Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

AT&T to buy territories from Verizon for $2.35B

Fri May 8, 2009 10:06 PM EDT
us-news, business, technology, us, tec, att, verizon-wireless
Peter Svensson, AP Technology Writer
Advertise | AdChoices

NEW YORK — AT&T Inc. said Friday it will buy the assets of Verizon Wireless in 79 mainly rural areas for $2.35 billion, a deal that will affect more than 1 million subscribers.

Verizon Wireless was forced to sell the service areas, which are spread over 18 states, to satisfy regulatory conditions of its purchase of Alltel Corp. The areas are mainly Alltel territories that overlap with Verizon's own coverage, but also some Verizon territories and areas covered by Rural Cellular, another carrier Verizon bought last year.

Dallas-based AT&T, the country's largest telecommunications company, was the expected winner of the auction for the assets.

AT&T is getting spectrum licenses, cell towers and 1.5 million subscribers in the deal. Since AT&T phones aren't compatible with Alltel or Verizon phones, these subscribers will need new phones to use AT&T's network.

AT&T said the deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter. After that, it will take less than a year to convert the areas to its own network technology, which will require about $400 million in investment.

The states with areas included in the deal are Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia and Wyoming.

AT&T also said it had agreed to sell five Centennial Communications Corp. service areas in Louisiana and Mississippi to Verizon Wireless for $240 million. AT&T announced plans to acquire Centennial in November 2008, and the deal is awaiting regulatory approval. AT&T said it expects that the sale of Centennial service areas that overlap with its own will boost the of approval.

Verizon Wireless is a joint venture of Verizon Communications Inc. of New York and Vodafone Group PLC of Britain.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Peter Svensson's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , New York
  • Public Discussion (15)
Dangwinewild

How much longer will it be until we see Goliath AT&T once again?

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sat May 9, 2009 3:24 AM EDT
Brian Ford

Your comment doesn't really make much sense, in the context of this story.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Sun May 10, 2009 1:38 AM EDT
Dangwinewild

Maybe not... wasn't AT&T broken up years ago along the same time frame as Bell Telephone? Called the nation's largest, AT&T is busy gobbling up Verizon, CellularOne, and who else? To me it appears AT&T is growing in mass again.

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Sun May 10, 2009 1:47 AM EDT
Tappy McWidestance

Verizon is being forced to sell because they already own other companies with service in these areas. If AT&T bought all of Verizon and Sprint, then your assertion would have more merit. As a result of this deal, Verizon will have more cash on hand to expand their other services.

Personally I wish Verizon would bring FIOS to my neighborhood so I could dump my AT&T DSL, but I don't see that happening any time soon.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Sun May 10, 2009 8:42 AM EDT
Chasing

AT&T broken up years ago

The old AT&T and "Ma Bell" were one in the same.

AT&T is busy gobbling up Verizon

They aren't doing anything of the sort, they're, in essence, swapping territories to appease regulators, after Verizon expanded into new areas, and areas where services overlapped. Both Verizon and AT&T are comprised of regional "Bells" that have been conglomerated - while Verizon cellular also has a hefty investment from overseas in the form of Vodaphone.

In any case, Verizon and AT&T use different cellular technology that are incompatible - any merger would be one hell of an expensive headache. Plus regulators would never allow it.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Sun May 10, 2009 1:31 PM EDT
Dangwinewild

Thanks for schooling me... I live in a region dominated by AT&T. Recently forced to change from 3G network to 5G. The claim was AT&T was not compatible but it is compatible to 3G because I have used it for the last 2 years after AT&T bought out Cellularone.

Now they increased the price on a plan I never wanted to change out of and they didn't change me out. They just say I needed to go to the 5G network and it costs more.

Any way, I focused on AT&T getting bigger when I should have been looking at Verizon forced to exchange.

What else should I be made aware of?

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Sun May 10, 2009 2:07 PM EDT
Brian Ford

What else should I be made aware of?

I'd say the biggest point is that there is a lot of healthy competition between the various companies. (Sprint, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, etc.)

There's really no risk of AT&T earning a monopoly sized slice of the pie, at least in the way you were thinking earlier.

  • 2 votes
#1.6 - Sun May 10, 2009 3:15 PM EDT
Dangwinewild

I'd say the biggest point is that there is a lot of healthy competition between the various companies. (Sprint, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, etc.)

AT&T is the only cell game here. No Sprint, no T-mobile, No Verizon, Yes CenturyTel hard lines. Yes there is Voip Via cable which I use at home. Well I suppose that's healthy competition considering the rural region.

  • 1 vote
#1.7 - Sun May 10, 2009 3:39 PM EDT
Kirk Lennon

Recently forced to change from 3G network to 5G.

Huh? They're still working on transitioning to their 3G network, which will itself transition through a few stages over the next several years before actual 4G service begins to come out.

  • 1 vote
#1.8 - Sun May 10, 2009 6:28 PM EDT
Dangwinewild

Was on a 3G through Cellularone sim-card... But carried over the AT&T network. They said the card was incompatible and we needed to upgrade to the 5G sim-card AT&T.

I do know in Duluth Verizon offers 5G and today I see through the link Brian Ford provided this side of the lake shows complete coverage through Verizon. Yet we have never been aware until now that Verizon was also supported on this side I suppose because AT&T sends us their mailers, have their local stores in Superior since they were Cellularone stores, and AT&T bought out the local Cellularone.

    #1.9 - Sun May 10, 2009 9:47 PM EDT
    Kirk Lennon

    Nobody is the world offers 5G service, and neither AT&T nor Verizon will be offering what can properly be called 4G service for years from now. The current transition is from 2G or 2.5G to 3G. Either your Duluth store time-warped back from ten years in the future, or somebody is utterly confused on terminology.

      #1.10 - Mon May 11, 2009 10:25 AM EDT
      Dangwinewild

      I'm looking into it. Could not find the current contract we have. Maybe the sales girl was confused and gave me bad info because I argued this point wit her in the store. My wife began getting upset with me because I did put up an argument. We still went with what the sales girl said we had to do.

      If I have to I'll call the local store and post back.

        #1.11 - Mon May 11, 2009 12:49 PM EDT
        Dangwinewild

        Got it. The contract did say we purchased a 5G sim-card but I called the store and the sales guy I talked to said she made a big mistake because they don't offer 5G service. It was for the 3G network.

          #1.12 - Mon May 11, 2009 1:03 PM EDT
          Reply
          Brian Ford

          AT&T is the only cell game here.

          Where is here?

          In Duluth, MN?

          Seems like Verizon has pretty good coverage there.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#2 - Sun May 10, 2009 4:04 PM EDT
          Dangwinewild

          NE Superior- just used your link to check and it shows Verizon. This must be a case of sharing or overlapping regions. There is an AT&T store here but I do believe the closest Verizon is in Duluth. I had no idea I had Verizon for a choice. Thanks.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#3 - Sun May 10, 2009 4:24 PM EDT
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy |
          • About our ads
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com