Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Brazil custody battle hangs in balance

Thu Jun 4, 2009 8:30 AM EDT
today-people, obama, united-states, only-on-msnbc-com, supreme-court, brazil, new-jersey, custody, goldman, luiz-inacio-lula, vieira, david-goldman, brazil�s-supreme-court, hague-treaty
msnbc.com News — Mike Celizic, msnbc.com - Only on msnbc.com
Advertise | AdChoices

— Brazil’s Supreme Court is expected to rule June 10 on the nearly five-year custody battle between a New Jersey father and the Brazilian family that claims his son as their own. The decision could affect the fates of 50 or more other American children in Brazil involved in similar cases.

New Jersey dad David Goldman had gone to Brazil on Monday expecting to regain custody of his son on Wednesday, in accordance with a federal court ruling. But on Tuesday, a minor political party persuaded a single judge on the 11-member Supreme Court to stop the transfer of custody. The party, which is allied with the government of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, argued that the Hague Treaty — to which Brazil and the United States are signatories, and which upholds Goldman’s parental rights — is not legally enforceable under the Brazilian constitution.

The 10 other justices on the Brazilian supreme court are expected to rule on the appeal June 10. Meantime, in the wake of the single judge’s action, a U.S. lawmaker planned to introduce a bill that would suspend trading preferences with Brazil until the country honors a treaty regarding international child abductions. Rep. Chris Smith, a Republican of New Jersey, called for the trading sanctions.

Hope on hold
Before he returned dejectedly to the U.S. Friday morning, Goldman did get to meet with his son under supervision by Brazilian authorities on Wednesday. He said he was told that Sean was distraught and was taken to see a psychologist Wednesday morning, before the visit.

“I don’t know if that’s true,” he said of the visit to the psychologist. But, he added, “He’s not in a good emotional state over there with the environment that he’s in. It’s very, very sad.”

On the Web site BringSeanHome.org, Goldman said if the Supreme Court upholds the argument that the Hague Treaty does not apply in Brazil, it would affect many other children in Brazil involved in similar custody battles.

On Wednesday, the distraught father had told TODAY’s Meredith Vieira in an exclusive interview that he fears for his son’s well-being the longer the legal tug-of-war continues.

“This isn’t good. This isn’t good at all,” Goldman told Vieira. “He’s got to come home with me. He’s in a very unhealthy environment, and this has to stop.”

Another delay
The boy's mother, Bruna, took Sean for a two-week vacation to her native Brazil in 2004 and never returned. Instead, she divorced David Goldman in Brazil and married influential Rio de Janeiro lawyer Joao Paulo Lins e Silva. Bruna died last year of complications from the birth of a subsequent child.

The case seemed to begin to turn in Goldman’s favor earlier this year when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama became involved. After Clinton’s intervention, the case was transferred from lower courts to Brazil’s federal court system, where Goldman hoped he would get a fairer hearing. He was able to visit Sean twice under tight supervision before the federal court finally ruled that he should regain custody.

The newest roadblock was thrown up by the conservative Progressive Party, one of many small Brazilian political parties allied with the leftist Workers Party of President Lula da Silva. The party said Sean should stay in Brazil because he's been living here for five years and would be stripped of his current family environment of “happiness, love and comprehension.”

“It’s very, very sad and very frustrating that my son is still held there in this environment, and I cannot do a thing to get him out of there,” Goldman told Vieira Wednesday. He then added, “I’m not giving up. He’s coming home.”

On Thursday, he told Vieira, “I hope this is over. I hope today’s the day.”

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Mike Celizic's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (75)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
burgerkinglover

I will never visit Brazil, and I will recommend that neither do any other US residents do either, obviously don't date or marry anyone from Brazil either, fire all the brazilian models too-lol I am just heart broken over this man's situation, he lost his wife to another man, then lost his child, now the mother is dead, and he doesn't know whether he will get his son, who is a legal US citizen back, ooooh, I want to strangle that step-father, who now isn't really the step-father since the mother is dead, he's just the father of the other child, which is the half sibling of this child that I am sure is very confused! Don't we have the right, our government, to go take the child? I don't really know the laws, but it only seems right, since to me everything seemed to be done illegally. I thought you had to get divorced in the same country that you were married in?? I tell ya!!! God Bless them, and I am praying it all works out for them!

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 9:31 AM EDT
gatorgirl72

I agree obviously there disregard for the treaty shows that we are not safe there.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:32 AM EDT
m0u5y

If the United States will not put its foot down in this situation then we only show ourselves as burocratic cowards. I'm sorry but I'm tired of hearing our people stuck in other countries while we do nothing. If the child is unhappy and unhealthy then send the damn military over and get him. These are our kids and they are kidnapping them. This is disgusting. This country's government is disgusting. Why doesn't our country care about the child? Why would we rather avoid conflict than save our people? This isn't a war on oil, this is a child who is suffering. GET HIM THE HECK OUT OF THERE!

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:45 AM EDT
Johnny WalkerDeleted
Auzziegirl

Hello! What does the child want?

As in many divorce cases, children all of a sudden become "property"!

I'm not condoning Brazil's actions, but I think the child is old enough to make his own decision about where he wants to live.

What do they say, "Possession is nine-tenths of the law?"

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 4:44 PM EDT
hartcamargo

Wait a minute here, I am an American citizen happily married to a Brazilian man for over 4 years with 2 kids and I want to say not all Brazilians are bad. Unfortunatly Bruna was selfish for tricking her American husband and going back to Brazil with the son. Then to make it worse the man she married in Brazil is very rich and his father has high status with judges in Brazil and they have been paying them off. I am not sure if it is the step-father thats wants to the son, but I think it is Brunas parents. Her karma was she died giving birth to the other baby. Sean needs to be with his father in America. HE WAS BORN IN AMERICA AND HE IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN. The problem is that the stepdad is paying off the judges. Brazil is a poor country and money and bribes can pay for anything!!!

    #1.5 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 5:24 PM EDT
    Janeinthisworld

    Auzziegirl, how can we possibly know what this child wants? How can the child even know what he wants? He has been living with a family for 5 years that has NO BIOLOGICAL claim to him. He should never have been allowed to have custody of the boy in the first place. The child has not been legally adopted, in fact, the man who claims to be his stepfather fraudulently changed the boys Brazilian id to name himself as the biological father. This child has basically been abducted by a man who is not his father. And who knows what kinds of things that man has been telling this young boy all these years?

    What would you want if your child was taken illegally to another country? What will this young boy think of this system which allowed him to live in this bizarre limbo?

    • 1 vote
    #1.6 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 6:12 PM EDT
    Auzziegirl

    Janesinthisworld

    You know a lot of details. If this is true, it's still going to be an uphill battle for his biological dad to get custody at this point, especially since the so-called step-dad is bribing the judges and other officials in Brazil. This is third world corruption to the max.

    Tell me, do you think the U.S. should or can intervene? In the past, they tend to stay out of these kinds of quarrels. What do you think should happen? What do you think will happen in the end?

      #1.7 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 6:53 PM EDT
      Rhino40

      Here is a killer detail for you. The "Step Dad" in question, is not just a lawyer. His name is João Paulo Lins e Silva (try saying that 3 times fast) and he is a highly respected lawyer who specializes in (brace yourself) Family Law, specifically International Custody and Kidnapping cases involving children. He has actually lectured in The Hague. That is why he has been able to drag this out so long. This guy is the Albert Einstein of international custody battles. What really kills me is this guy knows better than anybody that what he is doing is illegal but obviously does not care. This dirt bag is the height of hypocrisy. He needs to be disbarred and locked up FOREVER!!!!!

      • 3 votes
      #1.8 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 7:16 PM EDT
      Reply
      Barbara-1139233

      Americans should boycott all travel to Brazil and the importation of all Brazilian products. This is a total outrage. How dare this country hold this boy hostage from his biological parent. If Brazil feels the pain in their pocketbook maybe they will then recognize the Hague Treaty and become somewhat human.

      • 11 votes
      Reply#2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 9:44 AM EDT
      J.R. Gravelines

      I'm curious to know what the child's life is like in Brazil? Is he with people who love him? If his stepfather is an influential lawyer, it must mean that the child is living in relative comfort. What about the child - what is his state of mind? Does he want to return to his father? None of this was covered. I have complete sympathy for the his father - of course he wants his son back; but what are the child's desires? Most of his cognitive years have been spent in Brazil - if that is where he wants to stay - and if his mother's family wants to keep him - I think that should have some bearing on the case.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#3 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 9:44 AM EDT
      Erin-397394

      You obviously don't have children! This child is 9 years old. His desires don't mean much honestly. Who would know what he wants anyway. I'm sure that the Brazilian "family" speak for him and don't allow him to have an opinion. He remembers his father and that is all that matters. I don't care what kind of lifestyle he is living there. His father has been fighting for him for 5 years! The step father has no claim nor right to this child! Period!!!!!!! This child was kidnapped by his mother and he should be returned to his biological father. The mother would be in jail if it had happened in this country.

      Return this child, and all the rest of the children being held in that (and all other) country. Children are not pawns or weapons!

      • 12 votes
      #3.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:10 AM EDT
      J.R. Gravelines

      I happen to have raised two children - and I give a nine year old more respect than you do obviously. How do you know his Brazilian "family" is speaking for him? Why do you immediately assume that he'd be better off in the USA? I don't think you care about the child, I think what's bothering you is that Brazil is daring to say "no" to the USA.

      • 1 vote
      #3.2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:54 AM EDT
      bonepony

      J.R. would you be saying this if it was one of YOUR children snatched????

      • 10 votes
      #3.3 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
      bonepony

      I wonder how much economic aid (free money) we give Brazil? We give all these countries economic aid and all they do is snub us every chance they get even when it's absurd! BOMB THEM!!! that will get their attention.

      • 3 votes
      #3.4 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:12 PM EDT
      lmv77

      She kidnapped her own son! How long had he been fighting for HIS son, that he didn't want taken away from him in the first place!

      • 2 votes
      #3.5 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:59 PM EDT
      Chris Gilliard

      Then let someone kidnap your child and hold them for years. See how you like that.

      • 3 votes
      #3.6 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 1:14 PM EDT
      Johnny WalkerDeleted
      Janeinthisworld

      J.R., if Goldman hadn't been trying to regain custody of his son for the past 5 years, I might agree with you. However, this young boy was basically abducted. He cannot stay with the very people who abducted him. He must be returned to his father.

      • 1 vote
      #3.8 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 6:14 PM EDT
      Robbie-395507

      So if one of your children were stolen from you the determining factor on whether they shoud be returned is the length of time the kidnapper can keep them from you? Why bother with adoption, just take a kid and keep them away from the natural parents for five years or so? I understand that any child would rather stay with the familiar, but there is a deeper moral question and this situation should never have become the norm for this child. The father should get him back, he never wanted to lose his son.

        #3.9 - Fri Jun 5, 2009 5:11 PM EDT
        Reply
        Felicia Woods

        I guess they can get away with Kidnapping......Sad.

        • 5 votes
        Reply#4 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 9:45 AM EDT
        humanadvocate

        Illian Gonzales in reverse. At least the U.S. saw fit to return him to his biological father, even if it meant remitting him to a communist dictatorship. Will Brazil sue him for child support next?

        • 5 votes
        Reply#5 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 9:54 AM EDT
        skeptic-227981

        Believe it or not, in the Dateline presentation last fall, some idiot actually complained about no child support with a straight face. Forget the fact that the biological father has spent who knows how much on travel back and forth for 5 years, plus all legal costs that occured. It was an absurd accusation, since the boy should have been returned to his father immediately when the mother died.

        The whole situation is disgusting. I really hope David Goldman gets his son back very soon.

        • 1 vote
        #5.1 - Fri Jun 5, 2009 6:52 AM EDT
        Reply
        jimbo719

        I believe the step father is a millionair, I guess money talks in that country too. But if the military can come in with AK47's and take Elian Gonzalez away and return him to his father, I think we should deploy special forces and bring this boy back home to his father and scare the $hit out of the step father during the process ;)

        • 5 votes
        Reply#6 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 9:55 AM EDT
        Deb-454574

        What on earth are you talking about? Deploy special forces for one child? Yesterday's article said there are about 50 other kids in Brazil in the same situation. Unfortunately this kind of parental "kidnapping" happens all the time when one parent is from another country. The only reason this story has gotten so much publicity is because the father was an international model and knows how to work the media. The reporting on this story has also been deplorably one-sided. I heard on a news story a long time ago (and I admit I can't remember where) that the father got some kind of legal freeze on the ex-in-laws property and money they hold in the US. I believe he settled with them for a huge amount of money like $300K (he received from them). They never talk about that and I would like to know more.

        • 1 vote
        #6.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 10:04 AM EDT
        jimbo719

        Hey Deb, What if it was your child?

        • 6 votes
        #6.2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 10:18 AM EDT
        Deb-454574

        I don't know what I would do... I would be devastated for sure. What I was trying to say is that there has got to be more to this. We are only getting one side.

          #6.3 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 10:22 AM EDT
          gatorgirl72

          Deb,

          The father battled for 4 years by his self!!!!! He has only recently received help from the media. If he was so influential as you say he would not have gone 4 years without seeing his child. In those 4 year he tried to contact our politicians for there help and finally Hilary Clinton(her one good thing) came to the aid. If it was my child I would want every special forces person to charge in. I agree that there is another side to the story but how can they justify shutting out THE father.

          • 8 votes
          #6.4 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:31 AM EDT
          m0u5y

          The United States should take the kid and talk to him. I don't care what people think but I know children that have more common sense than adults and this kid knows what he wants. If he says that he wants to stay with his father then give him back.

          • 1 vote
          #6.5 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
          LoveBubble5

          Five years or not, this father has been fighting to regain custody since the day his child was taken away from him (or at least once he learned that Mom had no intentions of coming back.)  For those who feel he shouldn't be removed from the former step-dad's household, are you saying it's ok to kidnap as long as the time kept from the other parent is substantial?  I've seen parents walk away from this type of conflict in lesser severe situations, but this man has been fighting relentlessly for five years now.  Give him his son back.

          • 2 votes
          #6.6 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
          Reply
          idaho-925967

          I haven't seen or missed where was the child born?...if in the US he's an american citizen and Brazil should release him immediately....

            Reply#7 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 10:09 AM EDT
            Meli-771751

            It's not that easy. Because the mother was a Brazilian national and wasn't a full citizen of the U.S., they also claim the boy as a Brazilian.

              #7.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:05 AM EDT
              m0u5y

              So you're saying that if my mother had kidnapped me back to Italy only because I have dual citicenship it is ok?

                #7.2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
                bonepony

                YUP! especially Italy which we don't have an extradition agreement with. You mother could gun down half the country when she was leaving and she would get to stay in Italy.

                • 1 vote
                #7.3 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:15 PM EDT
                LoveBubble5

                Wow. I'm not naive and I've had the US court system work against my family in a custody situation, but it is atrocious how easy it can be to just abduct a child. It's sad.

                  #7.4 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 1:48 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  Sandra-1136342

                  The lawyer who married this woman seems to have a huge sense of entitlement. Unless Mr. Goldman was an abusive father, he has every right to his son. I cannot even believe this case has gone on this long. The lawyer has been a caretaker at best and it seems that karma dealt with Mr. Goldman's ex. I am on a personal boycott of all things Brazilian and am encouraging others I know to do the same. Also, J. R. Gravelines posted about the boy's feelings being considered and yes I think they should be heard BUT the decision cannot be decided based on the child's desires. This entire matter is another instance of money, power and connections trumping decency and what is right.

                  • 5 votes
                  Reply#8 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 10:13 AM EDT
                  Just_Another_SheepDeleted
                  Sandra-1136342

                  Totally agree Just_Another_Sheep that sanctions are needed. I am not sure exactly when or how but, for me, it feels like the U.S. is becoming one great big doormat for other countries to wipe their feet on. I don't want to come across as someone who thinks this country is the end all and be all and we can do no wrong because that is totally not me, however, I am concerned that we (the U.S.) do not seem to understand or care that a very large portion of what used to be American owned businesses are now owned by other nations or the fact that the national debt is killing us from the inside out or the fact that we do not adequately protect our borders among other big issues. So ok, those ARE big issues to tackle but this case with Mr. Goldman was not really a big issue. It has become one due to the actions of the deceased mother's family, the husband/lawyer and the Brazilian courts. I am sure that others would say that sanctions would be going too far but what if this was your child? Diplomacy has its place but sometimes a good butt kicking is what's needed. Less money in their coffers/wallets is a good beginning.

                  • 3 votes
                  #8.2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:49 AM EDT
                  m0u5y

                  And that American supreme court judge needs to be whipped.

                  • 1 vote
                  #8.3 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:49 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  Deb-454574

                  The whole thing is bizarre. This was on msnbc.com on 3/13/09:

                  Bruna’s Brazilian husband, Joao Paulo Bianchi, and his family have charged that she had a barren relationship with Goldman before she took Sean to Brazil. They allege that Bruna supported her husband and Sean by teaching Italian, and that she feared for her safety because he would violently punch furniture and walls when they argued. They claim that Goldman never tried to contact his son for four years, and that he demanded $500,000 from the family to settle the legal case over what Goldman says was their illegal adoption of Sean.

                  Goldman admits getting a $150,000 payment from the family as part of a judicial settlement, but denies the other allegations, saying he and Bruna had a good sex life. He says he contributed to the expenses of the household through his career as a model.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#9 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
                  Just_Another_SheepDeleted
                  Marie485962

                  If you watch previous broadcasts of this story, it seems obvious Bruna didn't decide she was unhappy in the US with her American husband until her parents showed up for a visit. Likely their visit was for the sole purpose of manipulating Bruna to give up her American husband because they thought he was not good enough for her, persuaded her to return to Brazil and keep it hush-hush why, made up stories eventually to explain why, then pushed her into the new marriage. Too bad she wasn't strong enough to stand against that as now she has lost her life in the process. So now unhappy they lose their daughter for their stupid interference, they are not likely to give up their grandson and are behind a lot of the wrangling to keep him in Brazil. Thank God I don't have parents like that!

                  • 5 votes
                  #9.2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:40 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  Steve-837340Deleted
                  Meli-771751

                  The arugment the Hague Treaty isn't enforceable in Brazil has bigger implications than just child custody. If the Brazilian Supreme Court ruled that the Hague Treaty has no merit, then that means any country in the world could do whatever the hell it wanted and there would be no international law to stop them or punish them for criminal acts or atrocities against others. If they make that ruling, then nobody is safe anywhere at any time.

                  I can just imagine the list of countries who would be the next to argue they're not liable under the Hague Treaty: North Korea, Iran, China, etc., etc.

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#11 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:01 AM EDT
                  LoveBubble5

                  You are absolutely right. But of course this stupid Brazilian family is not thinking about that, they only want for "right now," and not in the future.

                  • 1 vote
                  #11.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 1:53 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  gatorgirl72

                  This just ridiculous we are the United States of America!!!!! We are too soft on issues like this. My brother married a Woman form Ireland they had a child and she wanted to go on a family trip to Ireland to visit family so they applied for passports and all we. Two months after they got home she stole the passport and left while he was at work. A year later he got his child back not thanks to the politicians. We do what is right and send kids back all of the time. Case in point the child that came over from Cuba with his mother and step father. The mother died in route and they sent the little boy back to Cuba. This should never have gotten to this point. The US should demand that the child be sent back now.

                  PS If you are married with children to someone from a Foreign Country take the passport and keep it under lock and key with only you having access!!!!

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#12 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:13 AM EDT
                  Monica-1139460

                  I wonder when the wellfare of the child will be taken into consideration. 5 years is a long time and given the boy is 9, he has already adapted to a very loving culture, where family ties are still a priority, and to just disregard the experiences he had so far is just a shame.

                    Reply#13 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:23 AM EDT
                    m0u5y

                    I'm from a loving culture in Italy but ther ARE BASTARDS everwhere and for one second I do not believe that this child is being loved. This is sick. I curse these people with all I have. The child needs to be where he wishes and it is looking like he doesn't want to be where he is. Get him out!

                    • 1 vote
                    #13.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:52 AM EDT
                    Sandra-1136342

                    Monica, the experience he has had so far is BEING KIDNAPPED. How do you know what he has adapted to? I know I don't. I do know that a biological parent that has not given up his or her parental rights, should have custody of their child(ren) barring any abusive behavior. Parental rights trump grandparents rights and certainly this Brazilian interloper has ZERO rights when it comes to this child. He should be thankful for the child he had with his deceased wife and return Mr. Goldman's son to him immediately before karma decides to deal him the hand it dealt his wife.

                    • 4 votes
                    #13.2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:02 PM EDT
                    Jeff-573598

                    Yes, Monica, I agree with you. I think there should be international laws that state that, if you kidnap a child, and can avoid arrest for "x" number of years, you should be able to keep the child. In fact, I think there should be 1-day statute of Limitation on all crimes. If you can avoid arrest for any period of time, you should be rewarded for it by getting off scott free. After all, YOU know what's best for the child, right ? Better to live in a bannana republic with an unrelated man with his natural mother gone, then to come to the U.S. and be with his natural father. I'll bet you work for some child welfare agency.

                    • 3 votes
                    #13.3 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:14 PM EDT
                    LoveBubble5

                    Jeff, aside from the sarcasm, I feel the same way. A crime is a crime, period. A murderer can be put away YEARS after committing the crime because why? S/he STILL COMMITTED IT.

                      #13.4 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 1:58 PM EDT
                      Johnny WalkerDeleted
                      coloradovet

                      DON'T MAKE COMMENTS LIKE YOU DID UNLESS YOU KNOW THE FACTS MONICA!!! PEOPLE LIKE YOU IRRITATE THE HELL OUT OF ME, CAUSE YOUR EXACTLY THE TYPE LAWYERS TRY TO CONVINCE AND PLAY OFF THE DUMBNESS OF. The welfare of the child was never taken into consideration when HE WAS KIDNAPPED FROM the father. You don't say your going on vacation and then announce that you're never coming home. In our country this is called PARENTAL ABDUCTION!!!

                      • 1 vote
                      #13.6 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 2:13 PM EDT
                      Janeinthisworld

                      Johnny, don't be rude.

                      Monica, you cannot assume this young boy has had a happy ending life in Brazil. We only hear from the maternal family that he is happy in this home. Who knows what kinds of things the family has been telling him. What we do know for sure is that this boy was illegally taken and has been illegally held by a man who has no biological or legal claim to him. Goldman has been trying since day 1 to get his son back.

                        #13.7 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 6:45 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        Ronnie-294246

                        I can understand why this was in limbo under the whacky Bush White House because he could careless for Americans. I hope Obama and Hillary Clinton have the balls to take this in front of the U.N and have Brazil brought up on charges of kidnapping and sanctioned.Freeze all Brazil's holdings in the U.S. and refuse visa's for their people.This story is f-ed up and someone in our government needs to step,grow so balls and do what is right for this boy and his father.

                        • 3 votes
                        Reply#14 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:49 AM EDT
                        m0u5y

                        Our government definitely needs to grow some balls. We do nothing against North Korea and now they have one of ours. And we let foreigners kidnap our kids. How do you know that this child isn't being abused? The thought of being forced away from a parent like that makes me so sad. It hurts my heart that bureaucracy comes before justice.

                        • 1 vote
                        #14.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 11:53 AM EDT
                        bonepony

                        not another "it's all Bush's fault" give it a rest! It rained today on my picnic....must be Bush's fault. That is what you liberals sound like now! Blaming Bush for EVERYTHING under the sun. The man must have been the most influential president ever to be the cause of ALL the worlds woes!

                        • 2 votes
                        #14.2 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:27 PM EDT
                        gumbo dawgDeleted
                        Reply
                        Angry Taxpayer-970589

                        David I am praying that the Brazilian courts return your son to you. I agree with the person that said that your ex-wifes family is probably behind trying to keep the boy there, but he is YOUR son not theirs. They had their daughter for many years and it is said that she was taken from them in death but that is NO EXCUSE or REASON for them to deny you your son.

                        I have a daughter who was abducted and taken into Mexico a6 years ago by her Mexican National boyfriend. I was not able to get help from the FBI or police as she was over eighteen years of age. The police here told me that the boyfriend (an educated man; a doctor to be exact) was using her as a sex slave. I know in my heart that my beutiful daughter is dead and I pray that she is rather than be living the live this evil man forced her into. So, I can truly feel the pain that you feel at not having your precious son with you.

                        I hope that the supreme courts and the lawmakers of this country cut off ALL trade with Brazil until you and the other children that have been abducted and not returned to their parents live up to the treaty. AMERICANS DO NOT TRAVEL TO BRAZIL OR ANY OTHER FOREIGN COUNTRY THAT FEELS THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW. CUT OFF ALL TRADE TO THEM.

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#15 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
                        gumbo dawgDeleted
                        Reply
                        MOMof3-746571

                        my heart bleeds for this man and child. for all the years he has missed. horrible.

                          Reply#16 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 1:22 PM EDT
                          tequizabird

                          I am on the side of the biological father, and if it were me I would hire mercenaries to go in and retrieve my kidnapped child!!! Heck i would just snatch him myself!!! To heck with the stupid governments!!!

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#17 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 1:40 PM EDT
                          coloradovet

                          Heelll yeaaahhh!!!!!!! If this sorry excuse for a court rules against goldman, let's send some delta force soldiers into this lame excuse for a country and take him out ourselves. Brazil, you suck!!!

                          • 1 vote
                          #17.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 2:18 PM EDT
                          Reply
                          Citizensmith

                          The boy is an American citizen and should be returned immediately. He is and never has been a Brazilian citizen which means he is there "illegally" and should be returned to his native country - to his NATURAL father and not some man who pretends to be his father. That poor dad. He's been through more than any dad should have to to get his child back from a country that kidnapped him.

                            Reply#18 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 1:43 PM EDT
                            LoveBubble5

                            For those of you implying that perhaps the Brazilian "family" is giving this boy a secure and loving home, the #1 priority in US custody cases is THIS: the child's BEST INTERESTS. And I say US cases because I'm certain your logic is coming from that and not whatever the laws are in Brazil. One of those best interests is to allow a "continuing and meaningful relationship with the noncustodial parent." This child was deprived of that from day one.

                            I just don't understand this. My heart bleeds for this father AND for his son. If this child is returned to his biological father (and I pray he is returned,) I'm sure he's going to need some sort of therapy. This father has fought for five years now to regain rightful custody. I'm certain if he regains custody he will continue to do whatever is in the child's best interest and seek the professional help this child may need.

                            Again, I've seen it and experienced a similar situation to where I was nothing but a third party (interstate, not intercountry.) I would have fought tooth and nail for my child/ren, never stopping to rest. In the end the decision wasn't mine and the battle stopped. At least we get to see the children, albeit just the crumbs we're allowed. It's heartbreaking and I've come to the conclusion that we will have more time with my stepchildren when they're adults as opposed to when they're young. But this father does not have that option. It's fight for his child now, or quite possibly never have a relationship with him ever again.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#19 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 2:14 PM EDT
                            Erica-265759

                            The US needs to withold any aid we send to Brazil. And we need to not travel or buy anything made in that country. This is outrageous!

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#20 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 2:39 PM EDT
                            Hot-in-Miami

                            I am hoping he can get his child back, 5 years of fighting is more than enough. That witch just wanted to get married to someone to get her green card, I don't know if she was of money or if that's because she married the Brazilian lawyer but if she wasn't wealthy, this may have been another reason to target Mr. Goldman as well. Karma took care of her in the end, it's now time for karma to take care of the Brazilian lawyer's family and ensure that they LOSE custody of the boy and give it to Mr. Goldman, where it rightly belongs. Teach them that money can't always get them what they want, especially when it is something wrong, like denying his real father the chance to bring him up. Mr. Goldman, I hope you have better luck in the future in picking a wife or girlfriend, don't go for golddiggers, stay away from foreigners if possible, and look for a woman with a big heart, rather than choosing someone based on looks who can turn out to be another witch.

                              Reply#21 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 3:06 PM EDT
                              Kathryn-610638

                              Brazil needs to give this man's child back to him - NOW. The U.S. needs to put the pressure on Brazil to release any child that is suffering the same injustice as Mr. Goldman's son. I feel so bad for the Mr. Goldman. I've seen him repeatedly on television pleading to get his son back. I do not for one minute question the love and devotion that this man has for his child. This needs to happen before the child grows to be the age when they start getting angry (you know how young men can get at that age) and no amount of psychological counseling will ever return the love of his father that he is missing as time goes by. The mother is dead and the father deserves to have his son returned to him. I will never, ever visit Brazil because of this issue.

                                Reply#22 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
                                bustanti

                                I want to know what the heck is wrong with our Government why hasn't our government demanded the return of an american citizen. Why hasn't our government provided the support David Goldman needs. This ordeal should have been over years ago. I am sorry people but when a small corrupt political party has more to say than two governments me thinks its time for everyone to write their senators and the president. Shame on us for not doing it sooner. Shame on Hillary Clinton for not making a greater stand on this. Shame, shame shame.

                                • 1 vote
                                #22.1 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 9:58 PM EDT
                                Reply
                                doreen-380369

                                Five years is a long time to be fighting for one's own child. All Americans and other people around the world should NOT travel to Brazil. And I'm with the rest of you people who say to stop trading with Brazil. Put sanctions and whatever else we can on them. Force their citizens to undergo massive searches if they try to enter the United States.

                                This child is an American citizen and Brazil has no right to keep him. Remember Elian Gonzales from Cuba? There's no difference here except this is now a fight with the Brazilian goverment to give back and AMerican citizen.

                                Why doesn't someone do a google search on this so called Step-Father. I'm sure there are things that we can find out about him and his ties to the President of Brazil. A little fishy there, isn't it??? This man probably doesn't even really want Sean. Now that this situation has become national news and everyone knows about him, he needs to show that he's the loving father...NOT!!!!!!!

                                  Reply#23 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 3:40 PM EDT
                                  FROU

                                  i would like to say that i was so happy when i read the boy was coming home, but part of me knew that this could not happen.because unfortunatelly, in brazil, things go by acquaintances....if you have connections you can only find a way to stop things...

                                  i only say that what these people are doing to that boy is a crime....they already paid a high price ,with the mother`s death, and they can`t forget that this child will grow up and then we will see the day, he will leave anyway, because they took him away from his father and the consequences of this will be unspeakable.

                                  Now he is 9 and they are doing whatever they want...but tomorrow...He will be older and God knows hw he will react....

                                  and if Brazil is doing this because it doesn`t want to return the child to the usa, then America should watch this matter closer, because in a while it will be very easy for anyone to kidnap children and go to Brazil, because there, laws exist only for a few.

                                    Reply#24 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 5:35 PM EDT
                                    Freedom Writer-801740

                                    The bottom line is the biological mother died, the biological father has every right to his son unless he is unfit. It is obvious since the real father has the assets to fight for 5 years to get this child back that is probably untrue. To me this case is just a travesty of justice and seems to me like it should be fairly cut and dried. The mother is dead, the father wants him he should be in his fathers custody.

                                      Reply#25 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 5:40 PM EDT
                                      BigRick

                                      We should boycott anything Brazillian!

                                      This is a tragedy of epic proportions and its not th eonly child in Brazil with extremely similar circumstances.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#26 - Thu Jun 4, 2009 6:07 PM EDT
                                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                      Leave a Comment:
                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                      Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                      FUN STUFF:
                                      • Leaderboard |
                                      • E-Mail Alerts |
                                      • Top of the Vine |
                                      • Newsvine Live |
                                      • Newsvine Archives |
                                      • The Greenhouse
                                      COMPANY STUFF:
                                      • Code of Honor |
                                      • Company Info |
                                      • Contact Us |
                                      • Jobs |
                                      • User Agreement |
                                      • Privacy Policy |
                                      • About our ads
                                      LEGAL STUFF:
                                      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com