Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

THE INFLUENCE GAME: Excuse me! Lobby wins on burps

Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:29 AM EDT
business, politics, us, bill, house-democrats, climate-bill, cow-tax
Dina Cappiello, Associated Press
< PreviousNext >
showing 1 of 2 photos
<p>FILE - In this March 2, 2002 file photo, a Holstein cow east hay at the De Vries Dairy in Pasco, Wash. One contributor to global warming - bigger than coal mines, landfills and sewage treatment plants - is being left out of efforts by the Obama administration and House Democrats to limit greenhouse gas emissions: cow burps. (AP Photo/Jackie Johnston, FILE)</p>

FILE - In this March 2, 2002 file photo, a Holstein cow east hay at the De Vries Dairy in Pasco, Wash. One contributor to global warming - bigger than coal mines, landfills and sewage treatment plants - is being left out of efforts by the Obama administration and House Democrats to limit greenhouse gas emissions: cow burps. (AP Photo/Jackie Johnston, FILE)

Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON — One contributor to global warming — bigger than coal mines, landfills and sewage treatment plants — is being left out of efforts by the Obama administration and House Democrats to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

Cow burps.

Belching from the nation's 170 million cattle, sheep and pigs produces about one-quarter of the methane released in the U.S. each year, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. That makes the hoofed critters the largest source of the heat-trapping gas.

In part because of an adept farm lobby campaign that equates government regulation with a cow tax, the gas that farm animals pass is exempt from legislation being considered by Congress to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

The EPA under President Barack Obama has said it has no plans to regulate the gas, even though the agency recently included methane among six greenhouse gases it believes are endangering human health and welfare.

The message circulating in Internet chat rooms, the halls of Congress and farm co-ops had America's farms facing financial ruin if the EPA required them to purchase air-pollution permits like power plants and factories do. The cost of those permits amounted to a cow tax, farm groups argued.

"It really has taken on a life of its own," said Rick Krause, a lobbyist with the American Farm Bureau Federation, which coined the term cow tax and spread it to farmers across the country. "This is something that people understand. All that we have to say is that (cows) are the next step with these proposed permit fees. And people are still talking about it."

Administration officials and House Democratic leaders have tried to assure farm groups that they have no intention of regulating cows. That effort, however, has done little to ease the concern of farmers and their advocates in Congress about the toll that regulating greenhouse gases will have on agriculture.

Lawmakers and farm groups are now pressing for the climate legislation to guarantee that farmers will be compensated for taking steps to reduce greenhouse gases. That could lead to farmers getting paid if their cows pass less gas.

Research has shown that changing cattle diet and boosting efficiency — such as producing the same amount of milk and beef from a smaller herd — can result in less gas, according Frank M. Mitloehner, an associate professor at the University of California at Davis, who has studied livestock gas for 15 years.

"I don't think livestock should be ignored. Every industry has to play their role," Mitloehner said. But laws designed to reduce emissions from smokestacks and tailpipes won't work with cattle, which can't be fitted with pollution control devices, Mitloehner said.

"The belching is very hard to collect," he said. "You cannot capture these gases."

The climate bill specifically excludes enteric fermentation — the fancy term for the gas created by digestion and expelled largely by burping — from the limit it would place on greenhouse gas emissions. The legislation directs the EPA not to include it among the various sources that could be subject to new performance standards.

EPA administrator Lisa Jackson has called rumors of the cow tax "ridiculous notions" and a "distraction."

House aides and EPA officials say that controlling such emissions is unworkable. Cow burps make up about 2 percent of all the climate-altering pollution in the U.S.

But allies of farmers in Congress say the reluctance to step in the cow tax debate has a lot to do with the outcry from the agriculture industry and moderate Democrats from rural states whose votes are needed to pass the bill.

"I think they realized that if you are a Democrat in an agricultural state, a red state, that this is radioactive and I think that is why they have tried scrupulously to reaffirm that they don't have any intention of doing this," said Sen. John Thune, R-S.D. He is sponsoring a bill that would bar the EPA from requiring farmers to get permits for cattle burps.

Thune, whose state is home to a half-million cattle, first heard about the cow tax at a South Dakota Cattlemen Association's conference in early December. Within weeks he introduced his bill and recruited support from New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, whose state boasts three times more cows.

The origins of the cow tax can be traced to last July, when President George W. Bush's EPA released documents outlining how the Clean Air Act could regulate greenhouse gases.

Even though the Bush administration had no intention of using the law, farm groups seized on a single paragraph deep in the comments from various federal agencies. The Agriculture Department warned that if EPA decided to regulate agricultural sources of greenhouse gases, numerous farms would face costly and time-consuming process to acquire permits for barnyard burping.

The Farm Bureau quickly did the math and figured farms would have to pay about $175 for each dairy cow, $87.50 per head of beef cattle and $20 for each hog to purchase permits for emissions.

The cow tax was born.

___

On the Net:

Environmental Protection Agency: http://www.epa.gov/

Agriculture Department: http://www.usda.gov

American Farm Bureau Federation: http://www.fb.org/

Sen. Thune's release: http://tinyurl.com/n6z52s

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Dina Cappiello's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Climate Change, Corporate Watchdogs, Corporatism, Das Krapital, Farmers on the Vine, Free Thinkers, Gut Check America, Left of Center, LeftWing Warriors, Question Authority, Silly and Stupid, Sociology, The Green Room, The Open Closet, The Truth Network, To MSNBC
  • Regions: United States , Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (31)
AlanA0720

My sources tell me that a company in Northern Colorado has developed a new kind of grain which has been genetically altered to include the active ingredient in Bean-o (r), which will greatly reduce the amount of methane produced when Bessie burps. I have the seeds for sale if anyone is interrested:)

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:42 AM EDT
ffeineandsugar

AlanA0720, you are hereby subpoenaed to appear in the case, Monsanto v. AlanA0720, to give deposition as to how Bean-o-T Corn seeds, on which we have the patent, have appeared in your possession without license. Remember, our client, Monsanto, owns all of the patents on nature. If you wish to settle, you may contact our office.

Sincerely,

Hugh Louis Dewey, J.D.,

Chief Counsel

Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe, LLC. (tip of the hat to the nice folks at Car Talk).

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
AlanA0720

Actually my seeds grow into a lovely plant with seven leaves/stem. They also have other medical benifits (for humans mostly). The greatest one being making it possible to deal with dumbasses who want to tax cow burps.

Although cultivating "medically benificial" plants is legal in CO, it is not so in all states, so Monsanto's patents on this "nature" do not apply.

Sincerely Alan A.

Altered Estates

(yes that is the name of my company, est.1996).

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:22 PM EDT
Pamela Drew

AlanA0720...My sources tell me that a company in Northern Colorado has developed a new kind of grain which has been genetically altered to include the active ingredient in Bean-o (r), which will greatly reduce the amount of methane produced when Bessie burps. I have the seeds for sale if anyone is interrested:)

Marketing products here is strictly prohibited and peddling agribusiness seeds raises ethical issues as well. The gmo seeds have never been tested for safety and the claims of benefits are widely rumored with scant evidence to back it up. If you have studies citing the safety of these for both contamination of human food crops or animals who eat them please link it.

"It really has taken on a life of its own," said Rick Krause, a lobbyist with the American Farm Bureau Federation, which coined the term cow tax and spread it to farmers across the country. "

The ABF represents large agribusiness interests who have jumped on the global warming bandwagon as a way to promote the gmo crops which are fee based seeds farmers pay for yearly and require petrochemical fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides which are convieniently left out of their calculations for global warming effects.

Sourcewatch - The 5 million "members" of AFBF are simply the people who buy insurance from it. It is in fact an insurance conglomerate, with annual net profits exceeding $6.5 billion (annual report, 1996). It controls two major farmer co-ops and keeps a stock portfolio that reads like a who’s who of agribusiness giants: Archer Daniels Midland, ConAgra, Monsanto, Phillip Morris, Dupont, Novartis and Dow. It is also heavily invested in oil, banking and media."

If agribusiness were really concerned about the environmental impact of farming the factory farm operations and their pollution would be on the agenda, not the gmo seeds for burps!

Almost two trillion pounds of animal waste are produced per year nationally. An increasing amount of this animal waste is produced by intensive livestock operations, which are really more factories than farms. Common animal waste treatment practices used by these livestock factories are often inadequate to protect our drinking water and environment, posing one of America's serious pollution problems. See Scorecard's overviewof animal waste problems.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:13 PM EDT
AlanA0720

Damn it! Here I was trying to make a joke and it turns out that such seeds do exist. That'll learn me. I also thought that ffeinandsugar was making a joke about Bean-o T corn seeds, that's what I get for thinking.

SO, FOR THE RECORD:::::: ! I am not in the business of selling, pimping, or any other "ing" for Monsanto. Nor do I sell nor have attempted to sell seeds for Medical MJ to anyone for any reason. My statement mearly reflected the need to be stoned to tollerate this @!$%# from Washington.

Altered Estates is a home remodeling business. I don't sell or resale anything, just my time. (Please do not call me for work, I wouldn't want The NV police to think that I am pimpING my business).

"It's a joke, it's just a f--ing joke" Rob Reiner, SNL

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:01 PM EDT
Pamela Drew

Damn it! Here I was trying to make a joke and it turns out that such seeds do exist.

Sorry, my sense of humor is pretty good, except where it concerns the Agent Orange Gang's patent protected, pesticide producing, seeds of destruction!

  • 2 votes
#1.5 - Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:11 PM EDT
Reply
Atsidi

Another one they are not figuring in is the 6 billion or so humans wandering around the planet farting and burping all day long-- but ten we are already taxed pretty thoroughly aren't we?

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:45 AM EDT
Maxwell Despard

Missing the point much?

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:57 AM EDT
Atsidi

Could be, could just be getting tired of all the crap (was that a pun?)

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:04 PM EDT
JoMan

I was wondering the same thing atsidiwashichu - us humans put out quite a bit of methane ourselves. Should individual states be taxed accordingly? Out here in the West say Washington, Oregon... we have quite a few heath conscientious people, we stay away from the fatty greasy foods, keep to the lean meats, etc... Back East they have the Deep Dish Pizzaites, the Italian Master Chefs and Philli-double Decker cured meat sandwiches. Hmmmm

So maybe leaving the cows out of it was a good idea. We can get into sticky areas if the point is forced.

  • 1 vote
#2.3 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:10 PM EDT
hhabilis

atsidiwashichu, the solution to that major source of pollution is for the government to require us all to light our farts - problem solved!

  • 1 vote
#2.4 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:27 PM EDT
Joe Esposito

the gas we put out is natural. Let's focus on the unnatural gases being put out by corporations. If it was just cows and humans, it wouldn't be a problem.

  • 2 votes
#2.5 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
Atsidi

Too bad hot air isn't the problem we all know that most of that comes out of Washington.

  • 2 votes
#2.6 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:59 PM EDT
Reply
iamright-492840

What America (or is it now Obamica?) needs now is a Fart Czar. Those caught farting would be given significant fines. Don't even think of farting and burping, the consequences are too severe even to contemplate.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:51 AM EDT
AlanA0720

I offer my services as the "Fart Czar", that way the new laws would not apply to me. (Damn Italian food, gets me every time).

  • 1 vote
#3.1 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:26 PM EDT
Reply
Maxwell Despard

This is why so many environmentalists are vegetarians and vegans.

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:56 AM EDT
Beckyal

Just another thing to control!!!! how much is this going to cost the American taxpayers and consurmers? Before congress does anything we need CBO to run the numbers and then we double that number and decide if it is cost effective. We are going broke for all the wrong reasons.

  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:23 PM EDT
iamright-492840

Not to worry - the brain(s) of the administration will just 'guess', like Biden said they did regarding the unemployment numbers.

  • 1 vote
#5.1 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:26 PM EDT
Reply
E Boyd

Not even sure why I read this article, just one more article to prove how much time we have to waste. Has anyone contacted peta about this? Are we going to contact the wild life department about all the Flatulent animals in the wild? What about all the pets we own are we going to put them on low fiber diets to control there emissions.

We let the government close or car plant with all the regulations, now we buy foreign cars now we can buy foreign beef and pork, and put a tale pipe on our animal, or pets, or just pay another tax, I'm sure we won't mind. Can we all agree on one thing that this is something we DON'T have control of. I can't believe I'm writing this about farm animals that pass to much gas, Just a question do vegetarians and vegans pass gas from all that fiber they eat if so they should tax.

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:51 PM EDT
neal242

Where do politicians get their crack from?

  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:53 PM EDT
AlanA0720

The other end of the cow. CAUTION: Crack kills!

  • 1 vote
#7.1 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:03 PM EDT
Reply
E Boyd

Just thought some of u might like to know this info.

In the mid-1800s flatulence took center with the French entertainer Joseph Pugol ("Le Petomane"). Pugol was able to pass gas at will and at varying pitch, thereby playing tunes for sold-out shows at the Moulin Rouge. Such was his success that lesser competitors began to appear, including the Spaniard "El Rey" and the female Angele Thiebeau (later revealed as a fake using hidden air bellows).

  • 2 votes
Reply#8 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:18 PM EDT
Big Bang-1167974

Sounds like a lost art. Do you think Joseph Pugol could play "Free Bird" or Jimi Hendrix?

  • 1 vote
#8.1 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:26 PM EDT
Reply
Big Bang-1167974

How did our planet survive when our fruited planes were loaded with wild buffalo and other large herbivores? How did our planet survive from swampy marshes, there’s a lot of methane there too. The cycles of green house gases and other gases has been around way before man-kind…why hasn’t the planet boiled-over eons ago, Like Venus?

  • 1 vote
Reply#9 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:41 PM EDT
oneforall

"why hasn't the planet boiled-over eons ago"

Have you seen any dinosaurs walking around?

    #9.1 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:41 PM EDT
    hhabilis

    Have you seen any dinosaurs walking around?

    Yup; but mostly they fly.

      #9.2 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:45 PM EDT
      AlanA0720

      It did, kinda sorta, not really. But the gasses did seem to cause some ice ages.

        #9.3 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:37 PM EDT
        Reply
        Atsidi

        Could be that I am as far off base as I think a lot of the green house gas people are, but I subscribe to the theory that because of the warming trend, there is much more fresh water being dumped into the oceans which changes the currents and the weather patterns with the end result being the onset of another ice age. One thing for sure climate isn't static and it will change.

          Reply#10 - Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:00 PM EDT
          banshee8989

          What a junk piece of science this article is.

          #1 Cattle are carbon neutral because the carbon in the methane comes from the digestion of vegetation produced by photosynthesis.

          #2 I highly and I mean highly doubt that cattle give off more Mathane than land fills and sewage treatment plants. Hell, even swamps give off methane.

          My guess is some lobby is trying to make money off of this or some large cooperation wants the attention drawn away from it. Think Auto Manufacturers.

          The US has 241000000 registered cars, 90,000,000 registerd trucks, but it must be the farts from the 96,000,000 head of cattle we have in the USA. Just a rough run of the numbers tells me that

          We can power 5 houses on the farts from 1 cow.... if we go by the logic in this article.

          The energy crisis has been solved.

          • 3 votes
          Reply#11 - Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:15 PM EDT
          Rebekah-575410

          How much waste and air pollution does NASA cause each year? How does NASA's long term unnatural pollution effect outer space? What happens to NASA pollution in outer space? Does it form dangerous gas pockets? Will it effect our global atmosphere in the future?

          • 1 vote
          Reply#12 - Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:28 AM EDT
          AlanA0720

          We discussed NASCAR on another seed. Did you know that they still used LEADED fuel up until 2008? Which kinda explains the thought process of NASCAR fans.

          NASA on the other hand uses liquid hydrogen for fuel inside the atmosphere and liquid oxygen in space. Both completely safe.

          • 1 vote
          #12.1 - Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:58 AM EDT
          Reply
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
          (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
          Newsvine Privacy Statement
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          FUN STUFF:
          • Leaderboard |
          • E-Mail Alerts |
          • Top of the Vine |
          • Newsvine Live |
          • Newsvine Archives |
          • The Greenhouse
          COMPANY STUFF:
          • Code of Honor |
          • Company Info |
          • Contact Us |
          • Jobs |
          • User Agreement |
          • Privacy Policy |
          • About our ads
          LEGAL STUFF:
          • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
          • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com