Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Sotomayor's objectivity on bench is key question

Sat Jun 6, 2009 6:11 AM EDT
politics, us, republicans, supreme-court, sotomayor, sonia-sotomayor
Ben Evans, Associated Press
Republican Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama says he hopes the American people will closely follow the nomination process for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 3 photos
<p>Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor meets with Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., in his hideaway office on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 4, 2009. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)</p>

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor meets with Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., in his hideaway office on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 4, 2009. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — The senator leading the GOP's review of Sonia Sotomayor said the central question in her Supreme Court nomination should be whether she allows personal views to color her decisions.

In the Republican Party's weekly radio and Internet address Saturday, Sen. Jeff Sessions didn't say whether he thinks Sotomayor crosses that line. But he raised questions that reflect a growing chorus of GOP criticism that the federal appeals court judge sees her role as something more than an impartial umpire.

Republicans have seized on speeches in which Sotomayor said she hoped a wise woman or Latina "with the richness of her experiences" would make better, more compassionate decisions in court than a white man.

While he didn't specifically mention those remarks, Sessions asked "if a judge is allowed to let his or her feelings for one party in the case sway his decision, hasn't that judge then demonstrated a bias against the other party?"

"Although we sometimes take our heritage of neutral and independent judiciary for granted, the truth is, this great tradition is under attack," he said.

Sessions said Americans should follow the confirmation process closely and ask what kind of judge they would want in court.

"Do I want a judge that allows his or her social, political or religious views to impact the outcome, or do I want a judge that objectively applies the law to the facts?" he said. "That is the central question around which this entire nomination process will revolve."

Sotomayor was raised in a working-class family in the Bronx and would be the first Hispanic justice. She told senators in private meetings this past week that while her background shapes who she is, she believes judges should follow the law above all.

President Barack Obama has said she misspoke when she made her "wise Latina" remarks and probably would phrase them differently today.

Some Republicans have labeled her a racist for the comments. Sessions has called such criticism inappropriate and said Sotomayor has an impressive life story and resume. But he is trying to slow down Democrats' plans for a summertime confirmation, saying Republicans need more time to review her record.

___

On the Net:

Sessions' video: http://tinyurl.com/ohcbza

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Ben Evans's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (18)
Linc 58

Republicans should drag thier feet on this one. There's dirt here despite her resume.

  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 7:09 AM EDT
AZPADDY

You don't like her? She's as good as in. Too bad for you.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 9:48 PM EDT
Reply
Simplistic Reality

Yep. Next!

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 7:34 AM EDT
puffin prophet

Oh the GOP wears their hypocrisy well, wouldn't you say?

  • 7 votes
Reply#3 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 9:49 AM EDT
Linc 58

What does that mean?

    #3.1 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 9:58 AM EDT
    puffin prophet

    LOL... ummm, it means "take a look at the SCJ's the GOP put in place during their reign."

    • 5 votes
    #3.2 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 11:01 AM EDT
    Xerxes-727854

    Puffin prophet,

    "take a look at the SCJ's the GOP put in place during their reign."

    Do you mean Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito and Roberts?

    Did they ever say,""I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina female who hasn't lived that life."? No, they did not.

    I sincerely hope you are not referring to Clarence Thomas, whose childhood poverty make Maria Sotomayor's life look like Queen Elizabeth's.

    • 1 vote
    #3.3 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 5:43 PM EDT
    AZPADDY

    Scalia belongs in a rubber room, and Roberts is a Patrician elitist if there ever was one. Having Sotomayor on the bench won't solve the extremism that exists now, but she will bring a much needed voice of reason that can be counted on to judge with impartiality.

    • 3 votes
    #3.4 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 9:51 PM EDT
    Reply
    Stone5150

    Why not base your objections on her rulings instead of one speech?

    Oh yeah, then you wouldn't have any, sorry for my ignorance.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#4 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 10:36 PM EDT
    AZPADDY

    The entire reading hearing world was aware that conservatives would mount a challenge to whomever president Obama selected as nominee to the Supreme Court. Heck, they started weeks before he even announced who it was.

    You can probably write out the questions political hacks like Jon Kyle will ask in advance of his asking them. The process should prove to be highly entertaining, with Kyle and other windbags trying to trip her up with lawyerly prose and questions with "no win" answers.

    If anything, the process will be further evidence that the enemies of President Obama only damage themselves when they attempt to damage him and his policies.

    Let the games begin! ( In August )

      #4.1 - Sat Jun 6, 2009 11:10 PM EDT
      Reply
      JQP1959

      We now know she has repeated her "wise Latina" remark on numerous occasions. She did not misspeak.

      By definition, she is a racist.

      Just like The Messiah who nominated her.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#5 - Sun Jun 7, 2009 3:44 AM EDT
      Linc 58

      Absolutely. Let's have a hearing and review her past performance!

      • 1 vote
      #5.1 - Sun Jun 7, 2009 7:00 AM EDT
      AZPADDY

      It's pretty much been reviewed already. The only thing left is for conservative extremists to attempt to make her appear unqualified. The problem for them, is that with Scalia being on the court, they have no argument.

      She's in. Done deal.

      • 3 votes
      #5.2 - Sun Jun 7, 2009 10:37 AM EDT
      Reply
      ModerateOne

      Well... so the GOP is taking statements from a couple of decades ago, and then taking them out of context to try to make some kind of point. (BTW, I'm a middle-aged White male and I think there will come a time when enough has been done to reach some kinds of balance (regarding race, gender, etc.) in our government... but, we're not there yet... and so the GOP should look elsewhere to try to become "new and improved" again.)

      Even if her statements weren't part of a longer statement about having balance in one's viewpoints (REGARDLESS of race, etc.), the Republicans have, CONSISTENTLY and FOR DECADES fought against every possible kind of equality one can think of:

      Women's rights? GOP against.

      Gay rights? GOP against.

      Voting rights for minorities? GOP against.

      And then, there's lying us in to a war... tanking the U.S. economy (with Bush making numerous trips to his "ranch" while all hell was breaking loose economically), and, last but certainly not least, PROMOTING THE ILLEGAL TORTURE OF PRISONERS! Anyone who doesn't believe that it's true should just read what the Red Cross has said about Bush's pro-torture policies:

      Please be sure that everyone you know is aware of the statements from the Red Cross. Bush should not be allowed to get away with his torture denials and explanations.

      Just go away GOP... if America ever needs anything from you... we'll let you know.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#6 - Sun Jun 7, 2009 10:05 AM EDT
      Simplistic Reality

      Republicans have, CONSISTENTLY and FOR DECADES fought against every possible kind of equality one can think of:

      Kind of like how Democrats fought to keep segregation and slaves... while Republicans fought for equality.

        #6.1 - Mon Jun 8, 2009 1:39 AM EDT
        Stone5150

        That was about 150 years ago, both parties have changed significantly since then, so much so they have nearly switched places in the political spectrum.

        • 1 vote
        #6.2 - Mon Jun 8, 2009 1:42 AM EDT
        Reply
        deveousdevil

        i'm not sure whether or not Sotomayor is gonna be a good judge but the fact that Republicans are the biggest hypocrites as usual to call someone racist when their party is the one full of bigots and white men who are frightened by any person with more than 0 relatives who are not white, to have some kind of influence in this country, has become too obvious and borderline pathetic.

        white male speaking.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#7 - Sun Jun 7, 2009 5:04 PM EDT
        breelaboyDeleted
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com