Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Official: Mattel fined $2.3 million for toy hazard

Fri Jun 5, 2009 3:24 PM EDT
business, politics, us, fined, toymaker
Jennifer C. Kerr, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>FILE - In this Aug. 1, 2007 file photo, Fisher- Price toys subject to recall including 'Go Diego Go Mountain Rescue,' and 'Birthday Dora,' right,  are seen on a store shelf late in  Alexandria, Va. Mattel Inc. and its Fisher-Price subsidiary have been hit with a $2.3 million civil penalty for producing toys with unsafe levels of lead paint. (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf, FILE)</p>

FILE - In this Aug. 1, 2007 file photo, Fisher- Price toys subject to recall including 'Go Diego Go Mountain Rescue,' and 'Birthday Dora,' right, are seen on a store shelf late in Alexandria, Va. Mattel Inc. and its Fisher-Price subsidiary have been hit with a $2.3 million civil penalty for producing toys with unsafe levels of lead paint. (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf, FILE)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — Toy maker Mattel Inc. and its Fisher-Price subsidiary have agreed to pay a $2.3 million civil penalty for importing and selling toys with excessive levels of lead.

The penalty is part of a settlement the companies reached with the Consumer Product Safety Commission, which announced Friday, that the toymaker had knowingly violated a 30-year-old federal ban on lead paint in toys.

The companies deny having willfully violated the ban.

The penalty stems from a series of recalls by Mattel and Fisher-Price in 2007, when the companies recalled nearly 2 million popular Big Bird, Elmo, Dora and other toys because of excessive levels of lead found in the paint on the toys.

Barbie doll accessories and "Sarge" toy cars were also part of the recalls.

The commission says the fine is the biggest for a lead paint violation involving children's toys.

Mattel and Fisher-Price were among dozens of manufacturers that yanked millions of Chinese-made toys from store shelves in the months leading up to the 2007 holiday shopping season. The recalls made parents uneasy as they shopped for gifts for small children.

The Mattel and Fisher-Price fine is the commission's first penalty resulting from those recalls.

"These highly publicized toy recalls helped spur congressional action last year to strengthen CPSC and make even stricter the ban on lead paint on toys," said the commission's acting chairman Thomas Moore. "This penalty should serve notice to toy makers that CPSC is committed to the safety of children."

"Today's settlement announcement by the U.S. CPSC resolves Mattel's outstanding issues with the agency related to certain matters that arose in 2007," Mattel said. "Mattel promptly took a series of steps after discovering compliance issues with some of our toys at that time.

"We were able to effectively minimize any potential concerns by launching a fast-track recall of the affected product in conjunction with the CPSC and other global regulatory agencies, and by taking several steps to enhance our product compliance protocols and procedures to confirm that every Mattel toy is safe for children to enjoy," Mattel said. Fisher-Price referred calls to Mattel.

Mattel, based in El Segundo, Calif., has not had any lead paint recalls since the 2007 cases, which spurred congressional action and a new law last summer — called the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act — that restricts the amount of lead allowed in children's products.

Lead poisoning in children can cause neurological damage, delayed mental and physical development, learning deficiencies, and other problems.

___

On the Net:

Consumer Product Safety Commission: http://www.cpsc.gov

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Jennifer C. Kerr's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: China , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (2)
Better Careful

Mattel knew those toys were toxic. The 2007 incidents were the second time Mattel had a mass recall of Chinese goods. The most recent occurrence, with Barbie accessories, occurred in spite of the previous two. Mattel, and it's management, care more for easy profits than they care for the health of America's children. Mattel managers need to have a day in court. Include the CEO in that, too. After every incident Mattel has said that they would take steps to assure it never happens again. Until the next time, that is. How long until the next time?

    Reply#1 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 1:34 AM EDT
    shadywood-1

    I am very sorry for all you people and your poor children who have suffered at the hands of Mattel and their blatant incompetence and sheer neglect of the wellfare and wellbeing of people who put the food in their mouths and pay for their lavish lifestyles. But then, I'm not surprised. In 1999, while at college, my husband and I invented a board game which we named, 'MOVIEMASTERS'. It consisted of naming films, actors/actresses and what films famous one liners came from and who said them. It was pretty damn good if I say so myself. Anyway, our Tutor David Collins offered to put in on a CD for us so we could 'get it out there'. Unfortunately for us, Mr Collins was offered a job in local Government which he obviously took and bang went his offer. I decided to send it to Mattel here in England but a short while later I received a letter from them telling me they weren't interested. I was so upset that I screwed the letter up and threw it away. I think you can guess what's coming next?????? One day, out of the blue, Mr Collins phoned me and excitedly congratulated us on having our game on sale. He said he'd seen the advert on TV. I was so shocked I burst into tears straight away and sobbed down the phone that it wasn't our game because Mattel had turned us down. Quite simply Mattel had stolen our idea, cleverly leaving it long enough so as not to arouse suspicion hoping we would forget and then bought the game out in their name which they called, 'SCENE-IT'. I immediately contacted Mattel who denied catergorically that they knew anything about my sending our game to them. They also denied sending a letter and said they had nothing in their records that such a letter had ever been sent to us. I was so angry. I then contacted a lawyer who told me that Mattel is a huge organisation with untold resources at their disposal and to take them on would be madness. I explained that we still had all the ORIGINAL documents showing how we put our game together plus that Mr Collins had expressed he would be more than willing to give evidence that it was OUR game and that we had invented it in 1999 so it was obvious Mattel had stolen our idea AFTER receiving my letter and details of our game, and then sat on it until they thought it was safe to market it.

    What pisses me of is, my husband and I are disabled, myself more severely and the money generated from the sales of our game would have made our lives so much easier. Apparently, it's been distributed all around the world so we've REALLY lost out.

    MATTEL ARE MONEY GRABBING BACK-STABBING @!$%#S AND I'M REALLY GLAD THEIR DISREGARD OF CHILDRENS SAFETY HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE MEDIA. LET'S HOPE THIS TIME THEY TAKE HEED TO WHAT COULD HAVE HAPPENED TO AN INNOCENT CHILD. $2.4 MILLION IS JUST A DROP IN THE OCEAN FOR THEM. I SAY, CLOSE THEM DOWN BECAUSE IT'S NOT THE FIRST TIME THEY'VE BEEN BROUGHT TO TASK OVER THEIR INCOMPETENCE.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 5:27 PM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com