 AM EDT
          ftmackinc

          Is there an honest person in Washington?

          well...

          there was one, we done run his ass off though...

          What the real irony is on that little gem...

          turns out he was a republican...lol

          now who coulda seen that coming?

          You know who the big winner in this one is really...

          Blago,

          That hairpiece is on his knees thanking god right this moment dontacha know ;)

          • 1 vote
          #5.1 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 6:06 PM EDT
          Reply
          Archie Haase

          This is why Americans have lost respect for government and it's institutions. What a loud joke played on the American people. But what the hell --- Americans are stupid lot! Does not matter what political party you support this is wrong this issue to have gone this far!! I hope this man lives a long time!

          • 2 votes
          Reply#6 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 9:22 AM EDT
          MB_Wichita

          Only one thing more dangerous than stupid people in government is stupid people with power to destroy lives.

          • 4 votes
          Reply#7 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 9:31 AM EDT
          Archie Haase

          My you must be happy Bush is in Texas away from Washington and possibly more damage!

          • 2 votes
          #7.1 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 11:59 AM EDT
          MB_Wichita

          Good point; I'll amend my statement: The only thing more dangerous than stupid people with power is very smart evil people at the pinnacle of power.

          • 1 vote
          #7.2 - Mon Apr 6, 2009 8:40 AM EDT
          Archie Haase

          If you are trying to tell us Obama is evil? If so that is why you people non reading Limbaugh watching non thinking Americans will continue to lose elections across the US. You people just do not get it. You have no idea what a bad politician is.

          • 1 vote
          #7.3 - Mon Apr 6, 2009 8:50 AM EDT
          Reply
          caleb52

          Don't Trust Anyone Over Eighty...

          • 2 votes
          Reply#8 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 10:05 AM EDT
          MIGeezer

          ... or under.

          • 2 votes
          #8.1 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 10:58 AM EDT
          caleb52

          Good Point

            #8.2 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 11:31 AM EDT
            Reply
            DJO1

            Wow, what a shock. The Justice Department of an Administration that has tax problems with its top appointees, including the most recent one who wants to try to wreck our healthcare system more than it already has been by corrupt insurance companies and big Pharma, who stuff millions into the pockets of Washington poltical hacks, decides in Chicago, Illinois fashion, to play what we here in Chicago, thanks to Chicago Tribune's John Kass, call Combine politics and let a corrupt hack off the hook. Obama's Justice Department is just like Bush's.

            In Obama's home state there is no difference between Republicons and Demoncrats. They are all corrupt scum who steal in a bipartisan fashion and now thanks to U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald go to jail in large numbers. I am surprised that the Justice Department hasn't replaced U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald for actually doing his job. Our last Republican is doing time for selling driver's licenses to unqualified truckers, one of whom killed six children in a van who were burned to death, and everyone knows about Blagojevich who even by Chicago Democrat standards was considered filth. Obama and Durbin would like to replace Fitzgerald because he is not corrupt but they probably won't dare. Usually we get a hack U.S. Attorney who goes after petty criminals.

            On a different topic, does anyone find it strange that the head of the Pharmaceutical lobby, who is a former rep. from Louisiana, one of the few states more corrupt than Illinois, is in favor of the federal takeover of our healthcare system? All you hopium smoking Obama worshippers need to wake up and realize Obama is just another Chicago politician.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#9 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 11:27 AM EDT
            Archie Haase

            There was a man I know in Maine. Runs a nice Cafe has no health insurance. His wife has lumps in her breasts both breast not just one. By god he is not happy about socialized medicine. It is a give away program. His wife died. True. He was and is a great repubican!

            • 1 vote
            #9.1 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 12:06 PM EDT
            Reply
            Paul-534930

            Rick Scott: The Bernie Madoff of Health Care - The Seminal :: Independent Media and Politics

              Reply#10 - Wed Apr 1, 2009 12:12 PM EDT
              DeMock

              MIGeezer said:

              No, but I am curious why that event during the final months of the year you would attribute to Bush. Remember that the justice department was acting on the information they were provided by the prosecutors. You know, the ones that now admit they didn't have a case, and so the JD is dropping the charges.

              MIGeezer... no they never said there was no case... what they said was that the Bush administration lawyers did unethical things during the prosecution... if the prosecutors in the Ted Bundy case had with held some evidence back in part of his case would it mean they did not have a case against Bundy? No... same here. It is just that here, Holder felt the leason for the justice department was more inmportant than the case against Stevens... Stevens is 86, out of office, disgraced? No?

              • 2 votes
              Reply#11 - Sun Apr 5, 2009 4:01 AM EDT
              Archie Haase

              This old man creep was guilty as hell! He is lucky that he is not in jail like the rest of those %%%% people or families who profited from their service to our great republic!!!!

                Reply#12 - Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:31 PM EDT
                Jerry Verlinger

                This old man creep was guilty as hell! He is lucky that he is not in jail

                When this story first broke, I took the time to look up a little info about Stevens, because I was curious as to how he managed to stay in office for over 50 years. After all that is quite a remarkable accomplishment, and it is a very hard thing to do if your corrupt.

                Well, it turns out that Stevens had an amazing track record in Alaska. They love him up there because it seems he has done an tremendous amount for that State. His track record regarding his honesty and ethics were unblemished, and after his indictment, most of his peers in in Congress expressed shock and surprise, because of his exemplary record.

                So I posted comments supporting Stevens, an excerpt of one of them is posted here in comment #4.16. I never believed Stevens did anything wrong, because it just didn't make sense.

                So,. Archie ........ just what evidence or insight do you have that proving that this "this old man creep" is as guilty as hell? And where do you come off calling a man that has served in the U.S. Senate for more than a half a century a "creep"? I thought they taught U.S. Marines to have more respect.

                • 1 vote
                #12.1 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:36 AM EDT
                DeMock

                Jerry Verlinger wrote:

                he managed to stay in office for over 50 years. After all that is quite a remarkable accomplishment, and it is a very hard thing to do if your corrupt.

                Jerry- I would say just the opposite. His corruption was what kept him in office. It looks like he and his cronies were trading favors... no doubt some of those favors included money for re-election.

                just what evidence or insight do you have that proving that this "this old man creep" is as guilty as hell?

                Jerry have you heard the tapes? you do know about them? His own words convicted him... some misconduct on a technical issue got him off. Stevens was stealing tax payer money by rigging oil contracts for gifts... that makes him a scum bucket. The rules are simple. Senators get a lot of power and wealth from their position. Stevens wasn't satisfied with that ....

                • 2 votes
                #12.2 - Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:14 AM EDT
                Reply
                Leave a Comment:
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                Newsvine Privacy Statement
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                FUN STUFF:
                • Leaderboard |
                • E-Mail Alerts |
                • Top of the Vine |
                • Newsvine Live |
                • Newsvine Archives |
                • The Greenhouse
                COMPANY STUFF:
                • Code of Honor |
                • Company Info |
                • Contact Us |
                • Jobs |
                • User Agreement |
                • Privacy Policy |
                • About our ads
                LEGAL STUFF:
                • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com