Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

US audit faults security spending in Afghanistan

Tue May 19, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
politics, us, afghanistan, spending
Richard Lardner, Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The military command overseeing $15 billion in U.S. programs to develop Afghanistan's security forces cannot be sure the money is being managed effectively, a top government watchdog warned Tuesday.

In its first audit report since being formed a year ago, the office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction says the Combined Security Transition Command "lacks effective contract oversight capabilities."

It is the command's responsibility to ensure U.S. tax dollars are spent properly, the audit says. That means command staff must visit locations where contractors are working to verify that contractors are following the terms of their deals with the government.

"This is not happening," the audit said.

Arnold Fields, the special inspector general, said during a telephone interview with reporters there is no substitute for firsthand inspections.

"Those folks need to be on site for an extended period of time," said Fields, a retired Marine Corps general.

He acknowledged that tough conditions in Afghanistan can make long-term visits difficult. But the huge sums of money being spent require that level of oversight, he said.

Fields' office examined one training contract worth $404 million and found the official responsible for monitoring contractor performance was located at an Army office in Maryland — nine time zones away.

The report does not name the contractor because the auditors did not assess the vendor's performance. But in comments from command authorities in an appendix to the report, the company is identified as MPRI. Headquartered in Alexandria, Va., MPRI is a large consulting firm led by retired U.S. military officers.

The government contracting official in Maryland belatedly appointed a representative in Afghanistan to watch over the work, according to the audit.

But the auditors said the Afghan-based representative had limited contracting experience, had too little time to make field visits and was on a six-month assignment to the country — too brief to dig into details.

The mission of the Combined Security Transition Command, based at Camp Eggers in Kabul, is to help Afghanistan's government train and equip its army and national police. The command is led by a two-star Army general and includes officers from other members of the international coalition in Afghanistan.

In their comments, command officials didn't dispute the information in the audit. But they said they are concerned that the report gives the incorrect impression there is no oversight of MPRI's work.

The officials also said most of MPRI's employees work at Afghanistan's defense and interior ministries in Kabul and are seen regularly by command staff.

"The contractors who operate outside Kabul are watched at a commensurate level by our subordinate commands," the comments read.

__

On the Net:

Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction: http://www.sigar.mil/

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Richard Lardner's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Afghanistan , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (1)
Paul Lucero

The article illuminates the colossal waste of money the Government is spending on a place that will get ZERO benefits from the expenses.

"$15 billion in U.S. programs to develop Afghanistan's security forces"

How about we use this money to rebase all the troops we have in the middle east back to the rust belt to boost the economy here.

Idiots

    Reply#1 - Tue May 19, 2009 12:06 PM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com