WASHINGTON — Legislation to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan this year is on its way to President Barack Obama, but it provides no money for closing the Guantanamo detainee prison and sets tough restrictions on the transfer of its inmates.
The $106 billion emergency war bill is not all for war fighting. It includes many unrelated items, including a "cash for clunkers" incentive to swap gas guzzlers for more fuel-efficient vehicles; and funds for UN peacekeeping, air service to rural communities, Gulf Coast housing for hurricane victims and the response to a flu pandemic.
Lawmakers sent Obama, who wants to close the prison, not one but two messages Thursday to prove they don't like the idea.
In addition to the war fighting bill, which received final congressional approval, the House used the first spending bill for 2010 to deny the president money to close the prison next year. The legislation funds law enforcement and science programs.
Many lawmakers are upset at the possibility that alleged terrorists could end up in their states or districts.
The Iraq and Afghanistan war bill, passed 91-5 Thursday by the Senate and 226-202 the previous day in the House, may represent a milestone in paying for the two wars.
The White House and Democratic lawmakers say this will be the last time the war-fighting bill will be given special treatment as emergency legislation — allowing it to add to the deficit without funds to pay the cost.
Obama has said that in the future all war operation expenses will be incorporated in the Defense Department budget.
Several senators complained about the add-ons that gave the bill an extra $20 billion cost above the president's request.
The bill includes about $80 billion to finance the two wars through this fiscal year that ends Sept. 30. The Pentagon has predicted that the Army could begin running out of money for personnel and operations as early as July without the infusion of more money.
Other items include $4.5 billion, $1.9 billion above what the president requested, for lightweight mine-resistant vehicles, called MRAPs, and $2.7 billion for eight C-17 and seven C-130J cargo planes that the Pentagon did not ask for.
The Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, restrictions in the war funding bill would:
_Prohibit detainees from being released in the United States.
_Prevent prisoners being transferred to the United States, except to be prosecuted. Even then, a number of requirements would have to be met, including a plan showing the risks involved, the costs, the legal rationale and certification from the attorney general that the individual poses little or no security risk.
_Stop detainees from being transferred or released to another country unless the president meets a separate set of requirements, including an assessment of risks posed and terms of the transfer agreement with the receiving country.
The House voted 259-157 for the $64.4 billion package to fund Obama's law enforcement and science priorities in the budget year starting in October.
The bill passed by the House was the first of 12 spending bills Congress must pass for next year.
Got to please the constituents. Bunch of "Not in my backyard" cowards.
They aren't cowards, probably is the only decent thing that the Congress had been doing in a very long time.
The reason that the Bush administration in its' infinite wisdom, put these guys in prison at Gitmo in the first place, was because they thought that, being off-shore, they didn't have to worry about those pesky U.S. Courts having jurisdiction while they held people without anything resembling due process. After several years, they discovered that was not the case.
Now, instead of putting them in a prison in the U.S., where they should have been in the first place, (that is not right, since most of them should never have been taken in the first place, but you know what I mean) they are quibbling over how safe it is to keep them in the U.S.
This carries stupid to the level of an art form.
Well, our Armed Forces don't read the Tarot, Palm or Crystal Bowl to know at that moment why nationalized citizens of France, China or the UK were doing in the country.
We found our own American Taliban in Afghanistan.
I know, all were buying Afghani carpets.
So far we have seen some 600 or so detainees held at Gitmo in the last 6 years. The Courts have ordered about 5 released, and those haven't been released yet. There are about 200 there now.
Where did the others go and why?
Could it be, that there were a bunch of clowns running around there who had neighbors who didn't like them as much as they liked the $25k the U.S. Army was offering for "Terrorists"?
These were the "Worst of the worst" if you go by what Dick Cheney said about the prisoners being held there. Yet, we have since found out that a lot of these guys were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Yet we were going to keep these guys there in prison, without trial or appeal of any kind, for as long as George Bush and company chose to keep them there.
Tarot cards or crystal balls? How about either the Geneva Convention or the U.S. Constitution? Or just common sense.
This makes no sense! Bush's regime captured these people, many are not even criminals, Americans paid for their capture, they were captured during Bush's war, they are American prisoners - yet Congress decided America is not going to take responsibility for them? How cowardly. They say they are catering to their constituents' desires, yet more of their constituents support a single-payer health care option than oppose detainees from entering the US, but Congress ignores THESE constituents! How utterly despicable. Both Dems and Repubs' politics smacks Americans in the face on so many issues.
Why their country of origin don't want them?
I am a good citizen, pay my taxes and live a clean life. However, I can't go to Bermuda for a beach vacation. It figures.
determined0a1-
I would comment on that, but I can not figure what you are talking about.
You know what I am saying very well.
Actually, I don't have any idea what your trip to Bermuda might have to do with anything, but regarding their country of origin not wanting them, that might have something to do with the problem that some of these guys who are from China have with going back there and hoping to live through the experience.
Shouldn't really make much difference to us though. I mean, the last administration sent people to other countries for the express reason of getting them tortured. It just isn't the way we, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, are supposed to act.
If they are terrorist, take them to court and get them convicted and sentenced. If they aren't, then we seem to find ourselves in the situation of the shopper in a crystal store. You know. "You broke it, you bought it."
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |