Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

AOL: You've got irrelevancy?

Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:24 AM EDT
technology, internet, only-on-msnbc-com, service, digital-home, aol, earthlink, dial-up, walled, got-mail�, america-online�s
msnbc.com News — Suzanne Choney, msnbc.com - Only on msnbc.com

After 20 years as a dial-up Internet service provider, America Online still serves millions of people, although it's a far cry from the tens of millions of customers it had at its peak seven years ago.

Advertise | AdChoices

— America Online’s dial-up Internet service may be headed for the sale bin. Do we care?

Many don’t. Those of us who were around 20 years ago when AOL began might look back fondly at what became known as “the Internet on training wheels” for some.

I’m sentimental about AOL, but then, like lots of Americans, I moved on to high-speed broadband years ago. Now AOL, the once-dominant ISP in the country, is considered a drain and a pain to Time Warner, which is thinking of offloading it.

AOL had about 27 million customers in the United States at its peak in 2002, but is now down to about 7 million, a relative shadow of itself. Some of those subscribers are folks who live in areas that don’t have high-speed service available; others just don’t need or want to pay for it.

A possible purchaser for AOL could be EarthLink, which provides both dial-up and broadband Internet service, and had just under 3 million subscribers at the end of 2008. United Online, which owns NetZero and Juno dial-up services, has about 1.5 million paid subscribers.

Keys to the kingdom
AOL’s decline is somewhat like watching the aging of a smart but aggravating uncle who once taught you how to drive, then missed no opportunity to make each car trip a misery with his harping about the way you handle the road. You appreciate what he did for you, but it came at a cost.

America Online helped me and millions of others find their way onto the Web and into the world of e-mail at a time when only engineers and scientists had the keys to those kingdoms.

The dial-up service wasn’t the first — Prodigy, CompuServe (later bought by AOL) and others preceded it. But AOL was the easiest and most friendly with its digital greetings of “Welcome!” and “You’ve Got Mail.”

As hard as it is to believe now, there actually was a time when being told e-mail was sitting in your inbox was considered exciting, and not exacting.

And who could quibble with the charming 1998 movie, “You’ve Got Mail,” with Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan? It marked AOL’s heyday and represented a cultural milestone: We were on our way to blending real life — including romance — with technology.

Oh, those busy signals
AOL did provide an easy avenue to the Web — once you could get to that avenue.

Busy signals while trying to get online were as common as the frustration of reaching a human being at the company, despite the blanketing of the nation with free AOL installation CDs in every magazine and at every convenience store.

Good luck, too, if you decided you’d had it with the service and wanted out. You were met with an infinite loop by phone — and forget e-mail.

Spam, too, became an electronic byproduct and not just a canned one, a problem that took AOL years to address.

We lived in what is now dubbed an electronic “walled garden,” the world of the Web as AOL saw it, where we didn’t venture out to the Internet at large. Of course, in the mid-1990s, there wasn’t much of the Internet as we know it now, and AOL’s walled garden kept most of us pretty happy.

In the mid-1990s, that would change, as browsers, such as Netscape (which AOL ultimately bought, then essentially killed) and Internet Explorer, let us move freely about the Web.

It was an intoxicating and liberating feeling. The speed at which we could wander the Web went from sluggish to screamin’ as cable TV companies also became cable Internet providers.

Both factors contributed to cementing our confidence that we could not only explore the Internet on our own, but do so quickly and without the screeching sound of a telephone modem.

The Internet was alive with lots of places, or sites, to explore. AOL seemed to be an impediment, not a gateway, to that world of excitement and energy.

AOL rebels took to the Net, outside of the provider’s walled garden, with sites such as AOLsucks.org and Anti-AOL.org. (The latter is “dead,” according to the person who was maintaining the site. “The information that was here is out of date and I’ve no plans to …research new information, nor update the site any further,” he writes on the site. “That said, I was shocked at how many hits the site still gets. Obviously, even in AOL’s current state, people still have questions about why it sucks and/or how to cancel.”

It is an improved AOL
The company has worked hard to improve its dial-up service and its spam filters. Still, it faces a hard road even though dial-up service, we’re told, is far from dead, especially in a recession.

AOL raised its lowest monthly price from $9.99 to $11.99 last year for unlimited service and 24/7 tech support. Those who just want the unlimited service, but with limited tech support, can still get the $9.99 plan.

EarthLink recently lowered its least expensive monthly plan by $2 to $7.95, and United Online charges $9.95 a month for its cheapest service.

In a study last year, the Pew Internet & American Life Project found that about 10 percent of Americans use dial-up connections at home. Of that number, 19 percent said there’s nothing that will convince them to switch to broadband — not better availability or lower prices.

AOL may live on if Time Warner decides to keep it, or as part of another ISP. I’m just grateful that it’s a distant memory. Like floppy disks and dot-matrix printers, AOL is best considered nostalgically and not as a day-to-day reality of 21st-century life.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Suzanne Choney's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (34)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
Jack-1021369

Nice article but a couple of comments. I've maintained a paid AOL account since 1991, starting as dialup. We permitted seven addresses and made a unique one to register products including software apps. Shared a couple of email addresses with family that live(d) in areas that even now don't have a cable or DSL option. Transitioned to cable modem broadband and shared it as my primary personal e-mail address. In a year and a half the cable company got sold and domain name changed and the e-mail address went dead. Shared the new broadband address but kept registering products/software with the AOL address. Couple of years later the 2nd cable company went bust and was sold; e-mail domain changed. I switched to DSL with a national company hoping it might be more long-term domain name and shared the new broadband address but kept registering products/software with the AOL address. After a year of shaky DSL service (poor speed, had to put special filters on all the phones in my house) I went back to cable modem. Once again shared the new broadband address but kept registering products/software with the AOL address. Eighteen years later I can contact the suppliers of ALL products and software that I've registered in the last 18 years and with my same AOL e-mail address they can verify my registrations. I travel quite a bit both US and International. For ten years AOL dial-up was available pretty much any place I went in the world. Yes, sometimes a surcharge but never as much as the typical $10-15 a day I now pay for hotel internet access. Life goes on. If I move from this area I’m not guaranteed that I’ll have the same cable company wherever I move to so may have to change e-mail addresses again. I’ve maintained my basic AOL paid account and still have one family user that accesses AOL by dial up. I still have use that unique AOL address to register products & software. Personally, I hope AOL does NOT go away.

    Reply#1 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:58 AM EDT
    regina-1021484

    I wouldn't count them out. New guy at top.

      Reply#2 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:11 AM EDT
      Jake-312935

      I disagree. I think AOL has become irrelevant. You might say they have become the Shawn Hannity of internet service.

      • 1 vote
      #2.1 - Tue May 5, 2009 2:51 AM EDT
      Reply
      P.C. Moblee

      I got my "internet training wheels" from Prodigy, and for the longest time refused to switch to AOL because I thought they were "cheesy", LOL. At some point I gave in and I've been with AOL for well over ten years. Except for the occasional billing error, I never really had a problem with them and might just miss them if they go away.

      It doesn't help that I'm just too lazy to move everything over to my other email address and cancel the AOL account.

        Reply#3 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:13 PM EDT
        freudianslip

        Updating artwork - please wait...

          Reply#4 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:14 PM EDT
          Indigo Halo

          That was one of the reasons I cancelled. Every time I'd log off, there would be this 20-30 minute "updating artwork" crappola at the end of the session.

            #4.1 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:01 PM EDT
            Reply
            checkerbattery

            Didn't even know AOL was still in business. Can you even buy modems any more? Man, I sure won't miss those things. What a PITA.

              Reply#5 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:00 PM EDT
              Russell-inSacto

              I got my training wheels with Prodigy as well. I tried AO Hell for a short time but got tired of being sold on various things at log in. I figured that if i'm paying for the system, I shouldn't need to deal with pop ups on how to use AOL better. I went to cable modem as soon as it was available because I worked with computers and trying to do remote work on a server using dial up was a pain in the rear. I'm surprised they are still around given the amount of things that need high speed connections to work but to each his own.

                Reply#6 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:57 PM EDT
                flyfishva

                Originally intended as internet for the masses-time to bury it-it's been dead for awhile!

                  Reply#7 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 6:14 PM EDT
                  iconoclasm

                  It was around before the internet was popular on BBSs (and before BBSs became ISPs). I disliked it before the internet and preferred other BBSs. After the internet I didn't see the point of AOL. I was a member now and again espically when you could bounce from service to service for free (with free trials).

                  • 1 vote
                  #7.1 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:52 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  dee11

                  It has changed. It's free and you don't have to dial up, where have u been? It's just like the rest.

                    Reply#8 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:20 PM EDT
                    Barkingshins

                    The author of this article is apparently oblivious to the fact that AOL offers broadband connectivity and has for years. In fact, most of their services seem to have been re-engineered for broadband users of which I would guess a majority of those 7 million subscribers are.

                      Reply#9 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:44 PM EDT
                      P.C. Moblee

                      Yeah, I probably should have mentioned in my OP that I'm a broadband/cable user now, albeit just for email.

                      My "updating artwork" thingy never seemed to take that long when we switched to DSL...LOL...ah, the good old days!

                        #9.1 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:26 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        ClimbingFog

                        In a study last year, the Pew Internet & American Life Project found that about 10 percent of Americans use dial-up connections at home. Of that number, 19 percent said there’s nothing that will convince them to switch to broadband — not better availability or lower prices.

                        What is wrong with these people?

                          Reply#10 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:27 PM EDT
                          Unicorn*

                          I quit AOL when I had a problem and could not get it resolved with anyone who spoke english I could understand. Spent three days trying to get the problem resolved, finally communicated well enough to get someone to cancel my account. I am not sorry to see them go.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#11 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:02 PM EDT
                          Jake-312935

                          The biggest problem I had with them was back in the day that their software was everywhere in your computer. I believe they were the original spyware.

                            #11.1 - Tue May 5, 2009 3:00 AM EDT
                            Reply
                            wonderer22

                            OK, trivia question...what was Prodigy?

                              Reply#12 - Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:23 PM EDT
                              RobZ

                              I say they should bring back Quantum-Link.  Or if you are really a geek, you should demand Game-Link be brought back!  Viva la 2600!

                                Reply#13 - Sat Apr 11, 2009 12:27 AM EDT
                                Glenn Harvey

                                I had a trial account with AOL many years ago. Compared with local dial-up internet providers, they were overpriced and slow to navigate. People paid a premium monthly price for the illusion of having their hand held at a time when local providers were making internet connection easy to use and inexpensive. Canceling at the end of the trial was a nightmare. Customer service seemed to not want to take "No" for an answer. The rep said she canceled the account but I still got billed for it. It took about 3 months for their billing department to relent. Turns out attorney generals from several states were investigating a slug of similar complaints at the time. Earthlink was much more responsive and upfront in their billing practices. Ms. Choney has given us a sentimental rosy view of a not-so-nice company.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#14 - Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:17 AM EDT
                                wadew

                                This author's premise for this article is that dialup is a dying business (duh! don't need a PHD to make that deduction) and just happens to have AOL in her crosshairs.

                                I hate that respected news institutions like MSNBC allow their "professional bloggers" to post this kind of uneducated and poorly researched editorials. If this reporter had even bothered doing the least bit of research she would have found that over the past 4 years, AOL has been shedding the old ISP skin in favor of their new business model in advertising, content, and people networks - as outlined on their corporate site:

                                Furthermore, if Mrs. Choney had bothered searching for "AOL" on google news, she would have found that the expert speculations in the past month has been that AOL is no longer on the selling block, but rather being positioned by Time Warner for a spin off.

                                So to you Mrs. Choney, perhaps reporting isn't the best career choice for you...and to you MSNBC, this article just goes to show that you are perpetuating the trends of fact-less reporting which is plaguing news media.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#15 - Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
                                FedUp46

                                Expert speculations that AOL is no longer for sale? What propaganda have you been reading? AOL is still for sale, but no one wants to buy the POS. That's well documented by analysts who follow/report onTime Warner and AOL. Since there are nu buyers for AOL, TW's only likely choice to jettison AOL is through a spin-off. And believe this, TW wants to dump AOL just as quickly as they possibly can!

                                  #15.1 - Thu May 21, 2009 3:20 PM EDT
                                  Reply
                                  You've got to be kidding Sam

                                  Good riddance to AOL. The epitome of slimy marketeers who showed no social conscience. Probably the lowest of their lows was, and still is their AIM free product. They provided no parental controls, and in fact engineered it to specifically thwart the efforts of parents to limit or otherwise restrict access. Block one port, the program would work around it automatically to use a different one.

                                  Good bye, and good riddance.

                                    Reply#16 - Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:43 AM EDT
                                    Pepsi-1024011

                                    I read that AOL cost 9.99 and now 11.99. I was paying $23.00 and some odd cents. I wasn't doing to bad with the first few updates from 6.0 to 7.0 an then 8.0 to 9.0 things got worse. I had someone remove AOL for me. He is a computer geek and he was up all night with it and found someone online who knew how to get AOL'S claws out. That was years ago. I would try and let auto fix fix things but auto fix would stall out. I found out years latter that AOL wasn't compatible with WindowsMe. Someone with XP said it wasn't bad. Now I know. If I had of known then I could of switched to XP years ago. I have only had XP a few years. But AOL auto fix would freeze up soon after the dictionary and that is how I found the dictionary and I could go in and add words. Words like lehr when spell check thought the only ways to spell it were Lear or leer. Peoples names when it is not a common name like Mary or Sue but is a name like my mothers which is Ertis. I went to school with a girl named Burma Golf and she married and her last name is Cantwell and spell check doesn't recognize it. There are the odd names that the stored dictionary doesn't recogonize. I would like to know HOW do I find the dictionary now that I no longer have AOL. Remember AOL froze up soon after it got to the dictionary. All I had to do was repeat what auto fix did. I just now did spell check and it only recognizes spellcheck as spell check and you have to put a Capital L in Lear and it only excepts online as on line. I want to add peoples names to the stored in dictionary.

                                      Reply#17 - Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:04 PM EDT
                                      Pepsi-1024011

                                      I only gave myself the name Pepsi but Newsvine thought I needed numbers behind it so I printed the confirmation page so I will have a copy of the numbers they gave me.

                                        Reply#18 - Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:17 PM EDT
                                        Stephen-1024754

                                        Thumbs up, wadew!! If Suzanne thinks AOL is only about access, she needs to do a lot more research. AOL switched years ago from an access business to a content provider fueled by ad revenue. AOL provides a wide range of great content, from money and finance to sports. Recently, AOL has hired many talented journalists from "old media" companies and as a result, AOL users have access to articles and information that they wouldn't find on sites that rely on feeds from major news sources. For that that want to turn their noses up at AOL because they don't want to be part of the "internet on training wheels", so be it. But those people should know that AOL also helped people move from training wheels to two wheels and continue to advance. AOL is putting users on Ducatis when it comes to entertaining information.

                                          Reply#19 - Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:39 AM EDT
                                          bradbwh

                                          It's not AOL that's an artifact from the past, it's this article's author. 

                                          AOL the ISP has been on the back burner for year. It's AOL the publishing / advertising company now. It's AOL, home of Engadget, TMZ, Spinner, Urlesque, Joystiq, and dozens of other A-level destinations. 

                                          If you think AOL is just an ISP, you haven't been paying attention. Like, for about three years.

                                            Reply#20 - Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:26 AM EDT
                                            lavacano201014

                                            No wonder AOL spammed me with pop-ups. They were pop-ups for their own stuff. Slightly more reasonable.

                                              #20.1 - Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:11 PM EDT
                                              Reply
                                              Sam-1024949

                                              OK Suzanne Choney, so you work for whom--Microsoft, NBC or MSN? And you're trying to equate the AOL brand with being ONLY an ISP? Hello? Wasn't MSN an ISP once? Were they ONLY an ISP? Are they still around?

                                              I totally agree with bradbwh's comment. Methinks thou doth too much protest.

                                              Have you read the analysis? AOL's ISP business is still immensely profitable, they still have more paying subscribers than anyone else. And like the Pew study discovered, some people don't want or need broadband or still can't get it, so AOL's many dial-up points of presence meet their needs. No other ISP has more. That makes that part of their business very relevant. If TimeWarner thinks making hundreds of millions of dollars is a pain and a drain then all of AOL would be better off on their own. What ever happened to the business idea that says making tons of money is a good thing for a company?

                                              Personally I think AOL should buy the other guys and run that pony as far as it will go because they can do it better than anyone else and make more money in the process.

                                              And it case you haven't noticed AOL has some other businesses going too. I suggest you learn what comScore is. I suggest you Google "hiring journalists". AOL has always been about content, not just about getting people online though they did do that for America.

                                                Reply#21 - Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
                                                TheIndependentThinker-711113

                                                I don't know anyone under 40 that uses AOL.

                                                  Reply#22 - Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:34 PM EDT
                                                  Andyroo31

                                                  News organizations have "death files", basically stories that can be dusted off and used whenever a recognizable figure passes away. It seems like Suzanne Choney found an old article about AOL dated around 2003 and updated a few ISP subscriber statistics (Suzanne, it hasn't been known as "America Online" for years). Bradbwh and Sam are both right on with their comments, this is just bad journalism (if you can call it that) with very little reality. The ISP is highly profitable, and AOL is still one of the top ISP's in America. However, with all the content (most people don't realize TMZ is AOL), a profitable search engine using Google, AIM, and all kinds of other assets (even Bebo), AOL has a lot going for it. No mention of Tim Armstrong taking over. No mention of much of anything else except old history. If this article is Ms. Choney's version of being "sentimental", I'd hate to see what she's like under worse circumstances.

                                                    Reply#23 - Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:54 PM EDT
                                                    Gary-1080666

                                                    Actually the parent of AOL was QuantumLink (QLink) which was for Commodore 64s and that predated Prodigy. There were a couple of short lived spinoffs of Q-Link. (AppleLink,(apple 2), Prommonade and PCLink (Tandy) Surprised The Source and Delphi weren't mentioned.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    Reply#24 - Mon May 4, 2009 5:06 PM EDT
                                                    Escamama

                                                    I was being charged $23.99 per month for really a really slow service and had a chance to get DSL from another company for $19.99 per month. I called to cancel using my cordless home phone. I was on the line for almost two hours when my phone started to "beep, beep" to tell me it needed to be recharged. I attempted three times at home to cancel and was given alternative numbers to use only to be given another number. Finally I called from my desk at work and after being on hold for three hours and 45 minutes, someone came on the line. I told her that I needed to cancel AOL service. She wanted to know why and I told her. She went on to tell me what I was going to miss out on, that she could speak to a supervisor to see if they could meet the price, yada, yada, yada. I interrupted and said, "Please just cancel". She continued with her pitch and I again interrupted and told her that I had attempted to cancel three times and was calling from work. She curtly replied, "Madam, it is not MY fault you chose to call during your work day!! There, are you happy, you have been canceled!!" I told her "hell yes I'm happy - that's all I wanted - thanks!"

                                                      Reply#25 - Tue May 5, 2009 5:37 PM EDT
                                                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                      Leave a Comment:
                                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                      Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                      FUN STUFF:
                                                      • Leaderboard |
                                                      • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                      • Top of the Vine |
                                                      • Newsvine Live |
                                                      • Newsvine Archives |
                                                      • The Greenhouse
                                                      COMPANY STUFF:
                                                      • Code of Honor |
                                                      • Company Info |
                                                      • Contact Us |
                                                      • Jobs |
                                                      • User Agreement |
                                                      • Privacy Policy |
                                                      • About our ads
                                                      LEGAL STUFF:
                                                      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com