Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Experts say GM bankruptcy almost inevitable

Sun May 10, 2009 1:12 PM EDT
us-news, business, us, bankruptcy, gm, inevitable
Tom Krisher, AP Auto Writer
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 4 photos
<p>File - General Motors world headquarters is shown in Detroit,  in this Tuesday, April 21, 2009 file photo. General Motors Corp. said Thursday May 7, 2009 it lost $6 billion in the first quarter and spent $10.2 billion more cash than it took in, as a sales slump cut revenue by $20 billion. The nation's biggest domestic automaker lost $9.78 per share, compared with a loss of $3.3 billion, or $5.80 per share, in the year-ago period. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya, File)  </p>

File - General Motors world headquarters is shown in Detroit, in this Tuesday, April 21, 2009 file photo. General Motors Corp. said Thursday May 7, 2009 it lost $6 billion in the first quarter and spent $10.2 billion more cash than it took in, as a sales slump cut revenue by $20 billion. The nation's biggest domestic automaker lost $9.78 per share, compared with a loss of $3.3 billion, or $5.80 per share, in the year-ago period. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya, File)

Advertise | AdChoices

DETROIT — For General Motors Corp., the task at hand is so difficult that experts say a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing is all but inevitable.

To remake itself outside of court, GM must persuade bondholders to swap $27 billion in debt for 10 percent of its risky stock. On top of that, the automaker must work out deals with its union, announce factory closures, cut or sell brands and force hundreds of dealers out of business — all in three weeks.

"I just don't see how it's possible, given all of the pieces," said Stephen J. Lubben, a professor at Seton Hall University School of Law who specializes in bankruptcy.

GM, which is living on $15.4 billion in federal aid, faces a June 1 government deadline to complete its restructuring plan. If it can't finish in time, the company will follow Detroit competitor Chrysler LLC into bankruptcy protection.

Although company executives said last week they would still prefer to restructure out of court, experts say all GM is doing now is lining up majorities of stakeholders to make its court-supervised reorganization move more quickly.

"If we need to pursue bankruptcy, we will make sure that we do it in an expeditious fashion. The exact strategies I'm not getting into today, but we'll be ready to go if that's required," CEO Fritz Henderson said last week.

The threat of bankruptcy, however, may be just a negotiating ploy to pull reluctant bondholders into the equity swap deal. In Chrysler's case, some secured debtholders resisted taking roughly 30 cents on the dollar for what they were owed, but most gave in after they were identified in court documents.

Henderson, who took over in March when the government ousted Rick Wagoner, said last week there's still time to get everything done by the deadline, although he conceded it will be difficult to meet a government requirement that 90 percent of its thousands of bondholders agree to the stock swap.

The biggest obstacle to GM restructuring out of court appears to be its bondholders, who have been reluctant to sign on to the stock swap when the government and United Auto Workers union would get far more stock in exchange for debts owed by GM.

GM has proposed issuing 62 billion new shares, 100 times more than the 611 million now offered publicly.

Even though the U.S. government has agreed to back up GM and Chrysler new-car warranties, potential car buyers already view GM as if it's in bankruptcy, reflected by the company's step revenue drop in the latest quarter, Lubben said. On Thursday, GM posted a $6 billion first-quarter loss and said its revenue dropped plunged by nearly half, largely because bankruptcy fears scared customers away from showrooms.

"I don't think anyone is buying cars from a company who is wringing their hands about a potential bankruptcy for the past year or so," he said.

Under Chapter 11, a company can stay in operation under court protection while sheds debts and unprofitable assets to emerge in a stronger financial position.

At this point, GM needs to resolve the uncertainty and get in and out of bankruptcy as quickly as possible, Lubben said.

The company is talking with the UAW and Canadian auto workers unions about concessions, including getting the UAW to take roughly 39 percent of its stock in exchange for half of the $20 billion GM must pay into a union-run trust that will take over retiree health care payments next year.

About 50 percent of the stock would go to the government for its loans. GM said last week it would need another $2.6 billion in May and $9 billion more for the rest of the year, bringing the total to $27 billion.

One percent would go to current shareholders, with bondholders getting the other 10 percent.

Bondholders are reluctant to take the deal because the government and UAW are getting far bigger stakes in the company, said Kevin Tynan, an industry analyst for Argus Research in New York.

"When you look across at what the union is getting and what the government is getting, to expect them to take 10 percent is just unrealistic," he said.

Cutting dealers also remains a huge hurdle, with GM hoping to shed 2,600 of its 6,246 dealerships by 2010.

But dealers are protected by state franchise laws, and trying to shed them outside of bankruptcy would result in either millions of dollars in payments or multiple lengthy lawsuits, Lubben said.

"That means you've got to negotiate with each one of those dealers individually."

Also, GM on Friday told its major parts suppliers that it would move up payments due on June 2 to May 28.

Company spokesman Dan Flores said it was being done to help the suppliers at a critical time, but he denied that the payments were pulled ahead of a potential June 1 bankruptcy filing.

GM has begun to temporarily close 13 assembly plants for up to 11 weeks through mid-July in an effort to control inventory. With Chrysler plants also shut down during its bankruptcy proceedings, parts suppliers will soon have no income and could go under.

It would help speed up GM's stay in bankruptcy court if it could pull together big blocks of stakeholders to agree on reducing debt or changing other stakes, said Robert Gordon, head of the corporate restructuring and bankruptcy group at the Clark Hill PLC law firm in Detroit.

During its quest for government aid, GM executives said bankruptcy would severely cut their sales, with research showing that people would shy away from GM vehicles for fear that warranties would not be backed and parts would not be available.

Tynan said the executives now can't change their story, even though they likely know that bankruptcy is inevitable.

"They're sort of morally obligated to say 'we're intent on doing this outside of bankruptcy,'" he said. "But at the end off the day, they just want the magnitude of the restructuring to get done."

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Tom Krisher's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Canada , Detroit
  • Public Discussion (15)
Absolute Zero

I grew up right outside of Detroit. This is really sad, but necessary. I hope there comes a day that our auto industry is strong once again. Time will tell, I guess? :(

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sun May 10, 2009 2:57 PM EDT
blaze1024

They probably wouldn't be in this mess if 10 yeas ago they started thinking about building high quality fuel efficient commuter cars instead of peddling gas guzzling trucks and SUV's. Unfortunately it's an old mindset thats been hard for Detroit to escape from.

I have been constantly ridiculed by my friends for supporting the American auto industry. All my friends have moved up to imports such as Honda while I continued to support Detroit. It's becoming much more difficult for me to continue supporting Detroit especial considering that every American car I have owned has spent far more time in the shop then the imports my friends drive.

My two year old American car was in the shop so much last year that i think I drove a rental car more then more then it.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Sun May 10, 2009 5:52 PM EDT
Albyf1z

I still support the American Automotive brands. I have had zero problems with any GM vehicle that I've owned and neither has really anyone that I know. Except for basic maintenance their vehicles have been fine. Now in the 80's and 90's the big three did put out some bad vehicles that branded each of them as cheap unreliable cars. Nowadays I don't think there is much difference in reliability between imports and domestics. Right now Detriot is feeling the pinch not necessarily that their cars aren't selling but because of a mishmosh of issues that are occuring. First, it's really expensive to keep up pensions and union benefits. Second, GMAC is no longer in the Mortgage business because of that crash. When it crashed so did a LARGE cash flow to help offset losses. I'm not going to go into a large list but some of the other big issues is CEO pensions/bonuses, vehicles between brands that were the exact same but ate away at resources and competed against each other, i.e. cobalt/G3, Mountaineer/Explorer, Jeep Compass/Dodge Nitro. Once they put things back into perspective for themselves I think the big three will be ok.

And if you don't believe me that their vehicles are selling, then check this out:

http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/01/news/companies/auto_sales/index.htm?section=money_topstories

The actual numbers are less than what they were a year ago but GM with 170k+ vehicles sold is still better than Toyota's 126k+ sales. Also granted this is data for one month but if you check out each month you'll see that the cars/trucks to sell and are competitive.

  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Sun May 10, 2009 6:31 PM EDT
kelvins273

The sad thing is that GM makes very reliable cars (at least since they stopped making the Chevy Nova back in the 70s). Their problem seems to be that they make stupid decisions like making new 6-cylinder Impalas slightly less efficient than the older models during a time when gas prices were constantly going up.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Sun May 10, 2009 6:38 PM EDT
Absolute Zero

I agree, they should have focused on fuel efficient automobiles many years ago. I don’t feel sorry for the company it’s self, but for the people who are losing their jobs. The kids who can no longer go to college because of those lost jobs. It’s sad! I have driven nothing but American-made cars and haven’t had a problem out of any of them. I would just as soon pedal a bike before putting my a$$ in an import. Sorry!! But that’s how I feel.

  • 2 votes
#2.3 - Sun May 10, 2009 6:40 PM EDT
Reply
Xerxes-727854

The biggest obstacle to GM restructuring out of court appears to be its bondholders, who have been reluctant to sign on to the stock swap when the government and United Auto Workers union would get far more stock in exchange for debts owed by GM.

GM has proposed issuing 62 billion new shares, 100 times more than the 611 million now offered publicly.

So GM wants its bondholders (aka lenders) to swap their hard-earned money for GM stocks. The, GM will issue 62 billion new shares, effectively sending the value of a GM stock to zero.

Gee, now wonder the bondholders are against such a plan.

    Reply#3 - Sun May 10, 2009 6:36 PM EDT
    Tappy McWidestance

    So GM wants its bondholders (aka lenders) to swap their hard-earned money for GM stocks. The, GM will issue 62 billion new shares, effectively sending the value of a GM stock to zero. Gee, now wonder the bondholders are against such a plan.

    Of course, if they don't accept the plan, their bonds will be with zero anyway when GM goes out of business. When you buy unsecured bonds you have to accept the risk. You get a higher interest rate on the bond to compensate for the risk. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. The bond holders knew the risks when they bought GM.

    • 4 votes
    #3.1 - Sun May 10, 2009 7:11 PM EDT
    Reply
    nodomestic4evr

    GM should have been allowed to fail last fall. GM was unofficially bankrupt before they went to Capitol Hill and begged for taxpayers money. Those idiots in DC just made it few months longer to realize bankruptcy. They should have learned their lessons from the oil embargo in the 70's. GM should have also improved their quality and reliability back then instead of just recently. It's too late to earn my business.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Sun May 10, 2009 8:54 PM EDT
    Derek M.

    ^Agreed, kind of. Personally, I drive a Toyota, and have had absolutely zero problems with it. All I've done is kept up regular maintenance, and replaced consumable parts (clutch, rotors, etc...). My 4Runner has around 188--- km's on it, and by no means has it had an easy life since I got it. Ditches, mud pits, logs, stumps, snow banks.... just a hint of what I throw at it.

    What I'm getting at here is this: Toyota, and other import vehicles, have a reputation for being reliable...and they deliver. Yes, many people drive their Fords, Dodges, GMs under the same conditions I drive in, and yes, their vehicles fare just as good. But what has driven me away, and perhaps many other people, is the fact that they all aren't that way. I've seen Dodges that went through 6 or 7 computers before they got one that didn't disintegrate, GMs that blow head gaskets like I blow my nose, and oodles of Fords with turbo problems. The thing, I think, that drives people away from the Big 3 is that the reputation just isn't there.

    That being said, however, they do bring something to the table that no other automaker can match-trucks. Full-size pickups are, as I see it, are non-domestic kryptonite. Yes, the Tundra is a good truck, but sadly no, it will not haul your 5th wheel trailer, function as a flat-deck work truck, pack around a trailer full of horses, etc... (not without some bad arse suspension/engine/transmission upgrades anyways) Same deal with the Nissan Titan. Yes, they are good, reliable trucks, but when it comes to heavy-duty trucks, the Big 3 has it covered. (Personally I'm considering a Dodge 3500 diesel when my Toyota is toast...maybe by then I'll have enough money to afford a used one :S )

    Aside from heavy-duty trucks, pretty well all domestic vehicles do stack up quite well against there non-domestic counterparts, however, the reputation just isn't there anymore. But yeah, this is how I see it, feel free to agree or disagree!

    • 3 votes
    Reply#5 - Sun May 10, 2009 11:14 PM EDT
    dubldoc

    I used to be a true blue 'Buy American' redneck, but I had so many blown motors and the like that I said 'hell yes' to my new Lexus (not a single problem). Detroit still makes a pretty good truck..I have a Denali XL (no MAJOR problems, just trim stuff) that will serve till I find something better. I agree, Detroit had MANY years to improve (by leading, not following) and to ask for more time at this point seems unrealistic...

    • 2 votes
    Reply#6 - Mon May 11, 2009 8:30 AM EDT
    Fiscally Responsible

    Good riddance to GM and Chrysler. It's too bad that our elected officials kept them afloat this long, at our expense. Ford was smart enough to realize that accepting the bailout was akin to admiting they were not financially viable, which would further hurt sales. Just another of many errors on the part of the overpaid management of GM/Chrysler. The UAW is also to blame for decades of undeserved labor contracts founded upon gluttony. Paying workers when they are not working, as guaranteed by the UAW contracts, is a discrace to American labor workers. I guess I should just accept that I am now living in the Socialist States of America (SSA) in which the true working class (now known as the rich) will be required to support the lazy and non-productive.

      Reply#7 - Mon May 11, 2009 12:43 PM EDT
      kelvins273

      I agree with you about Chrysler. They were always the least of the big three and most famous for making cars that didn't start. It's kind of a shame to see GM go, though. They used to make some pretty good cars, and even their current cars were pretty reliable if you took care of them.

      I do take issue with your little rant about the "nonproductive" working class. It's true that the UAW got a lot of sweetheart deals out of the auto companies, especially GM (they don't call it Generous Motors for nothing). However, much of the American workforce is non-unionized and often working for people who pressure them into working off the clock and otherwise abuse them.

      • 1 vote
      #7.1 - Tue May 12, 2009 3:21 AM EDT
      Fiscally Responsible

      kelvins273, I think you may have misunderstood me. I was not complaining about the working class, I was complaining about UAW workers who get laid off and then receive nearly 100% of their salary to do nothing. The money for this comes from the taxpayers (unemployment) and the shareholders of the automaker. I have no complaint about anyone (union or otherwise) who works an honest day for their pay. I am vehemently opposed to social programs from the government that encourage people not to work. I have several family members that were coal miners in PA in the 80s when all the mines started shutting down. They sat around doing nada, while receiving unemployment, which the government kept extending for longer periods. Did they look for a job during that time? Nope, not a single day and when unemployment finally ran out, they whined about how the government should help them out! There were jobs out there, but they were not going to work for minimum wage. And as an added incentive not to work, their kids got to go to college for FREE on hardship grants. Meanwhile, my parents were working two jobs and the thermostat at home was set to 50 degrees all Winter long. During the Summer, it got so hot without air conditioning, that we spent our free time at the mall window shopping. I'm not complaining about my situation, mind you, because it was what America is all about... working hard to get ahead. Nowadays, if you do nothing, you get all kinds of handouts. It makes me sick.

      • 1 vote
      #7.2 - Tue May 12, 2009 7:40 AM EDT
      Reply
      kelvins273

      Well, at least the coal miners had to work long hours in dangerous conditions for years before getting the handouts. In the old days, UAW workers were doing practically nothing on the job. I had a neighbor who worked for one of GM's parts plants before they were spun off into Delphi. He routinely came home hours early because there were three people doing a job that required only one. I'm pretty sure his friends clocked him out so he would get a full day's pay. But if your complaint's only about ridiculous union contracts that reward laziness, then we agree.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#8 - Tue May 12, 2009 9:00 PM EDT
      Doug S.-934339

      The Heartbeat of America ehh?

      Sounds to me like a trojan horse.

        Reply#9 - Wed May 13, 2009 1:19 PM EDT
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com