Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Obama signs bill to cut wasteful defense spending

Fri May 22, 2009 9:15 AM EDT
business, politics, us, obama, barack-obama, military, purchasing
Julie Pace, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>President Barack Obama delivers an address on national security, terrorism, and the closing of Guantanamo Bay prison, Thursday, May 21, 2009, at the National Archives in Washington.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) </p>

President Barack Obama delivers an address on national security, terrorism, and the closing of Guantanamo Bay prison, Thursday, May 21, 2009, at the National Archives in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama granted the Pentagon new power to rein in wasteful defense spending Friday, a change he said was long overdue.

Standing with leading congressional players on the South Lawn of the White House, Obama signed the weapons acquisition overhaul bill, which passed unanimously in both the House and Senate this week. The president said the bill will crack down on defense programs with huge cost overruns and increase competition for contracts.

"Every penny we waste on this effort because of no-bid contracts or cost overruns is not only an affront to American taxpayers, it's an affront to our military," Obama said.

The president said he would do whatever it takes to ensure the safety of the American people, but rejected the notion "that we need to waste billions of dollars to keep this nation secure."

Obama cited one government study which found that roughly $295 billion of taxpayers' money was wasted last year on cost overruns involving 95 defense programs.

"At a time when we're fighting two wars and facing a serious deficit, this is inexcusable and unconscionable," he said.

Lawmakers passed the legislation with unusual speed to meet Obama's request that they get it to his desk before the Memorial Day holiday.

The bill creates a new director of independent cost assessment, appointed by the president and subject to Senate confirmation. Early warning systems will also be put in place to address cost problems before they get out of hand.

There are no predictions for how much will be saved by increasing control over Pentagon procurement practices, but with multibillion-dollar cost overruns a common occurrence, lawmakers said there is potential for huge financial rewards.

Obama has emphasized the need to make Pentagon operations more cost-efficient. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has taken steps to cut the military budget by curtailing weapons — including the F-22 fighter — that cost more than originally expected or are behind in development.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Julie Pace's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (27)
Rixar13

Obama signed into law a bill aimed at tightening the controls on defense spending, saying it is "long overdue."

Obama noted one study which found that roughly $295 billion of taxpayers' money was wasted last year on cost overruns involving 95 defense programs.

President Obama finally ends the free ride of GOP Policy for defence contractors.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Fri May 22, 2009 9:57 AM EDT
Paul Lucero

Buddy what are you talking about. California had the biggest collection of defense companies since the 1950's. That state was and is predominately operated by the Democrat party.

This is the same with MA, NY and FL where most of the large defense contractors are located.

Get this BOTH parties suck! The screw their voters and you and I are paying the price for a system that has NO controls and this bill does nothing to SAVE Americans any money.

READ THE SUMMARY! IT adds more FEDERAL jobs and COST!!

MORE COSTS in adding more FEDERAL JOBS

======

S.454
Title: A bill to improve the organization and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition of major weapon systems, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Levin, Carl [MI] (introduced 2/23/2009) Cosponsors (14)
Related Bills: H.RES.432, H.RES.463, H.R.1830, H.R.2101
Latest Major Action: 5/21/2009 Cleared for White House.
Latest Conference Report: 111-124 (in Congressional Record H5795-5805)

SUMMARY AS OF:
5/7/2009--Passed Senate amended. (There are 2 other summaries)

Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 - Title I: Acquisition Organization - (Sec. 101) Requires a report from: (1) the service acquisition executive of each military department to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (Under Secretary) describing major weapon system strategy and engineering capabilities of their department; and (2) the Under Secretary to the congressional defense committees on the system engineering capabilities of the Department of Defense (DOD).

(Sec. 102) Establishes within DOD a Director of Developmental Test and Evaluation to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary on DOD developmental test and evaluation. Outlines related duties. Requires: (1) the Director to report annually to Congress on the developmental test and evaluation activities of the major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) and major automated information system programs of DOD; and (2) departmental service acquisition executives to report to the Director on the extent to which the test organizations of their department have in place, or have effective plans to develop, adequate numbers of development test and evaluation personnel with appropriate expertise.

(Sec. 103) Requires the Director of Defense Research and Engineering to: (1) periodically review and assess the technological maturity and integration risk of critical technologies of MDAPs, and submit review and assessment findings to the Under Secretary; (2) report annually to the Secretary and Congress on the maturity and risk of such technologies; and (3) report to the defense and appropriations committees on additional resources required to implement DOD system critical technology assessments.

(Sec. 104) Establishes within DOD a Director of Independent Cost Assessment to advise the Secretary, Under Secretary, and Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) on cost estimation and analyses for DOD acquisition programs. Outlines related duties. Requires the: (1) Secretary of each military department to report promptly to such Director the results of all MDAP cost estimates, analyses, and studies conducted by that department; (2) Director to report annually to the Secretary, each Under Secretary, and Congress summarizing DOD cost estimation and analysis activities; and (3) Director to review existing DOD systems and methods for tracking and assessing operating and support costs on MDAPs, and submit review findings to the Secretary, who shall submit such findings to the defense and appropriations committees. Directs the Comptroller General (CG) to report to such committees on growth in operating and support costs for major weapon systems.

(Sec. 105) Directs the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) to seek and consider input from commanders of combatant commands prior to identifying joint military requirements. Requires the CG to report to the defense committees on the implementation of such requirement.

(Sec. 106) Requires that, if the Director of the Department of Defense Test Resource Management Center is not serving concurrently as the Director of Developmental Test and Evaluation, then the Director's certification concerning the adequacy of proposed DOD departmental test and evaluation budgets shall be submitted directly and independently to the Secretary.

Title II: Acquisition Policy - (Sec. 201) Requires: (1) the Secretary to develop and implement mechanisms to ensure the consideration of tradeoffs between major weapon system cost, schedule, and performance; (2) the JROC, upon recommending a new joint military requirement, to submit it to the Under Secretary for review and concurrence or non-concurrence; and (3) the Under Secretary to ensure that DOD guidance on MDAPs requires the milestone decision authority to conduct an analysis of alternatives during the material solution analysis phase of each MDAP.

(Sec. 202) Requires the milestone decision authority for an MDAP to have received a preliminary design review and conducted a formal post-preliminary design review assessment before an MDAP may receive Milestone B or Key Decision Point B approval. Directs the Under Secretary to ensure that DOD guidance on MDAPs requires a critical design review and a formal post-critical design review assessment for each MDAP.

(Sec. 203) Requires the Secretary to: (1) ensure that each MDAP acquisition plan includes measures to maximize competition at both the prime contract and subcontract level throughout the MDAP's life cycle; and (2) modify current DOD acquisition regulations to ensure competitive prototyping for MDAPs. Directs the: (1) milestone decision authority for an MDAP, whenever such authority exercises a waiver of the requirement for MDAP prototypes on the basis of excessive cost, to notify the CG of such waiver; and (2) CG to review the waiver rationale and report review results to the defense and appropriations committees.

(Sec. 204) Requires the Secretary to terminate an MDAP that meets or exceeds its critical cost growth threshold, unless the Secretary determines that the program's continuation is essential to national security and certifies such fact to Congress. Outlines additional requirements with respect to such certification. Requires the Secretary to report to Congress on terminated programs.

(Sec. 205) Directs the Under Secretary to revise the Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to address organizational conflicts of interests by contractors in the acquisition of major weapon systems. Requires the Secretary to establish within DOD the Organizational Conflict of Interest Review Board to advise the Under Secretary on policies relating to such conflicts of interest.

(Sec. 206) Requires the Secretary to carry out a program to recognize excellent performance by individuals and teams of members of the Armed Forces and civilian DOD personnel in the acquisition of products and services. Authorizes cash bonuses as part of the program.

(Sec. 207) Directs the Under Secretary to review existing (and if necessary, prescribe additional) guidance governing implementation of the Earned Value Management requirements and reporting for DOD contracts.

(Sec. 208) Includes as a national security objective of the national technology and industrial base maintaining critical design skills to ensure that the Armed Forces are provided with systems capable of ensuring technological superiority over potential adversaries. Requires the Secretary, upon termination of an MDAP, to notify Congress of the effects of the termination on such objectives.

(Sec. 209) Directs DOD's Chief Management Officer to report to Congress identifying and addressing weaknesses in operation that hinder the capacity to assemble and assess reliable cost information on the systems and assets to be acquired under MDAPs. Requires such Officer, in preparing the report, to seek and consider the input of the chief management officers of the military departments.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Fri May 22, 2009 11:33 AM EDT
Reply
KyleN

It's a good idea and I could get behind it much more if the President and Congress hadn't already promised far more money than this to even more wasteful purposes. In that light this seems less a truly cost saving move and more a political stunt.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Fri May 22, 2009 10:43 AM EDT
Bubba-939441

That's what dems do.  Cut defense and send the money to Mexico for abortions. 

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Fri May 22, 2009 10:53 AM EDT
janice-376027

bubba - such a well thought out comment....

  • 2 votes
#2.2 - Fri May 22, 2009 11:09 AM EDT
Bubba-939441

Thanks Janice, true too!

    #2.3 - Fri May 22, 2009 1:44 PM EDT
    janice-376027

    I was being sarcastic - I believe one must give thought to issues and if they have opinions, it's good to articulate them. It would have been more effective for me if you would have written something that showed why you think this rather than the throwaway line.

      #2.4 - Sat May 23, 2009 7:50 AM EDT
      Reply
      TheEarthIsNotMyMother

      This is what democrats are good at--cutting defense and defending terrorists.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#3 - Fri May 22, 2009 10:58 AM EDT
      Tlang

      OMG! The terrorists are gonna get us!!

      • 1 vote
      #3.1 - Fri May 22, 2009 11:42 AM EDT
      California Militia

      its not the terrorists you have to worry about. Our military can keep them at bay with the blood of freedom. what you have to watch for is people who think they can run your life better than you getting into political office.

      the pen is mightier than the sword.

        #3.2 - Fri May 22, 2009 11:56 AM EDT
        Frank BlackDeleted
        Tlang

        I dont know, I've been stabbed by both and I have to say, the sword hurt alot more.

          #3.4 - Fri May 22, 2009 1:59 PM EDT
          Reply
          MedTech

          That's what dems do. Cut defense and send the money to Mexico for abortions.

          This is what democrats are good at--cutting defense and defending terrorists.

          Oh brother.....

          ***rolls eyes****

          • 1 vote
          Reply#4 - Fri May 22, 2009 11:11 AM EDT
          Frank BlackDeleted
          California Militia

          " feel your pain over a typical rightwingnut's knee jerk reaction"...

          i love this one... can i use it 1000 times to when I have nothing of any merit to add? Please please please...

            #4.2 - Sat May 23, 2009 8:13 PM EDT
            Reply
            Peggy97478

            What a freakin' joke! This Amatuer Hour Wonder has done more wasteful spending than every President in our history, COMBINED!!!! His agenda is to bring our economy down for his Saul-Alinsky Utopia wet dreams! If this doofus is not booted out in 2012, the Kool-Aid drinkers who put him in office will be walking around with wheelbarrows full of worthless dollars, trying to buy a loaf of bread!

            • 2 votes
            Reply#5 - Fri May 22, 2009 11:50 AM EDT
            Frank BlackDeleted
            PK Raja

            Peggy - .................................. never mind!

            • 1 vote
            #5.2 - Fri May 22, 2009 12:15 PM EDT
            Tlang

            I guess it was better when Bush was spending trillions in Iraq? Bring our economy down? I don't know if youve been watching the stock market lately but it's already down. I think he will probably get another term in office in 2012, I mean you guys did re-elect the biggest moron in presidential history to a second term.

            I thinks its funny how mad people are at Obama for "bringing down our nation" when Bush had already accomplished that before Obama was even in the picture, but hey, Bush did it to protect us from the terrorists. America is now safer because of Bush, Broke, but safer. Damn Obama is killing us..............Mission Accomplished!

              #5.3 - Fri May 22, 2009 2:06 PM EDT
              rz-547309

              So Tlang...you're saying that Bush dropped the DOW, how? I remember the DOW at the close of 14,164.53 on Oct. 9, 2007. The DOW started falling around September of 2008...when it was apparent obama was going to win...

              How did Bush bring down the nation? Safer but broke? How?

                #5.4 - Fri May 22, 2009 3:12 PM EDT
                Tlang

                So the apparent election of Obama brought down the DOW? Thats amazing!!! I am pretty sure Bush was still in power then, but I guess not....good stuff

                All Bush had to do was talk and he brought our nation down. We had one of the worst foreign relations with ally countries in our history, He started meaningless wars and committed crimes against humanity with Guantanamo and using torcher to get information. Americans are disliked in most of Europe and many other nations because of the Bush Regime, Our dollar was crap during the whole second term Bush served, and he profited financially from 9/11. Is that enough information, or do I need to go further, cause I can?

                  #5.5 - Fri May 22, 2009 3:25 PM EDT
                  Tlang

                  Just some facts for ya just in case you need some.....

                  Under the Bush Administration, real GDP grew at an average annual rate of 2.5 percent,[75] considerably below the average for business cycles from 1949 to 2000.[76][77] Bush entered office with the Dow Jones Industrial Average at 10,587, and the average peaked in October 2007 at over 14,000. When Bush left office, the average was at 7,949, one of the lowest levels of his presidency.[78] Unemployment originally rose from 4.2 percent in January 2001 to 6.3 percent in June 2003, but subsequently dropped to 4.5 percent as of July 2007.[79] Adjusted for inflation, median household income dropped by $1,175 between 2000 and 2007,[80] while Professor Ken Homa of Georgetown University has noted that "after-tax median household income increased by 2%"[81] The poverty rate increased from 11.3% in 2000 to 12.3% in 2006 after peaking at 12.7% in 2004. [82] By October 2008, due to increases in domestic and foreign spending,[83] the national debt had risen to $11.3 trillion,[84][85] an increase of over 100% from the start of the year 2000 when the debt was $5.6 trillion.[86][87] The perception of President Bush's effect on the economy is significantly affected by partisanship.[88]

                    #5.6 - Fri May 22, 2009 3:43 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    Tlang

                    And some more.....

                    The United Kingdom's Daily Mirror newspaper ran the following headline the day of Bush's reelection: “How Can 59,054,087 People Be So Dumb?”, underlining Bush's unpopularity in some sections of the British press. Among the population of Britain, two-thirds of the population holds[when?] a dim view of Bush, a figure that is duplicated in Canada.

                    Bush fares[when?] slightly better in Italy, where just over half of the population has a negative view, but much worse in other countries. “Three-quarters of those in Spain and more than 80% in France and Germany had a negative view of President Bush's role in world affairs."[114] In Turkey, 72% of those polled said that George Bush's reelection made them “feel worse about Americans".[113] In November 2006, a survey taken in Great Britain, Mexico, and Canada showed that they believe Bush is more dangerous than North Korean leader Kim Jong-il and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.[115]

                      Reply#6 - Fri May 22, 2009 3:45 PM EDT
                      Tlang

                      Many economists and world governments determined that the situation became the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.[98][99] Additional regulation over the housing market would have been beneficial, according to former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.[100] President Bush, meanwhile, proposed a financial rescue plan to buy back a large portion of the U.S. mortgage market.[101] Vince Reinhardt, a former Federal Reserve economist now at the American Enterprise Institute, said "it would have helped for the Bush administration to empower the folks at Treasury and the Federal Reserve and the comptroller of the currency and the FDIC to look at these issues more closely", and additionally, that it would have helped "for Congress to have held hearings".[95]

                      In November 2008, over five hundred thousand jobs were lost. That marked the largest loss of jobs in the United States in 34 years.[102] In the last four months of 2008 alone, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the loss of 1.9 million jobs.[103]

                      But that was probably Obama's fault right?

                        Reply#7 - Fri May 22, 2009 3:48 PM EDT
                        Frank BlackDeleted
                        TheEarthIsNotMyMother

                        Tiang--Obama's spending is making Bush's spending look like the change I find under my couch cushions every so often.... never thought I'd say "I miss Bush" but I do.

                          Reply#9 - Tue May 26, 2009 8:50 AM EDT
                          breelaboyDeleted
                          Leave a Comment:
                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                          Newsvine Privacy Statement
                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                          FUN STUFF:
                          • Leaderboard |
                          • E-Mail Alerts |
                          • Top of the Vine |
                          • Newsvine Live |
                          • Newsvine Archives |
                          • The Greenhouse
                          COMPANY STUFF:
                          • Code of Honor |
                          • Company Info |
                          • Contact Us |
                          • Jobs |
                          • User Agreement |
                          • Privacy Policy |
                          • About our ads
                          LEGAL STUFF:
                          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com