Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Calif. rescission case judge rules for Blue Shield

Thu May 28, 2009 8:52 PM EDT
business, us, lawsuit, blue-shield
Shaya Tayefe Mohajer, Associated Press
Advertise | AdChoices

LOS ANGELES — A judge ruled Thursday that Blue Shield of California was right to drop the policy of a man who sued the health insurer on claims that he was wrongly dropped after an accident left him with huge bills.

In a directed verdict in the middle of trial, Orange County Superior Court Judge Peter Polos found that Blue Shield acted in good faith when the company investigated the medical history of Steve Hailey and dropped his policy.

Hailey had brought a civil case against the insurer, saying Blue Shield dropped his coverage wrongly after a car wreck left him with more than $400,000 in medical bills.

In a statement, Blue Shield called the verdict "a complete vindication" after five years of litigation.

"The Haileys finally admitted what Blue Shield maintained all along," Blue Shield general counsel Seth Jacobs said in a statement. "The evidence of deceit by the Haileys was overwhelming."

A call to Hailey's attorney, Michael Nutter, was not immediately returned Thursday afternoon.

The judge's order supersedes a jury's decision.

In the ruling, the judge called Blue Shield's investigation procedures reasonable, adding that the Haileys "willfully misrepresented" information on their Blue Shield application.

Steve Hailey's wife, Cindy, filled out his application for him and had not listed his full medical history, which included high blood pressure and chest pains.

During opening statements on May 20, attorneys on both sides agreed on a timeline of events: Blue Shield approved the Haileys for an insurance policy on Dec. 15, 2000; Hailey was in a major auto accident in March 2001; and Blue Shield canceled the policy in June 2001.

An attorney for the insurer said a February 2001 trip to the emergency room is what led Blue Shield to investigate Hailey's insurance application, not the massive claims that followed the car wreck.

When it first came to light, Hailey's case helped prompt state regulators to target questionable health insurance rescissions. More than $13 million in fines for rescissions have been collected from Anthem Blue Cross, Health Net Inc., PacifiCare, Kaiser Permanente and Blue Shield.

The Hailey lawsuit was dismissed in 2005, but in 2007 a state appeals court ruled that it should go to trial.

There are a number of lawsuits on state dockets alleging health insurers dropped coverage after policyholders made pricey claims.

One of them is a $1 billion lawsuit brought against Blue Shield by the Los Angeles city attorney's office. It contends the company dropped hundreds of policyholders illegally and used deceptive advertising. The next procedural hearing in that case is set for June 17.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Shaya Tayefe Mohajer's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: United States , Los Angeles
  • Public Discussion (1)
economicparty

Disclose, disclose, disclose.

That is the rule in real estate sales. And that is the rule for health, life and disability insurance. I feel for this guy.

Now my question is why did not the auto insurance pay for the health care anyway. That is what liability insurance on your auto is for anyway!

    Reply#1 - Thu May 28, 2009 11:49 PM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com