Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

NYC judge denounces woman's self-styled sting

Thu Apr 2, 2009 7:03 AM EDT
us-news, mother, undercover
Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

NEW YORK — A judge has rebuffed a woman's undercover attempt to get her son's Brooklyn murder conviction overturned by conducting an amateur sting operation targeting a juror in the case.

State Supreme Court Judge Alan Marrus said Wednesday that Doreen Giuliano's self-styled investigation was a "vigilante" effort that invaded the juror's privacy. Marrus didn't accuse her of any crime but said the case exposed flaws in protecting jurors.

Giuliano disguised herself and adopted a phony name to befriend the juror. She then claimed the juror admitted in secretly recorded conversations that he defied orders not to read about the case and lied to the court in saying he had no inside knowledge about Giuliano's son, John Giuca.

Giuca was found guilty in the 2003 murder of college student Mark Fisher.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Associated Press's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , New York
  • Public Discussion (2)
moonlighter

The law does not protect the people of this country today, it only protects the wealthy.

This woman did the right thing, the legal system doesn't care about justice, and for this judge to condemn this woman for what she did shows that this judge does not belong on the bench.

This action by this judge proves that the courts do not care about justice, all they care about is closing the books on a case, it doesn't matter if the person is guilty or innocent as long as they dispose of a case as quick as possible.

We are telling the world to practice democracy and justice, and yet we deny this to our own citizens.

This judge better wake up, his actions and many other judge's actions are what is going to lead to street justice.

    Reply#1 - Thu Apr 2, 2009 8:48 AM EDT
    RainDaze

    While I agree there are shady/shoddy aspects of this prosecution, and jailhouse snitches are unreliable in the least, this womans focus was on a technicality dismissal of the conviction and not evidence of the real guilty party.

    During her 'investigation' she participated in illegal activities including smoking weed. The judge does have a point in the selective portions of her secret (and likely inadmissable) recordings of what is assumed to be a private conversation. She may not be guilty of a crime simply due to the fact she wasnt working for law enforcement (who have to get warrents to record conversations in the bedroom), but it is unlikely (though I do not know the laws of new york) that secretly recording conversations to be used as incriminating evidence is grounds for re-trial. Even stores have warning signs proclaiming you may be being filmed. I doubt she informed her subject of her recording capabilities.

    This isnt a case of new/buried evidence that would have resulted in a not guilty. This is grasping at straws to get your kid out of prison. I dont blame a mom for fighting for her kid, but I also dont see much here to sway a judge to rule a retrial is needed.

      Reply#2 - Thu Apr 2, 2009 9:49 AM EDT
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com